Skip to main content
Log in

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Type III Achalasia of Chicago Classification: Outcomes with a Minimum Follow-Up of 24 Months

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

There are only few studies about the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for type III achalasia in a relatively large population to date. The purpose of this study was to explore the long-term efficacy of POEM for patients with type III achalasia.

Methods

There were a total of 32 consecutive patients with type III achalasia undergoing POEM in our hospital from July 2012 to October 2014. Clinical date of general characteristics, procedure-related parameters and adverse events, symptom relief, and the high-resolution manometry outcomes before and during the periodic follow-up were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

All of the 32 patients underwent POEM successfully with a median operation time of 34.9 min (range 17.9–88.6 min). No serious complications related to POEM were encountered. Treatment success was achieved in 90.6% cases during a median follow-up period of 27.0 months (range 24–51 months). The mean pretreatment and post-treatment Eckardt scores were 7.2 and 1.4, respectively (P < 0.001), and mean LES pressure also decreased from a mean of 39.2 to 19.0 mmHg after the procedure (P < 0.001). Both of the gas-related complication and clinical reflux complication rates were 18.8%.

Conclusion

Our results confirm that POEM for type III achalasia of Chicago Classification is effective with a long-term symptom relief in 90.6% cases. But a further, prospective study is needed to evaluate whether POEM outcome could be correlated with manometric subtypes according to Chicago Classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE (2014) Achalasia. Lancet (London, England) 383:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter JE (2010) Achalasia—an update. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 16:232–242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M, Boskoski I, Tringali A, Perri V, Costamagna G (2016) Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Outcomes of the First 100 Patients With Short-term Follow-up. Annals of surgery 263:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ (2008) Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 135:1526–1533

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ou YH, Nie XM, Li LF, Wei ZJ, Jiang B (2016) High-resolution manometric subtypes as a predictive factor for the treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Digestive Diseases 17:222–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salvador R, Costantini M, Zaninotto G, Morbin T, Rizzetto C, Zanatta L, Ceolin M, Finotti E, Nicoletti L, Da Dalt G, Cavallin F, Ancona E (2010) The preoperative manometric pattern predicts the outcome of surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery : Official Journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 14:1635–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, Bruley des Varannes, S, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Elizalde JI, Gaudric M, Smout AJ, Tack J, Busch OR, Zaninotto G, Boeckxstaens GE (2013) Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 144:718–725; quiz e713-714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, Joshi N, Ramchandani M, Banerjee R, Lakhtakia S, Gupta R, Tandan M, Rao GV, Reddy DN (2011) Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 17:48–53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamashita H, Ashida K, Fukuchi T, Nagatani Y, Koga H, Senda K, Eguchi T, Ubukata S, Kawaguchi S, Ueda A, Tanaka T, Ohashi R, Ito D (2013) Predictive factors associated with the success of pneumatic dilatation in Japanese patients with primary achalasia: a study using high-resolution manometry. Digestion 87:23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumbhari V, Tieu AH, Onimaru M, El Zein MH, Teitelbaum EN, Ujiki MB, Gitelis ME, Modayil RJ, Hungness ES, Stavropoulos SN, Shiwaku H, Kunda R, Chiu P, Saxena P, Messallam AA, Inoue H, Khashab MA (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study. Endoscopy international open 3:E195–201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li HK, Linghu EQ (2013) New endoscopic classification of achalasia for selection of candidates for peroral endoscopic myotomy. World Journal of Gastroenterology 19:556–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Yamashita K, Ohmiya T, Beppu R, Nakashima R, Takeno S, Sasaki T, Nimura S, Yamashita Y (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first over 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Surgical endoscopy 30:4817–4826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to En-Qiang Linghu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding Information Specific to this Paper

There is no special financial support for the present study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Linghu, EQ. Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Type III Achalasia of Chicago Classification: Outcomes with a Minimum Follow-Up of 24 Months. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 785–791 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3398-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3398-x

Keywords

Navigation