Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes, Recurrent Dysphagia, and Gastroesophageal Reflux After Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

There is limited data on long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of POEM in patients who completed a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Methods

Data of patients who underwent POEM and completed ≥ 5-year follow-up were analyzed, retrospectively. Primary outcome of study was clinical success (Eckardt ≤ 3) at ≥ 5 years after POEM. Secondary outcomes included predictors of dysphagia and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on long-term follow-up.

Results

Three hundred nineteen patients (males 182, mean age 40.5 ± 14.2 years) completed a median of 73-(60–89) month follow-up. Esophageal motility disorders included idiopathic achalasia (type I 26.6%, type II 60.8%, type III 5.6%) and Jackhammer esophagus or distal esophageal spasm (2.8%). POEM was technically successful in 307 (96.2%) patients. Long-term success was 92.6% (overall), 92.1% (type I), 94.7% (type II), 87.5% (type III), and 75% (Jackhammer esophagus/distal esophageal spasm). Symptomatic GERD and reflux esophagitis were detected in 28.9% and 35.3% patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, young age and female gender were independent risk factors for recurrent dysphagia (p = 0.037) and symptomatic GERD after POEM (p = 0.025), respectively. Lower post-POEM lower esophageal sphincter pressure was an independent predictor for reflux esophagitis (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

POEM is an effective and durable treatment for achalasia and non-achalasia spastic motility disorders. Young patients and females may be at higher risk for recurrent dysphagia and symptomatic GERD, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The original anonymous dataset is available on request from the corresponding author at zaheernabi1978@gmail.com.

References

  1. Guo H, Yang H, Zhang X, Wang L, Lv Y, Zou X, Ling T (2017) Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective single-center study. Dis Esophagus 30:1-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li QL, Wu QN, Zhang XC, Xu MD, Zhang W, Chen SY, Zhong YS, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, Qin WZ, Hu JW, Cai MY, Yao LQ, Zhou PH (2018) Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months. Gastrointest Endosc 87:1405-1412 e1403

    Google Scholar 

  3. Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM, Sharata AM, Ward MA, DeMeester SR, Swanstrom LL (2018) Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc 32:421-427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He C, Li M, Lu B, Ying X, Gao C, Wang S, Ma C, Jin C (2019) Long-Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: Outcomes with a Median Follow-Up of 36 Months. Dig Dis Sci 64:803-810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewer Gutierrez OI, Moran RA, Familiari P, Dbouk MH, Costamagna G, Ichkhanian Y, Seewald S, Bapaye A, Cho JY, Barret M, Eleftheriadis N, Pioche M, Hayee BH, Tantau M, Ujiki M, Landi R, Invernizzi M, Yoo IK, Roman S, Haji A, Hedberg HM, Parsa N, Mion F, Fayad L, Kumbhari V, Agarwalla A, Ngamruengphong S, Sanaei O, Ponchon T, Khashab MA (2020) Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years: a multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 8:E650-E655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramchandani M, Nageshwar Reddy D, Darisetty S, Kotla R, Chavan R, Kalpala R, Galasso D, Lakhtakia S, Rao GV (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: Treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center. Dig Endosc 28:19-26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, Rao GV, Reddy N (2017) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: outcomes in over 400 consecutive patients. Endosc Int Open 5:E331-E339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20:130-134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karyampudi A, Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Darisetty S, Goud R, Chavan R, Kalapala R, Rao GV, Reddy DN (2021) Gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case-control study. United European Gastroenterol J 9:63–71

  10. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, Johnson F, Hongo M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L (1999) Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 45:172-180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponds FA, Fockens P, Lei A, Neuhaus H, Beyna T, Kandler J, Frieling T, Chiu PWY, Wu JCY, Wong VWY, Costamagna G, Familiari P, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Smout A, Bredenoord AJ (2019) Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation on Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcomes Among Treatment-Naive Patients With Achalasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 322:134-144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J, Repici A, von Rahden BHA, Bredenoord AJ, Bisschops R, Messmann H, Vollberg MC, Noder T, Kersten JF, Mann O, Izbicki J, Pazdro A, Fumagalli U, Rosati R, Germer CT, Schijven MP, Emmermann A, von Renteln D, Fockens P, Boeckxstaens G, Rosch T (2019) Endoscopic or Surgical Myotomy in Patients with Idiopathic Achalasia. N Engl J Med 381:2219-2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung HK, Hong SJ, Lee OY, Pandolfino J, Park H, Miwa H, Ghoshal UC, Mahadeva S, Oshima T, Chen M, Chua ASB, Cho YK, Lee TH, Min YW, Park CH, Kwon JG, Park MI, Jung K, Park JK, Jung KW, Lim HC, Jung DH, Kim DH, Lim CH, Moon HS, Park JH, Choi SC, Suzuki H, Patcharatrakul T, Wu JCY, Lee KJ, Tanaka S, Siah KTH, Park KS, Kim SE, Korean Society of N, Motility (2020) 2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:180-203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khashab MA, Vela MF, Thosani N, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Fishman DS, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Kannadath BS, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Qumseya BJ, Sawhney MS, Yang J, Wani S (2020) ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 91:213-227 e216

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oude Nijhuis RAB, Zaninotto G, Roman S, Boeckxstaens GE, Fockens P, Langendam MW, Plumb AA, Smout A, Targarona EM, Trukhmanov AS, Weusten B, Bredenoord AJ (2020) European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J 8:13-33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT (2020) ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 115:1393-1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McKay SC, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Fletcher R, Reavis KM, Bradley DD, DeMeester SR, Muller D, Parker B, Swanstrom LL (2021) POEM: clinical outcomes beyond 5 years. Surg Endosc 35:5709–5716

  18. Zhang WG, Chai NL, Zhai YQ, Linghu EQ, Li HK (2020) Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Chin Med J (Engl) 133:996-998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tefas C, Boros C, Ciobanu L, Surdea-Blaga T, Tantau A, Tantau M (2020) POEM: Five Years of Experience in a Single East European Center. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 29:323-328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Onimaru M, Inoue H, Fujiyoshi Y, Abad MRA, Nishikawa Y, Toshimori A, Shimamura Y, Tanabe M, Sumi K, Ikeda H (2021) Long-term clinical results of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: First report of more than 10-year patient experience as assessed with a questionnaire-based survey. Endosc Int Open 9:E409-E416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Campagna RAJ, Cirera A, Holmstrom AL, Triggs JR, Teitelbaum EN, Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE, Hungness ES (2021) Outcomes of 100 Patients More Than 4 Years After POEM for Achalasia. Ann Surg 273:1135-1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Modayil RJ, Zhang X, Rothberg B, Kollarus M, Galibov I, Peller H, Taylor S, Brathwaite CE, Halwan B, Grendell JH, Stavropoulos SN (2021) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: 10-year outcomes from a large, single-center U.S. series with high follow-up completion and comprehensive analysis of long-term efficacy, safety, objective GERD, and endoscopic functional luminal assessment. Gastrointest Endosc 94:930–942

  23. Nabi Z, Chavan R, Ramchandani M, Basha J, Jagtap N, Karyampudi A, Darisetty S, Tandan M, Goud R, Rao GV, Reddy DN (2021) Long-term Outcomes of Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Spastic Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Large, Single-Center Study. J Clin Gastroenterol 55:594-601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Filicori F, Dunst CM, Sharata A, Abdelmoaty WF, Zihni AM, Reavis KM, Demeester SR, Swanstrom LL (2019) Long-term outcomes following POEM for non-achalasia motility disorders of the esophagus. Surg Endosc 33:1632-1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bernardot L, Roman S, Barret M, Vitton V, Wallenhorst T, Pioche M, Chaussade S, Gonzalez JM, Ponchon T, Prat F, Barthet M, Vergniol J, Chabrun E, Zerbib F (2020) Efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of non-achalasia esophageal motor disorders. Surg Endosc 34:5508–515

  26. Zhang W, Linghu EQ (2017) Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Type III Achalasia of Chicago Classification: Outcomes with a Minimum Follow-Up of 24 Months. J Gastrointest Surg 21:785-791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumbhari V, Familiari P, Bjerregaard NC, Pioche M, Jones E, Ko WJ, Hayee B, Cali A, Ngamruengphong S, Mion F, Hernaez R, Roman S, Tieu AH, El Zein M, Ajayi T, Haji A, Cho JY, Hazey J, Perry KA, Ponchon T, Kunda R, Costamagna G, Khashab MA (2017) Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study. Endoscopy 49:634-642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim YS, Kim N, Kim GH (2016) Sex and Gender Differences in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 22:575-588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Kotla R, Tandan M, Goud R, Darisetty S, Rao GV, Reddy DN (2020) Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy is unpredictable, but responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy: a large, single-center study. Endoscopy 52:643-651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Modayil RJ, Zhang X, Rothberg B, Kollarus M, Galibov I, Peller H, Taylor S, Brathwaite CE, Halwan B, Grendell JH, Stavropoulos SN (2021) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: 10-year outcomes from a large, single-center U.S. series with high follow-up completion and comprehensive analysis of long-term efficacy, safety, objective GERD, and endoscopic functional luminal assessment. Gastrointest Endosc 94:930-942

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zaheer Nabi, Pradev Inavolu, and Mohan Ramchandani were involved in conception of the study. Jahangeer Basha, Rajesh Goud, and Radhika Chavan were involved in acquisition and analysis of the data. Arun Karyampudi, Santosh Darisetty, and D. Nageshwar Reddy were involved in revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. All the authors agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zaheer Nabi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was reviewed and approved for publication by our Institutional Reviewer.

Consent to Participate

All study participants or their legal guardian provided informed written consent about personal and medical data collection prior to study enrolment.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nabi, Z., Karyampudi, A., Ramchandani, M. et al. Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes, Recurrent Dysphagia, and Gastroesophageal Reflux After Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 1352–1361 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05330-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05330-z

Keywords

Navigation