Summary
The epistellar body of Octopus appears to be a vestigial photoreceptive organ. Electron-microscope examination reveals that the wall of the epistellar organ is composed of four layers: 1. a layer of neuron-like cells subjacent to the capsule, which send processes into the lumen of the organ; 2. the capsule, which includes flat pigment-laden cells; 3. a layer of neuron-like cells, which also send processes into the lumen; and 4. a layer of smaller epithelioid cells bordering on the lumen, apparently supportive to the neuronal processes. The neurite-like processes are covered with tubular projections, similar to those found on the processes of the retinula cells of the cephalopod retina. When several epistellar processes are in contact they may become organized in a manner roughly equivalent to the rhabdome of the octopus eye. The lumen-directed processes and the perikarya of the epistellar neuron-like cells also contain lamellated membrane systems similar to the “myeloid” bodies found in squid retinula cell bodies by Zonana. The general structure of the epistellar body suggests a non-functional photoreceptive organ. No ultrastructural evidence could be adduced to support a neurosecretory (or secretory) status for this structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bern, H.A.: The properties of neurosecretory cells. Gen. comp. Endocr. (Suppl.) 1, 117–132 (1962).
—, R. S. Nishioka and I. R. Hagadorn: Association of elementary neurosecretory granules with the Golgi complex. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 5, 311–320 (1961).
Boycott, B. B., and J. Z. Young: The subpedunculate body and nerve and other organs associated with the optic tract of cephalopoda. In K. G. Wingstrand (ed.): Bertil HanStröm: Zoological Papers in Honour of his 65th Birthday. Lund: Zoological Institute (1959).
Caulfield, J. B.: Effects of varying the vehicles for osmium tetroxide in tissue fixation. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 3, 827–830 (1957).
Cazal, P., et D. Bogoraze: La glande épistellaire du poulpe (Octopus vulgaris Lam.) organe neuricrine. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 84, 10–22 (1944).
—: Les glandes neuricrines des céphalopodes. Année Biol. 25, 225–238 (1949).
Dalton, A. J., and R. F. Ziegel: A simplified method of staining thin sections of biological material with lead hydroxide for electron microscopy. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 7, 409–410 (1960).
Eakin, R. M., and J. A. Westfall: Fine structure of photoreceptors in Amphioxus. J. Ultrastruct. Res. (in press 1962).
Hama, K.: A photoreceptor-like structure in the ventral nerve cord of the crayfish, Cambarus virilus. Anat. Rec. 140, 329–336 (1961).
Luft, J. H.: Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 9, 409–414 (1961).
Millonig, G.: A modified procedure for lead staining of thin sections. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 11, 736–739 (1961).
Moody, M. F., and J. R. Parriss: The discrimination of polarized light by Octopus: A behavioural and morphological study. Z. vergl. Physiol. 44, 268–291 (1961).
Palade, G. E.: A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J. exp. Med. 95, 285–298 (1952).
Wolken, J.: Retinal structure. Mollusc cephalopoda: Octopus, Sepia. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 4, 835–838 (1958).
Young, J. Z.: The giant nerve fibers and epistellar body of cephalopods. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 78, 311–367 (1936).
Zonana, H. V.: Fine structure of the squid retina. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 109, 185–205 (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Aided by research grant G-8805 of the U.S. National Science Foundation. We are indebted to Professor Richard M. Eakin for review of the manuscript and for his suggestions. Mr. Lawrence Young provided us with competent photographic assistance, and Mrs. Emily Reid prepared Fig. 13.
Predoctoral Fellow in Biology of the National Science Foundation, 1959–1962.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nishioka, R.S., Hagadorn, I.R. & Bern, H.A. Ultrastructure of the epistellar body of the octopus. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung 57, 406–421 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343327
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343327