Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of house damage and prevention strategies for cut slope house-building landslides in tectonically weak and humid hilly areas: a case study of Jiangxi Province

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing intensity of human activity is exposing more people and property in hill regions to geohazards (including rockfall, landslide, debris flow, et al.). In tectonically weak and humid (TWH) hilly areas, such as the Jiangxi Province, a large proportion of the losses in geohazards are caused by cut slope house-building (CSHB) landslides. The house is the “first line of defense” of a household against geohazards. However, previous studies mainly studied cut slope landslides themselves to reduce disaster losses, but few conducted analyses from the perspective of house damage. Considering the situation, this study makes an inventory of house damage information related to CSHB landslides in Jiangxi Province from 2019 to 2022 and analyzes the house damage characteristics, effects of influencing factors on house damage, and prevention suggestions in TWH hilly areas. Some main findings can be summarized as follows: (i) The main house with a brick-concrete structure will not collapse under the influence of 81.07% cut slope landslides; (ii) the first floor needs to be reinforced due to its high frequency of damage; (iii) the ancillary houses should be placed in front of the main house or on diagonal sides away from the cut slope and should not be set up as high-activity functional areas; (iv) the kitchen is the functional area with the most severe damage closely related to layout pattern and stability characteristics. Our study contributes to subsequent analysis of house damage or physical vulnerability, and disaster loss reduction in TWH hilly areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Supplementary materials related to this article can be found in the attachment. Supplementary material presents the inventory of 1,622 geohazards that caused losses in Jiangxi Province from 2019 to 2022, and the inventory of 715 landslides related to cut slopes with rich information on house damage.

References

  • Bera S, Guru B, Oommen T (2020) Indicator-based approach for assigning physical vulnerability of the houses to landslide hazard in the Himalayan region of India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 50:101891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreño ML, Barbat AH, Pelling M, Schneiderbauer S, Kienberger S, Keiler M, Alexander D, Zeil P, Welle T (2013) Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67:193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizimana H, Sönmez O (2015) Landslide occurrences in the hilly areas of Rwanda, their causes and protection measures. Disaster Science and Engineering 1(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Cheng D, Choi CE, Jin W, Lei Y, Kargel JS (2019) The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster. Landslides 16(6):1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01167-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS-MH MR 4. Technical Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States.

  • Finlay PJ, Mostyn GR, Fell R (1999) Landslide risk assessment: prediction of travel distance. Can Geotech J 36(3):556–562. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs S, Kuhlicke C, Meyer V (2011) Vulnerability to natural hazards? The Challenge of Integration Natural Hazards 58(2):621–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9825-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünthal G (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998, European Seismological Commission (ESC). No. 2: 87977–008. ISBN.

  • He CR, Zhang R, Chen Q, Han SL (2011) Earthquake characteristics and building damage in high-intensity areas of Wenchuan earthquake I: Yingxiu town. Nat Hazards 57:435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9624-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu KH, Cui P, Zhang JQ (2012) Characteristics of damage to buildings by debris flows on 7 August 2010 in Zhouqu, Western China. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(7):2209–2217. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2209-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter G, Fell R (2003) Travel distance angle for “rapid” landslides in constructed and natural soil slopes. Can Geotech J 40(6):1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan HX, Li L, Zhang YS, Gao X, Liu HJ (2013) Risk assessment of debris flow in Yushu seismic area in China: a perspective for the reconstruction. Nat Hazard 13(11):2957–2968. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2957-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Kang H (2020) Spatial-temporal distribution of landslide, rockfall and debris flow hazards in Jiangxi Province. Chin J Geol Hazard Control 31(04):107–112 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo H Y, Zhang L M, Zhang L L, He J, Yin K S (2023) Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: the state of the art and future needs. Earth-Science Reviews 104329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329

  • Luo H Y (2020) Assessment of physical building vulnerability to landslides. School of Civil Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. Ph.D. thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/114358

  • Martín C (2019) Understanding US housing data in relation to the 2017 disasters. Nat Hazard Rev 20(3):04019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrouli O, Fotopoulou S, Pitilakis K, Zuccaro G, Corominas J, Santo A, Cacace DF, Gregorio D, Crescenzo GD, Foerster E, Ulrich T (2014) Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides. Bull Eng Geol Env 73:265–289

    Google Scholar 

  • MLRPRC (2009). Classification of earthquake damage to buildings and special structures (GB/T 24335–2009). Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China

  • MLRPRC (2014). Code for loss statistics of geological hazards (DZ/T 0269–2014). Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China

  • Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 37(9):1264–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papathoma-Köhle M, Gems B, Sturm M, Fuchs S (2017) Matrices, curves and indicators: a review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows. Earth Sci Rev 171:272–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25(6):747–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao C, Liu Y, Lan H, Li L, Liu S, Yan Z, Li Y (2022) Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics, causes, and prevention advice of fatal geohazards in Jiangxi Province. China Science of the Total Environment 834:155337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Kouris LA, Panagopoulos G, Kappos AJ, Nigro E, Rossetto T, Lloyd TO, Stathopoulos T (2010) Structural vulnerability assessment under natural hazards: a review. In COST ACTION C 26:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Demoulin A (2007) Characteristics of the size distribution of recent and historical landslides in a populated hilly region. Earth Planet Sci Lett 256(3–4):588–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Geest K, Schindler M (2016) Brief communication: loss and damage from a catastrophic landslide in Nepal. Nat Hazard 16(11):2347–2350. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2347-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu FJ, Mao SB, Zhong QF, Yang MG (2016) Characteristics of neotectonics and distributions law of earthquakes in Jiangxi Province. East China Geol 37(2):97–105 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Lu X, Qu Z, Peng F (2008) Analysis on building seismic damage in the Wenchuan earthquake. In The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China.

  • Zanchetta G, Sulpizio R, Pareschi MT, Leoni FM, Santacroce R (2004) Characteristics of May 5–6, 1998 volcaniclastic debris flows in the Sarno area (Campania, southern Italy): relationships to structural damage and hazard zonation. J Volcanol Geoth Res 133(1–4):377–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(03)00409-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng C, Cui P, Su Z, Lei Y, Chen R (2015) Failure modes of reinforced concrete columns of buildings under debris flow impact. Landslides 12:561–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0490-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Taucer F, Rossetto T (2009) Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Eng Struct 31(8):1707–1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Ali Darvishi Boloorani (University of Tehran) for discussing and improving the English version. Many thanks will go to the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments.

Funding

This work was supported by Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [grant number: 20232BAB213073], Open Fund from Engineering Research Center for Seismic Disaster Prevention and Engineering Geological Disaster Detection of Jiangxi Province [grant number: SDGD202204], Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education Science and Technology Research Project [grant number: GJJ2200759], Jiangxi Provincial Department of Natural Resources Project [grant number: 360000243188887011285]), and ECUT’s 2019 the Start-up Fund of Research for recent Ph. D. graduates [grant number: DHBK2019044].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chongjian Shao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 266 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Shao, C., Wu, Y. et al. Analysis of house damage and prevention strategies for cut slope house-building landslides in tectonically weak and humid hilly areas: a case study of Jiangxi Province. Landslides (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02245-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02245-5

Keywords

Navigation