Skip to main content
Log in

Is Cognitive Training Worth It? Exploring Individuals’ Willingness to Engage in Cognitive Training

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed how much time individuals would be willing to spend engaging in game-based cognitive training to gain prolonged functional independence. In study 1 (N = 294), participants completed a survey with questions assessing how much time they would be willing to invest in daily cognitive training to extend their functional independence by certain amounts of time using a slider response that ranged from 0 to 100 min. Participants also completed surveys that measured self-perceived health and cognitive functioning, personality, and other demographic variables. Even for relatively small gains, participants reported being willing to dedicate an average of 11 min every day to cognitive training, with some participants willing to engage for significantly longer. The best predictor of willingness to invest time in training was belief in cognitive training efficacy, followed by openness to experience, and participants’ self-perceived cognitive deficit. Study 2 examined the same question in a sample of 120 older adults, this time allowing for open-ended responses. Participants reported being willing to invest significantly more time, ranging from more than 40 min every day to gain just 1 week of independence, to over 2.5 h every day to gain an additional 3 years of independence. Again, perception of cognitive training efficacy was the strongest predictor of willingness to invest time. Results confirm that older adults are willing to invest significant amounts of time to gain independence later in life and have implications for predicting the adoption of, and adherence to, potentially effective treatments for cognitive decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this manuscript, we use the terms cognitive training or cognitive intervention to describe programs and activities designed to improve cognition in the aid of the performance of important everyday tasks. However, in our study materials aimed at the public, we used the more colloquial terms “brain training” and “brain games.”

References

  • “A consensus on the brain training industry from the scientific community.” (n.d.). Retrieved from http://longevity3.stanford.edu/blog/2014/10/15/the-consensus-on-the-brain-training-industry-from-the-scientific-community-2/. Accessed 2018

  • Boot, W. R., Champion, M., Blakely, D. P., Wright, T., Souders, D. J., & Charness, N. (2013). Video games as a means to reduce age-related cognitive decline: attitudes, compliance and effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Cognitive Training Data.” Retrieved from: https://www.cognitivetrainingdata.org/

  • Dennis, S. A., Goodson, B. M., & Pearson, C. (2018). MTurk workers’ use of low-cost ‘virtual private servers’ to circumvent screening methods: a Research Note. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3233954 or doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3233954

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Friedman, D. B., Laditka, S. B., Laditka, J. N., Wu, B., Liu, R., et al. (2011). Ethnically diverse older adults’ beliefs about staying mentally sharp. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 73(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., Myerson, J., & McFadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., Li, R., & Bavelier, D. (2010). Perceptual learning during action video game playing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(2), 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1995). The general self-efficacy scale (GSE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehegan, L., Rainville, C., & Skufca, L. (2017). 2017 AARP cognitive activity and brain health survey. Washington, DC: AARP Research. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00044.001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitzner, T. L., Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2016). Predicting older adults’ perceptions about a computer system designed for seniors. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(2), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabipour, S., & Davidson, P. S. R. (2015). Do you believe in brain training? A questionnaire about expectations of computerised cognitive training. Behavioural Brain Research, 295, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabipour, S., Andringa, R., Boot, W. R., & Davidson, P. S. (2018). What do people expect of cognitive enhancement? Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2(1), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In B. L. Cacioppo & L. L. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: a source book (pp. 153–176). London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly, 15(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souders, D. J., Boot, W. R., Blocker, K., Vitale, T., Roque, N. A., & Charness, N. (2017). Evidence for narrow transfer after short-term cognitive training in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan. (1990). Perceived deficits questionnaire (PDQ).

  • Tennstedt, S. L., & Unverzagt, F. W. (2013). The ACTIVE study: study overview and major findings. Journal of Aging and Health, 25(8 0), 3S–20S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toril, P., Reales, J. M., & Ballesteros, S. (2014). Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 706–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler memory scale—3rd edition. The Psychological. Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Institute on Aging, Project CREATE IV – Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (www.create-center.org, NIA P01 AG017211). This research was also partially funded by the Bess H. Ward Honors Thesis Award and the HSA Conference Presenter Award from Florida State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter R. Boot.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Study 1 and 2 data, as well as supplemental analyses, can be found here: https://osf.io/25czj/?view_only=100c1c46f2e04142a0e1a2efc5da41ba.

Appendix. Brain Training and Independence Survey

Appendix. Brain Training and Independence Survey

As we age, our ability to remember information, react quickly, and solve problems can worsen. A number of brain training products are marketed to prevent or slow these declines. These products usually take the form of simple games that can be played on a computer or mobile device. The ultimate goal of these products is to improve brain functioning so that as we age we can continue to perform the important everyday tasks required to live independently (for example, driving and managing finances).

Imagine that there is a proven brain training product on the market. Imagine that the evidence conclusively demonstrates that playing these brain games every day can allow people to live independently longer as they age. In one study, for example, people who engaged in brain training were able to live independently in their own homes for 6 months longer compared to a control group.

This survey will ask you about the amount of time you would be willing to engage in brain training each day in order to obtain benefits. For example:

  • Would you be willing to engage in brain training 6 h every day, starting now, to gain an additional 2 weeks of independent living later in life?

  • Would you be willing to engage in brain training 5 min every day, starting now, to gain an additional 6 months of independent living later in life?

These are the types of tradeoffs we would like you to consider. Please answer the following questions assuming that the brain training product works. Think carefully about how much time you would be willing to invest each day, starting now, to receive benefits later in life.

  1. a)

    If effective brain games were discovered that allowed people to live independently for 1 week longer, I would be willing to play these games: ______ minutes every day, starting today.

    (Slider from 0 to 100 min)

  2. b)

    If effective brain games were discovered that allowed people to live independently for 1 month longer, I would be willing to play these games: ______ minutes every day, starting today.

    (Slider from 0 to 100 min)

  1. c)

    If effective brain games were discovered that allowed people to live independently for 2 months longer, I would be willing to play these games: ______ minutes every day, starting today.

    (Slider from 0 to 100 min)

  1. d)

    If effective brain games were discovered that allowed people to live independently for 6 months longer, I would be willing to play these games: ______ minutes every day, starting today.

    (Slider from 0 to 100 min)

  1. e)

    If effective brain games were discovered that allowed people to live independently for 1 year longer, I would be willing to play these games: ______ minutes every day, starting today.

    (Slider from 0 to 100 min)

  2. f)

    If effective brain games were discovered that allowed people to live independently for 2 years longer, I would be willing to play these games: ______ minutes every day, starting today.

    (Slider from 0 to 100 min)

  3. g)

    If effective brain games were discovered that allowed people to live independently for 3 years longer, I would be willing to play these games: ______ minutes every day, starting today.

    (Slider from 0 to 100 min)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrell, E.R., Kmetz, B. & Boot, W.R. Is Cognitive Training Worth It? Exploring Individuals’ Willingness to Engage in Cognitive Training. J Cogn Enhanc 3, 405–415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00129-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00129-4

Keywords

Navigation