Abstract
We generalize the classical Lebesgue’s theorem and prove that the \(\ell _1\)-Cesàro means of the Fourier series of the multi-dimensional function \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\) converge to f at each strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In 1905, Lebesgue [13] proved in his famous result that the so called Fejér means
of the trigonometric Fourier series of a one-dimensional integrable function f converge to f(x) at each Lebesgue point, thus almost everywhere. Here \(\widehat{f}(k)\) denotes the kth Fourier coefficient. Some years later Riesz [17] generalized this theorem for the Cesàro means of one-dimensional integrable functions. The Cesàro summability was investigated in several papers (see e.g. Gát [5,6,7], Goginava [8,9,10], Simon [18, 19], Nagy et al. [15, 16], Weisz [22, 23] and Zygmund [27]).
In this paper, we will generalize this result to the Cesàro summability of multi-dimensional functions. More exactly, we investigate the \(\ell _1\)-Fejér means
and their generalization, the \(\ell _1\)-Cesàro means of d-dimensional functions, where \(|k|=|k_1|+\cdots +|k_d|\). These means were investigated e.g. in Berens et al. [1, 2, 14, 26], Szili and Vértesi [20]. Recently, using Hardy spaces, we [21, 22] proved that \(\sigma _nf\rightarrow f\) almost everywhere if \(f \in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^{d})\).
Here we partly characterize the set of this convergence. We generalize the Lebesgue points and introduce a new type Lebesgue points, the so called strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue points. In [24], we verified that almost every point is a strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point of \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\). Our main result reads as follows. If the Hardy–Littlewood maximal function \(\mathcal {M}^{\omega }f(x)\) is finite and x is a strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point of \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\), then
where \(\sigma _n^{\alpha } f\) denotes the nth \(\ell _1\)-Cesàro mean of the Fourier series of f. A similar result was shown for the \(\ell _1\)-\(\theta \)-means of Fourier transforms in [25]. However, the \(\theta \)-summability does not contain the Cesàro summability and in this paper we consider Fourier series. So in the present proof, we have to use new ideas and the parts that are similar to [25] are omitted.
2 Hardy–Littlewood maximal function and strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue points
Let us fix \(d \ge 3\), \(d\in {{\mathbb {N}}}\). For a set \({{{\mathbb {Y}}}}\ne \emptyset \), let \({{{\mathbb {Y}}}}^d\) be its Cartesian product \({{{\mathbb {Y}}}} \times \cdots \times {{{\mathbb {Y}}}}\) taken with itself d times. We briefly write \(L_p({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\) instead of the \(L_p({{\mathbb {T}}}^d,\lambda )\) space equipped with the norm
with the usual modification for \(p=\infty \), where \(\lambda \) is the Lebesgue measure. We identify the torus \({{\mathbb {T}}}\) with \([- \pi ,\pi ]\).
By a diagonal, we understand any diagonal of the two-dimensional faces of the cube \([0,\pi ]^d\). Let us denote by \(P_{2^{i_1}h,\ldots ,2^{i_d}h}\) a parallelepiped, whose center is the origin and whose sides are parallel to the axes and/or to the diagonals and whose kth side length is \(2^{i_k+1}h\) if the kth side is parallel to an axis and \(\sqrt{2} 2^{i_k+1}h\) if the kth side is parallel to a diagonal \((i\in {{\mathbb {N}}}^d,h>0,k=1,\ldots ,d)\). In [24], we introduced the next Hardy–Littlewood maximal function. For some \(\omega >0\) and \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\), let
where the supremum is taken over all parallelepipeds \(P_{2^{i_1}h,\ldots ,2^{i_d}h}\) \((i\in {{\mathbb {N}}}^d,h>0)\) just defined. Taking the supremum over all parallelepipeds whose sides are parallel to the axes and \(\omega =0\), we obtain the strong Hardy–Littlewood maximal function, and, if in addition \(i_1=\cdots =i_d\), the usual Hardy–Littlewood maximal function (for more about these maximal functions see e.g. Feichtinger and Weisz [4] and the references therein). We have proved in [24] that
and, for \(1<p \le \infty \),
In this paper the constants C and \(C_p\) may vary from line to line.
Based on the Hardy–Littlewood maximal function \(\mathcal {M}^{\omega }\), we introduced the following type of Lebesgue points in [25]. Let
where the supremum is taken over all parallelepipeds mentioned above. For \(\omega >0\), a point \(x\in {{\mathbb {T}}}^d\) is called a strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point of \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\) if
Taking the supremum in \(U_{r}^{\omega }f\) over all parallelepipeds whose sides are parallel to the axes and \(\omega =0\), we obtain the strong Lebesgue points. Moreover, if in addition \(i_1=\cdots =i_d\), then we get the usual Lebesgue points, i.e.,
Note that every strong \(\omega _2\)-Lebesgue point is a strong \(\omega _1\)-Lebesgue point \((0<\omega _2<\omega _1<\infty )\), because of \(U_{r}^{\omega _1} f\le U_{r}^{\omega _2} f\). If f is continuous at x, then x is a strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point of f. The next theorem was proved in [25].
Theorem 1
For \(\omega >0\), almost every point \(x\in {{\mathbb {T}}}^d\) is a strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point of \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\).
3 The kernel functions
For \(x=(x_1,\ldots ,x_d)\in {{\mathbb {R}}}^d\) and \(u=(u_1,\ldots ,u_d)\in {{\mathbb {R}}}^d\) set \( u\cdot x := \sum _{k=1}^d u_k x_k\) and \(|x|:= \sum _{k=1}^d |x_k|\). The kth Fourier coefficient of a d-dimensional integrable function \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\) is defined by
For \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\) and \(n \in {{\mathbb {N}}}\), the nth \(\ell _1\)-partial sum \(s_nf\) of the Fourier series of f and the nth \(\ell _1\)-Dirichlet kernel \(D_n\) are given by
and
respectively. It is known (see e.g. Grafakos [11] or Weisz [23]) that for \(f\in L_p({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\), \(1<p<\infty \),
Since this convergence does not hold for \(p=1\), we consider the Cesàro summation.
For \(\alpha \ne -1,-2,\ldots \) and \(n \in {{\mathbb {N}}}\), let
Then \(A_0^{\alpha }=1\), \(A_n^{0}=1\) and \(A_n^{1}=n+1\) \((n \in {{\mathbb {N}}})\). Let \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^{d})\), \(n \in {{\mathbb {N}}}\) and \(\alpha \ge 0\). The nth \(\ell _1\)-Cesàro means \(\sigma _n^{\alpha }f\) of the Fourier series of f are introduced by
If \(\alpha =0\), we get \(s_nf\), if \(\alpha =1\), then the \(\ell _1\)-Fejér means
It is easy to see that
where the \(\ell _1\)-Cesàro kernel is given by
It is clear that
The next two lemmas can be found in Zygmund [27].
Lemma 1
For \(0<\alpha \le 1\), \(n \ge 1\), \(m \in {{\mathbb {N}}}\) and \(t \in {{\mathbb {T}}}\), \(t\ne 0\),
and
Lemma 2
For \(\alpha >-1\) and \(h>0\), we have
Lemma 3 was proved in Weisz [21, 22].
Lemma 3
If \(0<\alpha \le 1\), then
We define the nth divided difference of a function f at the pairwise distinct knots \(x_1,\ldots ,x_n\in {{\mathbb {R}}}\) by
It is known (see e.g. DeVore and Lorentz [3, p. 120]) that if f is \((n-1)\)-times continuously differentiable on [a, b] and \(x_1,\ldots ,x_n\in [a,b]\), then there exists \(\xi \in [a,b]\) such that
Herriot [12] and Berens and Xu [1, 26] proved that the \(\ell _1\)-Dirichlet kernels can be expressed as
where
and
A sequence \((i_l,j_l)_{l}=(i_l,j_l)_{l=1}^{d-1}\) is called a proper index sequence, if
-
\(i_1=1\), \(j_1=d\),
-
for any \(l=1,\ldots ,d-2\) we have that either \(i_{l+1}=i_l\) and \(j_{l+1}=j_l-1\) or \(i_{l+1}=i_l+1\) and \(j_{l+1}=j_l\).
Let us denote by \(\mathcal {I}(1,\ldots ,d)\) the set of all proper index sequences. Then \((i_l)_l\) is non-decreasing and \((j_l)_l\) is non-increasing. Moreover, \(i_l<j_l\) for all \(l=1,\ldots ,d-1\) and \(j_l-i_l=d-l\) \((l=1,\ldots ,d-1)\). For \((i_l,j_l)_{l=1}^{d-1}\in \mathcal {I}(1,\ldots ,d)\), we say that the first k term of the sequence, i.e. \((i_l,j_l)_{l=1}^{k}\) is in \(\mathcal {I}^{{(k)}}(1,\ldots ,d)\). Then \(\mathcal {I}^{{(d-1)}}(1,\ldots ,d)\)=\(\mathcal {I}(1,\ldots ,d)\).
Using (3.4), we can easily prove the next lemma by induction (see also [21, 25]). For \(k=0\) the equation is the same as (3.4).
Lemma 4
For \(k=0,1,\ldots ,d-2\), we have
We estimate the Cesàro kernel \(K_{n}^{\alpha }\) as follows.
Lemma 5
If \(0<\alpha \le 1\), \(\pi>x_1>x_2>\ldots>x_d>0\), \(1<n_1<\cdots<n_m<d\) and \(m=0,\ldots ,d-2\), then
Proof
In this proof we use the notation \(D_n^d(x):=D_n(x)\), where d denotes the dimension. We apply Lemma 4 with \(k=d-2\) to get that
We use the trigonometric identity
and the estimations
and
if \(0 \le b<a\le \pi , \pi /2<a\). Then
Since \(x_{i_1}+x_{j_1}\ge x_{i_{1}}\), \(2 \pi -x_{i_1}-x_{j_1}>\pi -x_{j_l}\), \(x_{i_l}+x_{j_l}\ge x_{i_{d-1}}\) and \(2 \pi -x_{i_l}-x_{j_l}>\pi -x_{j_{d-1}}\) for \(l=2,\ldots ,d-1\), we have
Then (3.5) with \(m=0\) follows from (3.1).
We may suppose that \(n_1=2\). Observe that
We apply (3.9) for the \((d-1)\)-dimensional Dirichlet kernel \(D_{n-|k_2|}^{d-1}(x_1,x_3,\ldots ,x_{d})\) and get that
Hence (3.1) implies (3.5) with \(m=1\). The proof can be finished in the same way. \(\square \)
Lemma 6
Suppose that \(0<\alpha \le 1\) and \(\pi -1/n>x_1>x_2>\ldots>x_d>1/n\). Then
If \(m=1,\ldots ,d-2\), then
Moreover,
Proof
We use Lemma 4 with \(k=d-2\) and (3.1) to obtain
Taking into account Lemma 1 and the definition of \(G_n\),
Now we use again (3.6), (3.7) and (3.8) and conlude
Since \(\pi -1/n>x_1>x_2>\cdots>x_d>1/n\), we have
which shows (3.10).
After some basic calculation, we can see that
where \(r_1+r_2+r_3=m\) and
This implies for \(y=\cos \xi \) that
where
and
Using this formula as well as (3.1) and Lemma 4 for \(k=d-1-m\) \((m=1,\ldots ,d-1)\), we conclude
Taking into account (3.3), we deduce
where \(x_{j_{d-m}}^2 \le \xi =\xi _{(i_l,j_l)_l} \le x_{i_{d-m}}^2\). By Lemma 1, (3.6), (3.7) and (3.8),
Since \(1/n<\xi <\pi -1/n\),
and
Furthermore,
which proves (3.11). \(\square \)
4 Convergence at strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue points
Now we are ready to prove our main theorem.
Theorem 2
Suppose that \(0<\alpha <\infty \), \(0<\omega <\min (\alpha ,1)/d\) and \(\mathcal {M}^{\omega }f(x)\) is finite. If \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\) is periodic with respect to \(\pi \) and x is a strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point of f, then
Proof
By Lemma 2, it is enough to prove the theorem for \(0<\alpha \le 1\). Since
we have
It is enough to integrate on the set
We introduce the sets
for \(i=2,\ldots ,d-1\),
and
Since x is a strong \(\omega \)-Lebesgue point of f, we can fix a number \(r<\pi /2\) such that \(U_r^\omega f(x)<\epsilon \). Let us introduce the cubes
and suppose that \(8/n<r/2\). Instead of S, we will integrate on the sets \(A_0\) and
where \(H^{0}:=H\) and \(H^{1}:=H^c\) denotes the complement of the set H.
Since \(A_0\subset S_{r/2}\cup T_{r/2}\), (3.2) and the periodicity of f imply
Note that \(A_d\cap B_1 = A_d\cap B_2 = \emptyset \), \(S_{r/2} \cap T_{r/2}= \emptyset \), \(B_1 \cap T_{r/2}= \emptyset \) and \(B_2 \cap S_{r/2}=\emptyset \). Let us start with the integral on \(A_j\cap B_1^{c} \cap B_2 \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}\). If \(t \in T_{r/2}\), then each \(t_k>\pi /2\), hence we have to use only the second summand of (3.5). Henceforth, for \(j=1,\ldots ,d-1\),
For \(j=1\), we use this estimation with \(m=0\). On \(B_2 {{\setminus }} A_0\), we have \(\pi -t_d>2(\pi -t_1)\) and so \(t_1-t_d > (\pi -t_d)/2\). This implies
For a given proper index sequence \((i_l,j_l)_l\in \mathcal {I}(1,\ldots ,d)\), we introduce a permutation \(i_1',\ldots ,i_d'\) of \(1,\ldots ,d\) and then we integrate with respect to \(t_{i_d'}, t_{i_{d-1}'}, \ldots , t_{i_1'}\), in this order. Let \(i'_{1}=j_1=d\) and compute the integral
where \(r_0\) denotes the natural number i, for which \(r/2\le 2^{i+1}/n<r\). Next let \(i_2'=i_1=1\) and compute the integral
Let us continue with the next two cases. If \(i_2=i_1\) and \(j_2=j_1-1\), then let \(i_3'=j_2\) and consider the integral
If \(i_2=i_1+1\) and \(j_2=j_1\), then let \(i_3'=i_2\) and consider the integral
Continuing this process and substituting \(t_j=u_j+ \pi \), we get the integrals
and
or
Consequently, we integrate over a parallelepiped \(P_{2^{k_1}/n,\ldots ,2^{k_{d}}/n}\), with \(k_d=0\) and obtain
It is easy to see that \(t_1>(\pi -t_d)/2\) on \(B_2\). By (3.5),
for \(k_1=0,1\). Similarly as above,
as \(n\rightarrow \infty \).
To integrate on \(A_2\), we introduce the sets \(A_2^{\alpha _1,\ldots ,\alpha _m}\) \((1 \le \alpha _1<\cdots <\alpha _m \le d-1,1 \le m \le d-1)\) containing all \(t \in A_2\) for which \(t_{\alpha _j}-t_{\alpha _j+1}\le 2/n\) \((j=1, \ldots ,m)\) and \(t_k-t_{k+2}>2/n\) for all \(k=1,\ldots ,d-2\). Instead of \(A_2\), we will integrate on \(A_2^{\alpha _1,\ldots ,\alpha _m}\). If \(m=d-1\), then the integrals on \(A_2^{\alpha _1,\ldots ,\alpha _m}\cap B_1^{c} \cap B_2 \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}\) and \(A_2^{\alpha _1,\ldots ,\alpha _m}\cap B_1^{k_1} \cap B_2 \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}^{c}\) are similar to the integrals above. Suppose that \(1 \le m \le d-2\) and \(\alpha _m+1<d\). Then let \(n_j=\alpha _j+1\), \(j=1,\ldots ,m\) and by (4.1) and (4.2),
Here, we integrate first as follows:
Then we continue with the integrals as before in (4.2) with \(\mathcal {I}(\{1,\ldots ,d\}{\setminus }\{n_1,\ldots ,n_m\})\) instead of \(\mathcal {I}(\{1,\ldots ,d\})\). This means that we integrate over a parallelepiped \(P_{2^{k_1}/n,\ldots ,2^{k_{d}}/n}\) with \(k_{n_1}=\ldots =k_{n_m}=1\), \(k_d=0\) and get that
where the indices \(1<\beta _2<\cdots<\beta _{d-1-m}<d\) are all different from \(n_1,\ldots ,n_m\). It is easy to see that if \(\alpha _m+1=d\), then we can also choose \(1<n_1<\cdots<n_m<d\) such that \(n_j=\alpha _j\) or \(n_j=\alpha _j+1\), \(j=1,\ldots ,m\) and the estimation of the integral is the same. The integrals on the sets \(A_2^{\alpha _1,\ldots ,\alpha _m}\cap B_1^{k_1} \cap B_2 \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}^{c}\), \(A_j\cap B_1^{c} \cap B_2 \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}\) and on \(A_j\cap B_1^{k_1} \cap B_2 \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}^{c}\) \((j=3,\ldots ,d-1,k_0=0,1)\) can be handled similarly.
We estimate the integrals on \(A_j\cap B_1 \cap B_2^{c} \cap S_{r/2} \cap T_{r/2}^{c}\) and \(A_j\cap B_1 \cap B_2^{k_2} \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}^{c}\) \((j=1,\ldots ,d-1,k_0=0,1)\) with the integrals on \(A_j\cap B_1 \cap S_{r/2}\) and \(A_j\cap B_1 \cap S_{r/2}^{c}\) and these integrals can be found in Weisz [25]. Here we use the first summand of (3.5).
Next, we integrate on \(A_j\cap B_1^{c} \cap B_2^{c} \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}\) and introduce the set
For \(j=1\), we use inequality (3.10) to obtain
We can integrate as in (4.2) with the only difference that, with respect to \(t_{i_2'}\), we consider the integral \(\sum _{k_d=0}^{k_1} \int _{t_{j_1}+2^{k_d}/n}^{t_{j_1}+2^{k_d+1}/n}\cdots (t_{i_1}-t_{j_1})^{-1}\,\mathrm{d}t_{i_2'}\). Thus
Moreover, on the set \(F^{c}\), we have
We can use the same order as in (4.2) and we compute the integral
Similarly to (4.3),
On the set \(A_j\cap B_1^{c} \cap B_2^{c} \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}\), we use the inequality (3.11) with \(m=j-1\). We omit the details because they are similar to those above and to those in [25]. We estimate the integrals on \(A_j\cap B_1^{c} \cap B_2^{c} \cap S_{r/2} \cap T_{r/2}^{c}\) with the integrals on \(A_j\cap B_1^{c} \cap S_{r/2}\) \((j=1,\ldots ,d)\). The latter integrals can be found in Weisz [25].
Finally, by (3.10),
These integrals as well as the integral on \(A_j\cap B_1^{c} \cap B_2^{c} \cap S_{r/2}^{c} \cap T_{r/2}^{c}\) \((j=1,\ldots ,d)\) can be estimated as above. The details are left to the reader. This completes the proof of the theorem. \(\square \)
Theorems 1, 2 and (2.1) imply the next corollary, which was shown in Weisz [22].
Corollary 1
If \(0<\alpha <\infty \) and \(f\in L_1({{\mathbb {T}}}^d)\) is periodic with respect to \(\pi \), then
References
Berens, H., Li, Z., Xu, Y.: On l-1 Riesz summability of the inverse Fourier integral. Indag. Math. (N.S.) 12, 41–53 (2001)
Berens, H., Xu, Y.: \(l\)-1 summability of multiple Fourier integrals and positivity. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 122, 149–172 (1997)
DeVore, R.A., Lorentz, G.G.: Constructive Approximation. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Feichtinger, H.G., Weisz, F.: Wiener amalgams and pointwise summability of Fourier transforms and Fourier series. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 140, 509–536 (2006)
Gát, G.: Pointwise convergence of cone-like restricted two-dimensional \((C,1)\) means of trigonometric Fourier series. J. Approx. Theory. 149, 74–102 (2007)
Gát, G.: Almost everywhere convergence of sequences of Cesàro and Riesz means of integrable functions with respect to the multidimensional Walsh system. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 30(2), 311–322 (2014)
Gát, G., Goginava, U., Nagy, K.: On the Marcinkiewicz–Fejér means of double Fourier series with respect to Walsh–Kaczmarz system. Stud. Sci. Math. Hung. 46, 399–421 (2009)
Goginava, U.: Marcinkiewicz-Fejér means of \(d\)-dimensional Walsh–Fourier series. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 307, 206–218 (2005)
Goginava, U.: Almost everywhere convergence of \((C,\alpha )\)-means of cubical partial sums of d-dimensional Walsh–Fourier series. J. Approx. Theory 141, 8–28 (2006)
Goginava, U.: The maximal operator of the Marcinkiewicz–Fejér means of \(d\)-dimensional Walsh–Fourier series. East J. Approx. 12, 295–302 (2006)
Grafakos, L.: Classical and Modern Fourier Analysis. Pearson Education, New Jersey (2004)
Herriot, J.G.: Nörlund summability of multiple Fourier series. Duke Math. J. 11, 735–754 (1944)
Lebesgue, H.: Recherches sur la convergence des séries de Fourier. Math. Ann. 61, 251–280 (1905)
Li, Z., Xu, Y.: Summability of product Jacobi expansions. J. Approx. Theory 104, 287–301 (2000)
Nagy, K., Tephnadze, G.: The Walsh–Kaczmarz–Marcinkiewicz means and Hardy spaces. Acta Math. Hung. 149, 346–374 (2016)
Persson, L.E., Tephnadze, G., Wall, P.: Maximal operators of Vilenkin–Nörlund means. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 21(1), 76–94 (2015)
Riesz, M.: Sur la sommation des séries de Fourier. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 1, 104–113 (1923)
Simon, P.: Cesàro summability with respect to two-parameter Walsh systems. Monatshefte Math. 131, 321–334 (2000)
Simon, P.: \((C,\alpha )\) summability of Walsh–Kaczmarz–Fourier series. J. Approx. Theory 127, 39–60 (2004)
Szili, L., Vértesi, P.: On multivariate projection operators. J. Approx. Theory 159, 154–164 (2009)
Weisz, F.: \(\ell _1\)-summability of higher-dimensional Fourier series. J. Approx. Theory 163, 99–116 (2011)
Weisz, F.: Cesàro-summability of higher-dimensional Fourier series. Ann. Univ. Sci. Bp. Sect. Comput. 37, 47–64 (2012)
Weisz, F.: Summability of multi-dimensional trigonometric Fourier series. Surv. Approx. Theory 7, 1–179 (2012)
Weisz, F.: Lebesgue points of two-dimensional Fourier transforms and strong summability. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 21, 885–914 (2015)
Weisz, F.: \(\ell _1\)-summability and Lebesgue points of \(d\)-dimensional Fourier transforms. Adv. Oper. Theory 4, 284–304 (2019)
Xu, Y.: Christoffel functions and Fourier series for multivariate orthogonal polynomials. J. Approx. Theory 82, 205–239 (1995)
Zygmund, A.: Trigonometric Series, 3rd edn. Cambridge Press, London (2002)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Funds (OTKA) no. KH130426.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Eötvös Loránd University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by M. S. Moslehian.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Weisz, F. Lebesgue points of \(\ell _1\)-Cesàro summability of d-dimensional Fourier series. Adv. Oper. Theory 6, 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43036-021-00144-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43036-021-00144-3
Keywords
- Cesàro summability
- Fejér summability
- \(\ell _1\)-summability
- Hardy–Littlewood maximal function
- Lebesgue points