Skip to main content
Log in

Suprasegmental inhibition and facilitation after injection of tetanus toxin into the medullary nuclei (the so-called dispatch station phenomenon)

  • Pathological Physiology and General Pathology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Changes in descending inhibition and facilitation evoked by stimulation of the nucleus fastigii were studied after injection of tetanus toxin into the relay nuclei of the medulla in experiments on cats under superficial pentobarbital-chloralose anesthesia. Injection of tetanus toxin into these nuclei leads to an increase in their “functional dispatch.” Descending inhibition (in response to injection of tetanus toxin into the gigantocellular nucleus) and descending facilitation (injection of the toxin into Deiters' nucleus and the nucleus ambiguus) were increased to many times their previous intensity, the latent periods of the descending effects were considerably shortened, their intensity rose sharply to a maximum, and their duration was greatly lengthened. To interpret these results it is postulated that powerful excitation generators are formed in the relay nuclei following disturbance of their inhibitory mechanisms. These results indicate that the “dispatch station” concept is applicable also to supraspinal structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. A. D. Ado, G. V. Burlakov, and Yu. S. Sverdlov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,167, 478 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. N. Kryzhanovskii, in: Problems in Physiology and Pathology of the Nervous System [in Russian], Moscow (1962), p. 34.

  3. G. N. Kryzhanovskii, Tetanus [in Russian], Moscow (1966).

  4. G. N. Kryzhanovskii, in: General Neurophysiology and Experimental Pathology of the Nervous System [in Russian], Moscow (1970), p. 43.

  5. G. N. Kryzhanovskii, in: Models of Diseases [in Russian], Moscow (1973), p. 120.

  6. G. N. Kryzhanovskii, Pat. Fiziol., No. 4, 3 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. N. Kryzhanovskii and F. D. Sheikhon, Byull. Éksperim. Biol. i Med., No. 11, 9 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. N. Kryzhanovskii and F. D. Sheikhon, Byull. Éksperim. Biol. i Med., No. 7, 34 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. N. Kryzhanovskii and F. D. Sheikhon, Exp. Neurol.,38, 110 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. V. Montsevichyute-Éringene, Pat. Fiziol., No. 4, 71 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu. S. Sverdlov, Neirofiziologiya,1, 25 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. D. Sheikhon, in: Problems in Physiology and Pathology of the Nervous System [in Russian], Moscow (1966), p. 119.

  13. F. D. Sheikhon, G. N. Kryzhanovskii, and S. I. Igon'kina, in: Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the I. P. Pavlov All-Union Physiological Society [in Russian], Vol. 2, Leningrad (1970), p. 56.

  14. F. D. Sheikhon, in: Brain and Movement (Abstracts of Proceedings of a Symposium) [in Russian], Erevan (1973), p. 160.

  15. F. D. Sheikhon and M. B. Rekhtman, in: Convergence and Synapses [in Russian], Moscow (1973), p. 193.

  16. A. Brodal, F. Wallberg, and O. Pompeiano, The Vestibular Nuclei [Russian translation], Moscow-Leningrad (1966).

  17. V. B. Brooks, D. R. Curtis, and J. C. Eccles, J. Physiol. (London),135, 655 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. B. Carpenter, D. S. Bard, and F. A. Alling, J. Comp. Neurol.,11, 1 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Grillner, T. Hongo, and S. Lund, Exp. Brain Res.,10, 94 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Ito, M. Udo, N. Mano, et al., Exp. Brain Res.,11, 29 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. B. Lindsley, L. N. Schreiner, and H. W. Magoun, J. Neurophysiol.,12, 197 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. W. Magoun, Physiol. Rev.,30, 459 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Naquet, H. Regy, and H. Gastaut, J. Physiol. (Paris),50, 428 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Jap. J. Physiol.,13, 64 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. S. Snider, W. S. McCulloch, and H. W. Magoun, J. Neurophysiol.,5, 325 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. M. Sprague and W. W. Chambers, Am. J. Physiol.,176, 52 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. K. Tabécis and T. Ishikawa, Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol.,338, 273 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. K. Tabécis and A. D. L. Maria, Brain Res.,40, 373 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. O. Wallberg, O. Pompeiano, A. Brodal, et al., J. Comp. Neurol.,118, 49 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. M. Wylie, Exp. Brain Res.,12, 128 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Laboratory of Pathophysiology of Toxicoinfections, Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR, Moscow. Translated from Byulleten' Éksperimental'noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 24–28, January, 1975.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheikhon, F.D., Kryzhanovskii, G.N. Suprasegmental inhibition and facilitation after injection of tetanus toxin into the medullary nuclei (the so-called dispatch station phenomenon). Bull Exp Biol Med 79, 23–27 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00805495

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00805495

Key Words

Navigation