Skip to main content
Log in

Magnitude Estimation Approach for Assessing Stickiness Sensation Perceived in Wet Fabrics

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sweating will trigger stickiness sensation and affecting sensorial comfort of wearer. This study aims at assessing stickiness sensation perceived in wetted fabrics utilizing the Body Movement Simulator (BMS). BMS was built to drive the samples to and fro subject’s volar forearms, providing repeatable fabric movement. Assessors were asked to compare the sample with the reference and assign numerical value to the sample using the magnitude estimation approach. 22 types of fabrics with different constructional parameters and fiber content were assessed by 23 assessors. Statistical analysis shows that within-judge reliability and between-judge consistency are satisfactory, and significant between-fabric differences are observed, demonstrating that both experimental method and assessor panel are reliable. The results reveal that thicker fabrics with higher absorption capacity and less contact area with skin contribute to weaker stickiness sensation. The perceived stickiness is highly related to water content and saturation level of samples, but poorly related to its surface friction and roughness in dry condition. This subjective assessment method is useful for assessing the stickiness sensation in textiles especially for sportswear, intimate apparel or hygiene products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. P. Gashti, Fiber. Polym., 17, 130 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. I. Ebrahimi, M. Parvinzadeh Gashti, and M. Sarafpour, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 360, 278 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Parvinzadeh Gashti, M. Yousefpour Navid, and M. Hossein Rahimi, Pigm. Resin. Technol., 42, 34 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. P. Gashti and H. Adibzadeh, Fiber. Polym., 15, 65 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. M. Pasumarty, S. A. Johnson, S. A. Watson, and M. J. Adams, Tribol. Lett., 44, 117 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. K. Sivamani, J. Goodman, N. V. Gitis, and H. I. Maibach, Skin Res. Technol., 9, 227 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Derler, L. C. Gerhardt, A. Lenz, E. Bertaux, and M. Hadad, Tribol. Int., 42, 1565 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. van Kuilenburg, M. A. Masen, and E. van der Heide, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. J., 229, 243 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Gwosdow, J. Stevens, L. Berglund, and J. Stolwijk, Text. Res. J., 56, 574 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Shao, X. Chen, C. Barnes, and B. Henson, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H, 224, 97 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J. F. Ramírez, J. J. Pavón, and A. Toro, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. J., 259 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. N. Tasron, T. J. Thurston, and M. J. Carré, Procedia Eng., 112, 110 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Tomlinson, R. Lewis, X. Liu, C. Texier, and M. Carré, Tribol. Lett., 41, 283 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. A. Masen, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 4, 1620 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O. Dinç, C. Ettles, S. Calabrese, and H. Scarton, J. Tribol., 113, 512 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Derler and L. C. Gerhardt, Tribol. Lett., 45, 1 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Tasron, R. Maiti, M. Hemming, R. Lewis, and M. Carré, Procedia Eng., 147, 753 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Dong, J. Kong, C. Mu, C. Zhao, N. L. Thomas, and X. Lu, Mater. Des., 88, 82 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Bertaux, S. Derler, R. M. Rossi, X. Zeng, L. Koehl, and V. Ventenat, Text. Res. J., 80, 1803 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Raccuglia, K. Pistak, C. Heyde, J. Qu, N. Mao, S. Hodder, and G. Havenith, Text. Res. J., doi:10.1177/0040517517716905 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Meredith, J. Brown, and E. Clarke, Biotribology, 3, 20 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G.–M. Rotaru, D. Pille, F. Lehmeier, R. Stämpfli, A. Scheel–Sailer, R. Rossi, and S. Derler, Tribol. Int., 65, 91 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Baussan, M.–A. Bueno, R. Rossi, and S. Derler, Wear, 268, 1103 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Derler, G.–M. Rotaru, W. Ke, L. El Issawi–Frischknecht, P. Kellenberger, A. Scheel–Sailer, and R. Rossi, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 38, 114 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Ke, G. M. Rotaru, J. Y. Hu, X. Ding, R. M. Rossi, and S. Derler, Tribol. Lett., 56, 457 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. U. Wollina in “Handbook of Medical Textiles” (V. Bartels Ed.), p.248, Elsevier, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Derler, A. Rao, P. Ballistreri, R. Huber, A. Scheel–Sailer, and R. M. Rossi, Tribol. Int., 46, 208 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. D. F. Moore, “The Friction and Lubrication of Elastomers”, Pergamon Press Oxford, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Chen, S. Ge, W. Tang, J. Zhang, and N. Chen, Text. Res. J., 85, 2177 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. W. W. Carr, J. E. Posey, and W. C. Tincher, Text. Res. J., 58, 129 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. G. Gee, P. Tomlins, A. Calver, R. H. Darling, and M. Rides, Wear, 1437 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Kawabata, Sen'i Kikai Gakkaishi, 26, P721 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  33. V. Chaudhary, P. K. Bajpai, and S. Maheshwari, Fiber. Polym., 19, 403 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. R. R. Van Amber, B. J. Lowe, B. E. Niven, R. M. Laing, C. A. Wilson, and S. Collie, Text. Res. J., 85, 115 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. E. Kamalha, Y. Zeng, J. I. Mwasiagi, and S. Kyatuheire, J. Sens. Stud., 28, 423 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. L.–C. Gerhardt, V. Strässle, A. Lenz, N. D. Spencer, and S. Derler, J. Royal Soc. Interface, 5, 1317 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Derler, U. Schrade, and L. Gerhardt, Wear, 263, 1112 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. L. Skedung, K. Danerlöv, U. Olofsson, C. Michael Johannesson, M. Aikala, J. Kettle, M. Arvidsson, B. Berglund, and M. W. Rutland, Tribol. Int., 44, 505 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Jiang, J. Hu, X. Yang, and X. Ding, Fiber. Polym., 17, 630 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. N. Hollies, J. Text. Inst., 80, 1 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. S. S. Stevens and E. H. Galanter, J. Exp. Psychol., 54, 377 (1957).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. K. P. M. Tang, C. W. Kan, and J. T. Fan, J. Sens. Stud., 30, 329 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. E. Jeon, S. Yoo, and E. Kim, Ergonomics, 54, 576 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. A. Ramalho, P. Szekeres, and E. Fernandes, Tribol. Int., 63, 29 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. S. E.–G. Jeguirim, A. B. Dhouib, M. Sahnoun, M. Cheikhrouhou, N. Njeugna, L. Schacher, and D. Adolphe, J. Sens. Stud., 25, 201 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. D. Alimaa, T. Matsuo, M. Nakajima, and M. Takahashi, Text. Res. J., 70, 985 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. M. A. Darden and C. J. Schwartz, Wear, 267, 1289 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. L. Baker, H. Chen, and B. Cluver, J. Text. Eng. Fash. Tech., 2, 00044 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  49. “AATCC 79 Absorbency of Textiles”, American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, North Carolina, United States, 2007.

  50. K. P. M. Tang, C. W. Kan, and J. T. Fan, Text. Res. J., 85, 838 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. R. K. Garnsworthy, “Understanding the Causes of Prickle and Itch from the Skin Contact of Fabrics”, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  52. M. Yamakawa and S. Isaji, J. Text. Mach. Soc. Jpn., 33, 9 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  53. H. J. Sauer in “Principles of Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning: A Textbook with Design Data Based on the 2001 ASHRAE Handbook––Fundamentals” (J. Harry J. Sauer, R. H. Howell, and W. J. Coad Eds.), p.8.1, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air–Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, Ga., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  54. R. Mora–Rodriguez, J. Ortega, and N. Hamouti, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 111, 1073 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. J. Abián–Vicén, J. Del Coso, C. González–Millán, J. J. Salinero, and P. Abián, PLoS One, 7, e37821 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  56. E. Zetou, G. Giatsis, F. Mountaki, and A. Komninakidou, J. Sci. Med. Sport, 11, 139 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. C. N. Bardis, S. A. Kavouras, G. Arnaoutis, D. B. Panagiotakos, and L. S. Sidossis, J. Athl. Train., 48, 741 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. H. Daanen in “Textiles for Sportswear”, p.153, Woodhead Publishing, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  59. H. R. Moskowitz, J. Food Qual., 1, 195 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. R. Shishoo, “Textiles in Sport”, Woodhead Pub. in Association with the Textile Institute, CRC, Cambridge: Boca Raton, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. “ISO 11056Sensory Analysis–Methodology–Magnitude Estimation Method”, International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland, 1999.

  62. P. Kenins, Text. Res. J., 64, 722 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Wai Kan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maggie, KP., Chau, KH., Kan, CW. et al. Magnitude Estimation Approach for Assessing Stickiness Sensation Perceived in Wet Fabrics. Fibers Polym 19, 2418–2430 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8626-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8626-9

Keywords

Navigation