The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship
- 3.9k Downloads
According to the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, the context in which decision-making is derived can influence one’s determination to become an entrepreneur. In particular, a context that is rich in knowledge generates entrepreneurial opportunities from those ideas. By commercializing ideas that evolved from an incumbent organization via the creation of a new firm, the entrepreneur (human capital) not only serves as a conduit for the spillover of knowledge, but also for the ensuing innovative activity and enhanced economic performance through resource allocation. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship brings together contemporary theories and thoughts of entrepreneurship with prevailing theories of economic growth, geography, and strategy and therefore explains not just why some people choose to become an entrepreneur, but also why this matters significantly for the economy and society.
KeywordsKnowledge Knowledge spillovers Absorptive capacity Uncertainty Competition Endogenous growth
JEL ClassificationsJ24 L26 M13 O3
- Acs, Z. J. (2010). High impact entrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of Acs, Z. J. and entrepreneurship (2nd Ed.) (pp. 165–182). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.Google Scholar
- Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter and endogenous growth (discussion paper). Stockholm: Center for Business and Policy Studies.Google Scholar
- Acs, Z. J., & Plummer, L. (2005). Penetrating the “knowledge filter” in regional economies. The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3), 439–456.Google Scholar
- Acs, Z. J, & Sanders, M. (2013). Knowledge spillover entrepreneurship in an endogenous growth model. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9506-8.
- Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2013). The missing pillar: The creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9508-6.
- Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005b). Mansfield ’s missing link: The impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1/2), 207–210.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. (1996). Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 641–652.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. (1999). How and why does knowledge spill over in biotechnology? In D. B. Audretsch & R. Thurik (Eds.), Innovation, industry evolution, and employment (pp. 216–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo M. G., Guerrini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2013). University specialization and new firm creation across industries. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9509-5.
- Buenstorf, G. (2007). Opportunity spin-offs and necessity spin-offs. Papers on economics and evolution, 2007-18, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group.Google Scholar
- Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Fiet, J. O. (2002). The systematic search for entrepreneurial discoveries. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishers.Google Scholar
- Fritsch, M., & Amoucke, R. (2013). Regional public research, higher education, and innovative start-ups: An empirical investigation. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9510-z.
- Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.Google Scholar
- Hayter, C. (2013). Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: Perspectives from the literature. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9512-x.
- Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. NY: Random House.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. B. (1989). The real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79, 957–970.Google Scholar
- Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.Google Scholar
- Kortum, J., & Lerner, S. (1997). Stronger protection or technological revolution: What is behind the recent surge in patenting? NBER working papers 6204. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Krueger, N. (2003). The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 105–140). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2013). Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, & economic growth: The role of universities. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9507-7.
- Link, A. N., & Welsh, D. H. B. (2013). From laboratory to market: On the propensity of young inventors to form a new business. Small Business Economics, 40(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Mansfield, E., John, R., Anthony, R., Edmond, V., Samuel, W., & Frank, H. (1977a). The production and application of new industrial technology. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. (1981). Research on productivity growth and differences: Dead ends and new departures. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1029–1064.Google Scholar
- Plummer, L. A., & Acs, Z. J. (2012). Localized competition in the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.10.003.
- Sarasvathy, S., Dew, N., Velamuri, R., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z. Acs & D. Audretsch (Eds.), The international handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 141–160). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Shane S., & Eckhardt J. (2003). The individual-opportunity nexus. In Z. Acs, & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (p. 187). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Stam, E. (2013). Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: A country-level analysis. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9511-y.
- Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Armstrong, J. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.Google Scholar