Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating Student Nature of Science Views as Reflections of Authentic Science

Degrees of Contextualisation and the Teachers’ Role

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study seeks to explore the extent to which students think pedagogical activities exemplifying various degrees of contextualization accurately reflect the work of scientists. Arguing for scaffolding across multiple degrees of contextualization, Clough (2006) reasoned that different contextualization plays different, but complimentary, roles in promoting conceptual change, and he suggested that decontextualized and moderately contextualized NOS activities may be dismissed by students as not representing authentic science. For this study, sixth-grade students (N = 137) engaged in three activities reflecting various levels of contextualization and responded to Likert and open-ended prompts asking them their perceptions about the relationship between the activity and real science. Students also ranked the activities from most to least like real science. Our findings demonstrate that participants most often described decontextualized and moderately contextualized activities as most representative of real science because participants perceived themselves to be acting like scientists. This study provides empirical support for Höttecke (2008) who, building on Clough (2006), proposed that both authentic contextualization and students’ actions in the classroom play roles in students’ perception of whether NOS teaching scenarios accurately represent authentic science. Given participants’ propensity to view highly contextualized NOS activities as less reflective of real science, this study illustrates the important role of the teacher in guiding student noticing during NOS activities. Challenging students’ narrow, action-oriented views of scientists appears to demand that teachers draw students’ attention to ways in which activities of all degrees of contextualization accurately and inaccurately represent NOS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

adapted from Hottecke (p. 9, 2008)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1997). Analysis and description of students’ learning during science classes using a constructivist-based model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(3), 303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannerman, M. D. (2008). Continuum: Selecting inquiry-based experiences to promote a deeper understanding of the nature of science. Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 35(2), 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 414–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Mulvey, B. K., & Maeng, J. L. (2012). Beyond understanding: Process skills as a context for nature of science instruction. In Advances in nature of science research (pp. 225–245). Springer.

  • Bell, R. L., Mulvey, B. K., & Maeng, J. L. (2016). Outcomes of nature of science instruction along a context continuum: Preservice secondary science teachers’ conceptions and instructional intentions. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 493–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, D. J. (2018). “I Think You Mean…” Potential perils of teacher paraphrasing and alternative responses for student engagement. The Clearing House, 91(4–5), 201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). National Academy Press.

  • Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christidou, V. (2011). Interest, attitudes and images related to science: Combining students' voices with the voices of school science, Teachers, and Popular Science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(2), 141–159.

  • Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2007). Teaching the nature of science to secondary and post-secondary students: Questions rather than tenets. In The pantaneto forum (Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 31–40).

  • Clough, M. P. (2011a). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7), 701–717

  • Clough, M. P. (2011b). Teaching and assessing the nature of science: How to effectively incorporate the nature of science in your classroom. The Science Teacher, 78(6), 56–60

  • Clough, M. P., Berg, C. A., & Olson, J. K. (2009). Promoting effective science teacher education and science teaching: A framework for teacher decision-making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 821–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2020). Framing and teaching the nature of science as questions. Chapter 15 (pp. 271–282) in McComas (Ed.) Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies, Springer.

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Condorcet, N. (1785). Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Paris.

  • El Takach, S., & Yacoubian, H. A.(2020). Science teachers’ and their students’ perceptions of science and scientists. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(1), 65–75.

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing nature of science for science education. In Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education (pp. 1–18). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I. (2019). Towards a refined depiction of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(3), 503–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfi, H. E. (2017). Teaching about nature of science in secondary education: A view from multicultural classrooms. School Science Review, 98(365), 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Carmona, A., & Díaz, J. A. A. (2016). Learning about the nature of science using newspaper articles with scientific content. Science & Education, 25(5–6), 523–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. (2008). Are questions enough?: An action research investigation to analyze the effect of questions and non-verbal behaviors on student responses with suggestions for improving practice. Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 35(3), 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2013). Association between experienced teachers’ NOS implementation and reform-based practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1077–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 600–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D. (2008). Was ist Naturwissenschaft? Physikunterricht über die Natur der Naturwissenschaften [What does science mean? The nature of science in physics education]. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht - Physik, 19(103), 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D. (2013). A sketch of the problem of authentic inquiry-based learning from a history of science perspective. Paper presented at the 12th IHPST Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 5(2), 139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent-Schneider, I., & Kruse, J. (2020). Using a Simple Pendulum Investigation to Develop Students’ History and Nature of Science Knowledge. The Physics Teacher, 58(9), 628–631.

  • Khishfe, R. (2019). The transfer of nature of science understandings: A question of similarity and familiarity of contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1159–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(7), 551–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J. (2008). NOS: Integrating the nature of science throughout the entire school year. Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 35(2), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J. (2010). Historical short stories in the post-secondary biology classroom: Investigation of instructor and student use and views. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • Kruse, J. & Wilcox, J. (2011). Using historical science stories to illuminate nature of science ideas and reduce stereotypical views in a sixth grade classroom. Paper presented at the Association for Science Teacher Educators International Conference, Minneapolis, MN, January.

  • Kruse, J., Easter, J. M., Edgerly, H. S., Seebach, C., & Patel, N. (2017). The impact of a course on nature of science pedagogical views and rationales. Science & Education, 26(6), 613–636.

  • Kruse, J., Kent-Schneider, I., Voss, S., Zacharski, K., & Rockefeller, M. (2020). Investigating the effect of NOS question type on students’ NOS responses. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09923-z.

  • Lederman, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In The nature of science in science education (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Smith, M. U. (2019). Teaching nature of scientific knowledge to Kindergarten through University students. Science & Education, 28(3), 197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. Routledge.

  • Matthews, M. R., Clough, M. P., & Ogilvie, C. (n.d. A). Pendulum motion: The value of idealization in science. https://storybehindthescience.org/pdf/pendulum.pdf. Accessed 28 Apr 2021.

  • Matthews, M. R., Clough, M. P., & Ogilvie, C. (n.d. B) The role of theory: Pendulum motion, time measurement, and the shape of the Earth. https://storybehindthescience.org/pdf/earthshape.pdf. Accessed 28 Apr 2021.

  • Matkins, J. J., & Bell, R. L. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • Olson, J. K. (2008). Methods and strategies: The science representation continuum. Science and Children, 46(1), 52–55.

  • Paraskevopoulou, E., & Koliopoulos, D. (2011). Teaching the nature of science through the Millikan-Ehrenhaft dispute. Science & Education, 20(10), 943–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piliouras, P., Plakitsi, K., Seroglou, F., & Papantoniou, G. (2018). Teaching explicitly and reflecting on elements of nature of science: A discourse-focused professional development program with four fifth-grade teachers. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1221–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of teacher education, 37(1), 43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W., Cassidy, D. P., Fulford, J. M., & Howe, E. M. (2014). Changes observed in views of nature of science during a historically based unit. Science & Education, 23(9), 1879–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409.

  • Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(1), 27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.

  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3), 165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tala, S., & Vesterinen, V. M. (2015). Nature of science contextualized: Studying nature of science with scientists. Science & Education, 24(4), 435–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, P.-K. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students’ understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taplin, R. H. (1997). The statistical analysis of preference data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 46(4), 493–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, S., Kruse, J., and Kent-Schneider, I. (2020). Refining explicit-reflective questioning by examining responses to different NOS question types. Paper presented at the School Science and Mathematics Association Annual Conference. November.

  • Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2003). Students’ understanding of the nature of science and their reasoning on socioscientific issues: A web-based learning inquiry.

  • Williams, C. T., & Rudge, D. W. (2019). Effects of historical story telling on student understanding of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(9–10), 1105–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Drake University, Des Moines, IA, USA

    Jerrid Kruse, Isaiah Kent-Schneider, Sarah Voss, Kinsey Zacharski & Molly Rockefeller

Authors
  1. Jerrid Kruse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isaiah Kent-Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah Voss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kinsey Zacharski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Molly Rockefeller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jerrid Kruse or Isaiah Kent-Schneider.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author’s do not have any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kruse, J., Kent-Schneider, I., Voss, S. et al. Investigating Student Nature of Science Views as Reflections of Authentic Science. Sci & Educ 30, 1211–1231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00231-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00231-0

Search

Navigation