Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of grasshopper (Locusta Migratoria) and mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor) powders on the quality characteristics of protein rich muffins: nutritional, physicochemical, textural and sensory aspects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insects are the most common animal group in the world and they constitute about 80% of the animal kingdom. Today, around 1600 insect species have been consumed by humans. The aim of this study was to explore the potential use of edible insect flours for the production of protein rich muffins. Proximate composition and sensory quality of muffins were also explored. The protein and fat content of resulting muffins were effectively improved. While grasshopper powder provided 12.91 ± 0.40% protein content, mealworm powder enhancement obtained 36.56 ± 1.26% fat content compared with control (p ≤ 0.05). Physical properties of resulting muffins were also investigated. GR-M sample presented the highest baking yield of 88.66 ± 0.58%. On the other hand, fortification with edible insect powders led to have denser structures with the lower specific volume than the control; incorporation of 15% with mealworm powder obtained the lowest specific volume (1.14 ± 0.02 cm3/g). As regard to textural parameters, inclusion of edible insect flours also affected the textural properties; muffins fortified with grasshopper powder showed a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) softer crumb with lower springiness, cohesiveness and chewiness while no significant differences (p > 0.05) in all textural properties except cohesiveness and adhesiveness between used insect types were observed. Sensory characteristics revealed that fortification of wheat flour by mealworm powder provided a muffin with liking score ranged from 6.70 to 8.70 for all attributes tested, therefore, indicating that mealworm powder could be an effective ingredient in increasing nutritional value of bakery products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Pihlanto, P. Mattila, S. Mäkinen et al., Food Funct. 8(10), 3443–3458 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Sanz, A. Salvador, R. Baixauli et al., Eur. Food Res. Technol. 229(2), 197–204 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M.U. Rosales-Soto, J.R. Powers, J.R. Alldredge, J. Sci. Food Agric. 92(7), 1511–1518 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Jeong, J.S. Hong, Q. Liu et al., Cereal Chem. 98, 392–404 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K.T. Kaczmarska, M.V. Chandra-Hioe, D. Frank et al., LWT 96, 205–214 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Jisha, G. Padmaja, Food Bioprocess Technol. 4(1), 92–101 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Shevkani, A. Kaur, S. Kumar et al., LWT-Food Sci Technol. 63(2), 927–933 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Severini, D. Azzollini, M. Albenzio et al., Food Res. Int. 106, 666–676 (2018)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Raheem, C. Carrascosa, O.B. Oluwole et al., Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 59(14), 2169–2188 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kelemu, S. Niassy, B. Torto et al., J. Insects Food Feed 1(2), 103–119 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Zielińska, B. Baraniak, M. Karaś et al., Food Res. Int. 77, 460–466 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Spranghers, M. Ottoboni, C. Klootwijk et al., J. Sci. Food Agric. 97(8), 2594–2600 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. J.R.-E. Blásquez, J.M.P. Moreno, V.H.M. Camacho, Food Nutr. Sci. 3(02), 164 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Banjo, O. Lawal, E. Songonuga, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5(3), 298–301 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. De Prins, Adv. Entomol. 2, 47–48 (2014)

  16. B. Purschke, H. Tanzmeister, P. Meinlschmidt et al., Food Res. Int. 106, 271–279 (2018)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Stoops, S. Crauwels, M. Waud et al., Food Microbiol. 53, 122–127 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. C.M. González, R. Garzón, C.M. Rosell et al., Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 51, 205–210 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Roncolini, V. Milanović, F. Cardinali et al., PLoS ONE 14(2), e0211747 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Wendin, V. Olsson, M. Langton, Foods 8(8), 319 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Clarkson, M. Mirosa, J. Birch, Insects 9(1), 20 (2018)

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Van Itterbeeck, I.N. Rakotomalala Andrianavalona, F.I. Rajemison et al., Foods 8(12), 666 (2019)

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. AACC International, 10th edn. (St. Paul, Minessota, 2000)

  24. M. Pojić, T. Dapčević Hadnađev, M. Hadnađev et al., J. Food Qual. 38(6), 431–440 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Arifin, S.N. Izyan, N. Huda-Faujan, J. Food Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.3(6).090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Heo, M.J. Kim, J.W. Lee et al., Food Sci. Nutr. 7(5), 1778–1785 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. M.I. Palacio, A.I. Etcheverría, G.D. Manrique, J. Food Sci. Technol. 55(8), 2955–2962 (2018)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Martínez-Cervera, A. Salvador, T. Sanz, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 63(2), 1083–1090 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Goswami, R.K. Gupta, D. Mridula et al., LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 64(1), 374–380 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. B. Çabuk, B. Yılmaz, J. Food Sci. Technol. 57(7), 2750–2757 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. P.M.G. Ishida, C.J. Steel, Food Sci. Technol. 34(4), 746–754 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M.S. Soares Júnior, P.Z. Bassinello, M. Caliari et al., Food Sci. Technol. 29(3), 636–641 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Pauter, M. Różańska, P. Wiza et al., Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment 17(3), 227 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. C. da Rosamachado, R.C.S. Thys, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 56, 102180 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Dewi, A. Vidiarti, D. Fitranti et al., Food Res. 4(3), 114–122 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. B. Biró, R. Fodor, I. Szedljak et al., LWT-Food Sci Technol. 116, 108542 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Cappelli, N. Oliva, G. Bonaccorsi et al., LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 118, 108867 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Haber, M. Mishyna, J.J.I. Martinez et al., LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 115, 108395 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. C.B.J. Villarino, V. Jayasena, R. Coorey et al., Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56(5), 835–857 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. K. Ng, S. Bhaduri, R. Ghatak et al., J. Acad. Nutr. Diet 112(9), A58 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Valcarcel, R. Ghatak, S. Bhaduri et al., J. Acad. Nutr. Diet 112(9), A58 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Osimani, V. Milanović, F. Cardinali et al., Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 48, 150–163 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. P. García-Segovia, M. Igual, J. Martínez-Monzó, Foods 9(7), 933 (2020)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Indriani, M.S. Bin Ab Karim, S. Nalinanon et al., LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 119, 108876 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Premi, H.K. Sharma, J. Food Meas. Charact. 12(1), 11–21 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. G. Melgar-Lalanne, A.-J. Hernández-Álvarez, A. Salinas-Castro, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 18(4), 1166–1191 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. G. Kerch, F. Rustichelli, P. Ausili et al., Eur. Food Res. Technol. 226(6), 1459–1464 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. K. Khuenpet, C. Pakasap, S. Vatthanakul et al., Int. J. Agric. 16(2), 283–296 (2020)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. A.N. Bellary, A.R. Indiramma, M. Prakash et al., Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 33, 554–562 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. W. Mokrzycki, M. Tatol, Mach. Graph. Vis. 20(4), 383–411 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  51. R.A. Mohamad, F. Taip, S. Mazlina et al., J. Appl. Sci. Agric. 10(5), 63–68 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. G. Abera, W.K. Solomon, G. Bultosa, Food Sci. Nutr. 5(3), 653–661 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. N.C. Pa, N.L. Chin, Y.A. Yusof et al., J. Food Agric. Environ. 11(2), 48–55 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  54. C.B.J. Villarino, V. Jayasena, R. Coorey et al., LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 60(1), 435–443 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. P.Ł Kowalczewski, K. Walkowiak, Ł Masewicz et al., Foods 8(7), 240 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. R. Kaur, M. Kaur, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 91, 278–285 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. M.E. Matos, T. Sanz, C.M. Rosell, Food Hydrocoll. 35, 150–158 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. B. Herranz, W. Canet, M.J. Jiménez et al., Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 51(5), 1087–1098 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. M.D. Alvarez, B. Herranz, M.J. Jiménez et al., J. Texture Stud. 48(6), 550–561 (2017)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. M. Bala, T.V. Arun Kumar, S. Tushir et al., J. Food Sci. Technol. 56(2), 713–723 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Izmir Institute of Technology (IZTECH), Biotechnology and Bioengineering Application and Research Center (BIOMER) for the protein and fat content analysis and Akdeniz University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering for texture profile analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burcu Çabuk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çabuk, B. Influence of grasshopper (Locusta Migratoria) and mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor) powders on the quality characteristics of protein rich muffins: nutritional, physicochemical, textural and sensory aspects. Food Measure 15, 3862–3872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00967-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00967-x

Keywords

Navigation