Abstract
NAC proteins in plants respond to stress and play an important role in plant growth regulation. This regulation occurs through a variety of downstream effects mediated by plant hormones in response to stress. In this study, we performed a systematic genome-wide analysis of the NAC gene family in tomato based on genome version SL4.0. We identified 99 SlNAC genes by abiotic stress analysis of conserved motifs and gene structure, phylogenetic analysis, cis-element analysis, chromosome localization analysis, synteny relationship and expression pattern analysis. These 99 SlNAC genes were distributed on all 12 chromosomes. Except for genes without introns, there was no significant correlation between gene structures and phylogenetic relationships. Most of the cis-elements identified were associated with plant hormones and environmental responses. There were 77 SlNAC genes that showed no homogeneity between tomato and wild rice, suggesting that these homologous genes arose after the differentiation of dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. The comprehensive analysis of the SlNAC gene family provides a valuable resource for studying this gene family in tomato and a foundation for further study of the functional characteristics of these genes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aida M, Ishida T, Fukaki H et al (1997) Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: an analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant. Plant Cell 9:841–857. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.6.841
Alves MS, Dadalto SP, Goncalves AB et al (2013) Plant bZIP transcription factors responsive to pathogens: a review. Int J Mol Sci 14:7815–7828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14047815
Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA et al (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W202–W208. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp335
Balazadeh S, Siddiqui H, Allu AD et al (2010) A gene regulatory network controlled by the NAC transcription factor ANAC092/AtNAC2/ORE1 during salt-promoted senescence. Plant J 62:250–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04151.x
Consortium TTG (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11119
Dalman K, Wind JJ, Nemesio-Gorriz M et al (2017) Overexpression of PaNAC03, a stress induced NAC gene family transcription factor in Norway spruce leads to reduced flavonol biosynthesis and aberrant embryo development. BMC Plant Biol 17:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0952-8
Dangl JL, Jones JDG (2001) Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411:826–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/35081161
Diao W, Snyder J, Wang S et al (2018) Genome-wide analyses of the NAC transcription factor gene family in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): chromosome location, phylogeny, structure, expression patterns, cis-elements in the promoter, and interaction network. Int J Mol Sci 19:1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041028
Durrant WE, Dong X (2004) Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:185–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421
Eulgem T, Somssich IE (2007) Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:366–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.020
Fang L, Su L, Sun X et al (2016) Expression of Vitis amurensis NAC26 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance by modulating jasmonic acid synthesis. J Exp Bot 67:2829–2845. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw122
Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR (2011) HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W29–W37. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr367
Glazebrook J (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:205–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923
Guo W, Wang S, Chen R et al (2015) Characterization and expression profile of CaNAC2 pepper gene. Front Plant Sci 6:755. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00755
Gutterson N, Reuber TL (2004) Regulation of disease resistance pathways by AP2/ERF transcription factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:465–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2004.04.007
Han QQ, Qiao P, Song YZ et al (2015) Structural analysis and tissue-specific expression patterns of a novel salt-inducible NAC transcription factor gene fromNicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 89:700–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2014.11513140
He XJ, Mu RL, Cao WH et al (2005) AtNAC2, a transcription factor downstream of ethylene and auxin signaling pathways, is involved in salt stress response and lateral root development. Plant J 44:903–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02575.x
He L, Bian J, Xu J et al (2019) Novel maize NAC transcriptional repressor ZmNAC071 confers enhanced sensitivity to ABA and osmotic stress by downregulating stress-responsive genes in transgenic arabidopsis. J Agric Food Chem 67:8905–8918. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02331
Hu H, Dai M, Yao J et al (2006) Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12987–12992. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604882103
Hu H, You J, Fang Y et al (2008) Characterization of transcription factor gene SNAC2 conferring cold and salt tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol 67:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-008-9309-5
Hussain RM, Ali M, Feng X et al (2017) The essence of NAC gene family to the cultivation of drought-resistant soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars. BMC Plant Biol 17:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1001-y
Petrović I, Savić S, Gricourt J et al (2021) Effect of long-term drought on tomato leaves: the impact on metabolic and antioxidative response. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 27:2805–2817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-01102-2
Jensen MK, Lindemose S, de Masi F et al (2013) ATAF1 transcription factor directly regulates abscisic acid biosynthetic geneNCED3 inArabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Open Bio 3:321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2013.07.006
Jin JF, Wang ZQ, He QY et al (2020) Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the NAC transcription factor family in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) during aluminum stress. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6689-7
Kim HS, Park HC, Kim KE et al (2012) A NAC transcription factor and SNI1 cooperatively suppress basal pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res 40:9182–9192. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks683
Kou X, Wang S, Wu M et al (2014) Molecular characterization and expression analysis of NAC family transcription factors in tomato. Plant Mol Biol Rep 32:501–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-013-0655-3
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P (2013) APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol 199:639–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12291
Lin R, Zhao W, Meng X et al (2007) Rice gene OsNAC19 encodes a novel NAC-domain transcription factor and responds to infection by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Sci 172:120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.07.019
Liu J, Wang X, Mitchell T et al (2010) Recent progress and understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the rice-Magnaporthe oryzae interaction. Mol Plant Pathol 11:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00607.x
Liu Q, Sun C, Han J et al (2020) Identification, characterization and functional differentiation of the NAC gene family and its roles in response to cold stress in ginseng, Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. PLoS ONE 15:e234423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234423
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25:402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Mao H, Yu L, Han R et al (2016) ZmNAC55, a maize stress-responsive NAC transcription factor, confers drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Bioch 105:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.018
Mishra R, Shteinberg M, Shkolnik D et al (2021) Interplay between abiotic (drought) and biotic (virus) stresses in tomato plants. Mol Plant Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13172
Mushtaq N, Wang Y, Fan J et al (2022) Down-regulation of cytokinin receptor gene slhk2 improves plant tolerance to drought, heat, and combined stresses in tomato. Plants-Basel 11(2):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11020154
Nakashima K, Takasaki H, Mizoi J et al (2012) NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.005
Nelson GC, Valin H, Sands RD et al (2014) Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:3274–3279. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222465110
Nuruzzaman M, Sharoni AM, Kikuchi S (2013) Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. Front Microbiol 4:248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00248
Ohnishi T, Sugahara S, Yamada T et al (2005) OsNAC6, a member of the NAC gene family, is induced by various stresses in rice. Genes Genet Syst 80:135–139. https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.80.135
Olsen AN, Ernst HA, Leggio LL et al (2005) NAC transcription factors: structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci 10:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.010
Ooka H, Satoh K, Doi K et al (2003) Comprehensive analysis of NAC family genes in Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis thaliana. Dna Res 10:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/10.6.239
Pang X, Xue M, Ren M et al (2019) Ammopiptanthus mongolicus stress-responsive NAC gene enhances the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana to drought and cold stresses. Genet Mol Biol 42:624–634. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0101
Puranik S, Sahu PP, Srivastava PS et al (2012) NAC proteins: regulation and role in stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 17:369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.004
Sahi C, Singh A, Blumwald E et al (2006) Beyond osmolytes and transporters: novel plant salt-stress tolerance-related genes from transcriptional profiling data. Physiol Plantarum 127:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00610.x
Schafleitner R, Kumar S, Lin CY et al (2013) The okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) transcriptome as a source for gene sequence information and molecular markers for diversity analysis. Gene 517:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.098
Shan X, Yang K, Xu X et al (2019) Genome-wide investigation of the NAC gene family and its potential association with the secondary cell wall in Moso Bamboo. Biomolecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9100609
Tweneboah S, Oh S (2017) Biological roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in solanaceous crops. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 44:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2017.44.1.001
Wang G, Zhang S, Ma X et al (2016) A stress-associated NAC transcription factor (SlNAC35) from tomato plays a positive role in biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol Plant 158:45–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12444
Xie Q, Tian Y, Hu Z et al (2021) Novel translational and phosphorylation modification regulation mechanisms of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit ripening revealed by integrative proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111782
Xu ZY, Kim SY, Hyeon DY et al (2013) The Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor ANAC096 cooperates with bZIP-type transcription factors in dehydration and osmotic stress responses. Plant Cell 25:4708–4724. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.119099
Yang S, Zhu H, Huang L et al (2021) Transcriptome-wide and expression analysis of the NAC gene family in pepino (Solanum muricatum) during drought stress. PeerJ 9:e10966. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10966
Yokotani N, Tsuchida-Mayama T, Ichikawa H et al (2014) OsNAC111, a blast disease-responsive transcription factor in rice, positively regulates the expression of defense-related genes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 27:1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-03-14-0065-R
Yu X, Liu Y, Wang S et al (2016) CarNAC4, a NAC-type chickpea transcription factor conferring enhanced drought and salt stress tolerances in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 35:613–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1907-5
Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H et al (2017) ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol 8(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12628
Zhang L, Zhang L, Xia C et al (2016) The novel wheat transcription factor TaNAC47 enhances multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic plants. Front Plant Sci 6:1174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01174
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2020C011), Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund of Heilongjiang Province (LBH-Q18023), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872120 and 32072588).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XC: Writing-original draft, Formal analysis. FM: Formal analysis. CS: Data curation. LM: Data curation. YZ: Formal analysis. XX: Formal analysis. MC: Data curation. FM: Formal analysis. HQ: Formal analysis. AW: Conceptualization, Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Inhwa Yeam.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Mo, F., Shen, C. et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SlNAC gene family in tomato based on a high-quality genome. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 63, 887–901 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-022-00443-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-022-00443-5