Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Exposure-Response Analyses to Establish the Pharmacodynamic Similarity of a Once-Daily Regimen to an Approved Twice-Daily Dosing Regimen for the Treatment of HCV Infection

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The triple direct-acting antiviral (3-DAA) regimen (two co-formulated tablets of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir once daily and one tablet of dasabuvir twice daily) for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection has been reformulated for once-daily administration containing all three active DAAs (3QD regimen). Two bioequivalence studies compared the 3-DAA and 3QD regimens. In study 1, fed, single-, and multiple-dose crossover comparisons revealed exposures for drug components that were slightly outside the bioequivalence criteria, i.e., 21 to 29% lower dasabuvir C trough, paritaprevir C max, and ritonavir C max. In study 2, fed and fasted single-dose crossover comparisons demonstrated a large impact of food on exposures, confirming the product’s labeling requirement for administration only with food, and revealed a lack of bioequivalence under fasting conditions. Exposure-response analyses using efficacy data from phase 2/3 studies of the 3-DAA regimen demonstrated that the lower dasabuvir C trough for the 3QD regimen (under fed condition) would have minimal impact on sustained virologic response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12). Thus, the pharmacodynamic similarity between the regimens was established and the analyses provided the basis for regulatory approval of the 3QD regimen to treat patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis C. Fact Sheet No. 164. 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.

  2. Andreone P, Colombo MG, Enejosa JV, Koksal I, Ferenci P, Maieron A, et al. ABT-450, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir achieves 97% and 100% sustained virologic response with or without ribavirin in treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 1b infection. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:359–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eron JJ, Lalezari J, Slim J, Gathe J, Ruane PJ, Wang C, et al. Safety and efficacy of ombitasvir–450/r and dasabuvir and ribavirin in HCV/HIV-1 co-infected patients receiving atazanavir or raltegravir ART regimens. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(Suppl 3):19500.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Feld JJ, Kowdley KV, Coakley E, Sigal S, Nelson DR, Crawford D, et al. Treatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1594–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferenci P, Bernstein D, Lalezari J, Cohen D, Luo Y, Cooper C, et al. ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for HCV. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1983–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwo PY, Mantry PS, Coakley E, Te HS, Vargas HE, Brown R Jr, et al. An interferon-free antiviral regimen for HCV after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2375–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poordad F, Hezode C, Trinh R, Kowdley KV, Zeuzem S, Agarwal K, et al. ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin for hepatitis C with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeuzem S, Jacobson IM, Baykal T, Marinho T, Poordad F, Bourlière M, et al. Retreatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1604–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Viekira Pak. (ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir tablets; dasabuvir tablets), co-packaged for oral use [prescribing information]. North Chicago: AbbVie Inc; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation of modified-release dosage forms. 2013. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2014/11/WC500177884.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2016.

  11. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Statistical approaches to establishing bioequivalence. 2001. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/.../Guidances/ucm070244.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2014.

  12. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence. 2010. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2010/01/WC500070039.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2016.

  13. Haidar SH, Davit B, Chen M-L, Conner D, Lee LM, Li QH, et al. Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drug products. Pharm Res. 2008;25:237–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tothfalusi L, Endrenyi L. Sample sizes for designing bioequivalence studies for highly variable drugs. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 2012;15:73–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. US Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance on progesterone. 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm209294.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2016.

  16. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Providing clinical evidence of effectiveness for human drug and biological products. 1998. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance%20RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM078749.pdf+Providing+clinical+evidence+of+effectiveness+for+human+and+bio&client=FDAgov&site=FDAgov&lr=&proxystylesheet=FDAgov&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&access=p&oe=UTF-8. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.

  17. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Exposure-response relationships—study design, data analysis, and regulatory applications. 2003. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm072109.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2016.

  18. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products—general considerations. 2003. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/03/briefing/3995B1_07_GFI-BioAvail-BioEquiv.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2016.

  19. Bhattaram VA, Bonapace C, Chilukuri DM, Duan JZ, Garnett C, Gobburu JV, et al. Impact of pharmacometric reviews on new drug approval and labeling decisions—a survey of 31 new drug applications submitted between 2005 and 2006. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;81:213–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhattaram VA, Booth BP, Ramchandani RP, Beasley BN, Wang Y, Tandon V, et al. Impact of pharmacometrics on drug approval and labeling decisions: a survey of 42 new drug applications. AAPS J. 2005;7:E503–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JY, Garnett CE, Gobburu JVS, Bhattaram VA, Satjit B, Earp JC, et al. Impact of pharmacometric analyses on new drug approval and labelling decisions: a review of 198 submissions between 2000 and 2008. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50:627–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Polepally A, Dutta S, Hu B, Podsacki T, Awni W, Menon R. Drug-drug interaction of omeprazole with the HCV direct-acting antiviral agents paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with and without dasabuvir. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2016;5:269–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kowdley KV, Lawitz E, Poordad F, Cohen DE, Nelson DR, Zeuzem S, et al. Phase 2b trial of interferon-free therapy for hepatitis C virus genotype 1. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:222–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lalezari J, Sullivan JG, Varunok P, Gale E, Kowdley KV, Rustgi V, et al. Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir plus ribavirin in HCV genotype 1-infected patients on methadone or buprenorphine. J Hepatol. 2015;63:364–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mensing S, Eckert D, Sharma S, Polepally AR, Khatri A, Podsadecki TJ, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of paritaprevir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir, ritonavir and ribavirin in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: analysis of six phase III trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(3):527–39.

  26. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Comm Stat. 1980;A10:1043–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Menon RM, Polepally AR, Khatri A, Awni WM, Dutta S. Clinical pharmacokinetics of paritaprevir. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017; doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0520-x.

  28. Booth BP, Rahman A, Dagher R, Griebel D, Lennon S, Fuller D, et al. Population pharmacokinetic-based dosing of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47:101–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li F, Nandy P, Chien S, Noel GJ, Tornoe CW. Pharmacometrics-based dose selection of levofloxacin as a treatment for postexposure inhalational anthrax in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:375–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Madabushi R, Cox DS, Hossain M, Boyle DA, Patel BR, Young G, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic basis for effective argatroban dosing in pediatrics. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51:19–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tornoe CW, Tworzyanski JJ, Imoisili MA, Alexander JJ, Korth-Bradley JM, Gobburu JV. Optimising piperacillin/tazobactam dosing in paediatrics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:320–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug approval package: Cleviprex (clevidipine butyrate) [FDA application No. NDA 22156]. Clinical Pharmacology Biopharmaceutics Review. 2008. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2008/022156s000_ClinPharmR_P1.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2016.

  33. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug approval package: Lamictal XR (lamotrigine) [FDA Application No. NDA 22–115s; online]. 2009. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2009/022115s000_MedR.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by AbbVie Inc. AbbVie contributed to the study design, research, and interpretation of data and the writing, reviewing, and approving of the manuscript for publication. The authors thank the clinical sites and investigators and AbbVie study team members Peter Probst, Pamela Watson, Natalie Hycner, and Lisa Hernandez for assistance with the conduct of the study and/or report writing. The authors thank Meher M. Dustoor, PhD, and Lamara D. Shrode, PhD, CMPP, of JB Ashtin for editorial assistance (writing, technical editing, and proofreading) in preparing this manuscript for publication on behalf of AbbVie Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.R.P. contributed to the design of the research, performed research and analysis, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. H.W. contributed to the design of the research, performed research and analysis, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. P.J.M. contributed to the design of the research, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. M.M. contributed to the analysis, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. B.H. performed the research and critically reviewed the manuscript. A.K. contributed to the design of the research, performed analysis, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. S.M. contributed to the analysis, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. T.J.P. contributed to the design of the research, analyzed and interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. D.E.C. contributed to the design of the research, analyzed and interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. W.M.A. contributed to the design of the research, analyzed and interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. R.M.M. contributed to the design of the research, analyzed and interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeev M. Menon.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

A.R.P., H.W., P.J.M., M.M., B.H., A.K., T.J.P, D.E.C., W.M.A., and R.M.M are employees/contractors of AbbVie Inc. and own stock or stock options. S.M. is a full-time employee of AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG and owns stock or stock options.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 154 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polepally, A.R., Wang, H., Marroum, P.J. et al. Application of Exposure-Response Analyses to Establish the Pharmacodynamic Similarity of a Once-Daily Regimen to an Approved Twice-Daily Dosing Regimen for the Treatment of HCV Infection. AAPS J 19, 1523–1535 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0115-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0115-3

Key words

Navigation