Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: Outcomes with a Median Follow-Up of 36 Months

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for patients with achalasia.

Methods

Prospective data collected from 115 patients (median age 45 years; interquartile range 34–57) with achalasia who underwent POEM at the First Affiliated Hospital of ZheJiang Chinese Medical University with a median follow-up of 36 months were retrospectively analyzed. The Eckardt score and lower esophageal sphincter pressure changes were analyzed, and the gastroesophageal reflux was observed.

Results

During the final follow-up, the mean Eckardt score reduced from 7.5 ± 1.9 preoperatively to 2.3 ± 1.4 after 1 month of surgery (P < 0.001). Treatment success was observed in 91.3% [confidence interval (CI) 86.2–96.4], 90.3% (CI 84.8–95.8), 89.0% (CI 83.1–94.9), 83.7% (CI 75.7–91.7), and 80.1% (CI 69.7–90.5) of patients after 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, respectively. A total of 16 (13.9%) failures occurred. Four patients were nonresponders (failure within 3 months), eight had an early recurrence (between 3 months and 3 years), and four had a late recurrence (after 3 years). Further, 21 (20.6%) patients had symptoms of reflux during the two-year follow-up. Only one patient with symptomatic reflux was newly added during the subsequent three-year follow-up. Moreover, 71 (61.7%) patients underwent gastroscopy after POEM, and 13 (18.3%) patients were diagnosed with reflux esophagitis.

Conclusion

POEM is safe and effective in treating achalasia and has a favorable long-term efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boeckxstaens GE, Giovanni Z, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014;383:83–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bello B, Herbella FA, Patti MG. Evolution of the minimally invasive treatment of esophageal achalasia. World J Surg. 2011;35:1442–1446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy. 2007;39:761–764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Allemann P, et al. Multimedia manuscript. Heller myotomy and intraluminal fundoplication: a NOTES technique. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:265–271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Von Renteln D, Fuchs KH, Fockens P, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:309–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramchandani M, Nageshwar Reddy D, Darisetty S, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: Treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:256–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo H, Yang H, Zhang X, et al. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective single-center study. Dis Esophagus. 2017;1:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM, et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endocr. 2018;32:421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bin L, Meng L, Yue H, et al. Effect of peroral esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: a Chinese study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:5622–5629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Y, Li M, Lu B, et al. Esophageal motility after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:458–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crespin OM, Liu LWC, Parmar A, et al. Safety and efficacy of POEM for treatment of achalasia: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2187–2201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckardt VF. Clinical presentations and complications of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001;11:281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eckardt VF, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:1732–1738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1807–1816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li QL, Wu QN, Zhang XC, et al. Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1405–1412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herbella FA, Armijo PR, Patti MG. A pictorial presentation of 3.0 Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorders. Einstein. 2016;14:439–442.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jan M, Hana S, Zuzana V, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): mid-term efficacy and safety. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1293–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Werner YB, Costamagna G, Swanström LL, et al. Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Gut. 2015;65:899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Chiu PW, et al. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moonen A, Annese V, Belmans A, et al. Long-term results of the European achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Gut. 2016;65:732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Greene CL, Chang EJ, Oh DS, et al. High resolution manometry sub-classification of achalasia: does it really matter? Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu QN, Xu XY, Zhang XC, et al. Submucosal fibrosis in achalasia patients is a rare cause of aborted peroral endoscopic myotomy procedures. Endoscopy. 2017;49:736–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Rizzetto C, et al. Four hundred laparoscopic myotomies for esophageal achalasia. Ann Surg. 2008;248:986–993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patti MG, Molena D, Fisichella PM, et al. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for achalasia: analysis of successes and failures. Arch Surg. 2001;136:870–877.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hernández OM, Martinez González MA, Blancas JV, et al. Long-term quality of life after peroral endoscopic myotomy remains compromised in patients with achalasia type III. Endoscopy. 2017;49:1209–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Pescarus R, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:161–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Yamashita K, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first over 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4817–4826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ren Y, Tang X, Chen Y, et al. Pre-treatment Eckardt score is a simple factor for predicting one-year peroral endoscopic myotomy failure in patients with achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3234–3241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Repici A, Fuccio L, Maselli R, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller’s myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:934–943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hajar N, Castell DO, Ghomrawi H, et al. Impedance pH confirms the relationship between GERD and BMI. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:1875–1879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Viazis N, Karamanolis GP, Anastasiou J, et al. Refractory GERD: increased body mass index is associated with persisting acid exposure but not hypersensitive esophagus or functional heartburn. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:1450–1455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kejia Zhao and Xianjing Zhao for assisting in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, C., Li, M., Lu, B. et al. Long-Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: Outcomes with a Median Follow-Up of 36 Months. Dig Dis Sci 64, 803–810 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5373-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5373-0

Keywords

Navigation