Abstract
A model is presented which describes the 3-dimensional non-radial solar wind expansion between the Sun and the Earth in a specified magnetic field configuration subject to synoptically observed plasma properties at the coronal base. In this paper, the field is taken to be potential in the inner corona based upon the Mt. Wilson magnetograph observations and radial beyond a certain chosen surface. For plasma boundary conditions at the Sun, we use deconvoluted density profiles obtained from synopticK-coronameter brightness observations. The temperature is taken to be 2 × 106 K at the base of closed field lines and 1.6 x 106K at the base of open field lines.
For a sample calculation, we employ data taken during the period of the 12 November 1966 eclipse. Although qualitative agreement with observations at 1 AU is obtained, important discrepancies emerge which are not apparent from spherically symmetric models or those models which do not incorporate actual observations in the lower corona. These discrepancies appear to be due to two primary difficulties - the rapid geometric divergence of the open field lines in the inner corona as well as the breakdown in the validity of the Spitzer heat conduction formula even closer to the Sun than predicted by radial flow models. These two effects combine to produce conductively dominated solutions and lower velocities, densities, and field strengths at the Earth than those observed. The traditional difficulty in solar wind theory in that unrealistically small densities must be assumed at the coronal base in order to obtain observed densities at 1 AU is more than compensated for here by the rapid divergence of field lines in the inner corona.
For these base conditions, the value ofβ(ratio of gas pressure to magnetic pressure) is shown to be significantly greater than one over most of the lower corona - suggesting that, for the coronal boundary conditions used here, the use of a potential or force-free magnetic field configuration may not be justified.
The calculations of this paper point to the directions where future research on solar-interplanetary modelling should receive priority:
-
(a)
better models for the coronal magnetic field structure
-
(b)
improved understanding of the thermal conductivity relevant for the solar wind plasma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso-Faus, A.: 1968,Planetary Space Sci. 16, 1.
Altschuler, M. D. and Newkirk, G. Jr.: 1969,Solar Phys. 9, 131.
Altschuler, M. D. and Perry R. M.: 1972,Solar Phys. 26, 354.
Braginskii, S. I.: 1965,Rev. of Plasma Physics, Consultant Bureau, New York, p. 205.
Brandt, J. C., Wolff, C., and Casinelli, J. P.: 1969,Astrophys. J. 156, 1117.
Burlaga, L. F., Ogilvie, K. W., Fairfield, D. H., Montgomery, M. D., and Bame, S. J.: 1971,Astrophys. J. 164, 137.
Chamberlain, J. W.: 1961,Astrophys. J. 133, 675.
Dicke, R. H.: 1964,Nature 202, 432.
Dupree, A. K.: 1972,Astrophys. J. 178, 527.
Durney, B. R.: 1971,Astrophys. J. 166, 669.
Durney, B. R.: 1972,J. Geophys. Res. 77, 4042.
Durney, B. R.: 1973,J. Geophys. Res. 78, 7229.
Durney, B. R. and Roberts, P. H.: 1971,Astrophys. J. 170, 319.
Durney, B. R. and Hundhausen, A. J.: 1974,J. Geophys. Res. 79, 3711.
Endler, F.: 1971, Ph.D. Thesis, Gottingen Univ.
Forslund, D. W.: 1970,J. Geophys. Res. 75, 17.
Gentry, R. A. and Hundhausen, A. J.: 1969,Trans. A.G.U. 50, 302.
Gosling, J. T., Hundhausen, A. J., Pizzo, V., and Asbridge, J. R.: 1972,J. Geophys. Res. 77, 5442.
Hansen, R., Hansen, S., and Garcia, C.: 1967, HAO Astro-Geophysical Memorandum No. 174.
Hansen, S., Hansen, R., and Garcia, C.: 1972,Solar Phys. 26, 202.
Hollweg, J. V.: 1971,J. Geophys. Res. 76, 7491.
Hollweg, J. V.: 1974,J. Geophys. Res. 79, 3845.
Hollweg, J. V. and Jokipii, J. R.: 1972,J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3311.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1969,J. Geophys. Res. 74, 5810.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1971, in S. I. Rasool (ed.),Physics of the Solar System, NASA SP-300, Washington, D.C.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1972,Coronal Expansion and Solar Wind, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1973,J. Geophys. Res. 78, 1528.
Kopp, R. A.: 1968, Harvard Univ. Thesis, Scientific Rept. No. 4, AFCRL-68-0312.
Krieger, A. S., Timothy, A. F., and Roelof, E. C.: 1973,Solar Phys. 29, 505.
Krieger, A. S., Vaiana, G. S., and Van Speybroeck, L. P.: 1971, in R. Howard (ed.), ‘Solar Magnetic Fields’,IAU Symp. 43, 397.
Modisette, J. L.: 1967,J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1521.
Montgomery, M. D.: 1972a, in K. Schindler (ed.),Cosmic Plasma Physics, Plenum Publ. Co, New York, p. 61.
Montgomery, M. D.: 1972b, in C. P. Sonett, P. J. Coleman Jr., and J. M. Wilcox, (eds.)Solar Wind, NASA-SP-308, p. 208.
Montgomery, M. D., Bame, S. J., and Hundhausen, A. J.: 1968,J. Geophys. Res. 73, 4999.
Munro, R. H. and Withbroe, G. L.: 1972,Properties of a Coronal Hole from EUV Observations, Harvard College Observatory TR-31.
Neugebauer, M. and Snyder, C. W.: 1966.J. Geophys. Res. 71, 4469.
Neupert, W. M. and Pizzo, V.: 1973, submitted toJ. Geophys. Res.
Newkirk, G. Jr., Altschuler, M. D., and Harvey, J. W.: 1968, in K. O. Kiepenheuer (ed.), ‘Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions’,IAU Symp. 35, 379.
Newkirk, G. Jr., Dupree, R. G., and Schmahl, E. J.: 1970,Solar Phys. 15, 15.
Noble, L. M. and Scarf, F. L.: 1963,Astrophys. J. 138, 1169.
Nolte, J. T. and Roelof, E. C.: 1973,Solar Phys. 33, 483.
Ogilvie, K. W., Scudder, J. D., and Sugiura, M.: 1971,J. Geophys. Res. 76, 8165.
Parker, E. N.: 1963,Interplanetary Dynamical Processes, Interscience Publ., New York.
Parker, E. N.: 1964a,Astrophys. J. 139, 72.
Parker, E. N.: 1964b,Astrophys. J. 139, 93.
Parker, E. N.: 1965a,Astrophys. J. 141, 1963.
Parker, E. N.: 1965b,Space Sci. Rev. 4, 666.
Parker, E. N.: 1972, in C. P. Sonett, P. J. Coleman, and J. M. Wilcox (eds.),Solar Wind, NASA SP-308, Washington, D.C., p. 161.
Perkins, F.: 1973,Astrophys. J. 179, 637.
Perry, R. M.: 1973, unpublished.
Perry, R. M. and Altschuler, M. D.: 1973,Solar Phys. 28, 435.
Pneuman, G. W.: 1966,Astrophys. J. 145, 242.
Pneuman, G. W.: 1968,Solar Phys. 3, 578.
Pneuman, G. W.: 1969,Solar Phys. 6, 255.
Pneuman, G. W.: 1973,Solar Phys. 28, 247.
Pneuman, G. W. and Kopp, R. A.: 1970,Solar Phys. 13, 176.
Pneuman, G. W. and Kopp, R. A.: 1971,Solar Phys. 18, 258.
Richer, A.: 1974, private communication.
Roberts, P. H.: 1971,Astrophys. Letters 9, 79.
Roberts, P. H. and Soward, A. M.: 1972,Proc. Roy. Soc., Series A,328, 185.
Schatten, K. H.: 1971,Cosmic Electrodyn. 2, 232.
Schatten, K. H., Wilcox, J. M., and Ness, N. F.: 1969,Solar Phys. 6, 442.
Schulz M. and Eviatar, A.: 1972,Cosmic Electrodyn. 2, 402.
Spitzer, L.: 1956,Physics of Fully Ionized Gases, Interscience Publ., New York.
Urch, I. H.: 1969,Solar Phys. 10, 219.
Vaiana, G. S., Davis, J. M., Giacconi, R., Krieger, A. S., Silk, J. K., Timothy, A. F., and Zombeck, M.: 1973,Astrophys. J. Letters, in press.
Weber, E. J. and Davis, L. Jr.: 1967,Astrophys. J. 148, 217.
Whang, Y. C.: 1971,Astrophys. J. 169, 369.
Whang, Y. C.: 1972,Astrophys. J. 178, 221.
Wilcox, J. M.: 1968,Space Sci. Rev. 8, 258.
Wilson, D. C. and MacQueen, R. M.: 1974, submitted toJ. Geophys. Res.
Withbroe, G. L.: 1970,Solar Phys. 11, 42.
Wolff, C. L., Brandt, J. C., and Southwick, R. G.: 1971,Astrophys. J. 165, 181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durney, B.R., Pneuman, G.W. Solar-interplanetary modeling: 3-D solar wind solutions in prescribed non-radial magnetic field geometries. Sol Phys 40, 461–486 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162392
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162392