Abstract
The development of stress-resistant crops without compromising their yield and nutritional quality is one of the major challenges in plant biology. Plant breeders have made considerable effort in developing cultivars with high yield and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. This research aimed to evaluate pre-breeding resources for favorable genes conferring good yield and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses for rice varietal improvement. Two hundred forty diverse rice cultivars from top countries with which the United States imports and exports rice were selected from the Germplasm Resource Information Network (GRIN) collection, and these were characterized using molecular markers for various desirable traits. Among the cultivars, 16 were used as checks. The genes of various traits evaluated were grain number (Gn1a), panicle weight (WFP), cold stress tolerance (qSCT-11 and qCTS-12), anaerobic germination (AG1 and AG2), rice blast disease resistance (PiB, Pi-ta, Ptr, and Piz), wide compatibility (S5-n), and restoring ability (Rf4). Out of these 240 accessions, 192 have the Gn1a gene, 168 possess the qSCT-11 cold tolerance gene, 139 carry the Rf4 gene, 152 have the qCTS12 cold tolerance gene, 87 have blast resistance genes, and 44 possess the WC gene. None of the 240 accessions possess the WFP (Wealthy Farmer’s Panicle) gene. The selections with favorable genes can be used by breeders as potential donor parents for varietal improvement programs to produce new and promising cultivars with desired specific traits that may contribute towards alleviating global issues related to food security.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Rice (Oryza sativa) is a staple food for more than half of the world’s population. It is grown in 114 countries worldwide (Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database 2022), with 90% of rice production in Asian countries (Fukagawa and Ziska 2019). Global rice demand is increasing yearly, and global rice production is expected to grow by 58 million tons and reach 567 million tons by 2030 (OECD and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2021). Global rice consumption is expected to increase from 2.7 to 3 billion tons by 2030 (OECD and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2021). Rice ranks second after corn in yield and harvest among cereal crops (Mukhina et al. 2020) and provides more than 20% of the calories consumed worldwide (Fukagawa and Ziska 2019).
Due to the world’s booming population, which may reach up to 9 billion in 2050, there is a need to increase the productivity of food crops to satisfy the rising food demand (Fahad et al. 2017). Moreover, the production of stress-tolerant cultivars is also necessary since various biotic and abiotic stresses limit crop productivity (Fahad et al. 2017). Researchers and breeders work together to solve these problems by utilizing traditional genetic engineering (Shanmugam et al. 2020, 2021), hybridization (Goulet et al. 2017), mutation breeding (Zakir 2018), polyploidy breeding (Jain et al. 2022), tissue culture (Brown and Thorpe 1995), molecular breeding, and marker-assisted selection (MAS) (Parihar and Shiwani 2022), as well as modern crop improvement technologies such as genomic selection (Heffner et al. 2009), nanotechnology (Rezaei Cherati et al. 2021), CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Liu et al. 2021), and multi-omics technologies (Yang et al. 2021). Pre-breeding enhances genetic variability by using a wider range of germplasm, acting as a connecting link between genetic resources and crop improvement (Jain and Prakash 2019). Breeders use pre-breeding or germplasm resources to select accessions with desirable traits or genes, such as high yield or its components or resistance to stresses, and incorporate them into the intermediate or modern breeding materials (Jain and Prakash 2019).
Irrespective of the crop enhancement methods used, the aim is crop improvement or the development of crops or cultivars with high yield, pest resistance, and tolerance to various abiotic stresses. Some of the desired traits or genes in rice are grain number gene Gn1a, wealthy farmers panicle gene (WFP), cold tolerance genes (qSCT-11 and qCTS12), and the anaerobic germination genes (AG1 and AG2). In addition, the wide compatibility (S5-n allele) and the restorer factor gene (Rf) are useful in hybrid rice breeding.
Panicle weight and grain number
Rice grain yield is determined by three component traits: number of panicles per plant, number of grains per panicle, and grain weight (Song et al. 2022). These agronomic traits are controlled by multiple genes or quantitative trait loci (QTLs) (Feng et al. 2021). Gn1a is one of the candidate genes that enhance grain number or yield in plants (Reyes et al. 2021). The Gn1a QTL carries a mutation in the OsCKX2 gene, which is responsible for producing the enzyme cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase, an enzyme that reduces the amount of cytokinin in plants (Ashikari et al. 2005). Reduced expression of this enzyme leads to the accumulation of cytokinin in the inflorescence meristems and increases the number of spikelets, thereby increasing grain production (Ashikari et al. 2005). Thus, Gn1a has excellent potential for application in breeding rice cultivars with higher yields and enhanced productivity.
The incorporation of the WFP allele (OsSLP-14) into Nipponbare increased its panicle branching, leading to higher yield (Miura et al. 2010). The overexpression of this allele has led to improved physiological changes in rice, in terms of growth period, leaf development, hormonal levels, culm composition, and grain quality (Lian et al. 2020). Integrating the WFP allele in the elite indica cultivars (PR37951, PR38012, IR04A115, IR05N412, IRRI 123, IRRI 146, IRRI 154, IRRI 156, CT5803, CT5805, IRGA 427, and Parao) has improved the panicle traits and grain yield (Kim et al. 2018).
Cold stress tolerance
Cold stress is one of the major factors limiting rice productivity worldwide (Cruz et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2014; Sahu and Tiwary 2017). Breeding for tolerance to cold stress will be beneficial to the farmers who plant early in the season in subtropical countries, as this leads to increased crop productivity. Several cold tolerance genes have been identified (Zhi-Hong et al. 2005; Andaya and Tai 2006), two of which are qSCT-11 and qCTS-12, which are major QTLs conferring cold tolerance in the early seedling stage of rice. Other cold tolerance genes include CTB4a (Zhang et al. 2017), COLD1 (Ma et al. 2015), LTG1 (Lu et al. 2014), and QTL qLTG3-1 (Fujino et al. 2008).
Anaerobic germination
Submerged conditions gives anaerobic stress on germinating seeds. AG1 and AG2 genes have improved the growth and physiology during anaerobic germination in rice or under flooded or submerged conditions (Mondal et al. 2020b). OsTPP7 (Trehalose 6-phosphate phosphatase) enhances the anaerobic germination tolerance in rice (Kretzschmar et al. 2015). SUB1A confers tolerance to complete submergence in rice at the vegetative stage (Fukao and Bailey-Serres 2008), while SNORKEL regulates plant development and elongation to escape deep water (Oe et al. 2022). In addition, PDC-ALDH-ACS and ALDH are excellent candidate genes for flooding tolerance in rice (Miro and Ismail 2013).
Rice blast disease resistance
Biotic stresses, especially diseases, are limiting factors of rice crop productivity, and the development of disease-resistant cultivars is a major economical solution. Rice blast disease caused by the fungus Magnaporthe oryzae is one of the most damaging rice diseases worldwide (Valent 2021), as it affects rice growth, grain yield, and quality (Koutroubas et al. 2009). It causes 10–30% crop loss worldwide annually (Miller and Arkansas 2018). Genes that have provided resistance to rice blast include Pi-b, Pi-kh (Tanweer et al. 2015), Pita, Pita2, Ptr (Meng et al. 2020), Pi54 (Singh et al. 2020), and NLR (Wang et al. 2019). These genes can be used in rice breeding to develop cultivars resistant to this fungal disease (Xing et al. 2019).
Wide-compatibility and restoring ability
Intersubspecific crosses are useful in rice crop improvement, especially in the introgression of useful traits from one subspecies to another (Kato and Mii 2012). However, hybrid sterility is a major problem in these wide intersubspecific (i.e., indica × japonica) crosses. A major regulator for the reproductive barrier and cross-compatibility between indica and japonica in rice is the S5 gene (Chen et al. 2008). The S5 locus has three alleles: S5-i (indica), S5-j (japonica), and S5-n (neutral). Hybrids produced from S5-i × S5-j parents tend to be sterile (Chen et al. 2008). S5-n is a neutral allele that produces fertile offspring when crossed with the indica or japonica allele (Ji et al. 2012). To overcome the potential problem of sterility in intersubspecific hybrids, there is a need to develop parental lines that possess the wide compatibility (WC) or S5-n allele (Priyadarshi et al. 2018). Parental lines with the WC gene have the potential to produce fertile indica x japonica F1s, which can be used as highly heterotic hybrids or as progenitors of breeding populations.
In hybrid rice, the cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) lines need to be pollinated by male plants that possess a restorer gene (Rf) (Itabashi et al. 2011) to produce fertile F1 plants. A restorer fertility gene, such as Rf4, must be present in the male parent that is used to pollinate the CMS line and produce fertile F1 seeds (Tang et al. 2014). One of the major challenges in hybrid rice breeding is the low frequency of restorers with desirable agronomic traits. Since partial restorers cannot be directly used in hybrid rice breeding, restorer lines with the Rf4 need to be identified or bred.
The objective of this study was to analyze 240 diverse rice entries from the Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) for the presence or absence of genes for grain number (Gn1a), panicle weight (WFP), cold tolerance (qSCT-11 and qCTS12), anaerobic germination (AG1, AG2), blast resistance (Ptr, Pita, Piz, Pib), wide compatibility (S5-n), and restoring ability (Rf4). The phenotypic validation of the 240 rice accessions is being conducted in separate research. The results from these analyses will be useful for rice breeders interested in improving or modifying their breeding lines for grain yield and quality, stress tolerance (cold, anaerobic germination, and disease), and hybrid seed production.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Seeds of 240 diverse rice cultivars or genotypes were obtained from the GRIN genebank, which has passport data that indicates the source or country of origin of its accessions. The rice accessions used in this study originated from the top 8 countries from which the US imports rice (Brazil, Pakistan, Italy, India, Australia, Vietnam, Thailand, and China) and the top 8 countries to which the US exports rice (Colombia, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Japan, Venezuela, Turkey, and Mexico). Among the rice cultivars of countries from which the US imports rice, this study evaluated 9 from India, 45 from Brazil, 6 from Pakistan, 49 from Italy, 7 from Australia, 4 from Australia (but originally bred in the United States), 8 from Vietnam, 8 from Thailand, and 5 cultivars from China. The rice cultivars of countries to which the US exports rice include 10 cultivars from Colombia, 5 from Guatemala, 13 from Haiti, 2 from Honduras, 37 from Japan, 6 from Venezuela, 3 from Turkey, and 13 from Mexico. Some cultivars like Baldo, Veneria, Ribe, Cica-7, and Cica-8 are grown in two countries. For example, Baldo is grown in Italy and Japan (Russo and Callegarin 2007). Veneria and Ribe are grown in Italy and Turkey (Surek 1990), whereas Cica-7 and Cica-8 are grown in Brazil and Colombia (Spijkers 1983). Another rice cultivar, IR 22, is grown in Venezuela and Brazil (Brown 1969). Some cultivars (Caloro, Caloro II, Calrose, and Lemont) were developed in the US but also grown in Australia (Blakeney et al. 1996). Sixteen cultivars developed in rice-growing states of the US (Cheniere, Jupiter, L-203, M-401, Presidio, Rex, Thad, Titan, Roy J, Wells, ARoma 17, Cocodrie, Lakast, Diamond, MM17, and M-202) served as check cultivars.
DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and gel lectrophoresis
The 240 accessions were planted in the Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at Beaumont in the summer of 2020. Each accession was planted in a 3-row plot that was 2.4 m long with a row spacing of 28 cm. At the 4-leaf stage, a leaf from each accession was sampled and prepared for DNA extraction and MAS to evaluate their genes for panicle size or grain number (Gn1a and WFP), cold tolerance (qSCT-11 and qCTS12), anaerobic germination (AG1, AG2), blast resistance (Ptr, Pita, Piz, Pib), wide compatibility (S5-n), and restoring ability (Rf4). DNA from each accession was extracted using the NaOH ‘quick and dirty’ method (Collard et al. 2007). One hundred (100) μL of 0.5 M NaOH and 800 μL of 100 mM Tris solution, pH 8.0, was added to each leaf sample. The samples were placed in 96-well deep well plates with two grinding balls in each well and ground for 3 min using a SPEX MiniG homogenizer (SPEX SamplePrep, Metuchen, NJ, USA) and centrifuged 139 g (RCF) for 5 min (Collard et al. 2007). The supernatant containing the DNA was collected and stored at − 20 °C.
For each 20 μL volume of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) solution, 0.2 μL of DNA solution was transferred to a 96-well PCR plate along with 0.3–0.4 μL of both reverse and forward primers (10 µM concentration) for specific markers, 10 μL of DNA master mix (New England Biolabs Quick-Load® Taq 2X Master Mix), and 7.1–7.2 μL of ddH2O. PCR was performed using Bio-Rad T100 thermal cyclers (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The forward and reverse primers used for detecting specific markers are listed in Table 1, while the PCR profile applied for each gene is shown in Table 2.
The PCR products were resolved using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide, in which the presence or absence of a gene marker can be determined by viewing in a Gel Documentation system-BL (Axygen, Corning Brand, United States) under UV (365 nm) light.
Results
Considerable allelic variation was observed between the 240 accessions in the specific genes we studied in this project (Fig. 1, Table 3). Among the 240 accessions, 192 (80.0%) have the Gn1a gene, 168 (70.0%) possess the qSCT-11 cold tolerance gene, 139 (57.9%) carry the Rf4 gene, 152 (63.3%) have the qCTS12 cold tolerance gene, 87 (36.25%) have blast resistance genes, and 84 (35.0%) possess the anaerobic germination tolerance AG1gene. As for the other genes, 44 (18.3%) possess the WC gene, and 16 (6.6%) carry the AG2 gene. None of the 240 entries possess the WFP gene.
Cultivars of countries from which the US imports rice
Among the countries from which the United States imports rice, cultivars from Italy and Brazil possess the most cold tolerance genes (Table 4). Italy and Brazil had 35 and 30 cultivars, respectively, with the qSCT-11 gene, and had 37 and 24 cultivars, respectively, with the qCTS-12 gene. On the other hand, only two cultivars from Vietnam possess the qSCT-11 gene, and none of the US-made cultivars grown in Australia possess the qCTS-12 gene.
Most rice cultivars from Brazil possess the anaerobic germination genes (AG1 and AG2), which improve germination in wet-seeded conditions. Twenty-one and five rice cultivars from Brazil possess the AG1 and AG2 genes, respectively. Similarly, 18 rice cultivars from Italy possess the AG1 gene.
Brazil had the most rice cultivars with blast resistance genes. Piz was the most common blast resistance gene found in the 240 rice cultivars evaluated in this study.
Cultivars of countries to which the US exports rice
Most rice cultivars of Japan possess the cold tolerance genes (qSCT-11 and qCTS-12) (Table 5). Twenty-six possess the qSCT-11 gene, and 26 possess the qCTS-12 gene. Honduras had the least number of cultivars with cold tolerance genes. Two cultivars of Honduras possess the qSCT-11 gene, and another two possess the qCTS-12 gene.
Most rice cultivars of Japan and Colombia possess the anaerobic germination and blast resistance genes. Twelve rice cultivars of Japan possess the AG1 gene, and two of Colombia possess the AG2 gene.
Eight rice cultivars of Japan (temperate) and eight of Colombia (fully tropical) possess blast resistance genes. Out of these, two cultivars from each country possess two blast resistance genes.
Discussion
Cold tolerance
Among the major abiotic stresses, the incorporation of cold tolerance is an important breeding objective, especially in temperate regions where it is cold during planting. Several QTLs contributing to cold tolerance in the japonica alleles were detected, suggesting an important role of japonica germplasm in breeding for low-temperature tolerance in indica lines (Ranawake et al. 2014). A major QTL conferring cold tolerance, qSCT-11, is linked to the microsatellite marker RM202 in chromosome 11 (Zhi-Hong et al. 2005). The possession of cold tolerance genes will allow for better rice vigor when planted early during the rice crop season, even when the temperatures are still low (14 °C/12 °C) (Najeeb et al. 2020). Planting early can also enable the rice crop to avoid high summer temperatures, which increases maintenance respiration and reduces grain yield and quality (Li et al. 2021). The QTL qCTSL-12-1 confers seedling stage cold tolerance, which is enhanced when other cold tolerance QTLs co-segregate with it (Biswas et al. 2017). The QTL network for cold tolerance at the reproductive stage was also studied using the cold tolerance (CT) introgression lines of rice (Liang et al. 2018). Identification of novel QTLs for cold tolerance during the fertilization (CTF) stage has been studied, and these can be used to develop rice lines with enhanced CTF levels using MAS (Shinada et al. 2014).
In general, most rice cultivars with cold tolerance genes were present in temperate and sub-tropical countries, with a few grown in fully tropical countries. Rice cultivars of Japan (temperate), Italy (sub-tropical), and Brazil (partially tropical) possess the most cold tolerance genes, while those of Vietnam (fully tropical), Australia (partially tropical), and Honduras (fully tropical) possess few to none of the cold tolerance genes. Developing rice cultivars with enhanced cold tolerance results in better seedling vigor when planted early during the rice crop season in temperate regions. Cold tolerance also results in good grain filling when cold fronts occur late in the crop season, thus preventing grain yield reduction.
Research has identified QTLs associated with low-temperature tolerance during the germination and bud stages of rice and have identified 6 QTLs out of the 11 tested to show a total phenotypic variance explained (PVE) of 5.13–9.42% during the germination stage and 5 QTLs showed a total PVE of 4.17–6.42% during the bud stage (Yang et al. 2020). In another study, QTLs associated with cold tolerance at the seedling stage were identified with a phenotypic variation (R2) ranging from 6.1 to 16.5% (Kim et al. 2014). Similar to the above study, QTL qSCT-11 conferring cold tolerance at the early seedling stage in rice was identified with a PVE of up to 30% (Zhi-Hong et al. 2005), while the PVE by qCTS12 was over 40% (Andaya and Tai 2006).
Anaerobic germination
Another important abiotic stress that reduces crop productivity is flooding or anaerobic stress during germination. Around 25% of rice crops in Asia are damaged yearly due to flooding (Loo et al. 2015). AG1 and AG2 QTLs in the rice lines make them more tolerant to submerged conditions by showing higher seedling growth and faster plant elongation when the dry seeds were planted in flooded soil (Mondal et al. 2020b). Four japonica backcross lines were developed by incorporating AG1 and AG2 genes from an indica KHO (Khao Hlan On) into a japonica Dongan by marker-assisted backcross breeding (Kim et al. 2019). The introgression of AG1–AG2 QTLs into rice did not negatively affect the germination rate and growth of rice seedlings subjected to flooding stress (Mondal et al. 2020a).
In this study, the rice cultivars from countries where direct wet seeding or direct seeding in saturated soil is a widely adopted practice possess the anaerobic germination genes, such as Brazil (Fischer and Antigua 1996), Italy (Hill et al. 1991), Japan (Ye and Qian 2019), and Colombia (Arango-Londoño et al. 2020). Rice breeders can use the cultivars that possess AG1 and AG2 QTLs, as identified by this study, as donors to develop new cultivars with tolerance to submergence, flooding, or anaerobic germination stresses.
A study that characterized a major QTL for anaerobic germination (AG2) has also shown that the total PVE ranged from 9.9 to 39.7% (Tnani et al. 2021). A high-density genetic mapping study has identified QTLs for anaerobic germination in rice with a total PVE ranging from 0.34 to 11.17% (Liang et al. 2022). In a study that evaluates the anaerobic germination in rice, a major QTL AG1 showed a total PVE of 64.3% (Kuya et al. 2019).
Rice blast resistance
Rice blast disease, caused by the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae, has been estimated to contribute 30% of yield loss in rice worldwide (Nalley et al. 2016). Rice blast can be found in all rice-growing regions of the United States, including Arkansas, California, Louisiana, and Texas (Greer and Webster 2001; Wang et al. 2017). Due to the widespread presence and impact of the disease, millions of dollars are spent annually to mitigate its effects (Nalley et al. 2016).
Rice blast resistance genes, such as Pi-ta, Pi-b, and Pi-k, confer resistance to this disease and are present in rice cultivars, including IR64, Saber, and Kanto51 (Ashikawa et al. 2012; Roychowdhury et al. 2012a, 2012b; Meng et al. 2019). Integrating one or more R-genes into rice cultivars using marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) has been used to incorporate R-genes such as Pi-54 in Samba Mahsuri (Kumar et al. 2018), Pi54 and Piz-5 in Basmati rice PRR78 restorer line (Singh et al. 2012), Pi1, Pita, and Pi54 into aromatic Mushk Budgi (Khan et al. 2018), Pi9 or Pi2 in restorer line Hui 316 (Tian et al. 2019) and Pi-b and Pi-kh into MR218 (Tanweer et al. 2015).
The occurrence of rice blast disease is high in tropical and humid regions (Kirtphaiboon et al. 2021), but it can also cause severe yield losses in temperate regions (Nalley et al. 2016). Blast-resistant rice cultivars are bred and adopted in countries where blast is a major constraint, such as Brazil (Guimaraes et al. 2000), Colombia (Victoria and Martinez 2009), and Japan (Kawasaki-Tanaka et al. 2016), as observed in this study.
Inheritance research conducted on the US rice cultivars for characterizing genes that show resistance to the pathotype Magnaporthe oryzae has identified 3 Pi- resistance genes (pi-n, pi-g, and pi-d), which were resistant to blast races IB-54, IG-1, and IB-1, respectively, and were identified in Brazos (pi-n), Gulfrose (pi-g) and Lebonnet (pi-d) cultivars (Marchetti 1987). Another unnamed Pi gene resistant to the blast race IB-49 was identified in the blast-differential cultivar Usen (Marchetti 1987). The molecular analysis and phenotypic validation of blast resistance genes Pita and Pita2 indicate that they confer resistance to different races (Mo-ni-0066, Mo-ni-0052, Mo-nwi-32) of rice blast fungus (Shikari et al. 2013). Similarly, the Pi-z gene confers resistance to a wide range of races of rice blast fungus, including an avirulent strain (IE1k) and two virulent strains (IB33, IB49) (Roychowdhury et al. 2012a, 2012b). Similarly, the Pi-b gene in rice has shown resistance to different blast races, including IE1k, IB1, and IB54 (Roychowdhury et al. 2012a, 2012b). An allelic variant of the broad spectrum blast resistance gene Ptr in weedy rice has been reported to show resistance to the most virulent blast race IB-33 (Zhao et al. 2022a).
Panicle size and grain number
Rice grain productivity links various phenotypical traits, such as tiller number, grain filling, grain size, and grain number, to the increased yield of the plants (Lu et al. 2022). Instead of just selecting for high grain yield alone, the selection of desirable plant types or yield-related alleles is gaining popularity in plant research and breeding programs. The wealthy farmer’s panicle (WFP) gene shows the potential to increase grain yield, as its introgression into elite indica rice cultivars (e.g., PR37951, IR04A115, IRRI 123, CT5803, IRGA 427, Parao) increased the grain number per panicle (GNPP) and yield significantly (Kim et al. 2018). The incorporation of Gn1a from high-yielding indica cultivar Habataki into temperate japonica cultivars Koshihikari and Sasanishiki improves their grain number per panicle by 21% and 28–37%, respectively (Ashikari et al. 2005; Ohsumi et al. 2011). In addition, the yield of the elite rice Kongyu 131 was improved by the Gn1a locus (Feng et al. 2017). The QTLs Gn1a and WFP were introgressed in selected NERICA cultivars (NERICA 1, NERICA 4, and NERICA 6) through MABC (Reyes et al. 2021). These investigations indicate the strong possibility of increasing the yield potential of rice cultivars through allele mining and its application.
When Gn1a was introgressed into an elite japonica rice cultivar Kongyu 131, grain yield increased by up to 11.9% (Feng et al. 2017). In another study, a mutation in the RGN1a (Regulator of Grain Number 1a) gene caused a decrease in the grain number, primary branch number per panicle, secondary branch number per panicle, and panicle length by 37.2, 27.8, 51.2 and 25.5%, respectively (Zhang et al. 2022). Similarly, it has been reported that WFP explains 35.7% of the phenotypic variation in primary branch number (Miura et al. 2010).
Wide compatibility and restorer genes
Wide-compatible rice cultivars, when used as parents in japonica × indica crosses, produced fertile hybrids (Vijayakumar et al. 1999). There is an improvement in embryo-sac fertility to 14.7–32.9% in these hybrids when the S5-n allele is in one of the parental lines (Mi 2016). A restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the wide compatibility genes in rice has shown that S5n conferred a phenotypic variance of 32.3% associated with spikelet fertility (Yan et al. 2000). A new QTL associated with the wide compatibility locus in inter-subspecific hybrids of rice has been identified and is reported to have a PVE of 17.9% and 18.4% in pollen and spikelet fertilities, respectively (Zhao et al. 2022b). Genetic analysis indicates that S5-interacting genes regulate hybrid sterility in rice and explain phenotypic variations of 7.02% (QTL qSIG3.1) and 10.44% (QTL qSIG5.1) (Rao et al. 2021).
The implementation of Rf4-specific markers can lead to the precise identification of restorer lines, thereby supporting the importance of transferring these genes into elite cultivars through MAS in a hybrid rice breeding program (Pranathi et al. 2016). The significant association of the novel Rf4 SNP marker with the WA-CMS restorer lines supports the molecular identification of restorers (Chen et al. 2017), differentiating them from potential maintainer lines. Fine mapping of Rf3 and Rf4 fertility restorer loci of wild abortive cytoplasmic male sterility (WA-CMS) in rice have identified a PVE of 66–72%, thus conferring their use in developing a marker for the identification of fertility restorers for WA-CMS (Balaji Suresh et al. 2012). A genetic analysis study of novel fertility restoration genes (qRf3 and qRf6) has shown a fertility restoration of 16.56% and 15.12%, respectively (Cai et al. 2023). GWAS revealing the genetic basis of fertility restoration in CMS-WA and CMS-HL in xian/indica and aus accessions in rice reported that different loci for pollen fertility; BSS (seed-setting rate of bagged panicles) and NSS (seed-setting rate of natural panicles) showed a phenotypic variation explained ranging from 2.9 to 48.5% for CMS-WA and 6.4–31.1% for CMS-HL (Li et al. 2020).
Conclusion
Several factors affect rice productivity worldwide, and breeders are developing rice cultivars that possess multiple desirable characteristics, such as yield-contributing traits and tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses, without compromising its nutritional quality. Conventional and traditional breeding techniques are very time-consuming and laborious. However, smart technologies such as MAS and gene pyramiding are now used to quickly screen and develop cultivars possessing the desirable alleles of important traits. This study used marker-assisted selection to screen rice cultivars of several countries based on valuable traits. The results identified cultivars useful as donor parents in crossing nurseries for specific traits to breed new cultivars or for pyramiding desirable traits. This study helps US rice breeders to develop cultivars with useful genes (yield-related traits, abiotic stress tolerance, and disease resistance), making them more productive and competitive in the rice industry.
References
Andaya VC, Tai TH (2006) Fine mapping of the qCTS12 locus, a major QTL for seedling cold tolerance in rice. TAG Theor Appl Genet 113:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0311-5
Arango-Londoño D, Ramírez-Villegas J, Barrios-Pérez C et al (2020) Closing yield gaps in Colombian direct seeding rice systems: a stochastic frontier analysis. Agron Colomb 38:110–119. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v38n1.79470
Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S et al (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309:741–745. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113373
Ashikawa I, Hayashi N, Abe F et al (2012) Characterization of the rice blast resistance gene Pik cloned from Kanto51. Mol Breed 30:485–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9638-y
Balaji Suresh P, Srikanth B, Hemanth Kishore V et al (2012) Fine mapping of Rf3 and Rf4 fertility restorer loci of WA-CMS of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and validation of the developed marker system for identification of restorer lines. Euphytica 187:421–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0737-6
Biswas PS, Khatun H, Das N et al (2017) Mapping and validation of QTLs for cold tolerance at seedling stage in rice from an indica cultivar Habiganj Boro VI (Hbj.BVI). 3 Biotech 7:359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0993-1
Blakeney AB, Lewin LG, Batten GD, Welsh LA (1996) Rice cultivation and quality in Australia. Ricegrowers’ Cooperative Limited: Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brown FB (1969) Upland Rice in Latin America. Int Rice Comm Newsl 18(1): 1–5.
Brown DC, Thorpe TA (1995) Crop improvement through tissue culture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 11:409–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364616
Cai W, Li W, Duan L et al (2023) Genetic analysis of novel fertility restoration genes (qRf3 and qRf6) in Dongxiang wild rice using GradedPool-Seq mapping and QTL-Seq correlation analysis. Int J Mol Sci 24:14832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914832
Chen J, Ding J, Ouyang Y et al (2008) A triallelic system of S5 is a major regulator of the reproductive barrier and compatibility of indica–japonica hybrids in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11436–11441. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804761105
Chen L, Yan X, Dai J et al (2017) Significant association of the novel Rf4-targeted SNP marker with the restorer for WA-CMS in different rice backgrounds and its utilization in molecular screening. J Integr Agric 16:2128–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61620-9
Collard BCY, Das A, Virk PS, Mackill DJ (2007) Evaluation of ‘quick and dirty’ DNA extraction methods for marker-assisted selection in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breed 126:47–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01272.x
da Cruz RP, Sperotto RA, Cargnelutti D et al (2013) Avoiding damage and achieving cold tolerance in rice plants. Food Energy Secur 2:96–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.25
Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U et al (2017) Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Front Plant Sci 8:1147
Feng X, Wang C, Nan J et al (2017) Updating the elite rice variety Kongyu 131 by improving the Gn1a locus. Rice 10:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-017-0174-1
Feng L, Ma A, Song B et al (2021) Mapping causal genes and genetic interactions for agronomic traits using a large F2 population in rice. G3 Genes Genomes Genet 11:jkab318. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab318
Fischer AJ, Antigua G (1996) Weed management for rice in Latin America and the Caribbean. FAO Plant prod Protec Papers 1996: 157–158
Fjellstrom R, Conaway-Bormans CA, McClung AM et al (2004) Development of DNA markers suitable for marker assisted selection of three Pi genes conferring resistance to multiple Pyricularia grisea pathotypes. Crop Sci 44:1790–1798. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1790
Fjellstrom R, McClung AM, Shank AR (2006) SSR markers closely linked to the Pi-z locus are useful for selection of blast resistance in a broad array of rice germplasm. Mol Breed 17:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-005-4735-4
Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database. (2022) Wikipedia
Fujino K, Sekiguchi H, Matsuda Y et al (2008) Molecular identification of a major quantitative trait locus, qLTG3–1, controlling low-temperature germinability in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:12623–12628. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805303105
Fukagawa NK, Ziska LH (2019) Rice: importance for global nutrition. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 65:S2–S3. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S2
Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J (2008) Submergence tolerance conferred by Sub1A is mediated by SLR1 and SLRL1 restriction of gibberellin responses in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:16814–16819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807821105
Goulet BE, Roda F, Hopkins R (2017) Hybridization in plants: old ideas, new techniques. Plant Physiol 173:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.01340
Greer CA, Webster RK (2001) Occurrence, distribution, epidemiology, cultivar reaction, and management of rice blast disease in California. Plant Dis 85:1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.10.1096
Guimaraes EP, Prabhu AS, Filippi MC, Silva AS (2000) Resistance to blast in hybrid rice. In: Tharreau D, Lebrun MH, Talbot NJ, Notteghem JL (eds) Advances in rice blast research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 129–136
Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2009) Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci 49:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
Hill JE, Bayer DE, Boochi S, Clampett WS (1991) Direct seeded rice in the temperate climates of Australia, Italy, and the United States. In: Direct Seeded Flooded Rice in the Tropics: Selected Papers from the International Rice Research Conference, 27–31 August 1990, Seoul, Korea 1991 (p. 91). Int. Rice Res. Inst.
Itabashi E, Iwata N, Fujii S et al (2011) The fertility restorer gene, Rf2, for Lead Rice-type cytoplasmic male sterility of rice encodes a mitochondrial glycine-rich protein. Plant J 65:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04427.x
Jain SK, Prakash O (2019) Pre-breeding: a bridge between genetic resources and crop improvement. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 8:198–207. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.802.234
Jain S, Maurya P, Sagore B et al (2022) Polyploidy breeding for fruit crops improvement. Ind J Agri Allied Sci 8:23-26.
Ji Q, Zhang M, Lu J et al (2012) Molecular basis underlying the S5-dependent reproductive isolation and compatibility of indica/japonica rice hybrids1[W][OA]. Plant Physiol 158:1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.189571
Jia Y, Wang Z, Singh P (2002) Development of dominant rice blast Pi-ta resistance gene markers. Crop Sci 42:2145–2149. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.2145
Kato J, Mii M (2012) Production of interspecific hybrids in ornamental plants. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ 877:233–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-818-4_18
Kawasaki-Tanaka A, Hayashi N, Yanagihara S, Fukuta Y (2016) Diversity and distribution of rice blast (Pyricularia oryzae Cavara) races in Japan. Plant Dis 100:816–823. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-15-0442-RE
Khan GH, Shikari AB, Vaishnavi R et al (2018) Marker-assisted introgression of three dominant blast resistance genes into an aromatic rice cultivar Mushk Budji. Sci Rep 8:4091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22246-4
Kim S-M, Suh J-P, Lee C-K et al (2014) QTL mapping and development of candidate gene-derived DNA markers associated with seedling cold tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Genet Genom 289:333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-014-0813-9
Kim S-R, Ramos J, Ashikari M et al (2016) Development and validation of allele-specific SNP/indel markers for eight yield-enhancing genes using whole-genome sequencing strategy to increase yield potential of rice, Oryza sativa L. Rice 9:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0084-7
Kim S-R, Ramos JM, Hizon RJM et al (2018) Introgression of a functional epigenetic OsSPL14WFP allele into elite indica rice genomes greatly improved panicle traits and grain yield. Sci Rep 8:3833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21355-4
Kim S-M, Kim C-S, Jeong J-U et al (2019) Marker-assisted breeding for improvement of anaerobic germination in japonica rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Breed 138:810–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12719
Kirtphaiboon S, Humphries U, Khan A, Yusuf A (2021) Model of rice blast disease under tropical climate conditions. Chaos Solitons Fractals 143:110530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110530
Koutroubas SD, Katsantonis D, Ntanos DA, Lupotto E (2009) Blast disease influence on agronomic and quality traits of rice varieties under Mediterranean conditions. Turk J Agric for. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-0812-15
Kretzschmar T, Pelayo MAF, Trijatmiko KR et al (2015) A trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase enhances anaerobic germination tolerance in rice. Nat Plants 1:15124. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.124
Kumar SV, Rambabu R, Bhaskar B et al (2018) Introgression of durable blast resistance gene Pi-54 into indica rice cv. samba mahsuri, through marker assisted backcross breeding. Electron J Plant Breed 9:705. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00084.4
Kuya N, Sun J, Iijima K et al (2019) Novel method for evaluation of anaerobic germination in rice and its application to diverse genetic collections. Breed Sci 69:633–639. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.19003
Li P, Zhou H, Yang H et al (2020) Genome-wide association studies reveal the genetic basis of fertility restoration of CMS-WA and CMS-HL in xian/indica and aus accessions of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice 13:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-0372-0
Li G, Chen T, Feng B et al (2021) Respiration, rather than photosynthesis, determines rice yield loss under moderate high-temperature conditions. Front Plant Sci 12:678653
Lian L, Xu H, Zhang H et al (2020) Overexpression of OsSPL14 results in transcriptome and physiology changes in indica rice ‘MH86.’ Plant Growth Regul 90:265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-019-00569-0
Liang Y, Meng L, Lin X et al (2018) QTL and QTL networks for cold tolerance at the reproductive stage detected using selective introgression in rice. PLoS ONE 13:e0200846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200846
Liang W, Du H, Pang B et al (2022) High-density genetic mapping identified QTLs for anaerobic germination tolerance in rice. Front Plant Sci 13:1076600
Liu Q, Yang F, Zhang J et al (2021) Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in crop quality improvement. Int J Mol Sci 22:4206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084206
Loo YY, Billa L, Singh A (2015) Effect of climate change on seasonal monsoon in Asia and its impact on the variability of monsoon rainfall in southeast Asia. Geosci Front 6:817–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.02.009
Lu G, Wu F-Q, Wu W et al (2014) Rice LTG1 is involved in adaptive growth and fitness under low ambient temperature. Plant J 78:468–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12487
Lu Y, Chuan M, Wang H et al (2022) Genetic and molecular factors in determining grain number per panicle of rice. Front Plant Sci 13:964246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.964246
Ma Y, Dai X, Xu Y et al (2015) COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 160:1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.046
Marchetti MA (1987) Inheritance of resistance to Pyricularia oryzae in rice cultivars grown in the United States. Phytopathology 77:799. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-77-799
Meng Q, Gupta R, Min CW et al (2019) Proteomics of rice—Magnaporthe oryzae interaction: What have we learned so far? Front Plant Sci 10:1383
Meng X, Xiao G, Telebanco-Yanoria MJ et al (2020) The broad-spectrum rice blast resistance (R) gene Pita2 encodes a novel R protein unique from Pita. Rice 13:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00377-5
Mi J (2016) Stacking S5-n and f5-n to overcome sterility in indica–japonica hybrid rice. Theor Appl Genet 13:563–575
Miller F, Arkansas U (2018) Rice blast: the most devastating rice disease in the world. In: AgFax. https://www.agfax.com/2018/09/28/rice-blast-the-most-devastating-rice-disease-in-the-world/. Accessed 26 Feb 2023
Miro B, Ismail A (2013) Tolerance of anaerobic conditions caused by flooding during germination and early growth in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front Plant Sci 4:269
Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A et al (2010) OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet 42:545–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.592
Mondal S, Hasan MJ, Ahmed T et al (2020a) Effects of AG1 and AG2 QTLs on nonstructural carbohydrate and seed management options for rice seedling growth and establishment under flooding stress. Rice Sci 27:515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2020.09.008
Mondal S, Khan MIR, Entila F et al (2020b) Responses of AG1 and AG2 QTL introgression lines and seed pre-treatment on growth and physiological processes during anaerobic germination of rice under flooding. Sci Rep 10:10214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67240-x
Mukhina ZM, Savenko EG, Korotenko TL et al (2020) Development of rice pre-breeding resources with blast resistance. E3S Web Conf 224:04020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202022404020
Najeeb S, Ali J, Mahender A et al (2020) Identification of main-effect quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for low-temperature stress tolerance germination- and early seedling vigor-related traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breed New Strateg Plant Improv 40:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-1090-4
Nalley L, Tsiboe F, Durand-Morat A et al (2016) Economic and environmental impact of rice blast pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae) alleviation in the United States. PLoS ONE 11:e0167295. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167295
Oe S, Sasayama D, Luo Q et al (2022) Growth responses of seedlings under complete submergence in rice cultivars carrying both the submergence-tolerance gene SUB1A-1 and the floating genes SNORKELs. Plant Prod Sci 25:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2021.1943465
OECD, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2021) OECD-agricultural outlook 2021–2030. OECD, Paris
Ohsumi A, Takai T, Ida M et al (2011) Evaluation of yield performance in rice near-isogenic lines with increased spikelet number. Field Crops Res 120:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.013
Parihar A, Shiwani (2022) Molecular breeding and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement. In: Singh RL, Mondal S, Parihar A, Singh PK (eds) Plant genomics for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore, pp 129–164
Pranathi K, Viraktamath BC, Neeraja CN et al (2016) Development and validation of candidate gene-specific markers for the major fertility restorer genes, Rf4 and Rf3 in rice. Mol Breed 36:145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0566-8
Priyadarshi R, Arremsetty HPS, Singh AK et al (2018) Marker-assisted improvement of the elite maintainer line of rice, IR 58025B for wide compatibility (S5n) gene. Front Plant Sci 9:1051
Ranawake AL, Manangkil OE, Yoshida S et al (2014) Mapping QTLs for cold tolerance at germination and the early seedling stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 28:989–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2014.978539
Rao J, Wang X, Cai Z et al (2021) Genetic analysis of S5-interacting genes regulating hybrid sterility in rice. Rice 14:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00452-x
Reyes VP, Angeles-Shim RB, Mendioro MS et al (2021) Marker-assisted introgression and stacking of major QTLs controlling grain number (Gn1a) and number of primary branching (WFP) to NERICA cultivars. Plants Basel Switz 10:844. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050844
Rezaei Cherati S, Shanmugam S, Pandey K, Khodakovskaya MV (2021) Whole-transcriptome responses to environmental stresses in agricultural crops treated with carbon-based nanomaterials. ACS Appl Bio Mater 4:4292–4301. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00108
RoyChowdhury M, Jia Y, Jackson A et al (2012a) Analysis of rice blast resistance gene Pi-z in rice germplasm using pathogenicity assays and DNA markers. Euphytica 184:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0481-3
Roychowdhury M, Jia Y, Jia MH et al (2012b) Identification of the rice blast resistance gene Pib in the National Small Grains Collection. Phytopathology 102:700–706. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-12-0026-R
Russo S, Callegarin AM (2007) Rice production and research potential in Italy. Opt Méditerr 24:139–146.
Sahu SK, Tiwary BK (2017) A transcriptomic study on cold stress in two Indian rice varieties using RNA-seq analysis. Can J Biotechnol 1:201–201. https://doi.org/10.24870/cjb.2017-a187
Shanmugam S, Zhao S, Nandy S et al (2020) Modification of soybean growth and abiotic stress tolerance by expression of truncated ERECTA protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 15:e0233383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233383
Shanmugam S, Boyett VA, Khodakovskaya M (2021) Enhancement of drought tolerance in rice by silencing of the OsSYT-5 gene. PLoS ONE 16:e0258171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258171
Shikari AB, Khanna A, Krishnan SG et al (2013) Molecular analysis and phenotypic validation of blast resistance genes Pita and Pita 2 in landraces of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed 73:131. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0975-6906.73.2.020
Shinada H, Iwata N, Sato T, Fujino K (2014) QTL pyramiding for improving of cold tolerance at fertilization stage in rice. Breed Sci 63:483–488. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.63.483
Singh VK, Singh A, Singh SP et al (2012) Incorporation of blast resistance into “PRR78”, an elite Basmati rice restorer line, through marker assisted backcross breeding. Field Crops Res 128:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.003
Singh J, Gupta SK, Devanna BN et al (2020) Blast resistance gene Pi54 over-expressed in rice to understand its cellular and sub-cellular localization and response to different pathogens. Sci Rep 10:5243. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59027-x
Song X, Meng X, Guo H et al (2022) Targeting a gene regulatory element enhances rice grain yield by decoupling panicle number and size. Nat Biotechnol 40:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01281-7
Spijkers P (1983) Rice peasants and rice research in Colombia. Wageningen University and Research. 263.
Sundaram RM, Sakthivel K, Hariprasad AS et al (2010) Development and validation of a PCR-based functional marker system for the major wide-compatible gene locus S5 in rice. Mol Breed 26:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9482-5
Surek H (1990) Rice production and research activities in Turkey. Thrace Agricultural Research Institute, Edirne
Tang H, Luo D, Zhou D et al (2014) The rice restorer Rf4 for wild-abortive cytoplasmic male sterility encodes a mitochondrial-localized PPR protein that functions in reduction of WA352 transcripts. Mol Plant 7:1497–1500. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu047
Tanweer FA, Rafii MY, Sijam K et al (2015) Introgression of blast resistance genes (putative Pi-b and Pi-kh) into elite rice cultivar MR219 through marker-assisted selection. Front Plant Sci 6:1002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01002
Tian D, Guo X, Zhang Z et al (2019) Improving blast resistance of the rice restorer line, Hui 316, by introducing Pi9 or Pi2 with marker-assisted selection. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 33:1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2019.1649095
Tnani H, Chebotarov D, Thapa R et al (2021) Enriched-GWAS and transcriptome analysis to refine and characterize a major QTL for anaerobic germination tolerance in rice. Int J Mol Sci 22:4445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094445
Valent B (2021) The impact of blast disease: past, present, and future. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ 2356:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1613-0_1
Victoria FC, Martinez C (2009) Breeding rice cultivars with durable blast resistance in Colombia. In: Wang G-L, Valent B (eds) Advances in genetics, genomics and control of rice blast disease. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 375–383
Vijayakumar CHM, Ahmed MI, Viraktamath BC, Ramesha MS (1999) Identification and utilisation of wide compatibility gene in rice. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 59:139–148
Wang X, Jia Y, Wamishe Y et al (2017) Dynamic changes in the rice blast population in the United States over six decades. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 30:803–812. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-04-17-0101-R
Wang L, Zhao L, Zhang X et al (2019) Large-scale identification and functional analysis of NLR genes in blast resistance in the Tetep rice genome sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:18479–18487. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910229116
Xing J, Deng H, Yuan L (2019) The utilization of rice blast resistance genes in hybrid rice breeding in China. IntechOpen, Rijeka
Yan CJ, Liang GH, Zhu LH, Gu MH (2000) RFLP analysis on wide compatibility genes in rice variety dular of ecotype aus. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 27:409–417
Yang J, Li D, Liu H et al (2020) Identification of QTLs involved in cold tolerance during the germination and bud stages of rice (Oryza sativa L.) via a high-density genetic map. Breed Sci 70:292–302. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.19127
Yang Y, Saand MA, Huang L et al (2021) Applications of multi-omics technologies for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 12:563953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.563953
Ye L, Qian L (2019) A study of Japanese traditional rice production technique in warm areas and its modern ecological value. Asian Agric Res. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.289556
Zakir M (2018) Mutation breeding and its application in crop improvement under current environmental situations for biotic and abiotic stresses. Int J Res Stud Agric Sci 4:1–10
Zhang Q, Chen Q, Wang S et al (2014) Rice and cold stress: methods for its evaluation and summary of cold tolerance-related quantitative trait loci. Rice 7:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-014-0024-3
Zhang Z, Li J, Pan Y et al (2017) Natural variation in CTB4a enhances rice adaptation to cold habitats. Nat Commun 8:14788. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14788
Zhang Q, Xie J, Wang X et al (2022) Natural variation of RGN1a regulates grain number per panicle in japonica rice. Front Plant Sci 13:1097622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1097622
Zhao H, Wang X, Jia Y et al (2018) The rice blast resistance gene Ptr encodes an atypical protein required for broad-spectrum disease resistance. Nat Commun 9:2039. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04369-4
Zhao H, Liu Y, Jia MH, Jia Y (2022a) An allelic variant of the broad-spectrum blast resistance gene Ptr in weedy rice is associated with resistance to the most virulent blast race IB-33. Plant Dis 106:1675–1680. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-21-2043-RE
Zhao W, Zhou W, Geng H et al (2022b) Identification of a new wide-compatibility locus in inter-subspecific hybrids of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agronomy 12:2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112851
Zhi-Hong Z, Li S, Wei L et al (2005) A major QTL conferring cold tolerance at the early seedling stage using recombinant inbred lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci 168:527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.09.021
Funding
The authors appreciate the funding provided by the Texas Rice Research Foundation, The Rice Foundation, and Texas A&M AgriLife Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SS did the investigation, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, writing the original draft, review, and editing of the manuscript. DLS contributed to the funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, formal analysis, supervision, review, and editing of the manuscript. JCY contributed to the data curation, formal analysis, review, and editing of the manuscript. SOPBS contributed to funding acquisition, project administration, resources, investigation, supervision, and review and editing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shanmugam, S., Samonte, S.O.P.B., Sanchez, D.L. et al. Genetic assessment of diverse rice germplasm for yield-related and stress tolerance traits. Genet Resour Crop Evol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-02004-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-02004-4