Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sparse Optimal Trajectory Design in Three-Body Problem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes the sparse optimal control in the circular restricted three-body problem to exploit the dynamical structure of the linearized motion around equilibrium points or periodic orbits. First, optimal transfer problem is formulated for a linearized system where the objective function and constraints are given by convex sets. For a long time transfer problem in the vicinity of periodic orbits, the Floquet-Lyapunov transformation and a normal form are introduced to enable numerical calculations. Then, the proposed method is applied to several transfer problems around an equilibrium point or periodic orbits and a parameter analysis is performed to understand the optimal transfer by changing the maximum thrust acceleration and time of flight. Finally, a new station-keeping strategy is proposed to implement the sparse optimal solution in a nonlinear dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gómez, G., Howell, K., Masdemont, J., Simó, C.: Station-keeping strategies for translunar libration point orbits. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. 99(2), 949–967 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scheeres, D., Hsiao, F., Vinh, N.: Stabilizing motion relative to an unstable orbit: applications to spacecraft formation flight. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 26(1), 62–73 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunham, D., Jen, S.J., Roberts, C.E., Seacord, Sharer, P.J., Folta, D.C., Muhonen, D.P.: Transfer trajectory design for the soho libration-point mission. In: International Astronautical Congress, 92-0066 (1993)

  4. Farquhar, R.W., Muhonen, D.P., Newman, C.R., Heubergerg, H.S.: Trajectories and orbital maneuvers for the first libration-point satellite. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 3(6), 549–554 (1980). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Folta, D.C., Woodard, M., Howell, K., Patterson, C., Schlei, W.: Applications of multi-body dynamical environments: the artemis transfer trajectory design. Acta Astronaut. 73, 237–249 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-018-3431-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franz, H., Sharer, P., Ogilvie, K., Desch, M.: Wind nominal mission performance and extended mission design. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, AIAA98-4467, pp. 1447–1464. AIAA (1998)

  7. Roberts, C.E.: Long duration lissajous orbit control for the ace sun-earth l1 libration point mission. In: Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 108, pp. 1447–1464. AAS (2001)

  8. Guzzetti, D., Zimovan, E.M., Howell, K.C., Davis, D.C.: Stationkeeping analysis for spacecraft in lunar near rectilinear halo orbits. In: 27th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, pp. 1–24. AAS Marriott Plaza, Texas (2017)

  9. Hou, X., Liu, L., Tang, J.: Station-keeping of small amplitude motions around the collinear libration point in the real Earth-Moon system. Adv. Space. Res. 47(7), 1127–1134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muralidharan, V., Howell, K.C.: Stationkeeping in Earth-Moon near rectinlinear halo orbits. In: 2020 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference. AAS (2020)

  11. Simó, C., Gómez, G., Llibre, J., Martinez, R., Rodriguez, J.: On the optimal station keeping control of halo orbits. Acta Astronaut. 15(6–7), 391–397 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(87)90175-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, H., Li, S.: Station-keeping of libration point orbits by means of projecting to the manifolds. Acta Astronaut. 163, 38–44 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Howell, K.C., Pernicka, H.J.: Stationkeeping method for libration point trajectories. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 16(1), 151–159 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qi, Y., de Ruiter, A.: Station-keeping strategy for real translunar libration point orbits using continuous thrust. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 94, 105376 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shirobokov, M., Trofimov, S., Ovchinnikov, M.: Survey of station-keeping techniques for libration point orbits. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 40(5), 1085–1105 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ulybyshev, Y.: Long-term station keeping of space station in lunar halo orbits. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 38(6), 1063–1070 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akiyama, Y., Bando, M., Hokamoto, S.: Station-keeping and formation flying based on nonlinear output regulation theory. Acta Astronaut. 153, 289–296 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rish, I., Cecchi, G.A., Lozano, A., Niculescu-Mizil, A.: Practical applications of sparse modeling. MIT Press (2014)

  19. Rish, I., Grabarnik, G.: Sparse modeling: Theory, algorithms, and applications. CRC Press (2014)

  20. Nagahara, M., Ostergaard, J., Queved, D.E.: Discrete-time hands-off control by sparse optimization. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 76, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13634-016-0372-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagahara, M., Quevedo, D.E., Nesic, D.: Maximum hands-off control: a paradigm of control effort minimization. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 61(3), 735–747 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2015.2452831

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagahara, M.: Sparsity methods for systems and control. Now Publishers, Boston-Delft (2000). https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680837254

  23. Blackmore, L., Acikmese, B., Scharf, D.P.: Minimum-landing-error powered-descent guidance for mars landing using convex optimization. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 33(4), 1161–1171 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.47202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eren, U., Dueri, D., Acikmese, B.: Constrained reachability and controllability sets for planetary precision landing via convex optimization. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 38(11), 2067–2083 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, X., Lu, P., Pan, B.: Survey of convex optimization for aerospace applications. Astrodynamics 1(1), 23–40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-017-0003-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan, D., Chung, S.J., Hadaegh, F.Y.: Model predictive control of swarms of spacecraft using sequential convex programming. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 37(6), 1725–1740 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sagliano, M.: Pseudospectral convex optimization for powered descent and landing. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 41(2), 320–334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shi, R., Long, T., Baoyin, H.: Multi-fidelity and multi-objective optimization of low-thrust transfers with control strategy for all-electric geostationary satellites. Acta Astronaut. 177, 577–587 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Z., Grant, M.J.: Minimum-fuel low-thrust transfers for spacecraft: a convex approach. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 54(5), 2274–2290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2812558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cobos, J., Masdemont, J.J.: Astrodynamical applications of invariant manifolds associated with collinear Lissajous libration orbits. In: Libration Point Orbits and Applications, pp. 253–268. World Scientific (2003)

  31. Montagnier, P., Paige, C.C., Spiteri, R.J.: Real Floquet factors of linear time-periodic systems. Syst. Contr. Lett. 50(4), 251–262 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(03)00158-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Grant, M., Boyd, S., Ye, Y.: CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming (2009)

  33. Bando, M., Scheeres, D.J.: Attractive sets to unstable orbits using optimal feedback control. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 39(12), 2725–2739 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Howell, K.C., Marchand, B.G.: Natural and non-natural spacecraft formations near the l1 and l2 libration points in the Sun-Earth/Moon ephemeris system. Dyn. Syst. 20(1), 149–173 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Bando, M., Ichikawa, A.: Formation flying along halo orbit of circular-restricted three-body problem. J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 38(1), 123–129 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fairman, F.W.: Linear control theory: the state space approach, chap. 2, pp. 186–189 John Wiley & Sons (1998)

Download references

Funding

The work of the first author was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19J11762. The work of the second author was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K18781.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishu-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan

    Yuki Kayama, Mai Bando & Shinji Hokamoto

Authors
  1. Yuki Kayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mai Bando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shinji Hokamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuki Kayama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayama, Y., Bando, M. & Hokamoto, S. Sparse Optimal Trajectory Design in Three-Body Problem. J Astronaut Sci 69, 829–856 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-022-00315-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-022-00315-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation