Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimal-Dose Resistance Training for Improving Muscle Mass, Strength, and Function: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Practical Considerations

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resistance training (RT) is the only non-pharmacological intervention known to consistently improve, and therefore offset age-related declines in, skeletal muscle mass, strength, and power. RT is also associated with various health benefits that are underappreciated compared with the perceived benefits of aerobic-based exercise. For example, RT participation is associated with reduced all-cause and cancer-related mortality and reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and symptoms of both anxiety and depression. Despite these benefits, participation in RT remains low, likely due to numerous factors including time constraints, a high-perceived difficulty, and limited access to facilities and equipment. Identification of RT strategies that limit barriers to participation may increase engagement in RT and subsequently improve population health outcomes. Across the lifespan, declines in strength and power occur up to eight times faster than the loss of muscle mass, and are more strongly associated with functional impairments and risks of morbidity and mortality. Strategies to maximise healthspan should therefore arguably focus more on improving or maintaining muscle strength and power than on increasing muscle mass per se. Accumulating evidence suggests that minimal doses of RT, characterised by lower session volumes than in traditional RT guidelines, together with either (1) higher training intensities/loads performed at lower frequencies (i.e. low-volume, high-load RT) or (2) lower training intensities/loads performed at higher frequencies and with minimal-to-no equipment (i.e. resistance ‘exercise snacking’), can improve strength and functional ability in younger and older adults. Such minimal-dose approaches to RT have the potential to minimise various barriers to participation, and may have positive implications for the feasibility and scalability of RT. In addition, brief but frequent minimal-dose RT approaches (i.e. resistance ‘exercise snacking’) may provide additional benefits for interrupting sedentary behaviour patterns associated with increased cardiometabolic risk. Compared to traditional approaches, minimal-dose RT may also limit negative affective responses, such as increased discomfort and lowered enjoyment, both of which are associated with higher training volumes and may negatively influence exercise adherence. A number of practical factors, including the selection of exercises that target major muscle groups and challenge both balance and the stabilising musculature, may influence the effectiveness of minimal-dose RT on outcomes such as improved independence and quality-of-life in older adults. This narrative review aims to summarise the evidence for minimal-dose RT as a strategy for preserving muscle strength and functional ability across the lifespan, and to discuss practical models and considerations for the application of minimal-dose RT approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

  2. Grgic J, McLlvenna LC, Fyfe JJ, et al. Does aerobic training promote the same skeletal muscle hypertrophy as resistance training? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019;49(2):233–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farup J, Kjolhede T, Sorensen H, et al. Muscle morphological and strength adaptations to endurance vs. resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(2):398–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Veen J, Montiel-Rojas D, Nilsson A, et al. Engagement in muscle-strengthening activities lowers sarcopenia risk in older adults already adhering to the aerobic physical activity guidelines. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):989.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Maestroni L, Read P, Bishop C, et al. The benefits of strength training on musculoskeletal system health: practical applications for interdisciplinary care. Sports Med. 2020;50(8):1431–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saeidifard F, Medina-Inojosa JR, West CP, et al. The association of resistance training with mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(15):1647–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stamatakis E, Lee IM, Bennie J, et al. Does strength-promoting exercise confer unique health benefits? A pooled analysis of data on 11 population cohorts with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality endpoints. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(5):1102–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanasescu M, Leitzmann MF, Rimm EB, et al. Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men. JAMA. 2002;288(16):1994–2000.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Babatunde OO, Jordan JL, Van der Windt DA, et al. Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic overview of current evidence. PLoS One. 2017;12(6): e0178621.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon BR, McDowell CP, Hallgren M, et al. Association of efficacy of resistance exercise training with depressive symptoms: meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiat. 2018;75(6):566–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH, Coeckelberghs E, et al. Impact of resistance training on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Hypertension. 2011;58(5):950–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck BR, Daly RM, Singh MA, et al. Exercise and Sports Science Australia (ESSA) position statement on exercise prescription for the prevention and management of osteoporosis. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(5):438–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank P, Andersson E, Ponten M, et al. Strength training improves muscle aerobic capacity and glucose tolerance in elderly. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(7):764–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Groennebaek T, Vissing K. Impact of resistance training on skeletal muscle mitochondrial biogenesis, content, and function. Front Physiol. 2017;8:713.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Parry HA, Roberts MD, Kavazis AN. Human skeletal muscle mitochondrial adaptations following resistance exercise training. Int J Sports Med. 2020;41(6):349–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Evans PL, McMillin SL, Weyrauch LA, et al. Regulation of skeletal muscle glucose transport and glucose metabolism by exercise training. Nutrients. 2019;11(10): 2432.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Metter EJ, Lynch N, Conwit R, et al. Muscle quality and age: cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54(5):B207–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennie JA, Shakespear-Druery J, De Cocker K. Muscle-strengthening exercise epidemiology: a new frontier in chronic disease prevention. Sports Med Open. 2020;6(1):40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bennie JA, Pedisic Z, van Uffelen JG, et al. Pumping iron in australia: prevalence, trends and sociodemographic correlates of muscle strengthening activity participation from a national sample of 195,926 adults. PLoS One. 2016;11(4): e0153225.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Burton E, Farrier K, Lewin G, et al. Motivators and barriers for older people participating in resistance training: a systematic review. J Aging Phys Act. 2017;25(2):311–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schutzer KA, Graves BS. Barriers and motivations to exercise in older adults. Prev Med. 2004;39(5):1056–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steele J, Raubold K, Kemmler W, et al. The effects of 6 months of progressive high effort resistance training methods upon strength, body composition, function, and wellbeing of elderly adults. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2541090.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher J, Steele J, McKinnon P, et al. Strength gains as a result of brief, infrequent resistance exercise in older adults. J Sports Med. 2014;2014: 731890.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Westcott WL, Winett RA, Annesi JJ, et al. Prescribing physical activity: applying the ACSM protocols for exercise type, intensity, and duration across 3 training frequencies. Phys Sports Med. 2009;37(2):51–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, et al. High-intensity resistance and impact training improves bone mineral density and physical function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis: the LIFTMOR randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):211–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ismail AD, Alkhayl FFA, Wilson J, et al. The effect of short-duration resistance training on insulin sensitivity and muscle adaptations in overweight men. Exp Physiol. 2019;104(4):540–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Fox LD, et al. Effects of low volume resistance and cardiovascular training on strength and aerobic capacity in unfit men and women: a demonstration of a threshold model. J Behav Med. 2003;26(3):183–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dankel SJ, Counts BR, Barnett BE, et al. Muscle adaptations following 21 consecutive days of strength test familiarization compared with traditional training. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56(2):307–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mattocks KT, Buckner SL, Jessee MB, et al. Practicing the test produces strength equivalent to higher volume training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(9):1945–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perkin OJ, McGuigan PM, Stokes KA. Exercise snacking to improve muscle function in healthy older adults: a pilot study. J Aging Res. 2019;2019:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sperlich B, Hahn LS, Edel A, et al. A 4-week intervention involving mobile-based daily 6-minute micro-sessions of functional high-intensity circuit training improves strength and quality of life, but not cardio-respiratory fitness of young untrained adults. Front Physiol. 2018;9:423.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Androulakis-Korakakis P, Fisher JP, Kolokotronis P, et al. Reduced volume “daily max” training compared to higher volume periodized training in powerlifters preparing for competition—a pilot study. Sports (Basel). 2018;6(3):86.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saint-Maurice PF, Troiano RP, Matthews CE, et al. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and all-cause mortality: do bouts matter? J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(6): e007678.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9798):1244–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadarangani KP, Hamer M, Mindell JS, et al. Physical activity and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in diabetic adults from Great Britain: pooled analysis of 10 population-based cohorts. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(4):1016–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu R, De Vito G, Delahunt E, et al. Age-related changes in motor function (I). Mechanical and neuromuscular factors. Int J Sports Med. 2020;41:709–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Landi F, Calvani R, Cesari M, et al. Sarcopenia as the biological substrate of physical frailty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2015;31(3):367–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Scott D, de Courten B, Ebeling PR. Sarcopenia: a potential cause and consequence of type 2 diabetes in Australia’s ageing population? Med J Aust. 2016;205(7):329–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell WK, Williams J, Atherton P, et al. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and the impact of advancing age on human skeletal muscle size and strength; a quantitative review. Front Physiol. 2012;3:260.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Schneider SM, et al. Prevalence of and interventions for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the International Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). Age Ageing. 2014;43(6):748–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Janssen I, Shepard DS, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. The healthcare costs of sarcopenia in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(1):80–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mijnarends DM, Schols JMGA, Halfens RJG, et al. Burden-of-illness of Dutch community-dwelling older adults with sarcopenia: health related outcomes and costs. Eur Geriatr Med. 2016;7:276–84.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Oikawa SY, Holloway TM, Phillips SM. The impact of step reduction on muscle health in aging: protein and exercise as countermeasures. Front Nutr. 2019;6:75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Fisher SR, Goodwin JS, Protas EJ, et al. Ambulatory activity of older adults hospitalized with acute medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(1):91–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kortebein P, Ferrando A, Lombeida J, et al. Effect of 10 days of bed rest on skeletal muscle in healthy older adults. JAMA. 2007;297(16):1772–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. English KL, Paddon-Jones D. Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010;13(1):34–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Reid KF, Pasha E, Doros G, et al. Longitudinal decline of lower extremity muscle power in healthy and mobility-limited older adults: influence of muscle mass, strength, composition, neuromuscular activation and single fiber contractile properties. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(1):29–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M, et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(6):1579–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee RC, Wang Z, Heo M, et al. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction models. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(3):796–803.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Dos Santos L, Cyrino ES, Antunes M, et al. Sarcopenia and physical independence in older adults: the independent and synergic role of muscle mass and muscle function. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8(2):245–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(1):72–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Reid KF, Fielding RA. Skeletal muscle power: a critical determinant of physical functioning in older adults. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2012;40(1):4–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Clark DJ, Manini TM, Fielding RA, et al. Neuromuscular determinants of maximum walking speed in well-functioning older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48(3):358–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Morton RW, Colenso-Semple L, Phillips SM. Training for strength and hypertrophy: an evidence-based approach. Curr Opin Physiol. 2019;10:90–5.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wolfe RR. The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(3):475–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Orazem J, et al. Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Fisher JP, Steele J. Heavier and lighter load resistance training to momentary failure produce similar increases in strength with differing degrees of discomfort. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56(4):797–803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, et al. The affective and behavioral responses to repeated “strength snacks.” Physiol Int. 2018;105(2):188–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, et al. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(12):1996–2001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Taber CB, Vigotsky A, Nuckols G, et al. Exercise-induced myofibrillar hypertrophy is a contributory cause of gains in muscle strength. Sports Med. 2019;49:993–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Loenneke JP, Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, et al. Exercise-induced changes in muscle size do not contribute to exercise-induced changes in muscle strength. Sports Med. 2019;49(7):987–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gibala MJ, Little JP. Physiological basis of brief vigorous exercise to improve health. J Physiol. 2020;598(1):61–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Sethi P, et al. Benefits for type 2 diabetes of interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light walking or simple resistance activities. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):964–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dempsey PC, Sacre JW, Larsen RN, et al. Interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light walking or simple resistance activities reduces resting blood pressure and plasma noradrenaline in type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens. 2016;34(12):2376–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zourdos M, Dolan C, Quiles J, et al. Efficacy of daily one-repetition maximum squat training in well-trained lifters. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:940.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Buckner SL, Yitzchaki N, Kataoka R, et al. Do exercise-induced increases in muscle size contribute to strength in resistance-trained individuals? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2021;41(4):326–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1423–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Harding AT, Weeks BK, Lambert C, et al. Effects of supervised high-intensity resistance and impact training or machine-based isometric training on regional bone geometry and strength in middle-aged and older men with low bone mass: the LIFTMOR-M semi-randomised controlled trial. Bone. 2020;136: 115362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Reynolds AN, Mann JI, Williams S, et al. Advice to walk after meals is more effective for lowering postprandial glycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus than advice that does not specify timing: a randomised crossover study. Diabetologia. 2016;59(12):2572–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Francois ME, Baldi JC, Manning PJ, et al. “Exercise snacks” before meals: a novel strategy to improve glycaemic control in individuals with insulin resistance. Diabetologia. 2014;57(7):1437–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kikuchi N, Nakazato K. Low-load bench press and push-up induce similar muscle hypertrophy and strength gain. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2017;15(1):37–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Kotarsky CJ, Christensen BK, Miller JS, et al. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(3):651–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Souza D, Barbalho M, Vieira CA, et al. Minimal dose resistance training with elastic tubes promotes functional and cardiovascular benefits to older women. Exp Gerontol. 2019;115:132–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Counts BR, Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, et al. The acute and chronic effects of “NO LOAD” resistance training. Physiol Behav. 2016;164(Pt A):345–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Yang Y, Bay PB, Wang YR, et al. Effects of consecutive versus non-consecutive days of resistance training on strength, body composition, and red blood cells. Front Physiol. 2018;9:725.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Del Vecchio A, Casolo A, Negro F, et al. The increase in muscle force after 4 weeks of strength training is mediated by adaptations in motor unit recruitment and rate coding. J Physiol. 2019;597:1873–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Jenkins NDM, Miramonti AA, Hill EC, et al. Greater neural adaptations following high- vs. low-load resistance training. Front Physiol. 2017;8:331.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Behm DG, Sale DG. Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(1):359–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Morrissey MC, Harman EA, Johnson MJ. Resistance training modes: specificity and effectiveness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(5):648–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Buckner SL, Jessee MB, Mattocks KT, et al. Determining strength: a case for multiple methods of measurement. Sports Med. 2017;47(2):193–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Fagerstrom C, Borglin G. Mobility, functional ability and health-related quality of life among people of 60 years or older. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010;22(5–6):387–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Ratamess NA, Alvar BA, Evetoch TK, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687–708.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, Jessee MB, et al. Frequency: the overlooked resistance training variable for inducing muscle hypertrophy? Sports Med. 2017;47(5):799–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Dunstan DW, Barr EL, Healy GN, et al. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation. 2010;121(3):384–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Murphy MH, Lahart I, Carlin A, et al. The effects of continuous compared to accumulated exercise on health: a meta-analytic review. Sports Med. 2019;49(10):1585–607.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

  89. Harris MC, Kessler LM. Habit formation and activity persistence: evidence from gym equipment. J Econ Behav Organ. 2019;166(October):688–708.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, et al. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(1):81–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Allison SJ, Folland JP, Rennie WJ, et al. High impact exercise increased femoral neck bone mineral density in older men: a randomised unilateral intervention. Bone. 2013;53(2):321–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Allison SJ, Poole KE, Treece GM, et al. The influence of high-impact exercise on cortical and trabecular bone mineral content and 3D distribution across the proximal femur in older men: a randomized controlled unilateral intervention. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(9):1709–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Lin CH, Faisal AA. Decomposing sensorimotor variability changes in ageing and their connection to falls in older people. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14546.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC, et al. Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(7):556–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Orr R, Raymond J, Fiatarone SM. Efficacy of progressive resistance training on balance performance in older adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sports Med. 2008;38(4):317–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Daun F, Kibele A. Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—implications for the risk of falls in older adults? PLoS One. 2019;14(3): e0213361.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Trudelle-Jackson EJ, Jackson AW, Morrow JR Jr. Muscle strength and postural stability in healthy, older women: implications for fall prevention. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(3):292–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sangwan S, Green RA, Taylor NF. Characteristics of stabilizer muscles: a systematic review. Physiother Can. 2014;66(4):348–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Hortobagyi T, et al. The importance of trunk muscle strength for balance, functional performance, and fall prevention in seniors: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013;43(7):627–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Zhao M, Veeranki SP, Magnussen CG, et al. Recommended physical activity and all cause and cause specific mortality in US adults: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2020;370: m2031.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Stepto NK. Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role of individual training variables. Sports Med. 2014;44(6):743–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, et al. Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2293–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hickson RC. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;45(2–3):255–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Fyfe JJ, Bartlett JD, Hanson ED, et al. Endurance training intensity does not mediate interference to maximal lower-body strength gain during short-term concurrent training. Front Physiol. 2016;7: 487.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Balabinis CP, Psarakis CH, Moukas M, et al. Early phase changes by concurrent endurance and strength training. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(2):393–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. McCarthy JP, Pozniak MA, Agre JC. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(3):511–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Fyfe JJ, Loenneke JP. Interpreting adaptation to concurrent compared with single-mode exercise training: some methodological considerations. Sports Med. 2018;48(2):289–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Murlasits Z, Kneffel Z, Thalib L. The physiological effects of concurrent strength and endurance training sequence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(11):1212–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Icons used in Figs. 1 and 3 were made by ‘Freepik’ and ‘ultimatearm’ from http://www.flaticon.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jackson J. Fyfe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jackson Fyfe, D. Lee Hamilton, and Robin Daly declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Funding

No funding was used to directly support the preparation of this narrative review.

Author contributions

JF wrote the manuscript, supported by DLH and RMD, who revised and wrote aspects of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fyfe, J.J., Hamilton, D.L. & Daly, R.M. Minimal-Dose Resistance Training for Improving Muscle Mass, Strength, and Function: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Practical Considerations. Sports Med 52, 463–479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01605-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01605-8

Navigation