Abstract
Cells in the brain are surrounded by extracellular space (ECS), which forms porous nets and interconnected routes for molecule transportation. Our view of brain ECS has changed from a largely static compartment to dynamic and diverse structures that actively regulate neural activity and brain states. Emerging evidence supports that dysregulation of brain ECS contributes to the pathogenesis and development of many neurological disorders, highlighting the importance of therapeutic modulation of brain ECS function. Here, we aim to provide an overview of the regulation and dysfunction of ECS in healthy and pathological brains, as well as advanced tools to investigate properties of brain ECS. This review emphasizes modulation methods to manipulate ECS with implications to restore their function in brain diseases.
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
• Up-to-date overview of the regulation of brain ECS in health and disease.
• Recent advances in detecting the biophysical properties, function, and dynamic changes of brain ECS are reviewed.
• Advanced pharmacological and physical methods to manipulate brain ECS, which provides therapeutic potentials for treating neurological disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Remarkable progress has been made in the past century in understanding the nervous system, especially for the characterization of neural connectome and brain atlas [1]. However, the narrow space between the brain cells has received much less attention, traditionally regarded as gap filler that glued the cells together. Recent studies have revealed that the brain extracellular space (ECS) is a complex dynamic compartment that occupies approximately one-fifth of brain volume, filled with interstitial fluid (ISF), extracellular matrix (ECM), and other secreted molecules, actively involved in the regulation of molecule transportation, cell communications, and signal integration [2,3,4]. It is therefore important to investigate the structures, functions, and regulation of brain ECS in both normal and pathological conditions, which would facilitate our understanding of the brain homeostasis and disorders.
The brain ECS resembles a comparatively vast reticulum yet has nano- to micrometer dimensions of tunnels and reservoirs [5]. Diffusion measurements were used to estimate the volume fraction (⍺ = ECS volume/total brain volume, normally 0.2–0.25) and the tortuosity (λ, normally 1.5–1.6), which indicates the hindrance imposed by brain ECS to molecular diffusion. These diffusion properties vary around each cell and in different brain regions. They also change depending on the stimulation or pathophysiological states [6, 7]. Emerging multi-modal approaches have updated our view of the spatial organization and geometry of brain ECS from the fluid-filled “pore” with approximately 40 nm in width into a highly heterogenous and dynamic ECS with widths ranging from 20 nm at neuron synapses to well above 1 µm [8,9,10]. At small scale, interaction of neurons and glia cannot be achieved without the involvement of the diffusion of transmitters and ions in the synaptic cleft via the nearby ECS. Neuroactive substances diffuse through the ECS and bind to extra-synaptic sites for volume transmission [11, 12]. At large scale, the extensive communications between ISF in brain ECS and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are important for the long-distance molecule transport, waste removal and homeostasis of brain microenvironment [13, 14]. The dysregulation of ECS due to abnormal changes of ECM components or obstruction of ISF solutes transportation, has been closely associated with pathogenesis and progression of many neurological diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, stroke, epilepsy and glioma [15,16,17]. Therefore, manipulation of ECS based on its physiological properties and function has great potential for the intervention of neurological disorders.
The aim of this review is to present an up-to-date overview of the regulation of brain ECS in health and disease, as well as the available techniques for detecting and experimentally manipulating ECS, highlighting their therapeutic potential for treating neurological disorders. In Section “Regulation of ECS in healthy brain”, the relationships between neuronal activity, glial volume, and brain ECS dynamics are discussed. Section “Dysregulation of ECS in neurological disorders” presents the evidence of brain ECS dysregulation in neurological diseases. In Section “Advanced methods for detecting changes in brain ECS”, the recent improvements for detecting the spatial organization and function of brain ECS are addressed. Section "Modulation of brain ECS for the intervention of neurological disorders" highlights the promising methods to modulate brain ECS for the intervention of central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Finally, the potential of using brain ECS knowledge in aging, blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, extracellular vesicle trafficking, drug delivery and space exploration are addressed.
Regulation of ECS in healthy brain
Brain ECS and neuronal activity
The brain ECS is a reservoir for ions and neurotransmitters that are important for maintaining neural signaling transduction. Local fluctuation of ions and changes of neurotransmitter concentration affect the membrane potential, neuronal activity, and extracellular space volume. Components in ECM dynamically regulate synaptic plasticity, contributing to brain cognitive function in daily life (Fig. 1A).
Fluctuation of neurotransmitters and ions in brain ECS
The migration of many molecules like ions and neurotransmitters through the ECS is governed by volume transmission, a form of synapse-independent intercellular communication [18]. Diffusion analysis of ECS by measuring volume fraction and tortuosity has revealed the heterogeneity and variability in different brain regions and physiological conditions [7]. Based on the physical properties of the ECS, mathematical modeling indicates that changes of interstitial ions correlate with neuronal activity and brain state [19,20,21]. Indeed, changes in extracellular potassium, calcium, magnesium, and proton concentration could control the sleep-wake cycle in rodents [22, 23]. Cortex-wide extracellular potassium fluctuation has been shown to parallel brain state transitions in awake behaving mice [24]. Studies from TMA+ real-time iontophoresis and MRI showed that neuronal excitation and activity could promote shrinkage of ECS and reduction of ISF flow [25,26,27]. Recently, single particle tracking paired with super-localization microscopy also revealed that modulation of neuronal activity is accompanied by nanoscale changes of ECS around synapses [28], which could in turn affect synaptic and brain activity by influencing the diffusion of ions and neurotransmitters. Synchronized ionic waves promoted CSF-to-ISF perfusion, while chemogenetic flattening of these rhythmic ionic waves impeded the CSF influx and clearance in the brain [29]. These studies indicate a bidirectional relationship between ECS and neuronal activity in the brain.
The concentration of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators varies in different compartments of the brain ECS, regulated by glial uptake, local diffusion and perineuronal net. While small molecules such as glutamate, GABA, dopamine and ATP could convey information in neuron-glia network via extra-synaptic transmission [30,31,32,33,34], larger molecules like neuropeptides slowly diffuse in brain ECS without the specialized uptake transporters, which are important for prolonged action and feedback control of brain circuit connectivity [35]. Thus, the differential diffusion rates and action time of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in ECS offer a dynamic spatiotemporal map to conduct neurotransmission and regulate brain function.
Synaptic remodeling by ECM components
ECM molecules are synthesized by neurons, glia, and non-neural cells and are secreted into the brain ECS. Many studies have shown that ECM has an indispensable role in neurodevelopment and synaptic homeostasis [36,37,38]. Specifically, net-like ECM acts as lateral diffusion barriers for AMPA receptors, modulating short-term synaptic plasticity [39]. Moreover, ECM components such as reelin, integrin and other glycoproteins interact with postsynaptic receptors to either promote phosphorylation and activation of NMDA receptors or amplify calcium channel activity [40,41,42,43]. Interestingly, depletion of hyaluronan, a major constituent of the ECM, induced reduction in the size of ECS, leading to hyperexcitability and epileptiform activity in the mice [44]. Enzymatic attenuation of neural ECM also increased the excitability and synaptic inputs into fast-spiking neurons [45]. These studies highlighted the ECM-mediated induction, stabilization, and remodeling of synaptic connectivity.
The abundant ECM interacting proteins not only modulate synaptic plasticity directly, but also control the diffusion properties of ECS and ISF flow, indirectly affecting neural network activity. For example, diverse range of proteoglycans and extracellular enzymes in ECM are responsible for proteolytic processes. Misfolded proteins in the ISF and CSF can either bind to cell surface directly or form soluble complexes with extracellular chaperons before binding to receptors, while large insoluble protein aggregates can activate extracellular proteolytic systems in the ECS [46]. Studies have shown that heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) mediate internalization and propagation of fibrillar protein aggregates [47], while matrix metalloproteinases and dis-integrin metalloproteinases are involved in sequential degradation and clearance of extracellular neuropathic fibrils [48, 49]. These extracellular proteases regulate ECM remodeling to alter viscoelasticity, affecting local diffusion and tortuosity of ECS [5]. Interestingly, nano-tracking combined with super-resolution imaging revealed that protein aggregates like ⍺-synuclein could change ECS diffusivity through ECM remodeling [50]. Taken together, these results demonstrate the interplay of ECM, protein aggregation and ECS in maintaining brain health.
Brain ECS and glial cell volume dynamics
Cell volume change in the brain is restricted due to limitations imposed by the rigid skull. Yet brain cells experience constant fluctuations of their volume due to ionic and osmolyte fluxes resulting from neuronal activity, neurotransmitter cycling, and dynamic changes in metabolic state [51]. While neurons may contribute to swelling of brain tissue in pathological situations including acute hypo-osmolar stress and brain trauma [52, 53], glial cells have been implicated to regulate cell volume in response to neuronal stimulation within physiological range, maintaining brain excitability, fluid flow and molecule transportation in ECS (Fig. 1A).
Astrocytic swelling and molecular machinery
Among brain cells, astrocytes are mostly studied in the context of cell swelling and shrinkage. Neuronal stimulation leads to elevation of extracellular K+, which is swiftly removed from ECS by astrocytes. Previously, inward rectifying K+ channel Kir4.1 expressed on astrocytes was believed to be responsible for astrocyte swelling in ECS with high K+ [54]. However, by utilizing various selective inhibitors in combination with real-time confocal volume imaging, it was discovered that the regulation of astrocyte-selective volume increase in elevated extracellular K+ condition is primarily mediated by Na+/K+ ATPase, rather than Kir4.1, sodium bicarbonate cotransporter NBCe1, or Na+-K+-Cl− cotransporter NKCC1. Notably, this regulation occurs independently of the water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4) [55]. Additionally, application of TGN-020, the AQP4 selective inhibitor, failed to diminish stimulus-induced ECS shrinkage in rat hippocampal slice [56]. These results decoupled AQP4 with activity-evoked astrocytic swelling and ECS shrinkage [57]. Nevertheless, co-immunoprecipitation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) studies showed that Na+/K+ ATPase catalytic domain interacts with the water channel AQP4 to form a transporting microdomain in astrocytes for the regulation of water and K+ homeostasis [58]. AQP4 could also co-assemble with sulfonylurea receptor 1 – transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (SUR1-TRPM4) monovalent cation channel to form a hetero-multimeric water/ion channel complex to drive astrocyte swelling [59]. These studies suggest that AQP4 might contribute to the astrocyte swelling associated with activity-evoked K+ increase. Despite of controversial results related to AQP4 and different ion transporters, the molecular machinery regulating astrocyte swelling and ECS volume is unlikely to be dependent on AQP4 alone, but involves multi-pathways of water entry into astrocytes in response to different stimulus and K+ concentrations in ECS [60, 61].
Astrocytic swelling is often parallel with ECS shrinkage that affects the transportation between CSF and ISF. It is important to note that the involvement of AQP4 in astrocyte volume regulation and associated changes of ECS or ISF flow varies in different brain regions. For example, TMA-iontophoresis showed that the AQP4-deficient mice had increased ECS volume without tortuosity change in somatosensory cortex [62]. Tracer-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed that AQP4-knockout rats had decreased ISF flow in thalamus, but increased volume fraction of ECS, decreased tortuosity, and unchanged ISF flow in caudate nucleus [63]. The discrepancy identified in previous studies in terms of astrocyte volume regulation maybe partially due to different investigated brain regions, animal models, and measurement techniques.
Interstitial fluid flow during sleep
Waste removal is essential for maintaining brain homeostasis. The glymphatic system has been proposed to serve as the brain waste drainage machinery that includes CSF transportation from subarachnoid space to brain parenchyma, where it mixes with the ISF mediated by AQP4 on astrocytic endfeet and ultimately exits through venous perivascular space [64, 65] (Fig. 1A(iii)). The exchange and drainage of CSF-ISF in brain ECS are crucial for the glymphatic clearance. Recently, the brain-wide waste clearance pathway has been further observed in both animal models and humans by MRI [66, 67]. TMA-diffusion assessment and two-photon imaging of in vivo mice demonstrated significant increase in the interstitial space, convective exchange of CSF with ISF, and Aβ clearance rate during natural sleep or ketamine/xylazine-induced anesthesia [68]. Moreover, the CSF influx positively correlates with the slow wave activity found in sleep and certain types of anesthesia [69], while slow wave sleep disruption or sleep deprivation promotes Aβ accumulation in CSF and brain regions [70,71,72]. These studies emphasized that CSF-ISF flow is an important gateway for clearance of protein aggregates and waste products in sleep [73]. Interestingly, the dynamic changes of astrocytic processes and gene expression also correlate with sleep-wake cycle [74]. Reduced astrocytic coverage of synapses and highest perivascular polarization of AQP4 were found during the sleep [74, 75], indicating that astrocytes might be the link between waste clearance and circadian rhythmicity. Further investigations are needed to determine whether astrocytic volume changes could directly alter waste clearance in interstitial system.
Changes of ECS in developing brain
The volume and composition of the brain ECS vary during development. Microscopic and diffusion analysis showed a relatively large extracellular volume fraction during early postnatal development, which was diminished with age [76, 77]. The large ECS volume fraction of the neonatal brain could potentially dilute ions, metabolites and neurotransmitters released from cells, preventing anoxia, seizure and spreading depression in young animals [77]. The reduction in ECS, is associated with progressive maturation-related decrease in water content, changes of intracranial viscoelastic properties, and decrease of nanoparticle diffusive ability [78, 79]. Notably, the significant ECS shrinkage are roughly correlated in time with the proliferation and maturation of glial cells [80]. And the homeostatic control of ECS dynamics in response to elevated K+ becomes tighter with development, allowing efficient synaptic transmission in the mature brain [23]. Moreover, the heterogeneity of the ECM in developing brain offers unique niche for cell proliferation, neuronal migration, and cortex expansion. For example, the spatiotemporal distribution of certain chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), reelin and fibronectin in ECS during early development helps defining the destination and pathway for migrating neurons and axonal extension [81,82,83]. In contrast, the perineuronal net, a specialized ECM structure is expressed later when the nervous system is in the final stages of maturation and the critical periods are closing, leading to decreased plasticity and increased synaptic stability [84, 85]. Since ECM components could regulate intercellular communication by affecting diffusion of signaling molecules, the maturation of ECM plays important role in the conversion of juvenile into adult plasticity and brain functional compartmentalization [86, 87]. Interestingly, the membrane accumulation and position of AQP4 is regulated by the dystrophin-dystroglycan complex, which links ECM to cell surface and intracellular proteins [88], indicating that changes of ECM components might affect the polarization of AQP4 during development. Astrocytic AQP4 polarization is also regulated by the signaling molecule platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGF-B), crucial for the development and maturation of glymphatic system [89, 90]. However, the connection between postnatal development of glymphatic system and ECM maturation is unclear. Further investigation of the changes of ECS in developing brain could shed new light on the mechanisms of neuropsychological disorders that generally develop after the developmental critical periods.
Dysregulation of ECS in neurological disorders
Alzheimer’s disease
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by progressive cognitive impairment and abnormal behavior in the elderly. Accumulation of aberrant proteins such as amyloid-β and tau due to impaired clearance mechanisms in the brain represents the pathological hallmark in AD. As a brain metabolites clearance pathway, glymphatic system is involved and affects Aβ aggregation and tau propagation [91]. It has been reported that perivascular space volume fraction and extracellular free water accumulation are higher, whereas diffusivity of the perivenous space is lower in AD patients, reflecting the impairment of the CSF influx [92]. Reduction of perivascular localization of AQP4 found in AD mouse models and AD patients is associated with impaired CSF-ISF exchange, increasing Aβ burden and cognitive decline [93, 94] (Fig. 1B). Supression of CSF-ISF drainage pathway by ligation of deep cervical lymph nodes exacerbared AD-like pathology [95], suggesting that blocked CSF-ISF flow is one of the derteriorating factors in the progression of AD. AQP4 genetic variant was associated with poor sleep quality, affecting Aβ burden [96]. Although it’s unclear whether the loss of AQP4 polarization is a consequence or a cause of Aβ accumulation, these findings imply a feed-forward pathway where the amyloid aggregation is amplified by AQP4-related glymphatic dysfunction [97]. It is worth to note that altered ECS diffusion parameters and compromised astrocyte volume regulation have been identified in the hippocampus of AD mouse model, with disease progression-related expression of astrocytic genes responsible for ion and water movement [98]. Additionally, AQP4 deletion in AD mice exaggerated intraneuronal accumulation of Aβ and apolipoprotein E (ApoE), while elimination of microglia resulted in deposition of Aβ plaque in the absence of AQP4 [99]. These studies indicate that microglia, astrocytes, and glymphatic system synergistically regulate amyloid aggregation in AD. In addition to brain waste clearance in ECS, components of ECM also play important and diverse roles in production, formation, and degradation of Aβ plaques [100]. For example, increased hyaluronan as associated with deposits of amyloid and tau in brain parenchyma in AD patients, promoted the formation of Aβ secondary structure by high molecular-weight form [101]. Sheddases of the metalloprotease family present in ECS have been reported to cleave microglial TREM2, secreting its ectodomain into the ECS to facilitate amyloid plaque phagocytosis and clearance [102].
Unlike Aβ pathology, the relationship between tau aggregation and ECS dysfunction in AD is less investigated. While tau is predominately cytoplasmic, it can be released into the brain ECS, allowing for its neuron-to-neuron propagation. Mouse ISF tau and human CSF tau increased during sleep deprivation, indicating that disrupted sleep identified in AD may contribute to tau pathology spreading [72]. Recently, a small subset of aggregated and/or phosphorylated tau present in the ISF of tauopathy mice was found to drive ISF seeding competency and tauopathy progression [103]. Pharmacological inhibition of AQP4 suppressed CSF-ISF exchange and tau clearance in the tauopathy mice [104], suggesting that glymphatic pathway also has the potential to exacerbate pathogenic accumulation of tau in AD. Moreover, it has been found that increased perivascular AQP4 promoted drainage of injected peptides but failed to accelerate drainage of abnormal tau in neurons. Unlike the situation in Aβ pathology, it is the AQP4 located at the neuron-facing membrane domains of astrocytes but not the perivascular endfeet that mainly brings abnormal tau away from neurons [105]. Further studies are required to determine whether ECS dysfunction mediated by astrocytes and glymphatic system differentially or collectively contribute to Aβ and tau aggregation in the progression of AD (Fig. 1B).
Parkinson’s disease
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease, characterized by progressive loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra and the presence of Lewy bodies or Lewy neurites formed by ⍺-Synuclein (⍺-syn) aggregation. In addition to motor symptoms, most PD patients experience some form of sleep dysfunction [106]. Since glymphatic clearance of brain waste positively correlates with sleep quality [107], PD patients also have impaired glymphatic drainage [108]. Blocking lymphatic drainage by ligating the deep cervical lymph nodes reduced interstitial clearance of ⍺-syn, promoting PD-lile pathology [109]. Multiple MRI studies and diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) have revealed that low perivascular diffusivity and enlarged perivascular spaces corelate with the severity and progression of PD [110,111,112,113,114]. Recently, it has been shown that ⍺-syn induced local enlargement of brain ECS by promoting the degradation of hyaluronan matrix in PD animal model [50]. Active matrix metalloproteinases-9 in PD mice promoted the AQP4 depolarization, structural instability of astrocyte endfeet, and glymphatic system dysfunction [115]. Moreover, decreasing or depletion of AQP4 expression impaired the glymphatic clearance and accelerated pathological ⍺-syn accumulation, which could further suppress AQP4 polarization and glymphatic influx [116, 117]. This feed-forward loop of glymphatic dysfunction and ⍺-syn aggregation contributes to progression of PD.
Neuropsychiatric disorders
Changes of brain ECS properties and components have been found in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, and depression. For example, increase of extracellular volume in both white and grey matter was detected in patients at early stage of schizophrenia [118, 119]. Multi-site diffusion MRI studies revealed that extracellular free water was negatively associated with the duration of illness in schizophrenia [120]. Similar increase of white matter extracellular free water was found in bipolar disorder patients [121], suggesting that the increased diffusivity in brain ECS could be a transient indication of early psychotic episodes [122, 123]. Interestingly, polymorphisms in human AQP4 were found to be associated with schizophrenia [124]. Abnormalities of astrocytes and AQP4 were also identified in bipolar disorders and animal models of depression [125], indicating that glymphatic impairment might contribute to the development of psychiatric disorders. Moreover, emerging evidence points to the involvement of ECM in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. For example, decreases of perineuronal nets and altered expression of ECM molecules like reelin, CSPGs, fibronectin, and tenascins are important for the pathology of psychiatric diseases via dysregulation of synaptic transmission and neuronal homeostasis [126,127,128]. Thus, ECM-dependent change of ECS function could bear direct relevance to neuropsychiatric disorders, which presents potential pharmacological targets for the development of new therapeutic approaches.
Stroke
Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability and death, including ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and cerebral hemorrhage, all accompanied by cerebral edema. At early stage, it is usually believed that cytotoxic edema occurs within minutes after ischemic insult and is triggered by significant osmotic imbalances without the change of total brain volume [129]. Cessation of blood supply quickly deprived the ATP and normal ion transportation, leading to the elevation of intracellular Na+ and accumulation of K+ in brain ECS aggravated by astrocytic K+ efflux [130]. Astrocytes rapidly swell under this osmotic stress [131], which compress the ECS, impeding the resolution of edema. Furthermore, ion imbalance-induced spreading depolarizations after focal ischemia could trigger rapid CSF entry into the ischemic brain and increase in perivascular CSF flow as revealed by MRI and multiphoton imaging recently [132]. At later stage, net water increases in the brain and vasogenic edema caused by the disruption of blood-brain-barrier (BBB) become dominant. Studies have reported persistent malfunction of glymphatic drainage, impaired AQP4 polarization, and accumulated toxic molecules in different rodent stroke models [133,134,135]. Importantly, DTI-ALPS studies also showed significant decrease of diffusivity along the perivascular space (ALPS index) at the lesion side of the brain, indicating the glymphatic dysfunction in patients with stroke [136, 137]. Taken together, these results suggest that regulation of ECS and glymphatic system could be the therapeutic target for stroke diagnosis and treatment [138].
Traumatic brain injury
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results from external forces that hinder normal brain function, where the development of secondary cerebral edema and injury cascades becomes the leading cause for patient’s morbidity and mortality [139]. Diffusion MRI studies have provided evidence for both decreased and increased diffusivity in brain ECS, which could be explained by the differences in injury severity and stages of cytotoxic and vasogenic edema [140]. Patients with TBI showed lower DTI-ALPS index than healthy controls, suggesting glymphatic dysfunction in TBI [141,142,143,144]. The heterogenous changes of influx and efflux of glymphatic pathway after mild TBI were found in different brain regions [145]. Genetic deletion of AQP4 promoted neurofibrillary pathology in post-traumatic brain [146]. These studies highlighted the importance of fluid management in brain ECS and glymphatic function in pathophysiology and treatment of TBI [147, 148]. Indeed, potentiating glymphatic drainage by inhibition of adrenergic signaling or application of nano-plumber containing microenvironment regulator and vascular growth factor improved neurological function after TBI [149, 150]. In addition to impaired fluid exchange in ECS, increased expression of developmentally restricted ECM components such as laminin, tenascins, and certain proteoglycans was found in murine models after TBI, indicating a regenerative response associated with repair processes [151, 152]. An in-depth understanding of brain ECS dysfunction in TBI may facilitate the discovery of new ways to reduce post-traumatic cerebral oedema and improve functional recovery.
Epilepsy
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent and unpredictable seizures. Approximately 30% of the epilepsy cases are refractory to current antiepileptic drugs, most of which target neuronal excitability and synaptic neurotransmission directly [153]. Notably, emerging evidence suggests that alterations in brain ECS contribute to the initiation and prolongation of seizures through non-synaptic mechanism [154]. Real-time iontophoresis and recent super-resolution shadow imaging showed significant ECS volume shrinkage during pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus and picrotoxin-induced seizures, respectively [10, 155]. In addition to the persistent ECS shrinkage during epileptic seizures, the rapid volume pulsation of brain ECS was recently identified in multiple mouse models of epileptiform activity, which depends on the activity of electrogenic Na+/HCO3− cotransporter (NBCe1) [156]. As a major factor in regulating ECS volume, astrocyte swelling following extracellular potassium uptake and buffering promotes rapid ECS shrinkage, which can concentrate ions and glutamate, enhance ephaptic interactions/field effects between neurons, and likely increase the formation of gap junctions to promote pathological neuronal firing and synchrony in epilepsy [157, 158]. In fact, treatments like furosemide and bumetanide that modulate the size of ECS may block epileptiform activity through blockade of astrocytic Na+/K+/Cl− cotransporter (NKCCl) [159]. Additionally, mice with depletion or enzymatic digestion of ECM hyaluronan had reduced ECS and increased seizures [44, 160]. These studies indicate a positive feedback loop between reduced ECS and epileptic activity. The shrinkage of ECS is often associated with glymphatic system dysfunction. Indeed, patients with focal epilepsy and status epilepticus showed lower DTI-ALPS index compared to healthy controls, suggesting the glymphatic dysfunction in epilepsy [161, 162]. Overall, these evidence in animals and humans highlighted the important roles and potential target of ECS modulation in the prevention of epileptogenesis.
Glioma
Glioma is one of the most common tumors in the CNS and has high malignancy and poor prognosis. The expansion and infiltration of glioma could alter the properties of the surrounding ECS, which in turn affect the migration and progression of tumors [163]. TMA+ iontophoresis confirmed that the volume fraction of ECS in many gliomas was significantly increased, positively correlated with the proliferation and malignancy of the tumors [163, 164]. However, enlarged ECS volume is not paired with high diffusion rate. In fact, the diffusion of molecules in high-grade gliomas is reduced due to increased production of ECM components, including hyaluronic acids, fibronectin, and tenascins that promote the adhesion and migration of glioma cells [165]. These changes of ECM lead to increased tortuosity of ECS, limiting the diffusion of ions and small molecules [166]. Importantly, studies using dynamic contrast-enhanced and tracer-based MRI revealed that ISF flow was heterogenous and decreased in regions adjacent to the glioma [167, 168]. In vivo and ex vivo imaging showed that the para-arterial influx of subarachnoid CSF was limited in glioma-bearing rats, especially in those tumor area with reduced perivascular AQP4 level, suggesting the impairment of CSF drainage in glioma [169]. Consistently, MRI studies in glioma patients revealed that gliomas at higher grade were associated with a lower ALPS index [170], while increased survival was associated with increased ISF convective flow velocity [171], suggesting a correlation between glymphatic dysfunction and glioma aggressiveness. Thus, targeting ECS and glymphatic changes by suppressing certain ECM overproduction and improving ISF flow could be beneficial for intervention of brain tumors.
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration. BBB leakage, together with substantial immune responses and demyelination within lesions, could cause disruption of ECS microenvironment in MS [172]. MS patients showed decreased intracellular sodium volume fraction as revealed by MRI study, indicating the expansion of ECS [173]. Growing evidence points to the involvement of glymphatic dysfunction in MS. Reduction of CSF circulation was found in MS patients [174, 175]. Disorganized expression of AQP4 away from the astrocyte endfeet was also identified in MS models and postmortem brains [176, 177]. PVS enlargement and reduced ALPS index are associated with the progression of MS [178,179,180]. These studies suggest that glymphatic system plays important role in MS. Whether there is casual link between glymphatic perturbation and the pathogenesis of MS is not yet clear. Furthermore, immunohistochemical and transcriptomic studies demonstrated widespread alterations in ECM compositions in MS lesions, promoting the activation of glial cells and neuroinflammation [181, 182]. Reactive myeloid cells in the brain secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) into the ECS, mediating the cascades of immune responses and disease progression in MS [183]. These EVs not only present biomarkers for the diagnosis of MS, but also could be artificially generated for drug delivery in ECS [184, 185]. Systematic understanding of ECS dysregulation in MS and other autoimmune diseases, including the interactions between glymphatic dysfunction, ECM alterations and EVs trafficking, could hold the key to effective treatment.
In summary, abnormal alterations of brain ECS are associated with many neurological disorders as verified in both animal models and clinical studies. Pathological protein aggregation and edema due to glymphatic dysfunction, excitotoxicity promoted by impaired astrocytic regulation, as well as changes of ECM components, all interact with each other and play important roles in the initiation and progression of brain diseases (Fig. 1B). The drainage of cerebrospinal fluid and ISF dynamics are closely associated with the clearance of brain waste, especially in neurodegenerative diseases where abnormal accumulation of metabolic waste is almost universally observed [186, 187]. Factors that contribute to the regulation of ECS properties and ISF flow, such as astrocytic volume regulation, AQP4 polarization and expression of ECM components, could become potential therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative disease, stroke, epilepsy, and brain tumors.
Advanced methods for detecting changes in brain ECS
Due to the small dimensions of the ECS (predominantly ~40 nm) [3] and the changes in ECS volume and metabolic clearance during sleep-wake cycle [68], it is challenging to reveal the spatial organization and dynamics of the brain ECS on multiple timescales. In order to investigate the structures, diffusion properties, and function of brain ECS, several techniques have been developed, including electron and optical imaging, electrochemical method, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The available experimental techniques to detect the brain ECS have been nicely compared and summarized previously [188]. Here, we focus on the recent improvement of established methods to unravel the dynamics and roles of the brain ECS.
Electron microscopy (EM)
EM has been used to reveal the structure of the ECS with nanoscale resolution. The application of EM for detection of changes in brain ECS was limited by the requirement for tissue fixation and incompatibility with live tissue. High pressure freezing with substitution fixation at low temperature allows the distribution of water in CNS to be maintained, which could reduce artifacts from structural fixation [189, 190]. Recent improvement of perfusion fixation method allows preserving brain ECS for high-quality optical and ultrastructural electron microscopy [191] (Fig. 2A-B). The most common EM methods for biological samples include scanning electron microscopy (SEM) that enables the visualization of topographic features, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) providing internal ultrastructural data. Nevertheless, the architectures of brain ECS could not be revealed without 3D imaging. The development of focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM) offered rapid and reliable acquisitions of large series of images with high Z-resolution [192]. Cryo-EM was used to study the nanoscale organization of pathological brain ECS in adult neurodegenerative mice [50]. Recent study using in situ cryo-sectioning, FIB-SEM and semiautomatic annotations revealed that the ECS volume fraction in the brain was 6.21% with 94.8% of the total ECS volume occupied by a large connected ECS network in rat hippocampal tissue [193] (Fig. 2C-D). Additionally, anisotropic and heterogenous character of the brain white matter has been demonstrated by simulation of the ISF flow between the axons of white matter areas reconstructed through FIB-SEM recordings, which is important for modeling the mechanisms of interstitial transport and drug-delivery [194]. These improvements of 3D EM imaging techniques, as well as the algorithms for annotation, segmentation, and diffusion simulation, promote further exploration of the precise structure and geometry of brain ECS.
Optical imaging techniques
Integrative optical imaging (IOI)
Integrative optical imaging (IOI) uses a macromolecule labelled with fluorophore as diffusing probe and a widefield microscope to visualize the diffusion gradient into the tissue [200]. Recently, time-resolved IOI was developed to measure fast changes in brain ECS diffusion with a time resolution of approximately 1 s during spreading depression [195] (Fig. 2E-F). Although the low cost and simplicity of IOI make the approach readily available to researchers, the measurements of brain ECS width or diffusion property are limited to the cortex, which does not allow ECS structure in deeper brain regions to be addressed [188].
Two-photon imaging
Compared to epifluorescence imaging or widefield microscopy, two-photon microscopy offers better optical resolution in the z-axis, enabling live imaging of in situ tissues or in vivo brain. For instance, fluorescent dyes were injected into the cisterna magna or parenchyma, followed by two-photon imaging through a cranial window. The fluorophore diffusion could be visualized and tracked over time to assess CSF influx, ISF flow in brain ECS and glymphatic function [64, 68, 196] (Fig. 2G). Even though two-photon microscopy has excellent resolution, the tissue penetration is still limited to layer 2–3 in cortex with the requirement of surgery [201]. The diffraction of light also poses a challenge for brain ECS detection, especially for the ECS tunnels less than 250 nm in width.
Super-resolution imaging
The advent of super-resolution microscopy has reconciled live brain tissue imaging with nanoscale spatial resolution [202, 203]. For example, stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy offers volumetric imaging of highly diffusible fluorophores, which makes it possible to visualize cellular morphology in live tissue [4, 204, 205]. Based on 3D-STED microscopy and cell impermeable diffusible fluorophore, super-resolution shadow imaging (SUSHI) was developed to reveal distinctive brain ECS structure changes in response to various stimuli [10] (Fig. 2I). By using the glycerol immersion objectives, SUSHI can provide clear images down to 50 µm tissue depth and sharp images of the ECS [10, 206]. Compared to intracellular labeling, SUSHI is insensitive to photobleaching and less likely to be affected by phototoxicity, making it an ideal imaging technique for extensive 3D STED time-lapse imaging over large fields of view. Recently, by integrating the data collected from live tissue 3D STED imaging, the machine-learning based image processing technology called LIONESS (live information-optimized nanoscopy enabling saturated segmentation) achieved dense anatomical reconstruction (Fig. 2J), which is promising for studying the dynamic functional architecture of brain ECS [198].
In addition to SUSHI, a carbon nanotube tracking method based on single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) has been developed to reveal the structure and viscoelastic properties of the brain ECS with dimensions down to approximately 40 nm [9]. Specifically, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) can be injected into cerebral ventricles, allowing tracking up to 100 μm deep in different live brain tissues using a widefield microscopy approach at millisecond timescale [197] (Fig. 2H). These SWCNTs could be used as near-infrared fluorescent probes to map the local organization and the changes of diffusivity of the ECS with nanoscale precision [28, 207]. Moreover, quantum dots (QDs) with bright and stable fluorescent signal have been successfully used to decipher the heterogenous nanoscale anatomy and diffusion properties in hippocampal areas [199] (Fig. 2K). Taken together, the application of these super-resolution imaging technologies for in vivo tracking of the dynamics of brain ECS channels or combination of them would provide new insights into brain physiology and pathology [208].
Real-time iontophoresis
Real-time iontophoresis (RTI) is widely used to determine the characteristics of brain ECS in real time: volume fraction and tortuosity [209]. Volume fraction (α) is the ratio of ECS volume to the total brain tissue volume, while tortuosity (λ) indicates how difficult a substance passes through brain ECS [210]. In RTI, a pulse of cation probe (typically tetramethylammonium, TMA+) is injected into brain ECS by iontophoresis from the source electrode. And the time-dependent ion concentration is measured by ion-selective microelectrode positioned about 100 µm away [211]. By comparing the result with an identical measurement of free diffusion in aqueous solution, λ and α of brain ECS in vivo can be extracted. Notably, a sinusoidal method of TMA+-RTI has been proposed to provide time-resolved quantification of dynamic α(t) and λ(t) in acute brain events (Fig. 3A). Specifically, the injection of TMA+ followed a sinusoidal pattern vs. time. And the transient modulations of the amplitude and phase lag of the sampled TMA+ waveforms were analyzed to infer α(t) and λ(t) [212]. However, the invasive RTI requires the distance between the source and ion-selective microelectrodes to be 80–130 µm, which limits the application of this method for larger brain regions. It is also noteworthy that boundaries in brain parenchyma and permeability of the BBB may make it inapplicable for the point-source paradigm to assess diffusivity [13].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
MRI is known as a non-invasive and safe tool widely used in the diagnosis of brain diseases. Typically, it can be divided into contrast and non-contrast imaging. Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and 17O labeled water are commonly used clinical tracers for contrast imaging to reveal the nanoscale material transport in the brain ECS. For example, H217O is a safe tracing agent that behaves like normal water in physiological condition, which is not dependent on additional equipment or pulse sequences [213] (Fig. 3B). Under the electromagnetic field, the spin–lattice relaxation time of the hydrogen nucleus of H217O was shortened to produce high signal on MRI, which reveals the distribution of water in brain tissue in real time [216]. As the water diffuses, the signal decreases, while the distribution area increases over time [63, 217, 218]. A recent diffusion weighted-MRI study revealed differential ECS clearance efficiency in different brain regions [63, 219]. Similar to RTI, MRI can be used to accurately measure α and λ by injecting contrast agents [63]. Therefore, contrast agent-MRI demonstrates its potential in revealing material transport in brain ECS. However, it is important to consider the significant variance between the movement of the solvent and the movement of the solute.
To observe brain ECS dynamics without the need for contrast agents, several non-contrast imaging methods have been developed. Recently, low b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been applied to evaluate the CSF dynamics in humans. By visualizing the distribution of motion-related signal dephasing by CSF, DWI showed heterogenous CSF movements across different brain regions within short imaging time [214, 220] (Fig. 3C). However, due to large white matter fibers in brain parenchyma, the defined movements of fluid in perivascular space and ISF are difficult to be assessed by DWI. Diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) was developed to overcome this problem by measuring diffusivity of water molecules using the diffusion tensor method [215] (Fig. 3D). The ALPS-index presents perivascular diffusivity, indicating the glymphatic system activity. A higher ALPS index may suggest better efficiency of glymphatic clearance.
Taken together, these techniques have their unique strengths and limitations (Table 1), which means that multimodal integration of advanced microscopy and imaging tools are required to investigate different aspects of brain ECS in healthy and pathological conditions.
Modulation of brain ECS for the intervention of neurological disorders
As described previously, dysregulation of ECS contributes to the disruption of brain homeostasis and the development of neurological disorders, suggesting that ECS could be potential therapeutic target for intervention of brain disorders. Advanced techniques have been developed to monitor the dynamic changes of ECS, allowing the detection of abnormal ECS in the different stages of diseases. Recently, several methods to manipulate brain ECS have been developed, including pharmacological regulation, and physical stimulation by electric or magnetic fields, light and ultrasound. Here we summarize the current findings of brain ECS manipulation, highlighting their applications in different neurological disorders.
Pharmacological modulation
Treatments that modulate glial swelling and the size of brain ECS could be beneficial for neurological disorders. For example, the loop diuretics furosemide and bumetanide blocked epileptiform activity in many seizure models through their blockade of NKCC1-mediated glial swelling [159] (Fig. 4A). Malfunction of the brain ECS and glymphatic cleansing system leads to waste piling up, contributing to the development and progression of many neurological disorders. Since cellular AQP-4 was found up-regulated in the aging brain, and mis-localized in AD [221], astrocytic AQP-4 seems to represent a possible pharmacological candidate for restoration of ECS function in brain diseases [222]. It has been shown that atorvastatin, the cholesterol-lowering drug, could downregulate AQP-4 expression to attenuate ischemic brain edema in rats [223]. Similarly, inhibition of AQP-4 by TGN-020 or AER-271 reduced brain edema and improved neurological deficits in different models of ischemia [224, 225] (Fig. 4B). Recently, a novel AQP4 facilitator, TGN-073 was proven to facilitate ISF circulation and was further tested in preclinical study with the goal to decrease amyloid deposits in AD [226, 227] (Fig. 5B). These studies indicate that AQP4 agonist/antagonist might be effective modulators of the ECS function and glymphatic flow. Pharmacotherapeutic interventions on perivascular CSF flow, AQP4 channels, and ISF flow have great potentials for treating brain diseases [228].
The removal efficiency of waste in the brain ECS is significantly higher during sleep than in awake state, while sleep deprivation could promote the deposition of proteins like tau [72]. Interestingly, tracer-based MRI revealed that brain ISF clearance rate varied depending on different anesthesia-induced sleep states [187, 234]. For example, dexmedetomidine and pentobarbital sodium could accelerate brain ISF drainage, while isoflurane inhalation decreased brain ECS volume fraction, reduced diffusion in brain ECS and ISF drainage via norepinephrine-dependent pathway [187] (Figs. 4C and 5A). These studies suggested that different anesthetics or local changes of norepinephrine levels could modulate the diffusion properties of brain ECS, providing the bidirectional manipulation tools to further investigate the function of brain ECS in physiological and pathological conditions.
Physical modulation
Electrical stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a conventional non-invasive technique, which involves attaching electrodes to the scalp to provide a low current (< 2 mA) to a specific area of the brain [235]. It has been widely reported that tDCS has the potential to reduce Aβ burden and protect neurons [236, 237]. In addition to neuronal activation, the changes in brain ECS induced by electrical stimulation may represent another intriguing avenue for modulation of brain disorders.
A multiphoton imaging of fluorescent tracer in rat brain tissue showed that tDCS could be attributed to an increase in the effective solute diffusion coefficient of brain tissue (Deff) and BBB permeability, indicating a potential use of tDCS to improve ECS function in diseases [229] (Fig. 5C). The mathematical model predicted that tDCS could increase Deff of brain ECS by transiently enhancing the brain ECS gap spacing and reducing the extracellular matrix density [229]. Furthermore, recent studies showed that early intervention with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (AtDCS) reduced Aβ42 burden and protected neurons in AD mouse model [236]. After 10 AtDCS treatments, hippocampal Aβ levels and glial fibrillary acidic protein were reduced in AD mice [238]. However, relegation of Aβ burden in the brain does not always suggest the improvement of cognitive function. It was reported that tDCS failed to improve behavioral deficits in the Morris water maze and novel object recognition tests, nor did it alter the expression of tau, phosphorylated tau and amyloid precursor protein in AD transgenic mice [239]. Therefore, the treatment effects of electrical stimulation and their dependence on the changes of brain ECS still need further investigation.
Another form of electrical stimulation is gamma electrical stimulation (GES), which is based on the gamma entrainment using sensory stimuli (GENUS) to potentially improve AD-associated cognitive impairment [240]. It has been shown that GES could increase microglial cell numbers, reduce Aβ load, and improve behavioral performance after 1 month of treatment [241]. But whether GES modulate the changes of brain ECS is unknown. Interestingly, electroacupuncture (EA) was recently found to enhance perivascular influx in the glymphatic system, improve AQP4 polarity, and reduce Aβ accumulation in AD mouse model as revealed by contrast-enhanced MRI and immunostaining [242] (Fig. 6). But how exactly EA affects CSF-ISF exchange in brain ECS is unclear.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique in which the electrical activity of the brain is modulated by the application of a rapidly changing magnetic field [245]. A single pulse of TMS recruits a mixture of excitatory and inhibitory neurons, each with distinct physiological characteristics [246,247,248]. And the relative recruitment of excitation/inhibition can be controlled by changes of pulse amplitude, width, shape and duration of TMS to modulate aberrant brain networks in diseases such as schizophrenia, depression, autism and dementia [249,250,251,252,253].
Recently, studies have shown that TMS could promote glymphatic function and solute clearance in the brain ECS. Continuous theta-burst stimulation, a new kind of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) model, improved glymphatic clearance efficiency and AQP4 polarization in a mouse model of sleep deprivation [254]. It was also reported that continuous theta-burst stimulation accelerated clearance efficiency of glymphatic system, improved spatial memory in AD model mice, reduced Aβ deposition and improved the polarized distribution of AQP4 in cortex and hippocampus [243]. Similarly, rTMS could increase drainage efficiency of brain clearance pathways in early AD mice, including the glymphatic system in the brain parenchyma and meningeal lymphatics [230] (Fig. 5D). These studies suggest that TMS promotes glymphatic Aβ clearance potentially through AQP4 repolarization. Beside the AD model, recent study also reported that rTMS treatment improved glymphatic function and molecule clearance in intracerebral hemorrhage model [255]. Interestingly, continuous theta burst TMS was found to modulate ISF penetration by activating GABAA receptors [256]. Whether TMS directly act on perivascular astrocyte AQP4 via GABA-dependent pathway remains to be explored.
Light stimulation
Light stimulation has been used in many neurological disorders. For example, interstitial photodynamic therapy has been used in the treatment of malignant glioma, where light delivered by implanted light-diffusing fibers activates a photosensitizing agent to induce tumor cell death [257,258,259]. Optogenetic deep brain stimulation was able to suppress abnormal oscillatory activity in neural circuits to alleviate Parkinsonian motor symptoms [260, 261]. Recent work suggested that 40 Hz light flickering had the beneficial potential to ameliorate AD-associated pathology [262, 263], which was then reported that it failed to entrain native gamma oscillations in AD mouse models [264]. 40 Hz multisensory audio-visual stimulation promoted CSF influx and ISF efflux in the cortex of AD mouse model via increased astrocytic AQP4 polarization and arterial pulsation, suggesting that sensory gamma stimulation could promote glymphatic function [265]. Interestingly, 60 Hz light-flickering entrainment, instead of 40 Hz frequency, was shown to recapitulate microglia-mediated removal of perineuronal nets, the components of brain ECM [266]. Nevertheless, whether and how light entrainment alone or the combination of sensory stimulation affects the properties and function of brain ECS require further investigation.
Low-level laser lights combined with photo-responsive agent could also dissemble Aβ by breaking its secondary structure in vitro [267]. Moreover, light stimulation has great potential to manipulate brain ECS. It has been shown that red light (630 nm) treatment not only directly destroyed Aβ assembly but also activated formaldehyde (FA) dehydrogenase to degrade FA and attenuated FA-facilitated Aβ aggregation in brain ECS [217, 268]. Subsequently, red light stimulation markedly smashed Aβ deposition in brain ECS, recovered the flow of ISF, increased the number of neurons near senile plaques, and rescued cognitive dysfunction in AD mice after 2 months treatment [217] (Fig. 5E). Besides the red light, a series of studies reported similar results that transcranial photo-biomodulation (tPBM, λ = 1267 nm) decreased Aβ deposition and increases lymphatic drainage [269, 270]. Since glymphatic clearance of waste in the brain has been shown to follow the circadian rhythm [72, 271], night tPBM improved Aβ clearance more effectively than daytime in AD mice [272]. These studies suggest that light stimulation could be used as a tool to modulate ISF flow and glymphatic clearance in brain ECS, while the underlying working mechanism requires further investigation (Fig. 6).
It is worth noting that the skull structure made it difficult for red light and near infrared light to penetrate. Although the longer wavelength of light increased the efficiency of transmission, the heating effects should not be ignored [217]. Intermittent stimulation instead of continuous treatment has been applied to reduce thermal effects, leading to positive effect on Aβ clearance [270]. Regardless, delivering sufficient light dose to deeper structures in the human brain with low heating effects continues to be challenging.
Ultrasound stimulation
A sound wave with a frequency higher than 20 kHz is called ultrasound. Ultrasound has been validated in clinical applications, particularly as an imaging tool for clinical diagnosis. Recently, ultrasound has emerged as a therapeutic tool for local drug or nanoparticle delivery by enlarging the interstitial spaces within the tissue through non-thermal mechanisms [273,274,275]. For example, recent study demonstrated that the ECS and the perivascular space were enlarged in rat brain neocortical slices after exposed to low intensity ultrasound, promoting the diffusion of small diameter nanoparticles that were injected into the brain slices [232, 276]. The same research team presented a MRI-guided transcranial focused ultrasound method and found that ultrasound enhanced the diffusion of small diameter nanoparticles in brain ECS [276]. Similarly, ultrasound alone has been validated to enhance the movement of a low molecular weight tracer in the cerebrospinal fluid [275]. Recent study claimed that low-intensity, non-invasive transcranial ultrasound upregulated the glymphatic pathway to enhance perivascular influx and efficacy of small molecule intrathecal drug delivery without causing brain parenchymal damage [244] (Fig. 5H). Additionally, low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUS) stimulation with intravenous injection of microbubbles has been reported to enhance glymphatic system-mediated molecular transport in deep brain regions without disrupting the BBB permeability [231] (Fig. 5F-G). These findings indicate that LIFUS has great potential to actively regulate molecule transport in brain ECS.
Furthermore, many studies have been carried out to determine whether and how ultrasound exposure could improve brain ECS function in neurological disorders. Specifically, ultrasound radiation can increase AQP4 expression, which is closely related to the glymphatic clearance of Aβ [277, 278]. AQP4 expression was upregulated after focused ultrasound mediated blood-brain-barrier disruption (FUS-BBBD) [277]. Similarly, other study found that in FUS-BBBD, higher acoustic pressure resulted in higher AQP4 expression and reduced number of Aβ plaques [278]. Focused ultrasound treatment in combination with microbubbles enhanced the clearance of soluble Aβ but not the Aβ plaques from the brain parenchyma into the cerebrospinal fluid space, which was then uptaken by the deep cervical lymph node [279]. Transient perivenous enhancement induced by MRI-guided FUS-BBBD was observed in humans with early AD as well [280]. Besides AD, as described above, AQP4 distribution is also closely associated with stroke. Ultrasound also shows great potential for treating stroke by altering AQP4 localization and expression. Low intensity ultrasound (LIUS) stimulation was reported to significantly suppress edema formation by reducing brain water content and intracranial pressure [281, 282]. Furthermore, LIFUS stimulation significantly decreased the localization of AQP4 on astrocytic endfeet in the edematous model. And the expression of AQP4 was significantly upregulated after water intoxication and downregulated after LIUS treatment [281, 283]. Taken together, these studies indicate that ultrasound could be a powerful tool to modulate ECS function in brain disease by regulating AQP4 expression, glymphatic clearance and molecule diffusion (Fig. 6).
Compared to light stimulation, ultrasound has been shown to have greater penetration and less heating effect [275, 284, 285]. In particular, pulsed focused ultrasound exposures with short duty cycles produce lower time-averaged energy deposition rates, resulting in minimal temperature increases (≤ 5 °C) [284]. However, most studies have focused on the acute treatment, while the chronic effects of ultrasound stimulation in different brain diseases remain unclear. This is especially important for FUS-BBBD method because of the secondary sterile inflammation effects following BBB disruption [286, 287]. In the absence of microbubble-related cavitation and thermal effects, the radiation force emitted by ultrasound might trigger a cascade of activation events in brain cells [288]. However, the relationships or molecular interactions between ultrasound stimulation of brain cells and changes of brain ECS are open for future investigation.
Surgical modulation
Epidural pulsation
In addition to the pharmacological and physical stimulations that actively regulate brain ECS, a clinical procedure has been discovered with the potential to regulate brain ECS through mechanical pulsation. Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) was clinically used to reduce the risk of stroke in patients by completely freeing the superficial temporal artery in the scalp and attaching to the ischemic brain surface to improve blood flow supply [289, 290]. Recent study found that epidural arterial implantation (EAI), in which a branch of the external carotid artery was severed and implanted epidurally, could simulate clinical EDAS surgery [233]. EAI surgery increased epidural arterial pulsation and decreased tortuosity in the caudate nucleus, promoting molecule diffusion and volume fraction increase in brain ECS of caudate nucleus region [233] (Fig. 5I). Moreover, regulation of intracerebral arterial pulsation by systematic administration of dopamine agonists and ligation of internal carotid artery was associated with the changes of CSF-ISF exchange rate [196]. Computational modeling also suggested that even in the presence of moderate adverse pressure gradients, arterial pulsation was sufficient to induce fluid flow in the perivascular space, promoting the molecule transport and ISF clearance [291,292,293]. These studies indicate that arterial pulsation could regulate ISF flow and molecule transport in brain ECS. And epidural pulsation might be a useful way with therapeutic potential to modulate the function of brain ECS.
Measurement and characterization of brain ECS paves the way to evaluate the influence of different pharmacological, physical, and surgical manipulations on ECS. These methods to alter the diffusion properties of brain ECS, ISF flow, or glymphatic function can offer insight into pathogenesis of brain diseases and potential therapy to correct or improve ECS function (Table 2). It is also important to note that a closed-loop system for brain ECS manipulation that combines the stimulation feedback and real-time tracking of brain ECS dynamics is required for future exploration and therapeutic application.
Perspectives
Changes of brain ECS in aging
The geometry of the brain ECS changes in aging due to the loss of synapses and neurons, demyelination, degradation of ECM, changes in morphology and numbers of glia, and accumulation of pathological proteins [294, 295]. Glymphatic system has been shown to facilitate the metabolite clearance in the brain ECS through CSF-ISF flow mainly during sleep [64, 68]. Glymphatic clearance was reduced by 40% in aged mice relative to young ones, suggesting impairment of glymphatic pathway in aging [94, 296]. Age-dependent disruption of sleep architecture and circadian rhythm may contribute to the accumulation of waste in brain ECS [72, 297, 298]. In fact, microstructure changes of ECS in the white matter of human brain correlate with sleep-wake state [299]. Aged brains also show altered AQP4 localization and enlarged perivascular spaces [300, 301]. These studies support the hypothesis of age-dependent impairment of waste disposal system in brain ECS. Interestingly, researchers have found that dietary intake of omega-3, intermittent fasting, and right lateral sleeping position, all could boost glymphatic transport [302,303,304]. Chronic alcohol consumption, on the other hand, is associated with decrease in brain ECS tortuosity and altered transmitter diffusion dynamics [305]. These findings have highlighted that healthy lifestyle is crucial for healthy aging from the perspectives of brain ECS geometry and function.
Blood-brain barrier function and brain ECS homeostasis
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) plays a crucial role in selectively controlling the transmission of essential materials from the vessels to the brain. Particularly, the presence of tight junction forms several distinct barriers forbidding the communication of CSF and blood stream and peripheral extracellular fluid [306]. It has been demonstrated that CSF flows between the basement membrane and astrocyte end feet of arteries and capillaries, with arteriole pulsations driving bulk fluid flow through the parenchyma [14]. BBB also regulates ion transport to keep the ISF optimal for neuronal functioning [307]. The integrity of BBB is related to the glymphatic efficiency and brain ECS homeostasis. The disruption of BBB causes significant changes in brain ECS, leading to brain pathology. For instance, increased BBB permeability and vascular pathology were found in patients with dementia [308]. The reciprocal relationships between Aβ accumulation and BBB disruption promote the progression of neurodegeneration [309, 310]. The entrance of blood driven molecules into interstitial space triggers the cascades of immune responses, leading to the reduction of convective flow, decreased CSF-ISF exchange, and impaired glymphatic clearance [311, 312]. Thus, BBB dysfunction contributes to the disruption of brain ECS homeostasis in various neurological diseases. A better understanding of the interactions between BBB and ECS transport will help us to develop clinical relevant methods to improve waste clearance and drug efficiency.
Extracellular vesicles in brain ECS
The intricate network of communication within the brain relies on the dynamic interplay between diverse cellular populations. Recently, the emergence of extracellular vesicles (EVs) has opened new avenues for intercellular communication in the brain [313]. Exosomes, are small EVs derived from neuronal and glial cells, containing proteins, RNAs, lipids, and other signaling molecules. They are actively involved in synaptic regulation, production and turnover of myelin, and the progression of neurodegenerative diseases [314, 315]. Exosomes that contained increased levels of Aβ and α-syn were identified in AD and PD patients [316, 317]. The administration of these exosomes could trigger disease-related symptoms and pathology in neuronal cultures and heathy mice, suggesting that exosome secretion could be the pathway to promote the spreading of pathological proteins in brain ECS [317, 318]. Besides, studies showed that changes of certain cargo expression and the number of EVs were associated with severity of depression, immune responses, and inflammatory cascades [319,320,321]. The close relationships between EVs and the neuropathological processes have highlighted the clinical potentials of EVs for disease screenning and drug delivery [322, 323]. Since EVs are secreted to brain ECS, the trafficking of EVs could be affected by dynamic changes of ECS. The expansion of ECS may facilitate long-range traveling of small EVs, while shrinkage of ECS may limit the EV transportation and exosome-mediated intercellular communication [324]. Future investigations of EV trafficking in different ECS conditions will help us to map the effective range of EV-mediated intercellular communication in the brain.
Pharmacokinetics in brain ECS
The heterogeneity of brain ECS also affect the distribution, elimination and dosage of drugs needed for brain disorders. Since the drug is subject to local diffusion, bulk flow, and fluid exchange in ECS, brain region-specific properties of ECS should be taken into considerations for clinical studies and medication [2]. On the one hand, simulation and mathematical modeling of the interstitial solute transport [325] and spatial drug distribution in different brain regions [326] would be helpful for understanding region-specific and drug-specific pharmacokinetics in brain ECS. On the other hand, improving the penetration of drugs into brain ECS is required since many promising drugs fail to work because of the inability to effectively deliver and maintain at the adequate working concentrations in the brain [327]. A series of studies has demonstrated a promising way to delivery drug to the brain by intraparenchymal microcatheters under pressure gradient, which is called as convection-enhanced delivery (CED) [328,329,330]. Although CED can increase drug distribution in brain ECS and ISF flow, problems involving catheter design, placement and implementation often occur due to limited understanding of ECS properties and variability in the target brain regions [331]. Increasing research has focused on the development of nanoparticles that could transport in brain ECS bypassing BBB [332, 333]. Manipulation of brain ECS could further promote the transportation and delivery of nanoparticles and drugs. For example, dexmedetomidine, an adrenergic agonist sedative, increased the brain delivery of intrathecally administered drugs through enhanced glymphatic flow [334]. Transcranial focused ultrasound was also found promising to increase drug delivery efficiency via the changes of brain ECS [275, 276]. Therefore, characterization of brain ECS is crucial for modeling pharmacokinetics, while the manipulation of brain ECS is helpful for the improvement of drug delivery.
Brain ECS in microgravity environment
Interestingly, many studies demonstrated that long time exposure of microgravity environment leads to certain adaptive changes in the brain parenchyma, CSF, and blood vessels in astronauts [335, 336]. Microgravity environment also results in structure changes of ECS. Specifically, the tortuosity of the ECS in hippocamps decreased at first and then increased, while the volume fraction of ECS increased in a tail-suspended hindlimb-unloading rat model [337]. The alterations to ISF drainage and diffusion in ECS were not able to recover after 7 days but not 3 days of microgravity treatment, indicating that long-time exposure to microgravity environment might affect brain ECS properties and function of astronauts [337]. Indeed, prolonged microgravity exposure during long-period spaceflight produces unusual and pathologic neuro-ophthalmic symptoms in astronauts, as well as changes in brain, including the enlarged basal ganglia and white matter perivascular space [338, 339]. The dilated perivascular space indicates the disturbances of the glymphatic pathway, which may play important role in the development of spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome [340]. However, it remains unknown that what kind of damages to brain ECS function would be caused and how to protect brain ECS function in microgravity environment.
Conclusion
Brain ECS has been recognized as gap-filler for years but is now viewed as a dynamic and active player in regulating brain function. The changes of biophysical properties of ECS affect the diffusion and transportation of molecular signals, neuromodulators, and waste in the brain. The development of state-of-art technologies has helped the dissection of heterogenous geometry and nanoscale architecture of brain ECS, while characterization and interpretation of real 3D dynamics of brain ECS are open for future research. Based on the close associations between dysregulation of brain ECS and pathogenesis and progression of many neurological disorders, manipulations of brain ECS offers a novel therapeutic pathway to alleviate aberrant protein accumulation, improve glymphatic flow and promote drug delivery. Pharmacological, physical, and surgical stimulations to modulate ECS will also help better understanding the effects of ECS change on the brain cells. Further research is required to unravel the underlying mechanisms connecting the dynamic brain ECS changes to neural network regulation to brain dysfunction in disease.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Altimus CM, Marlin BJ, Charalambakis NE, Colon-Rodriquez A, Glover EJ, Izbicki P, Johnson A, Lourenco MV, Makinson RA, McQuail J, et al. The next 50 years of neuroscience. J Neurosci. 2020;40:101–6. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0744-19.2019.
Lei Y, Han H, Yuan F, Javeed A, Zhao Y. The brain interstitial system: anatomy, modeling, in vivo measurement, and applications. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;157:230–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.12.007.
Nicholson C, Hrabetova S. Brain extracellular space: the final frontier of neuroscience. Biophys J. 2017;113:2133–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.052.
Hrabetova S, Cognet L, Rusakov DA, Nagerl UV. Unveiling the extracellular space of the brain: from super-resolved microstructure to in vivo function. J Neurosci. 2018;38:9355–63. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1664-18.2018.
Tonnesen J, Hrabetova S, Soria FN. Local diffusion in the extracellular space of the brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2023;177:105981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105981.
Sykova E. Diffusion properties of the brain in health and disease. Neurochem Int. 2004;45:453–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2003.11.009.
Nicholson C, Sykova E. Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:207–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01261-2.
Thorne RG, Nicholson C. In vivo diffusion analysis with quantum dots and dextrans predicts the width of brain extracellular space. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:5567–72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509425103.
Godin AG, Varela JA, Gao Z, Danne N, Dupuis JP, Lounis B, Groc L, Cognet L. Single-nanotube tracking reveals the nanoscale organization of the extracellular space in the live brain. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12:238–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.248.
Tonnesen J, Inavalli V, Nagerl UV. Super-resolution imaging of the extracellular space in living brain tissue. Cell. 2018;172:1108-1121.e1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.007.
Taber KH, Hurley RA. Volume transmission in the brain: beyond the synapse. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014;26:iv, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13110351.
Vargova L, Sykova E. Astrocytes and extracellular matrix in extrasynaptic volume transmission. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369:20130608. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0608.
Postnikov EB, Lavrova AI, Postnov DE. Transport in the brain extracellular space: diffusion, but which kind? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(20):12401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012401.
Abbott NJ, Pizzo ME, Preston JE, Janigro D, Thorne RG. The role of brain barriers in fluid movement in the CNS: is there a ‘glymphatic’ system? Acta Neuropathol. 2018;135:387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1812-4.
Bonneh-Barkay D, Wiley CA. Brain extracellular matrix in neurodegeneration. Brain Pathol. 2009;19:573–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00195.x.
Dityatev A, Seidenbecher C, Morawski M. Brain extracellular matrix: an upcoming target in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53:3807–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15336.
Rasmussen MK, Mestre H, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic pathway in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:1016–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30318-1.
Vargova L, Sykova E. Extracellular space diffusion and extrasynaptic transmission. Physiol Res. 2008;57(Suppl 3):S89–99. https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.931603.
Chen KC, Nicholson C. Spatial buffering of potassium ions in brain extracellular space. Biophys J. 2000;78:2776–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76822-6.
Egelman DM, Montague PR. Calcium dynamics in the extracellular space of mammalian neural tissue. Biophys J. 1999;76:1856–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(99)77345-5.
Krishnan GP, Gonzalez OC, Bazhenov M. Origin of slow spontaneous resting-state neuronal fluctuations in brain networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:6858–63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715841115.
Ding F, O’Donnell J, Xu Q, Kang N, Goldman N, Nedergaard M. Changes in the composition of brain interstitial ions control the sleep-wake cycle. Science. 2016;352:550–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad4821.
Larsen BR, Stoica A, MacAulay N. Developmental maturation of activity-induced K(+) and pH transients and the associated extracellular space dynamics in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol. 2019;597:583–97. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP276768.
Rasmussen R, Nicholas E, Petersen NC, Dietz AG, Xu Q, Sun Q, Nedergaard M. Cortex-wide changes in extracellular potassium ions parallel brain state transitions in awake behaving mice. Cell Rep. 2019;28:1182-1194.e1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.082.
Ransom BR, Yamate CL, Connors BW. Activity-dependent shrinkage of extracellular space in rat optic nerve: a developmental study. J Neurosci. 1985;5:532–5. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-02-00532.1985.
Shi C, Lei Y, Han H, Zuo L, Yan J, He Q, Yuan L, Liu H, Xu G, Xu W. Transportation in the interstitial space of the brain can be regulated by neuronal excitation. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17673. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17673.
Li Y, Han H, Shi K, Cui D, Yang J, Alberts IL, Yuan L, Zhao G, Wang R, Cai X, et al. The mechanism of downregulated interstitial fluid drainage following neuronal excitation. Aging Dis. 2020;11:1407–22. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2020.0224.
Paviolo C, Ferreira JS, Lee A, Hunter D, Calaresu I, Nandi S, Groc L, Cognet L. Near-infrared carbon nanotube tracking reveals the nanoscale extracellular space around synapses. Nano Lett. 2022;22:6849–56. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04259.
Jiang-Xie LF, Drieu A, Bhasiin K, Quintero D, Smirnov I, Kipnis J. Neuronal dynamics direct cerebrospinal fluid perfusion and brain clearance. Nature. 2024;627:157–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07108-6.
Pal B. Involvement of extrasynaptic glutamate in physiological and pathophysiological changes of neuronal excitability. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:2917–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2837-5.
Nyitrai G, Kekesi KA, Juhasz G. Extracellular level of GABA and Glu: in vivo microdialysis-HPLC measurements. Curr Top Med Chem. 2006;6:935–40. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802606777323674.
Arbuthnott GW, Wickens J. Space, time and dopamine. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:62–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.12.003.
Dunwiddie TV, Diao L, Proctor WR. Adenine nucleotides undergo rapid, quantitative conversion to adenosine in the extracellular space in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1997;17:7673–82. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-20-07673.1997.
Pinky NF, Wilkie CM, Barnes JR, Parsons MP. Region- and activity-dependent regulation of extracellular glutamate. J Neurosci. 2018;38:5351–66. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3213-17.2018.
Guillaumin MCC, Burdakov D. Neuropeptides as primary mediators of brain circuit connectivity. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:644313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.644313.
Long KR, Huttner WB. How the extracellular matrix shapes neural development. Open Biol. 2019;9:180216. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.180216.
Ferrer-Ferrer M, Dityatev A. Shaping synapses by the neural extracellular matrix. Front Neuroanat. 2018;12:40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2018.00040.
Dityatev A, Schachner M, Sonderegger P. The dual role of the extracellular matrix in synaptic plasticity and homeostasis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:735–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2898.
Frischknecht R, Heine M, Perrais D, Seidenbecher CI, Choquet D, Gundelfinger ED. Brain extracellular matrix affects AMPA receptor lateral mobility and short-term synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:897–904. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2338.
Chen Y, Beffert U, Ertunc M, Tang TS, Kavalali ET, Bezprozvanny I, Herz J. Reelin modulates NMDA receptor activity in cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8209–16. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1951-05.2005.
Durakoglugil MS, Wasser CR, Wong CH, Pohlkamp T, Xian X, Lane-Donovan C, Fritschle K, Naestle L, Herz J. Reelin regulates neuronal excitability through striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP(61)) and calcium permeable AMPARs in an NMDAR-dependent manner. J Neurosci. 2021;41:7340–9. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0388-21.2021.
Wiera G, Brzdak P, Lech AM, Lebida K, Jablonska J, Gmerek P, Mozrzymas JW. Integrins bidirectionally regulate the efficacy of inhibitory synaptic transmission and control GABAergic plasticity. J Neurosci. 2022;42:5830–42. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1458-21.2022.
Dembitskaya Y, Gavrilov N, Kraev I, Doronin M, Tang Y, Li L, Semyanov A. Attenuation of the extracellular matrix increases the number of synapses but suppresses synaptic plasticity through upregulation of SK channels. Cell Calcium. 2021;96:102406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2021.102406.
Arranz AM, Perkins KL, Irie F, Lewis DP, Hrabe J, Xiao F, Itano N, Kimata K, Hrabetova S, Yamaguchi Y. Hyaluronan deficiency due to Has3 knock-out causes altered neuronal activity and seizures via reduction in brain extracellular space. J Neurosci. 2014;34:6164–76. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-13.2014.
Hayani H, Song I, Dityatev A. Increased excitability and reduced excitatory synaptic input into fast-spiking CA2 interneurons after enzymatic attenuation of extracellular matrix. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00149.
Wilson MR, Satapathy S, Vendruscolo M. Extracellular protein homeostasis in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023;19:235–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-023-00786-2.
Holmes BB, DeVos SL, Kfoury N, Li M, Jacks R, Yanamandra K, Ouidja MO, Brodsky FM, Marasa J, Bagchi DP, et al. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate internalization and propagation of specific proteopathic seeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E3138-3147. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301440110.
Shackleton B, Ringland C, Abdullah L, Mullan M, Crawford F, Bachmeier C. Influence of matrix metallopeptidase 9 on beta-amyloid elimination across the blood-brain barrier. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56:8296–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01672-z.
Hernandez-Guillamon M, Mawhirt S, Blais S, Montaner J, Neubert TA, Rostagno A, Ghiso J. Sequential amyloid-beta degradation by the matrix metalloproteases MMP-2 and MMP-9. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:15078–91. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.610931.
Soria FN, Paviolo C, Doudnikoff E, Arotcarena ML, Lee A, Danne N, Mandal AK, Gosset P, Dehay B, Groc L, et al. Synucleinopathy alters nanoscale organization and diffusion in the brain extracellular space through hyaluronan remodeling. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17328-9.
Wilson CS, Mongin AA. Cell volume control in healthy brain and neuropathologies. Curr Top Membr. 2018;81:385–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctm.2018.07.006.
Rungta RL, Choi HB, Tyson JR, Malik A, Dissing-Olesen L, Lin PJC, Cain SM, Cullis PR, Snutch TP, MacVicar BA. The cellular mechanisms of neuronal swelling underlying cytotoxic edema. Cell. 2015;161:610–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.029.
Murphy TR, Davila D, Cuvelier N, Young LR, Lauderdale K, Binder DK, Fiacco TA. Hippocampal and cortical pyramidal neurons swell in parallel with astrocytes during acute hypoosmolar stress. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00275.
Karwoski CJ, Lu HK, Newman EA. Spatial buffering of light-evoked potassium increases by retinal Muller (glial) cells. Science. 1989;244:578–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2785716.
Walch E, Murphy TR, Cuvelier N, Aldoghmi M, Morozova C, Donohue J, Young G, Samant A, Garcia S, Alvarez C, et al. Astrocyte-selective volume increase in elevated extracellular potassium conditions is mediated by the Na(+)/K(+) ATPase and occurs independently of aquaporin 4. ASN Neuro. 2020;12:1759091420967152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759091420967152.
Toft-Bertelsen TL, Larsen BR, Christensen SK, Khandelia H, Waagepetersen HS, MacAulay N. Clearance of activity-evoked K(+) transients and associated glia cell swelling occur independently of AQP4: a study with an isoform-selective AQP4 inhibitor. Glia. 2021;69:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23851.
MacAulay N. Molecular mechanisms of K(+) clearance and extracellular space shrinkage-Glia cells as the stars. Glia. 2020;68:2192–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23824.
Illarionova NB, Gunnarson E, Li Y, Brismar H, Bondar A, Zelenin S, Aperia A. Functional and molecular interactions between aquaporins and Na, K-ATPase. Neuroscience. 2010;168:915–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.062.
Stokum JA, Kwon MS, Woo SK, Tsymbalyuk O, Vennekens R, Gerzanich V, Simard JM. SUR1-TRPM4 and AQP4 form a heteromultimeric complex that amplifies ion/water osmotic coupling and drives astrocyte swelling. Glia. 2018;66:108–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23231.
Walch E, Fiacco TA. Honey, I shrunk the extracellular space: measurements and mechanisms of astrocyte swelling. Glia. 2022;70:2013–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.24224.
Reed MM, Blazer-Yost B. Channels and transporters in astrocyte volume regulation in health and disease. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2022;56:12–30. https://doi.org/10.33594/000000495.
Yao X, Hrabetova S, Nicholson C, Manley GT. Aquaporin-4-deficient mice have increased extracellular space without tortuosity change. J Neurosci. 2008;28:5460–4. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0257-08.2008.
Teng Z, Wang A, Wang P, Wang R, Wang W, Han H. The effect of aquaporin-4 knockout on interstitial fluid flow and the structure of the extracellular space in the deep brain. Aging Dis. 2018;9:808–16. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2017.1115.
Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, Benveniste H, Vates GE, Deane R, Goldman SA, et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:147ra111. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748.
Benveniste H, Liu X, Koundal S, Sanggaard S, Lee H, Wardlaw J. The glymphatic system and waste clearance with brain aging: a review. Gerontology. 2019;65:106–19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490349.
Iliff JJ, Lee H, Yu M, Feng T, Logan J, Nedergaard M, Benveniste H. Brain-wide pathway for waste clearance captured by contrast-enhanced MRI. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1299–309. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI67677.
Ringstad G, Valnes LM, Dale AM, Pripp AH, Vatnehol SS, Emblem KE, Mardal KA, Eide PK. Brain-wide glymphatic enhancement and clearance in humans assessed with MRI. JCI Insight. 2018;3(13):e121537. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121537.
Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Chen MJ, Liao Y, Thiyagarajan M, O’Donnell J, Christensen DJ, Nicholson C, Iliff JJ, et al. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science. 2013;342:373–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241224.
Hablitz LM, Vinitsky HS, Sun Q, Staeger FF, Sigurdsson B, Mortensen KN, Lilius TO, Nedergaard M. Increased glymphatic influx is correlated with high EEG delta power and low heart rate in mice under anesthesia. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaav5447. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav5447.
Ju YS, Ooms SJ, Sutphen C, Macauley SL, Zangrilli MA, Jerome G, Fagan AM, Mignot E, Zempel JM, Claassen J, et al. Slow wave sleep disruption increases cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta levels. Brain. 2017;140:2104–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx148.
Shokri-Kojori E, Wang GJ, Wiers CE, Demiral SB, Guo M, Kim SW, Lindgren E, Ramirez V, Zehra A, Freeman C, et al. beta-Amyloid accumulation in the human brain after one night of sleep deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:4483–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721694115.
Holth JK, Fritschi SK, Wang C, Pedersen NP, Cirrito JR, Mahan TE, Finn MB, Manis M, Geerling JC, Fuller PM, et al. The sleep-wake cycle regulates brain interstitial fluid tau in mice and CSF tau in humans. Science. 2019;363:880–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2546.
Nedergaard M, Goldman SA. Glymphatic failure as a final common pathway to dementia. Science. 2020;370:50–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8739.
Bellesi M, de Vivo L, Tononi G, Cirelli C. Effects of sleep and wake on astrocytes: clues from molecular and ultrastructural studies. BMC Biol. 2015;13:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0176-7.
Hablitz LM, Pla V, Giannetto M, Vinitsky HS, Staeger FF, Metcalfe T, Nguyen R, Benrais A, Nedergaard M. Circadian control of brain glymphatic and lymphatic fluid flow. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4411. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18115-2.
Caley DW, Maxwell DS. Development of the blood vessels and extracellular spaces during postnatal maturation of rat cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1970;138:31–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901380104.
Lehmenkuhler A, Sykova E, Svoboda J, Zilles K, Nicholson C. Extracellular space parameters in the rat neocortex and subcortical white matter during postnatal development determined by diffusion analysis. Neuroscience. 1993;55:339–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(93)90503-8.
Shulyakov AV, Cenkowski SS, Buist RJ, Del Bigio MR. Age-dependence of intracranial viscoelastic properties in living rats. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:484–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.012.
McKenna M, Shackelford D, Ferreira Pontes H, Ball B, Nance E. Multiple particle tracking detects changes in brain extracellular matrix and predicts neurodevelopmental age. ACS Nano. 2021;15:8559–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c00394.
Ransom BR, Carlini WG, Connors BW. Brain extracellular space: developmental studies in rat optic nerve. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;481:87–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb27141.x.
Koppe G, Bruckner G, Brauer K, Hartig W, Bigl V. Developmental patterns of proteoglycan-containing extracellular matrix in perineuronal nets and neuropil of the postnatal rat brain. Cell Tissue Res. 1997;288:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004410050790.
Sheppard AM, Hamilton SK, Pearlman AL. Changes in the distribution of extracellular matrix components accompany early morphogenetic events of mammalian cortical development. J Neurosci. 1991;11:3928–42. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-12-03928.1991.
Amin S, Borrell V. The extracellular matrix in the evolution of cortical development and folding. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:604448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.604448.
Fawcett JW, Oohashi T, Pizzorusso T. The roles of perineuronal nets and the perinodal extracellular matrix in neuronal function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20:451–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0196-3.
McRae PA, Porter BE. The perineuronal net component of the extracellular matrix in plasticity and epilepsy. Neurochem Int. 2012;61:963–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2012.08.007.
Gundelfinger ED, Frischknecht R, Choquet D, Heine M. Converting juvenile into adult plasticity: a role for the brain’s extracellular matrix. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;31:2156–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07253.x.
Dityatev A, Seidenbecher CI, Schachner M. Compartmentalization from the outside: the extracellular matrix and functional microdomains in the brain. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:503–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2010.08.003.
Amiry-Moghaddam M, Otsuka T, Hurn PD, Traystman RJ, Haug FM, Froehner SC, Adams ME, Neely JD, Agre P, Ottersen OP, et al. An alpha-syntrophin-dependent pool of AQP4 in astroglial end-feet confers bidirectional water flow between blood and brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2106–11. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0437946100.
Munk AS, Wang W, Bechet NB, Eltanahy AM, Cheng AX, Sigurdsson B, Benraiss A, Mae MA, Kress BT, Kelley DH, et al. PDGF-B is required for development of the glymphatic system. Cell Rep. 2019;26:2955-2969.e2953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.050.
Rasmussen MK, Mestre H, Nedergaard M. Fluid transport in the brain. Physiol Rev. 2022;102:1025–151. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2020.
Ding D, Wang X, Li Q, Li L, Wu J. Research on the glial-lymphatic system and its relationship with Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:605586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.605586.
Kamagata K, Andica C, Takabayashi K, Saito Y, Taoka T, Nozaki H, Kikuta J, Fujita S, Hagiwara A, Kamiya K, et al. Association of MRI indices of glymphatic system with amyloid deposition and cognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2022;99:e2648-2660. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201300.
Simon M, Wang MX, Ismail O, Braun M, Schindler AG, Reemmer J, Wang Z, Haveliwala MA, O’Boyle RP, Han WY, et al. Loss of perivascular aquaporin-4 localization impairs glymphatic exchange and promotes amyloid beta plaque formation in mice. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-00999-5.
Kress BT, Iliff JJ, Xia M, Wang M, Wei HS, Zeppenfeld D, Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Liew JA, et al. Impairment of paravascular clearance pathways in the aging brain. Ann Neurol. 2014;76:845–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24271.
Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Marshall C, Wu T, Xiao M. Deep cervical lymph node ligation aggravates AD-like pathology of APP/PS1 mice. Brain Pathol. 2019;29:176–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12656.
Rainey-Smith SR, Mazzucchelli GN, Villemagne VL, Brown BM, Porter T, Weinborn M, Bucks RS, Milicic L, Sohrabi HR, Taddei K, et al. Genetic variation in Aquaporin-4 moderates the relationship between sleep and brain Abeta-amyloid burden. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0094-x.
Silva I, Silva J, Ferreira R, Trigo D. Glymphatic system, AQP4, and their implications in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Res Pract. 2021;3:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-021-00102-7.
Tureckova J, Kamenicka M, Kolenicova D, Filipi T, Hermanova Z, Kriska J, Meszarosova L, Pukajova B, Valihrach L, Androvic P, et al. Compromised astrocyte swelling/volume regulation in the hippocampus of the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:783120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.783120.
Feng W, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Xu H, Wu T, Marshall C, Gao J, Xiao M. Microglia prevent beta-amyloid plaque formation in the early stage of an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model with suppression of glymphatic clearance. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12:125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00688-1.
Sun Y, Xu S, Jiang M, Liu X, Yang L, Bai Z, Yang Q. Role of the extracellular matrix in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:707466. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.707466.
Reed MJ, Damodarasamy M, Pathan JL, Chan CK, Spiekerman C, Wight TN, Banks WA, Day AJ, Vernon RB, Keene CD. Increased hyaluronan and TSG-6 in association with neuropathologic changes of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67:91–102. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180797.
Yang J, Fu Z, Zhang X, Xiong M, Meng L, Zhang Z. TREM2 ectodomain and its soluble form in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01878-2.
Barini E, Plotzky G, Mordashova Y, Hoppe J, Rodriguez-Correa E, Julier S, LePrieult F, Mairhofer I, Mezler M, Biesinger S, et al. Tau in the brain interstitial fluid is fragmented and seeding-competent. Neurobiol Aging. 2022;109:64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.09.013.
Harrison IF, Ismail O, Machhada A, Colgan N, Ohene Y, Nahavandi P, Ahmed Z, Fisher A, Meftah S, Murray TK, et al. Impaired glymphatic function and clearance of tau in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Brain. 2020;143:2576–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa179.
Wu J, Carlock C, Shim J, Moreno-Gonzalez I, Glass W 2nd, Ross A, Barichello T, Quevedo J, Lou Y. Requirement of brain interleukin33 for aquaporin4 expression in astrocytes and glymphatic drainage of abnormal tau. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:5912–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00992-0.
Keir LHM, Breen DP. New awakenings: current understanding of sleep dysfunction and its treatment in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 2020;267:288–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09651-z.
Morawska MM, Moreira CG, Ginde VR, Valko PO, Weiss T, Buchele F, Imbach LL, Masneuf S, Kollarik S, Prymaczok N, et al. Slow-wave sleep affects synucleinopathy and regulates proteostatic processes in mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(623):eabe7099. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abe7099.
Buccellato FR, D’Anca M, Serpente M, Arighi A, Galimberti D. The role of glymphatic system in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Biomedicines. 2022;10(9):2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092261.
Zou W, Pu T, Feng W, Lu M, Zheng Y, Du R, Xiao M, Hu G. Blocking meningeal lymphatic drainage aggravates Parkinson’s disease-like pathology in mice overexpressing mutated α-synuclein. Transl Neurodegener. 2019;8:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-019-0147-y.
McKnight CD, Trujillo P, Lopez AM, Petersen K, Considine C, Lin YC, Yan Y, Kang H, Donahue MJ, Claassen DO. Diffusion along perivascular spaces reveals evidence supportive of glymphatic function impairment in Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021;89:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.06.004.
Si X, Guo T, Wang Z, Fang Y, Gu L, Cao L, Yang W, Gao T, Song Z, Tian J, et al. Neuroimaging evidence of glymphatic system dysfunction in possible REM sleep behavior disorder and Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022;8:54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00316-9.
Ma X, Li S, Li C, Wang R, Chen M, Chen H, Su W. Diffusion tensor imaging along the perivascular space index in different stages of Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:773951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.773951.
Donahue EK, Murdos A, Jakowec MW, Sheikh-Bahaei N, Toga AW, Petzinger GM, Sepehrband F. Global and regional changes in perivascular space in idiopathic and familial Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2021;36:1126–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28473.
Shen T, Yue Y, Ba F, He T, Tang X, Hu X, Pu J, Huang C, Lv W, Zhang B, et al. Diffusion along perivascular spaces as marker for impairment of glymphatic system in Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022;8:174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00437-1.
Si X, Dai S, Fang Y, Tang J, Wang Z, Li Y, Song Z, Chen Y, Liu Y, Zhao G, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibition prevents aquaporin-4 depolarization-mediated glymphatic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. J Adv Res. 2023;56:125–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2023.03.004.
Cui H, Wang W, Zheng X, Xia D, Liu H, Qin C, Tian H, Teng J. Decreased AQP4 expression aggravates a-synuclein pathology in Parkinson’s disease mice, possibly via impaired glymphatic clearance. J Mol Neurosci. 2021;71:2500–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-021-01836-4.
Zhang Y, Zhang C, He XZ, Li ZH, Meng JC, Mao RT, Li X, Xue R, Gui Q, Zhang GX, et al. Interaction between the glymphatic system and alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2023;60:2209–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03212-2.
Pasternak O, Westin CF, Bouix S, Seidman LJ, Goldstein JM, Woo TU, Petryshen TL, Mesholam-Gately RI, McCarley RW, Kikinis R, et al. Excessive extracellular volume reveals a neurodegenerative pattern in schizophrenia onset. J Neurosci. 2012;32:17365–72. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2904-12.2012.
Hegde RR, Kelly S, Lutz O, Guimond S, Karayumak SC, Mike L, Mesholam-Gately RI, Pasternak O, Kubicki M, Eack SM, et al. Association of white matter microstructure and extracellular free-water with cognitive performance in the early course of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2020;305:111159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111159.
Cetin-Karayumak S, Lyall AE, Di Biase MA, Seitz-Holland J, Zhang F, Kelly S, Elad D, Pearlson G, Tamminga CA, Sweeney JA, et al. Characterization of the extracellular free water signal in schizophrenia using multi-site diffusion MRI harmonization. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:2030–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02068-1.
Tuozzo C, Lyall AE, Pasternak O, James ACD, Crow TJ, Kubicki M. Patients with chronic bipolar disorder exhibit widespread increases in extracellular free water. Bipolar Disord. 2018;20:523–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12588.
Lyall AE, Pasternak O, Robinson DG, Newell D, Trampush JW, Gallego JA, Fava M, Malhotra AK, Karlsgodt KH, Kubicki M, et al. Greater extracellular free-water in first-episode psychosis predicts better neurocognitive functioning. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:701–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.43.
Chen X, Fan X, Song X, Gardner M, Du F, Ongur D. White matter metabolite relaxation and diffusion abnormalities in first-episode psychosis: a longitudinal study. Schizophr Bull. 2022;48:712–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab149.
Wu YF, Sytwu HK, Lung FW. Polymorphisms in the human Aquaporin 4 gene are associated with schizophrenia in the southern Chinese Han population: a case-control study. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:596. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00596.
Zhang D, Li X, Li B. Glymphatic system dysfunction in central nervous system diseases and mood disorders. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:873697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.873697.
Rodrigues-Amorim D, Rivera-Baltanas T, Fernandez-Palleiro P, Iglesias-Martinez-Almeida M, Freiria-Martinez L, Jarmardo-Rodriguez C, Del Carmen V-C, Alvarez-Ariza M, Lopez-Garcia M, de Las HE, et al. Changes in the brain extracellular matrix composition in schizophrenia: a pathophysiological dysregulation and a potential therapeutic target. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2022;42:1921–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-021-01073-8.
Ray MH, Williams BR, Kuppe MK, Bryant CD, Logan RW. A glitch in the matrix: the role of extracellular matrix remodeling in opioid use disorder. Front Integr Neurosci. 2022;16:899637. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.899637.
Pantazopoulos H, Katsel P, Haroutunian V, Chelini G, Klengel T, Berretta S. Molecular signature of extracellular matrix pathology in schizophrenia. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53:3960–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15009.
Han W, Song Y, Rocha M, Shi Y. Ischemic brain edema: emerging cellular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Neurobiol Dis. 2023;178:106029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106029.
van Putten M, Fahlke C, Kafitz KW, Hofmeijer J, Rose CR. Dysregulation of astrocyte ion homeostasis and its relevance for stroke-induced brain damage. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115679.
Risher WC, Andrew RD, Kirov SA. Real-time passive volume responses of astrocytes to acute osmotic and ischemic stress in cortical slices and in vivo revealed by two-photon microscopy. Glia. 2009;57:207–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20747.
Mestre H, Du T, Sweeney AM, Liu G, Samson AJ, Peng W, Mortensen KN, Staeger FF, Bork PAR, Bashford L, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid influx drives acute ischemic tissue swelling. Science. 2020;6483:eaax7171. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax7171.
Gaberel T, Gakuba C, Goulay R, Martinez De Lizarrondo S, Hanouz JL, Emery E, Touze E, Vivien D, Gauberti M. Impaired glymphatic perfusion after strokes revealed by contrast-enhanced MRI: a new target for fibrinolysis? Stroke. 2014;45:3092–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006617.
Pu T, Zou W, Feng W, Zhang Y, Wang L, Wang H, Xiao M. Persistent malfunction of glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic drainage in a mouse model of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Exp Neurobiol. 2019;28:104–18. https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2019.28.1.104.
Back DB, Choi BR, Han JS, Kwon KJ, Choi DH, Shin CY, Lee J, Kim HY. Characterization of tauopathy in a rat model of post-stroke dementia combining acute infarct and chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186929.
Toh CH, Siow TY. Glymphatic dysfunction in patients with ischemic stroke. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:756249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.756249.
Zhang C, Sha J, Cai L, Xia Y, Li D, Zhao H, Meng C, Xu K. Evaluation of the glymphatic system using the DTI-ALPS index in patients with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:2694316. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2694316.
Lv T, Zhao B, Hu Q, Zhang X. The glymphatic system: a novel therapeutic target for stroke treatment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:689098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.689098.
Jha RM, Kochanek PM, Simard JM. Pathophysiology and treatment of cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury. Neuropharmacology. 2019;145:230–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.08.004.
Hutchinson EB, Schwerin SC, Avram AV, Juliano SL, Pierpaoli C. Diffusion MRI and the detection of alterations following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res. 2018;96:612–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24065.
Park JH, Bae YJ, Kim JS, Jung WS, Choi JW, Roh TH, You N, Kim SH, Han M. Glymphatic system evaluation using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuroradiology. 2023;65:551–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03073-x.
Butler T, Zhou L, Ozsahin I, Wang XH, Garetti J, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Jamison K, de Leon MJ, Li Y, et al. Glymphatic clearance estimated using diffusion tensor imaging along perivascular spaces is reduced after traumatic brain injury and correlates with plasma neurofilament light, a biomarker of injury severity. Brain Commun. 2023;5:fcad134. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad134.
Yang DX, Sun Z, Yu MM, Zou QQ, Li PY, Zhang JK, Wu X, Li YH, Wang ML. Associations of MRI-derived glymphatic system impairment with global white matter damage and cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a DTI-ALPS study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;59:639–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28797.
Hicks AJ, Sinclair B, Shultz SR, Pham W, Silbert LC, Schwartz DL, Rowe CC, Ponsford JL, Law M, Spitz G. Associations of enlarged perivascular spaces with brain lesions, brain age, and clinical outcomes in chronic traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2023;101:e63–73. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207370.
Li L, Chopp M, Ding G, Davoodi-Bojd E, Zhang L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Jiang Q. MRI detection of impairment of glymphatic function in rat after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2020;1747:147062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147062.
Iliff JJ, Chen MJ, Plog BA, Zeppenfeld DM, Soltero M, Yang L, Singh I, Deane R, Nedergaard M. Impairment of glymphatic pathway function promotes tau pathology after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2014;34:16180–93. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3020-14.2014.
Rossi S, Picetti E, Zoerle T, Carbonara M, Zanier ER, Stocchetti N. Fluid management in acute brain injury. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18:74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0885-8.
Peters ME, Lyketsos CG. The glymphatic system’s role in traumatic brain injury-related neurodegeneration. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:2707–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02070-7.
Hussain R, Tithof J, Wang W, Cheetham-West A, Song W, Peng W, Sigurdsson B, Kim D, Sun Q, Peng S, et al. Potentiating glymphatic drainage minimizes post-traumatic cerebral oedema. Nature. 2023;623:992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06737-7.
Tong S, Xie L, Xie X, Xu J, You Y, Sun Y, Zhou S, Ma C, Jiang G, Ma F, et al. Nano-plumber reshapes glymphatic-lymphatic system to sustain microenvironment homeostasis and improve long-term prognosis after traumatic brain injury. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10:e2304284. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202304284.
Griffiths DR, Jenkins TM, Addington CP, Stabenfeldt SE, Lifshitz J. Extracellular matrix proteins are time-dependent and regional-specific markers in experimental diffuse brain injury. Brain Behav. 2020;10:e01767. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1767.
George N, Geller HM. Extracellular matrix and traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res. 2018;96:573–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24151.
Brodie MJ, Barry SJ, Bamagous GA, Norrie JD, Kwan P. Patterns of treatment response in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Neurology. 2012;78:1548–54. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182563b19.
Colbourn R, Naik A, Hrabetova S. ECS dynamism and its influence on neuronal excitability and seizures. Neurochem Res. 2019;44:1020–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02773-w.
Slais K, Vorisek I, Zoremba N, Homola A, Dmytrenko L, Sykova E. Brain metabolism and diffusion in the rat cerebral cortex during pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Exp Neurol. 2008;209:145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.09.008.
Colbourn R, Hrabe J, Nicholson C, Perkins M, Goodman JH, Hrabetova S. Rapid volume pulsation of the extracellular space coincides with epileptiform activity in mice and depends on the NBCe1 transporter. J Physiol. 2021;599:3195–220. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP281544.
Murphy TR, Binder DK, Fiacco TA. Turning down the volume: astrocyte volume change in the generation and termination of epileptic seizures. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;104:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2017.04.016.
Alcoreza OB, Patel DC, Tewari BP, Sontheimer H. Dysregulation of ambient glutamate and glutamate receptors in epilepsy: an astrocytic perspective. Front Neurol. 2021;12:652159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.652159.
Hochman DW. The extracellular space and epileptic activity in the adult brain: explaining the antiepileptic effects of furosemide and bumetanide. Epilepsia. 2012;53(Suppl 1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03471.x.
Balashova A, Pershin V, Zaborskaya O, Tkachenko N, Mironov A, Guryev E, Kurbatov L, Gainullin M, Mukhina I. Enzymatic digestion of hyaluronan-based brain extracellular matrix in vivo can induce seizures in neonatal mice. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01033.
Lee DA, Park BS, Ko J, Park SH, Park JH, Kim IH, Lee YJ, Park KM. Glymphatic system function in patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Brain Behav. 2022;12:e2504. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2504.
Lee DA, Lee J, Park KM. Glymphatic system impairment in patients with status epilepticus. Neuroradiology. 2022;64:2335–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03018-4.
Zamecnik J. The extracellular space and matrix of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;110:435–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-005-1078-5.
Vargova L, Homola A, Zamecnik J, Tichy M, Benes V, Sykova E. Diffusion parameters of the extracellular space in human gliomas. Glia. 2003;42:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.10204.
Mohiuddin E, Wakimoto H. Extracellular matrix in glioblastoma: opportunities for emerging therapeutic approaches. Am J Cancer Res. 2021;11:3742–54.
Zamecnik J, Vargova L, Homola A, Kodet R, Sykova E. Extracellular matrix glycoproteins and diffusion barriers in human astrocytic tumours. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2004;30:338–50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-1846.2003.00541.x.
Kingsmore KM, Vaccari A, Abler D, Cui SX, Epstein FH, Rockne RC, Acton ST, Munson JM. MRI analysis to map interstitial flow in the brain tumor microenvironment. APL Bioeng. 2018;2(3):031905. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5023503.
Guan XP, Wang W, Wang AB, Teng Z, Han HB. Brain interstitial fluid drainage alterations in glioma-bearing rats. Aging Dis. 2018;9:228–34. https://doi.org/10.14336/Ad.2017.0415.
Xu D, Zhou J, Mei H, Li H, Sun WB, Xu HB. Impediment of cerebrospinal fluid drainage through glymphatic system in glioma. Front Oncol. 2022;11:790821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.790821.
Toh CH, Siow TY. Factors associated with dysfunction of glymphatic system in patients with glioma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:744318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.744318.
Chatterjee K, Atay N, Abler D, Bhargava S, Sahoo P, Rockne RC, Munson JM. Utilizing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to analyze interstitial fluid flow and transport in glioblastoma and the surrounding parenchyma in human patients. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(2):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020212.
Lassmann H, van Horssen J, Mahad D. Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:647–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.168.
Petracca M, Vancea RO, Fleysher L, Jonkman LE, Oesingmann N, Inglese M. Brain intra- and extracellular sodium concentration in multiple sclerosis: a 7 T MRI study. Brain. 2016;139:795–806. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv386.
Fournier AP, Gauberti M, Quenault A, Vivien D, Macrez R, Docagne F. Reduced spinal cord parenchymal cerebrospinal fluid circulation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39:1258–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X18754732.
Schubert JJ, Veronese M, Marchitelli L, Bodini B, Tonietto M, Stankoff B, Brooks DJ, Bertoldo A, Edison P, Turkheimer FE. Dynamic (11)C-PiB PET shows cerebrospinal fluid flow alterations in Alzheimer disease and multiple sclerosis. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1452–60. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.223834.
Rohr SO, Greiner T, Joost S, Amor S, Valk PV, Schmitz C, Kipp M. Aquaporin-4 expression during toxic and autoimmune demyelination. Cells. 2020;9(10):2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9102187.
Aoki-Yoshino K, Uchihara T, Duyckaerts C, Nakamura A, Hauw JJ, Wakayama Y. Enhanced expression of aquaporin 4 in human brain with inflammatory diseases. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;110:281–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-005-1052-2.
Tomizawa Y, Hagiwara A, Hoshino Y, Nakaya M, Kamagata K, Cossu D, Yokoyama K, Aoki S, Hattori N. The glymphatic system as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024;83:105437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2024.105437.
Liu XY, Ma GY, Wang S, Gao Q, Guo C, Wei Q, Zhou X, Chen LP. Perivascular space is associated with brain atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022;12:1004–19. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-705.
Carotenuto A, Cacciaguerra L, Pagani E, Preziosa P, Filippi M, Rocca MA. Glymphatic system impairment in multiple sclerosis: relation with brain damage and disability. Brain. 2022;145:2785–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab454.
Ghorbani S, Yong VW. The extracellular matrix as modifier of neuroinflammation and remyelination in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2021;144:1958–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab059.
Stephenson EL, Jain RW, Ghorbani S, Gorter RP, D’Mello C, Yong VW. Uncovering novel extracellular matrix transcriptome alterations in lesions of multiple sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021240.
Wu WC, Song SJ, Zhang Y, Li X. Role of extracellular vesicles in autoimmune pathogenesis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:579043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.579043.
Lu M, DiBernardo E, Parks E, Fox H, Zheng SY, Wayne E. The role of extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis and treatment of autoimmune disorders. Front Immunol. 2021;12:566299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.566299.
Torres Iglesias G, Fernandez-Fournier M, Botella L, Piniella D, Laso-Garcia F, Carmen Gomez-de Frutos M, Chamorro B, Puertas I, Tallon Barranco A, Fuentes B, et al. Brain and immune system-derived extracellular vesicles mediate regulation of complement system, extracellular matrix remodeling, brain repair and antigen tolerance in Multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;113:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.06.025.
Thomas JH. Theoretical analysis of wake/sleep changes in brain solute transport suggests a flow of interstitial fluid. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022;19:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00325-z.
Zhao G, Han H, Yang J, Sun M, Cui D, Li Y, Gao Y, Zou J. Brain interstitial fluid drainage and extracellular space affected by inhalational isoflurane: in comparison with intravenous sedative dexmedetomidine and pentobarbital sodium. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;63:1363–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-019-1633-3.
Soria FN, Miguelez C, Penagarikano O, Tonnesen J. Current techniques for investigating the brain extracellular space. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:570750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.570750.
Van Harreveld A, Crowell J, Malhotra SK. A study of extracellular space in central nervous tissue by freeze-substitution. J Cell Biol. 1965;25:117–37. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.25.1.117.
Korogod N, Petersen CC, Knott GW. Ultrastructural analysis of adult mouse neocortex comparing aldehyde perfusion with cryo fixation. Elife. 2015;4:e05793. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.
Lu X, Han X, Meirovitch Y, Sjostedt E, Schalek RL, Lichtman JW. Preserving extracellular space for high-quality optical and ultrastructural studies of whole mammalian brains. Cell Rep Methods. 2023;3:100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100520.
Bushby AJ, P’Ng KM, Young RD, Pinali C, Knupp C, Quantock AJ. Imaging three-dimensional tissue architectures by focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:845–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.332.
Huang X, Li K, Liu Y, Yang C, Han H. Quantitative measurement of brain extracellular space with three-dimensional electron microscopy imaging. Sens Imaging. 2023;24:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-022-00408-z.
Vidotto M, Bernardini A, Trovatelli M, De Momi E, Dini D. On the microstructural origin of brain white matter hydraulic permeability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(36):e2105328118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105328118.
Hrabe J, Hrabetova S. Time-resolved integrative optical imaging of diffusion during spreading depression. Biophys J. 2019;117:1783–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.08.031.
Iliff JJ, Wang M, Zeppenfeld DM, Venkataraman A, Plog BA, Liao Y, Deane R, Nedergaard M. Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain. J Neurosci. 2013;33:18190–9. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1592-13.2013.
Paviolo C, Cognet L. Near-infrared nanoscopy with carbon-based nanoparticles for the exploration of the brain extracellular space. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;153:105328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105328.
Velicky P, Miguel E, Michalska JM, Lyudchik J, Wei D, Lin Z, Watson JF, Troidl J, Beyer J, Ben-Simon Y, et al. Dense 4D nanoscale reconstruction of living brain tissue. Nat Methods. 2023;20:1256–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01936-6.
Grassi D, Idziak A, Lee A, Calaresu I, Sibarita JB, Cognet L, Nagerl UV, Groc L. Nanoscale and functional heterogeneity of the hippocampal extracellular space. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112478.
Nicholson C, Tao L. Hindered diffusion of high molecular weight compounds in brain extracellular microenvironment measured with integrative optical imaging. Biophys J. 1993;65:2277–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81324-9.
Bohr T, Hjorth PG, Holst SC, Hrabetova S, Kiviniemi V, Lilius T, Lundgaard I, Mardal KA, Martens EA, Mori Y, et al. The glymphatic system: Current understanding and modeling. iScience. 2022;25:104987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104987.
Yoshida S, Kisley L. Super-resolution fluorescence imaging of extracellular environments. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2021;257:119767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2021.119767.
Fuhrmann M, Gockel N, Arizono M, Dembitskaya Y, Nagerl UV, Pennacchietti F, Damenti M, Testa I, Willig KI. Super-resolution microscopy opens new doors to life at the nanoscale. J Neurosci. 2022;42:8488–97. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1125-22.2022.
Pfeiffer T, Poll S, Bancelin S, Angibaud J, Inavalli VK, Keppler K, Mittag M, Fuhrmann M, Nagerl UV. Chronic 2P-STED imaging reveals high turnover of dendritic spines in the hippocampus in vivo. Elife. 2018;7:e34700. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34700.
Calovi S, Soria FN, Tonnesen J. Super-resolution STED microscopy in live brain tissue. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;156:105420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105420.
Arizono M, Inavalli V, Bancelin S, Fernandez-Monreal M, Nagerl UV. Super-resolution shadow imaging reveals local remodeling of astrocytic microstructures and brain extracellular space after osmotic challenge. Glia. 2021;69:1605–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23995.
Paviolo C, Soria FN, Ferreira JS, Lee A, Groc L, Bezard E, Cognet L. Nanoscale exploration of the extracellular space in the live brain by combining single carbon nanotube tracking and super-resolution imaging analysis. Methods. 2020;174:91–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.03.005.
Arizono M, Idziak A, Quici F, Nagerl UV. Getting sharper: the brain under the spotlight of super-resolution microscopy. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33:148–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2022.06.011.
Sykova E, Nicholson C. Diffusion in brain extracellular space. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:1277–340. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00027.2007.
Odackal J, Colbourn R, Odackal NJ, Tao L, Nicholson C, Hrabetova S. Real-time iontophoresis with tetramethylammonium to quantify volume fraction and tortuosity of brain extracellular space. J Vis Exp. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3791/55755.
Nicholson C, Phillips JM. Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular microenvironment of the rat cerebellum. J Physiol. 1981;321:225–57. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013981.
Chen KC, Zhou Y, Zhao HH. Time-resolved quantification of the dynamic extracellular space in the brain during short-lived event: methodology and simulations. J Neurophysiol. 2019;121:1718–34. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00347.2018.
Alshuhri MS, Gallagher L, Work LM, Holmes WM. Direct imaging of glymphatic transport using H217O MRI. JCI Insight. 2021;6(10):e141159. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.141159.
Taoka T, Kawai H, Nakane T, Abe T, Nakamichi R, Ito R, Sato Y, Sakai M, Naganawa S. Diffusion analysis of fluid dynamics with incremental strength of motion proving gradient (DANDYISM) to evaluate cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Jpn J Radiol. 2021;39:315–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-01075-4.
Taoka T, Masutani Y, Kawai H, Nakane T, Matsuoka K, Yasuno F, Kishimoto T, Naganawa S. Evaluation of glymphatic system activity with the diffusion MR technique: diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) in Alzheimer’s disease cases. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35:172–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0617-z.
Plewes DB, Kucharczyk W. Physics of MRI: a primer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:1038–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23642.
Yue X, Mei Y, Zhang Y, Tong Z, Cui D, Yang J, Wang A, Wang R, Fei X, Ai L, et al. New insight into Alzheimer’s disease: light reverses Abeta-obstructed interstitial fluid flow and ameliorates memory decline in APP/PS1 mice. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019;5:671–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.007.
Mériaux S, Conti A, Larrat B. Assessing diffusion in the extra-cellular space of brain tissue by dynamic MRI mapping of contrast agent concentrations. Front Phys. 2018;6:38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00038.
Hou J, Wang W, Quan X, Liang W, Li Z, Chen D, Han H. Quantitative visualization of dynamic tracer transportation in the extracellular space of deep brain regions using tracer-based magnetic resonance imaging. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:4260–8. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.903010.
Taoka T, Naganawa S, Kawai H, Nakane T, Murata K. Can low b value diffusion weighted imaging evaluate the character of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics? Jpn J Radiol. 2019;37:135–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0790-8.
Salman MM, Kitchen P, Halsey A, Wang MX, Tornroth-Horsefield S, Conner AC, Badaut J, Iliff JJ, Bill RM. Emerging roles for dynamic aquaporin-4 subcellular relocalization in CNS water homeostasis. Brain. 2022;145:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab311.
Valenza M, Facchinetti R, Steardo L, Scuderi C. Altered waste disposal system in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: focus on astrocytic aquaporin-4. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01656.
Cheng ZJ, Dai TM, Shen YY, He JL, Li J, Tu JL. Atorvastatin pretreatment attenuates ischemic brain edema by suppressing aquaporin 4. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27:3247–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.07.011.
Pirici I, Balsanu TA, Bogdan C, Margaritescu C, Divan T, Vitalie V, Mogoanta L, Pirici D, Carare RO, Muresanu DF. Inhibition of aquaporin-4 improves the outcome of ischaemic stroke and modulates brain paravascular drainage pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;19(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010046.
Farr GW, Hall CH, Farr SM, Wade R, Detzel JM, Adams AG, Buch JM, Beahm DL, Flask CA, Xu K, et al. Functionalized phenylbenzamides inhibit aquaporin-4 reducing cerebral edema and improving outcome in two models of CNS injury. Neuroscience. 2019;404:484–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.034.
Alghanimy A, Martin C, Gallagher L, Holmes WM. The effect of a novel AQP4 facilitator, TGN-073, on glymphatic transport captured by diffusion MRI and DCE-MRI. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0282955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282955.
Huber VJ, Igarashi H, Ueki S, Kwee IL, Nakada T. Aquaporin-4 facilitator TGN-073 promotes interstitial fluid circulation within the blood-brain barrier: [17O]H2O JJVCPE MRI study. NeuroReport. 2018;29:697–703. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000990.
Lohela TJ, Lilius TO, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic system: implications for drugs for central nervous system diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21:763–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00500-9.
Xia Y, Khalid W, Yin Z, Huang G, Bikson M, Fu BM. Modulation of solute diffusivity in brain tissue as a novel mechanism of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Sci Rep. 2020;10:18488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75460-4.
Lin Y, Jin J, Lv R, Luo Y, Dai W, Li W, Tang Y, Wang Y, Ye X, Lin WJ. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the brain’s drainage efficiency in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021;9:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-021-01198-3.
Ye D, Chen S, Liu Y, Weixel C, Hu Z, Yuan J, Chen H. Mechanically manipulating glymphatic transport by ultrasound combined with microbubbles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120:e2212933120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2212933120.
Hersh DS, Nguyen BA, Dancy JG, Adapa AR, Winkles JA, Woodworth GF, Kim AJ, Frenkel V. Pulsed ultrasound expands the extracellular and perivascular spaces of the brain. Brain Res. 2016;1646:543–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.040.
Cai X, He Q, Wang W, Li C, Wang H, Yin F, Li T, Kong D, Jia Y, Li H, et al. Epidural pulsation accelerates the drainage of brain interstitial fluid. Aging Dis. 2023;14:219–28. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2022.0609.
Zhao G, Han H, Wang W, Jia K. Propofol rather than isoflurane accelerates the interstitial fluid drainage in the deep rat brain. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18:652–9. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.54320.
Chase HW, Boudewyn MA, Carter CS, Phillips ML. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0499-9.
Luo Y, Yang W, Li N, Yang X, Zhu B, Wang C, Hou W, Wang X, Wen H, Tian X. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation can improve spatial learning and memory and attenuate Abeta(42) burden at the early stage of Alzheimer’s disease in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00134.
Luo Y, Yang H, Yan X, Wu Y, Wei G, Wu X, Tian X, Xiong Y, Wu G, Wen H. Transcranial direct current stimulation alleviates neurovascular unit dysfunction in mice with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:857415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.857415.
Luo YP, Liu Z, Wang C, Yang XF, Wu XY, Tian XL, Wen HZ. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation alleviates cognitive impairment in an APP/PS1 model of Alzheimer’s disease in the preclinical stage. Neural Regen Res. 2022;17:2278–85. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.337053.
Gondard E, Soto-Montenegro ML, Cassol A, Lozano AM, Hamani C. Transcranial direct current stimulation does not improve memory deficits or alter pathological hallmarks in a rodent model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;114:93–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.04.016.
Adaikkan C, Tsai LH. Gamma entrainment: impact on neurocircuits, glia, and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43:24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.11.001.
Liu Q, Contreras A, Afaq MS, Yang W, Hsu DK, Russell M, Lyeth B, Zanto TP, Zhao M. Intensity-dependent gamma electrical stimulation regulates microglial activation, reduces beta-amyloid load, and facilitates memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Biosci. 2023;13:138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-023-01085-5.
Liang PZ, Li L, Zhang YN, Shen Y, Zhang LL, Zhou J, Wang ZJ, Wang S, Yang S. Electroacupuncture improves clearance of amyloid-beta through the glymphatic system in the SAMP8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Plast. 2021;2021:9960304. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9960304.
Wu C, Lin T, Ding Q, Zhang N, Ou ZT, Cai GY, Chen HY, Xu JY, Li G, Pei Z, et al. Continuous theta-burst stimulation promotes paravascular CSF-interstitial fluid exchange through regulation of Aquaporin-4 polarization in APP/PS1 mice. Mediators Inflamm. 2022;2022:2140524. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2140524.
Aryal M, Azadian MM, Hart AR, Macedo N, Zhou Q, Rosenthal EL, Airan RD. Noninvasive ultrasonic induction of cerebrospinal fluid flow enhances intrathecal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2022;349:434–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.06.067.
Tatti E, Rossi S, Innocenti I, Rossi A, Santarnecchi E. Non-invasive brain stimulation of the aging brain: state of the art and future perspectives. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;29:66–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.05.006.
Romero MC, Davare M, Armendariz M, Janssen P. Neural effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation at the single-cell level. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10638-7.
Sommer M, Ciocca M, Chieffo R, Hammond P, Neef A, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Hannah R. TMS of primary motor cortex with a biphasic pulse activates two independent sets of excitable neurones. Brain Stimul. 2018;11:558–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.01.001.
Siebner HR, Funke K, Aberra AS, Antal A, Bestmann S, Chen R, Classen J, Davare M, Di Lazzaro V, Fox PT, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: what is stimulated? - a consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022;140:59–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022.
Hannah R, Rocchi L, Tremblay S, Wilson E, Rothwell JC. Pulse width biases the balance of excitation and inhibition recruited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2020;13:536–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.011.
Hannah R, Rothwell JC. Pulse duration as well as current direction determines the specificity of transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex during contraction. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.09.008.
Di Lazzaro V, Bella R, Benussi A, Bologna M, Borroni B, Capone F, Chen KS, Chen R, Chistyakov AV, Classen J, et al. Diagnostic contribution and therapeutic perspectives of transcranial magnetic stimulation in dementia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132:2568–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.035.
Mehta UM, Naik SS, Thanki MV, Thirthalli J. Investigational and therapeutic applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1076-2.
Casanova MF, Shaban M, Ghazal M, El-Baz AS, Casanova EL, Opris I, Sokhadze EM. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy on evoked and induced gamma oscillations in children with autism spectrum disorder. Brain Sci. 2020;10(7):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070423.
Liu DX, He X, Wu D, Zhang Q, Yang C, Liang FY, He XF, Dai GY, Pei Z, Lan Y, et al. Continuous theta burst stimulation facilitates the clearance efficiency of the glymphatic pathway in a mouse model of sleep deprivation. Neurosci Lett. 2017;653:189–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.064.
Liu Y, Liu X, Sun P, Li J, Nie M, Gong J, He A, Zhao M, Yang C, Wang Z. rTMS treatment for abrogating intracerebral hemorrhage-induced brain parenchymal metabolite clearance dysfunction in male mice by regulating intracranial lymphatic drainage. Brain Behav. 2023;13:e3062. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3062.
Wu C, Zhang Q, Feng YW, Zhang N, Liu Q, Ou ZT, Lin T, Ding Q, Li G, Pei Z, et al. GABA promotes interstitial fluid clearance in an AQP4-dependent manner by activating the GABA(A) R. J Neurochem. 2023;166:560–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15869.
Lietke S, Schmutzer M, Schwartz C, Weller J, Siller S, Aumiller M, Heckl C, Forbrig R, Niyazi M, Egensperger R, et al. Interstitial photodynamic therapy using 5-ALA for malignant glioma recurrences. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(8):1767. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081767.
Melnick K, Shin D, Dastmalchi F, Kabeer Z, Rahman M, Tran D, Ghiaseddin A. Role of laser interstitial thermal therapy in the management of primary and metastatic brain tumors. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021;22:108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-021-00912-6.
Leroy HA, Baert G, Guerin L, Delhem N, Mordon S, Reyns N, Vignion-Dewalle AS. Interstitial photodynamic therapy for glioblastomas: a standardized procedure for clinical use. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:5754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225754.
Valverde S, Vandecasteele M, Piette C, Derousseaux W, Gangarossa G, Aristieta Arbelaiz A, Touboul J, Degos B, Venance L. Deep brain stimulation-guided optogenetic rescue of Parkinsonian symptoms. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16046-6.
Yu C, Cassar IR, Sambangi J, Grill WM. Frequency-specific optogenetic deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus improves Parkinsonian motor behaviors. J Neurosci. 2020;40:4323–34. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3071-19.2020.
Park SS, Park HS, Kim CJ, Kang HS, Kim DH, Baek SS, Kim TW. Physical exercise during exposure to 40-Hz light flicker improves cognitive functions in the 3xTg mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00631-4.
Iaccarino HF, Singer AC, Martorell AJ, Rudenko A, Gao F, Gillingham TZ, Mathys H, Seo J, Kritskiy O, Abdurrob F, et al. Author Correction: Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature. 2018;562:E1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0351-4.
Soula M, Martin-Avila A, Zhang Y, Dhingra A, Nitzan N, Sadowski MJ, Gan WB, Buzsaki G. Forty-hertz light stimulation does not entrain native gamma oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26:570–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01270-2.
Murdock MH, Yang CY, Sun N, Pao PC, Blanco-Duque C, Kahn MC, Kim T, Lavoie NS, Victor MB, Islam MR, et al. Multisensory gamma stimulation promotes glymphatic clearance of amyloid. Nature. 2024;627:149–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07132-6.
Venturino A, Schulz R, De Jesus-Cortes H, Maes ME, Nagy B, Reilly-Andujar F, Colombo G, Cubero RJA, Schoot Uiterkamp FE, Bear MF, et al. Microglia enable mature perineuronal nets disassembly upon anesthetic ketamine exposure or 60-Hz light entrainment in the healthy brain. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109313.
Son G, Lee BI, Chung YJ, Park CB. Light-triggered dissociation of self-assembled beta-amyloid aggregates into small, nontoxic fragments by ruthenium (II) complex. Acta Biomater. 2018;67:147–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.048.
Fei X, Zhang Y, Mei Y, Yue X, Jiang W, Ai L, Yu Y, Luo H, Li H, Luo W, et al. Degradation of FA reduces Aβ neurotoxicity and Alzheimer-related phenotypes. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:5578–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00929-7.
Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya O, Klimova M, Iskra T, Bragin D, Abdurashitov A, Dubrovsky A, Khorovodov A, Terskov A, Blokhina I, Lezhnev N, et al. Transcranial photobiomodulation of clearance of beta-amyloid from the mouse brain: effects on the meningeal lymphatic drainage and blood oxygen saturation of the brain. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1269:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48238-1_9.
Zinchenko E, Navolokin N, Shirokov A, Khlebtsov B, Dubrovsky A, Saranceva E, Abdurashitov A, Khorovodov A, Terskov A, Mamedova A, et al. Pilot study of transcranial photobiomodulation of lymphatic clearance of beta-amyloid from the mouse brain: breakthrough strategies for non-pharmacologic therapy of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Opt Express. 2019;10:4003–17. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.004003.
Wang C, Holtzman DM. Bidirectional relationship between sleep and Alzheimer’s disease: role of amyloid, tau, and other factors. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45:104–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0478-5.
Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya O, Penzel T, Blokhina I, Khorovodov A, Fedosov I, Yu T, Karandin G, Evsukova A, Elovenko D, Adushkina V, et al. Night photostimulation of clearance of beta-amyloid from mouse brain: new strategies in preventing Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2021;10(12):3289. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123289.
Liu Y, Paliwal S, Bankiewicz KS, Bringas JR, Heart G, Mitragotri S, Prausnitz MR. Ultrasound-enhanced drug transport and distribution in the brain. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:1005–17. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9458-0.
Mano Y, Saito R, Haga Y, Matsunaga T, Zhang R, Chonan M, Haryu S, Shoji T, Sato A, Sonoda Y, et al. Intraparenchymal ultrasound application and improved distribution of infusate with convection-enhanced delivery in rodent and nonhuman primate brain. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:1490–500. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.JNS142152.
Yoo SS, Kim HC, Kim J, Kim E, Kowsari K, Van Reet J, Yoon K. Enhancement of cerebrospinal fluid tracer movement by the application of pulsed transcranial focused ultrasound. Sci Rep. 2022;12:12940. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17314-9.
Hersh DS, Anastasiadis P, Mohammadabadi A, Nguyen BA, Guo S, Winkles JA, Kim AJ, Gullapalli R, Keller A, Frenkel V, et al. MR-guided transcranial focused ultrasound safely enhances interstitial dispersion of large polymeric nanoparticles in the living brain. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192240. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192240.
Han M, Seo H, Choi H, Lee EH, Park J. Localized modification of water molecule transport after focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption in rat brain. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:685977. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685977.
Choi HJ, Han M, Jung B, Hong YR, Shin S, Lim S, Lee EH, Kim YK, Park J. Methylene blue delivery mediated by focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption reduces neural damage and amyloid-beta plaques by AQP-4 upregulation. Biomedicines. 2022;10(12):3191. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123191.
Lee Y, Choi Y, Park EJ, Kwon S, Kim H, Lee JY, Lee DS. Improvement of glymphatic-lymphatic drainage of beta-amyloid by focused ultrasound in Alzheimer’s disease model. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73151-8.
Mehta RI, Carpenter JS, Mehta RI, Haut MW, Ranjan M, Najib U, Lockman P, Wang P, D’Haese PF, Rezai AR. Blood-brain barrier opening with MRI-guided focused ultrasound elicits meningeal venous permeability in humans with early Alzheimer disease. Radiology. 2021;298:654–62. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021200643.
Karmacharya MB, Kim KH, Kim SY, Chung J, Min BH, Park SR, Choi BH. Low intensity ultrasound inhibits brain oedema formation in rats: potential action on AQP4 membrane localization. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015;41:e80-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12182.
Li H, Sun J, Zhang D, Omire-Mayor D, Lewin PA, Tong S. Low-intensity (400 mW/cm(2), 500 kHz) pulsed transcranial ultrasound preconditioning may mitigate focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.02.008.
Zheng T, Du J, Yuan Y, Wu S, Jin Y, Shi Q, Wang X, Liu L. Effect of low intensity transcranial ultrasound (LITUS) on post-traumatic brain edema in rats: evaluation by isotropic 3-dimensional T2 and multi-TE T2 weighted MRI. Front Neurol. 2020;11:578638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.578638.
O’Neill BE, Vo H, Angstadt M, Li KPC, Quinn T, Frenkel V. Pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound mediated nanoparticle delivery: mechanisms and efficacy in murine muscle. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:416–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.021.
Maresca D, Lakshmanan A, Abedi M, Bar-Zion A, Farhadi A, Lu GJ, Szablowski JO, Wu D, Yoo S, Shapiro MG. Biomolecular ultrasound and sonogenetics. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2018;9:229–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060817-084034.
Kovacs ZI, Kim S, Jikaria N, Qureshi F, Milo B, Lewis BK, Bresler M, Burks SR, Frank JA. Disrupting the blood-brain barrier by focused ultrasound induces sterile inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E75–84. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614777114.
Todd N, Angolano C, Ferran C, Devor A, Borsook D, McDannold N. Secondary effects on brain physiology caused by focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier. J Control Release. 2020;324:450–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.05.040.
Balbi M, Blackmore DG, Padmanabhan P, Gotz J. Ultrasound-mediated bioeffects in senescent mice and Alzheimer’s mouse models. Brain Sci. 2022;12(6):775. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060775.
Guo X, Yuan X, Gao L, Chen Y, Yu H, Chen W, Yang Y, Chong Z, Sun Z, Jin F, et al. Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) treatment of moyamoya syndrome: evaluation by computed tomography perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:8364–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07960-4.
Quintero-Consuegra MD, Toscano JF, Babadjouni R, Nisson P, Kayyali MN, Chang D, Almallouhi E, Saver JL, Gonzalez NR. Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis averts stroke in atherosclerotic patients with border-zone infarct: post hoc analysis from a performance criterion phase II trial. Neurosurgery. 2021;88:E312–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa563.
Bilston LE, Fletcher DF, Brodbelt AR, Stoodley MA. Arterial pulsation-driven cerebrospinal fluid flow in the perivascular space: a computational model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2003;6:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840310001606116.
Chatterjee K, Carman-Esparza CM, Munson JM. Methods to measure, model and manipulate fluid flow in brain. J Neurosci Methods. 2020;333:108541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108541.
Khadka N, Bikson M. Neurocapillary-modulation. Neuromodulation. 2022;25:1299–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13338.
Shetty AK, Zanirati G. The interstitial system of the brain in health and disease. Aging Dis. 2020;11:200–11. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2020.0103.
Nahirney PC, Tremblay ME. Brain ultrastructure: putting the pieces together. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:629503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.629503.
Gordleeva S, Kanakov O, Ivanchenko M, Zaikin A, Franceschi C. Brain aging and garbage cleaning: modelling the role of sleep, glymphatic system, and microglia senescence in the propagation of inflammaging. Semin Immunopathol. 2020;42:647–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-020-00816-x.
Li SB, Damonte VM, Chen C, Wang GX, Kebschull JM, Yamaguchi H, Bian WJ, Purmann C, Pattni R, Urban AE, et al. Hyperexcitable arousal circuits drive sleep instability during aging. Science. 2022;375:eabh3021. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh3021.
Bah TM, Goodman J, Iliff JJ. Sleep as a therapeutic target in the aging brain. Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16:554–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-019-00769-6.
Voldsbekk I, Maximov II, Zak N, Roelfs D, Geier O, Due-Tonnessen P, Elvsashagen T, Stromstad M, Bjornerud A, Groote I. Evidence for wakefulness-related changes to extracellular space in human brain white matter from diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroimage. 2020;212:116682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116682.
Zeppenfeld DM, Simon M, Haswell JD, D’Abreo D, Murchison C, Quinn JF, Grafe MR, Woltjer RL, Kaye J, Iliff JJ. Association of perivascular localization of aquaporin-4 with cognition and Alzheimer disease in aging brains. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:91–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4370.
Bown CW, Carare RO, Schrag MS, Jefferson AL. Physiology and clinical relevance of enlarged perivascular spaces in the aging brain. Neurology. 2022;98:107–17. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000013077.
Ren H, Luo C, Feng Y, Yao X, Shi Z, Liang F, Kang JX, Wan JB, Pei Z, Su H. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids promote amyloid-beta clearance from the brain through mediating the function of the glymphatic system. FASEB J. 2017;31:282–93. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201600896.
Zhang J, Zhan Z, Li X, Xing A, Jiang C, Chen Y, Shi W, An L. Intermittent fasting protects against Alzheimer’s disease possible through restoring aquaporin-4 polarity. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00395.
Lee H, Xie L, Yu M, Kang H, Feng T, Deane R, Logan J, Nedergaard M, Benveniste H. The effect of body posture on brain glymphatic transport. J Neurosci. 2015;35:11034–44. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1625-15.2015.
De Santis S, Cosa-Linan A, Garcia-Hernandez R, Dmytrenko L, Vargova L, Vorisek I, Stopponi S, Bach P, Kirsch P, Kiefer F, et al. Chronic alcohol consumption alters extracellular space geometry and transmitter diffusion in the brain. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba0154. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba0154.
Ueno M, Chiba Y, Murakami R, Matsumoto K, Kawauchi M, Fujihara R. Blood-brain barrier and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier in normal and pathological conditions. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2016;33:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-016-0255-7.
Abbott NJ. Evidence for bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid: significance for physiology and pathology. Neurochem Int. 2004;45:545–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2003.11.006.
van de Haar HJ, Burgmans S, Hofman PA, Verhey FR, Jansen JF, Backes WH. Blood-brain barrier impairment in dementia: current and future in vivo assessments. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;49:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.022.
Merlini M, Rafalski VA, Rios Coronado PE, Gill TM, Ellisman M, Muthukumar G, Subramanian KS, Ryu JK, Syme CA, Davalos D, et al. Fibrinogen induces microglia-mediated spine elimination and cognitive impairment in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Neuron. 2019;101:1099-1108.e1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.014.
Sweeney MD, Sagare AP, Zlokovic BV. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:133–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.188.
Verheggen ICM, Van Boxtel MPJ, Verhey FRJ, Jansen JFA, Backes WH. Interaction between blood-brain barrier and glymphatic system in solute clearance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;90:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.028.
Erickson MA, Hartvigson PE, Morofuji Y, Owen JB, Butterfield DA, Banks WA. Lipopolysaccharide impairs amyloid beta efflux from brain: altered vascular sequestration, cerebrospinal fluid reabsorption, peripheral clearance and transporter function at the blood–brain barrier. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-150.
Raposo G, Stahl PD. Extracellular vesicles: a new communication paradigm? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:509–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0158-7.
Graykowski DR, Wang YZ, Upadhyay A, Savas JN. The dichotomous role of extracellular vesicles in the central nervous system. iScience. 2020;23:101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101456.
Hermann DM, Peruzzotti-Jametti L, Giebel B, Pluchino S. Extracellular vesicles set the stage for brain plasticity and recovery by multimodal signalling. Brain. 2024;147:372–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awad332.
Perez-Gonzalez R, Gauthier SA, Kumar A, Levy E. The exosome secretory pathway transports amyloid precursor protein carboxyl-terminal fragments from the cell into the brain extracellular space. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:43108–15. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.404467.
Herman S, Djaldetti R, Mollenhauer B, Offen D. CSF-derived extracellular vesicles from patients with Parkinson’s disease induce symptoms and pathology. Brain. 2023;146:209–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac261.
Sardar Sinha M, Ansell-Schultz A, Civitelli L, Hildesjo C, Larsson M, Lannfelt L, Ingelsson M, Hallbeck M. Alzheimer’s disease pathology propagation by exosomes containing toxic amyloid-beta oligomers. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1868-1.
Chen F, Zou L, Dai Y, Sun J, Chen C, Zhang Y, Peng Q, Zhang Z, Xie Z, Wu H, et al. Prognostic plasma exosomal microRNA biomarkers in patients with substance use disorders presenting comorbid with anxiety and depression. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84501-5.
Kuwano N, Kato TA, Mitsuhashi M, Sato-Kasai M, Shimokawa N, Hayakawa K, Ohgidani M, Sagata N, Kubo H, Sakurai T, et al. Neuron-related blood inflammatory markers as an objective evaluation tool for major depressive disorder: an exploratory pilot case-control study. J Affect Disord. 2018;240:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.040.
Couch Y, Akbar N, Davis S, Fischer R, Dickens AM, Neuhaus AA, Burgess AI, Rothwell PM, Buchan AM. Inflammatory stroke extracellular vesicles induce macrophage activation. Stroke. 2017;48:2292–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017236.
Badhwar A, Haqqani AS. Biomarker potential of brain-secreted extracellular vesicles in blood in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020;12:e12001. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12001.
Thompson AG, Gray E, Heman-Ackah SM, Mager I, Talbot K, Andaloussi SE, Wood MJ, Turner MR. Extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative disease - pathogenesis to biomarkers. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:346–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.68.
Nieves Torres D, Lee SH. Inter-neuronal signaling mediated by small extracellular vesicles: wireless communication? Front Mol Neurosci. 2023;16:1187300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2023.1187300.
Ray L, Iliff JJ, Heys JJ. Analysis of convective and diffusive transport in the brain interstitium. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2019;16:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-019-0126-9.
Vendel E, Rottschäfer V, de Lange ECM. The need for mathematical modelling of spatial drug distribution within the brain. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2019;16:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-019-0133-x.
Modi G, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Ndesendo VMK, du Toit LC, Naidoo D. Nanotechnological applications for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. Prog Neurobiol. 2009;88:272–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.05.002.
Barua NU, Woolley M, Bienemann AS, Johnson DE, Lewis O, Wyatt MJ, Irving C, O’Sullivan S, Murray G, Fennelly C, et al. Intermittent convection-enhanced delivery to the brain through a novel transcutaneous bone-anchored port. J Neurosci Methods. 2013;214:223–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.02.007.
Anderson RCE, Kennedy B, Yanes CL, Garvin J, Needle M, Canoll P, Feldstein NA, Bruce JN. Convection-enhanced delivery of topotecan into diffuse intrinsic brainstem tumors in children: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;11:289–95. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.PEDS12142.
Adrian PK, Jamie E, Xiaomin S, Philip P, John B, Piotr H, Wade CN, William JB, Howard JF, John F, et al. Regeneration of the MPTP-lesioned dopaminergic system after convection-enhanced delivery of AAV2-GDNF. J Neurosci. 2010;30:9567. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0942-10.2010.
Stine CA, Munson JM. Convection-enhanced delivery: connection to and impact of interstitial fluid flow. Front Oncol. 2019;9:966. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00966.
Gu Z, Chen H, Zhao H, Yang W, Song Y, Li X, Wang Y, Du D, Liao H, Pan W, et al. New insight into brain disease therapy: nanomedicines-crossing blood-brain barrier and extracellular space for drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;19:1618–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2022.2139369.
Helmbrecht H, Joseph A, McKenna M, Zhang M, Nance E. Governing transport principles for nanotherapeutic application in the brain. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2020;30:112–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.08.010.
Lilius TO, Blomqvist K, Hauglund NL, Liu G, Staeger FF, Baerentzen S, Du T, Ahlstrom F, Backman JT, Kalso EA, et al. Dexmedetomidine enhances glymphatic brain delivery of intrathecally administered drugs. J Control Release. 2019;304:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.005.
Roberts DR, Albrecht MH, Collins HR, Asemani D, Chatterjee AR, Spampinato MV, Zhu X, Chimowitz MI, Antonucci MU. Effects of spaceflight on astronaut brain structure as indicated on MRI. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1746–53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705129.
Kermorgant M, Nasr N, Czosnyka M, Arvanitis DN, Hélissen O, Senard J-M, Pavy-Le Traon A. Impacts of microgravity analogs to spaceflight on cerebral autoregulation. Front Physiol. 2020;11:778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00778.
Gao Y, Han H, Du J, He Q, Jia Y, Yan J, Dai H, Cui B, Yang J, Wei X, et al. Early changes to the extracellular space in the hippocampus under simulated microgravity conditions. Sci China Life Sci. 2022;65:604–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-021-1932-3.
Barisano G, Sepehrband F, Collins HR, Jillings S, Jeurissen B, Taylor JA, Schoenmaekers C, De Laet C, Rukavishnikov I, Nosikova I, et al. The effect of prolonged spaceflight on cerebrospinal fluid and perivascular spaces of astronauts and cosmonauts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119:e2120439119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120439119.
Lee AG, Mader TH, Gibson CR, Tarver W, Rabiei P, Riascos RF, Galdamez LA, Brunstetter T. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) and the neuro-ophthalmologic effects of microgravity: a review and an update. NPJ Microgravity. 2020;6:7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-020-0097-9.
Wostyn P, Mader TH, Gibson CR, Nedergaard M. Does long-duration exposure to microgravity lead to dysregulation of the brain and ocular glymphatic systems? Eye Brain. 2022;14:49–58. https://doi.org/10.2147/EB.S354710.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This research was funded by the start-up funding of Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Y., H.H and F.L. conceived the review topic and scope. Y.Y., Y.C., J.L., L.M. and F.L. wrote and revised the manuscript. H.H provided feedback on revisions. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yong, Y., Cai, Y., Lin, J. et al. Advancement in modulation of brain extracellular space and unlocking its potential for intervention of neurological diseases. Med-X 2, 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44258-024-00021-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44258-024-00021-7