Skip to main content
Log in

Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holism

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We probably have simplified matters too much. We tend to talk about systems thinking and practice as if we knew what they are. The fashionable call for “holistic” or “systems” thinking in ecological issues provides a major example. This much is certain: the quest for comprehensiveness, although it represents an epistemologically necessary idea, is not realizable. If we assume that it is realizable, the critical idea underlying the quest will be perverted into its opposite, i.e., into a false pretension to superior knowledge and understanding—a danger of which the environmental movement does not always appear to be sufficiently aware. My question, therefore, is this: How can we deal critically with the fact that our thinking, and hence our knowledge, designs, and actions, cannot possibly be comprehensive, in the sense that we never “comprehend” all that ought to be understood before we pass to judgment and action? What consequences does this fact imply for a critical systems approach to ecological concerns and, ultimately, for our concepts of rationality in general?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974).Redesigning the Future, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1978).The Art of Problem Solving, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981a).Creating the Corporate Future, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981b). The art and science of mess management.TIMS/ORSA Interfaces 11, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H., and Banathy, B. A. (eds.) (1990),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), in Portland, Oregon, July 8–13 1990, Vol. I: Systems Design, ISSS/California State Polytechnic University, Ponoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, St. (1979).The Heart of Enterprise, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, St. (1981).Brain of the Firm, The Managerial Cybernetics of Organization, 2nd rev. ed., Wiley, Chichester, England (1st ed., Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, St. (1985).Diagnosing the System for Organisations, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982).The Turning Point, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. (1990).Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968).The Systems Approach, rev. ed., Dell, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971).The Design of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979).The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C. (1989). Contributing to social decision methodology: Citizen reports on technological projects. In Vlek, Ch., and Cvetkovich, G. (eds.),Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C. (1990).Die Planungszelle, Eine Alternative zur Establishment-Demokratie, 2nd ed., Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen (1st ed., 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K. (1980).Erkenntnis für freie Menschen (revised German edition ofScience in a Free Society, New Left Books, London, 1978), Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991a). Critical systems heuristics: Application of an emancipatory approach for police strategy toward the carrying of offensive weapons.Syst. Pract. 4, 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991b).Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.) (1991c).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Ulrich, W. (1990). Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners.Syst. Pract. 3, 7–29. [Reprinted in Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.) (1991c).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester, England, Chap. 12.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961).Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1969).Principles of Systems, Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1987).Planning in the Public Domain, From Knowledge to Action, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1964). Gegen einen positivistisch halbierten Rationalismus.Kölner Z. Soziol. Sozial-psychol. 16, 636–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971a).Knowledge and Human Interests, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971b).Towards a Rational Society, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973a).Theory and Practice, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973b). Wahrheitstheorien. In Fahrenbach, H. (ed.),Wirklichkeit und Reflexion, Neske, Pfullingen, Germany, pp. 211–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984).Theory of Communicative Action, Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., and Luhmann, N. (1971).Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie—Was leistet die Systemforschung? Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1931).The Philosophical Basis of Biology, Hodder and Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffe, O. (1979).Ethik und Politik, Grundmodelle und -probleme der praktischen Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985). The itinerary of a critical approach. Review of W. Ulrich's “Critical Heuristics of Social Planning.”J. Oper. Res. Soc. 36, 878–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991a). The origins and nature of critical systems thinking.Syst. Pract. 4, 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991b).Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1786).Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, 2nd ed. (B), translated by H. J. Paton, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787).Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd ed. (B), translated by N. K. Smith, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1788).Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, translated by L. W. Beck, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning.Manage. Sci. 15, B403-B414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O., and Mitroff, I. I. (1981).Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Abich, A. (1948).Naturphilosophie auf neuen Wegen, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Abich, K. M. (1984).Wege zum Frieden mit der Natur, Praktische Naturphilosophie für die Umweltpolitik, Hanser, Munich, Germany, and Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1961).The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York (Germ, orig., 1935; rev. Am. ed., Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972).Objective Knowledge, an Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. (1963).Ueberlegungen zur wissenschaftlichen und politischen Bedeutung der Entscheidungstheorie, polycopied manuscript, Studiengruppe für Systemforchung, Heidelberg, Germany. [Revised version in Krauch, H.,et al. (eds.) (1966).Forschungsplanung, Hanser, Munich, Germany, and Vienna, Austria, pp. 110ff.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, J. C. (1926).Holism and Evolution, Macmillan, London. [Reprinted 1973 by Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H. (1986). Über die normativen Grundlagen von Planungsentwürfen. Review of W. Ulrich's “Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy.”OR Spektrum 8, 118–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H. (1987). Review of W. Ulrich's “Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy.”Z. betriebswirtschaftl. Forschung u. Praxis 39, 94–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1977). The design of problem-solving systems.Manage. Sci. 23, 1099–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1980). The metaphysics of design: A Simon-Churchman debate.TIMS/ORSA Interfaces 10(2), 35–40. [Reprinted in a slightly expanded version in Van Gigch, J. P. (ed.) (1987).Decision Making About Decision Making: Metamodels and Metasystems, Abacus Press, Turnbridge Wells, England, pp. 219–226.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1981a). Systemrationalität und praktische Vernunft-Gedanken zum Stand des Systemansatzes. Translator's Introduction to Churchman, C. W.,Der Systemansatz und seine “Feinde,” Haupt, Bern, Switzerland, pp. 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1981b). A critique of pure cybernetic reason: The Chilean experience with cybernetics.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 8, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1982). Wissenschaftliche Evaluation als Aufgabe der Gesundheitsdirektion: Kanton Bern. In Gutzwiller, F., and Kocher, G. (eds.),Die Qualität medizinischer Leistungen-Konkrete Möglichkeiten der Qualitätsmessung, -kontrolle und -förderung, Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Gesundheitspolitik, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983).Critical Heuristics of Social Planning, a New Approach to Practical Philosophy, Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1984). Management oder die Kunst, Entscheidungen zu treffen, die andere betreffen.Die Unternehmung, Schweizerische Z. betriebswirtschaftl. Forschung u. Praxis 38, 326–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design.Eur. J. Oper. Res. 31, 276–283. [Reprinted in Jackson, M. C., Keys, P., and Cropper, S. A. (eds.) (1989)Operational Research and the Social Sciences, Plenum Press, New York and London, pp. 79–87; Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.) (1991).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester, England, Chap. 5.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988a). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research.Syst. Pract. 1, 137–163. [Reprinted in Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.) (1991),Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester, England, Chap. 12.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988b). Churchman's “process of unfolding”—Its significance for policy analysis and evaluation.Syst. Pract. 1, 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1989). Systemtheorie der Planung. In Szyperski, N. (ed.),Handwörterbuch der Planung, Poeschel, Stuttgart, Germany, columns 1971–1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1990a). What is called “Critical Systems Thinking”? The programmatic intent and current state of “Liberating Systems Theory.” Introduction to the Symposium on “Critical Systems Thinking: Liberating Systems Theory for the Future.” In Banathy, B. H., and Banathy, B. A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS) in Portland, Oregon, July 8–13 1990, Vol. I: Systems Design, ISSS/California State Polytechnic University, Ponoma, pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1990b). Critical systems thinking and ethics: The role of contemporary practical philosophy for developing an “ethics of whole systems.” In Banathy, B. H., and Banathy, B. A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS) in Portland, Oregon, July 8–13 1990, Vol. I: Systems Design, ISSS/California State Polytechnic University, Ponoma, pp. 52–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1990c). Critical systems thinking and future generations: The place of future generations in systems thinking. In Banathy, B. H., and Banathy, B. A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS) in Portland, Oregon, July 8–13 1990, Vol. I: Systems Design, ISSS/California State Polytechnic University, Ponoma, pp. 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1994). Can we secure future-responsive management through systems thinking and design?TIMS/ORSA Interfaces 24 (special issue in honor of C. W. Churchman, forthcoming).

  • Vester, F. (1983).Ballungsgebiete in der Krise, Vom Verstehen und Planen menschlicher Lebensräume, Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag, Munich, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester, F. (1988). The biocybernetic approach as a basis for planning our environment.Syst. Pract. 1, 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester, F., and von Hesler, A. (1988).The Sensitivity Model, Regionale Planungsgemeinschaft Untermain, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (English and German).

  • Wilmott, H. (1989). OR as a problem situation: From soft systems methodology to critical science. In Jackson, M. C., Keys, P., and Cropper, S. A. (eds.),Operational Research and the Social Sciences, Plenum Press, New York and London 1989, pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1984).Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenhome, E. F. (1990).System Enquiry: A System Dynamics Approach, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revised version of an opening address presented to the “Aegean Seminar” at the University of the Aegean, a seminar held in Pythagorion on the Island of Samos, Greece, 30 September–4 October 1991, dedicated to the topic of “Sustainable Development Through Systems Thinking and Design.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulrich, W. Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holism. Systems Practice 6, 583–611 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059480

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059480

Key words

Navigation