Skip to main content
Log in

Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IfSystems Practice is to serve the cause of socially rational decision making, its understanding of systems approach must open itself up to the communicative dimension of rational practice uncovered by contemporary practical philosophy. This programmatic paper argues that building the bridge between the two traditions of systems thinking and practical philosophy is a key challenge to be faced by the systems community. A three-level framework of rational systems practice is suggested as a point of departure for a program of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974).Redesigning the Future, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1982). On the hard headedness and soft heartedness of M. C. Jackson.J. Appl. Sys. Anal. 9, 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1975). Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals.Calif. Manage. Rev. 17, 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K. O. (1976).Transformation der Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1956).An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1972).Brain of the Firm, Penguin Press, Harmondsworth (2nd ed., Wiley, Chichester, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1983). A reply to Ulrich's “Critique of Pure Cybernetic Reason: The Chilean Experience With Cybernetics.”J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 10, 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1985).Diagnosing the System for Organisations, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryer, R. A. (1979). The status of the systems approach.Omega Int. J. Manage. 7, 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryer, R. A. (1980). Some comments on Churchman and Ulrich's “Reply” to “The Status of the Systems Approach.”Omega 8, 280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubner, R. (1975). Eine Renaissance der praktischen Philosophie.Philos. Rundschau 22, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982).The Turning Point, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a system-based methodology for real-world problem solving.J. Syst. Eng. 3(2), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1978). The origins and nature of “hard” systems thinking.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 5, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1982). Soft systems methodology as process: a reply to M. C. Jackson.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chestnut, H. (1967).Systems Engineering Methods, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, C. (1981). The systems approach and its enemies. Book Review.J. Enterprise Manage. 3, 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968a).Challenge to Reason, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968b).The Systems Approach, Delacorte and Dell, New York (2nd ed., Dell, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971).The Design of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979).The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1981).Thought and Wisdom, Intersystems, Seaside, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1982). Reply to M. C. Jackson.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W., and Ulrich, W. (1981). The status of the systems approach, a reply to R. A. Bryer.Omega 8, 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W., Cowan, T. A., and Ulrich, W. (1981). Counterpoint of Christenson's critique—a dialogue.J. Enterprise Manage. 3, 200–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daenzer, W. F. (ed.) (1976).Systems Engineering, BWI, Zurich, Switzerland, and Hanstein, Cologne, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Neufville, R., and Stafford, J. H. (1971).Systems Analysis for Engineers and Managers, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. (ed.) (1969).Systems Thinking, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., and Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organisational environment.Hum. Relat. 18, 21–32 [reprinted in Emery (1969, pp. 241–257)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Feibleman, J. K. (1954). Theory of integrative levels.Br. J. Philos. Sci. 5, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1971).World Dynamics, Wright-Allen, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, H. H., and Machol, R. E. (1957).Systems Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, W. (1962).The Design of Engineering Systems, Heywood, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971a).Knowledge and Human Interests, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971b).Towards a Rational Society, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973a).Theory and Practice, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973c). Wahrheitstheorien. In Fahrenbach, H. (ed.),Wirklichkeit und Reflexion, Neske, Pfullingen, Germany, pp. 211–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979a). What is universal pragmatics? InCommunication and the Evolution of Society, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass., pp. 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979b).Communication and the Evolution of Society, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981).Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. D. (1962).A Methodology for Systems Engineering, Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffe, O. (1979).Ethik and Politik, Grundmodelle und -probleme der praktischen Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoos, I. R. (1972).Systems Analysis in Public Policy: A Critique, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1967).Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft, Fischer, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1982). The nature of “soft” systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1983). The nature of “soft” systems thinking: Comment on the three replies.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 10, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985). Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach.Int. J. Gen. Syst. 10, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987). New directions in management science. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot, Hants., pp. 133–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.) (1987).New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot, Hants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1975).Design for Evolution, Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, G. M. (1969). The systems approach.J. Syst. Eng. 1(1), 3–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1786).Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, 2nd ed., Harper Torchbooks, New York (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787).Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd ed., Macmillan, London (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1788).Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. (1987). Traditional management science and the emerging critique. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot, Hants., pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, F., and Probst, G. J. B. (1982). Evolutionary management.Cybernet. Syst. 13, 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964).One-Dimensional Man, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. D., and Mitroff, I. I. (1981).Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W., III (1972).The Limits to Growth, A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. von, and Morgenstein, D. (1944).Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikaranov, S. P. (1965). Systems analysis: A stage in the development of the methodology of problem solving in the USA. In Optner, S. L. (ed.),Systems Analysis, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, pp. 141–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Optner, S. L. (ed.) (1973).Systems Analysis, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade, E. S., and Boucher, W. I. (1968).Systems Analysis and Policy Planning: Applications in Defence, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade, E. S., Brown, K., Levien, R., Majone, G., and Rakhmankulov, V. (1978). Systems analysis: An outline for the IIASA international series of monographs.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 5, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1960).Fights, Games and Debates, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, M. (ed.) (1972–1974).Rehabilitierung der praktischen Philosophy, Rombach, Freiburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1982). Why does management need management science? In Troncale, L. (ed.),A General Survey of Systems Methodology, Soc. Gen. Syst. Res., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1984). Debating systems methodology: Conflicting ideas about conflict and ideas.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 11 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1987). From management science to workers' science. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot, Hants., pp. 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity.Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 106, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1969).The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. L. R. (1966).The RAND Corporation: Case Study of a Non-profit Advisory Corporation, Harvard University Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, T., and Lowe, T. (1984). One-dimensional management science: The making of a technocratic consciousness.Interfaces 14, 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1964).The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P. (1988). Betriebswirtschaftslehre als praktische Sozialökonomie. In Wunderer, R. (ed.),Betriebswirtschaftslehre als Management-und Führungslehre, 2nd ed. Haupt, Berne, Switzerland, pp. 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1981a). On blaming the messenger for the bad news: Reply to Bryer's comments.Omega Int. J. Manage. Sci. 9, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1981b). A critique of pure cybernetic reason: The Chilean experience with cybernetics.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 8, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1981c). Systemrationalität und praktische Vernunft-Gedonken zum Stand des Systemansatzes. Introduction to the German translation of Churchman (1979),Der Systemansatz und seine Feinde, Haupt, Berne, Switzerland, pp. 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W., (1983).Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy, Haupt, Berne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1984). Management oder die Kunst, Entscheidungen zu treffen, die andere betreffen.Die Unternehmung 38, 326–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987a). The metaphysics of social systems design. In Van Gigch, J. P. (ed.),Decision Making About Decision Making: Metamodels and Metasystems, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, England, pp. 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987b). Critical heuristics of social systems design.Eur. J. Operation. Res. 31 276–283 (previously circulated as Working Paper No. 10, Department of Management Systems and Sciences, University of Hull, March 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988). Systemtheorie der Planung. In Szyperski, N. (ed.),Handwörterbuch der Planung, Poeschel, Stuttgart, Germany (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester, F., and Hesler, A. von (1980).The Sensitivity Model, Regionale Planungsgemeinschaft Untermain, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1983).Human Systems Are Different, Harper & Row, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulrich, W. Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research. Systems Practice 1, 137–163 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059855

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059855

Key words

Navigation