Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review

  • Review
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The most recent international guideline on inguinal hernia management recommends a short convalescence after repair. However, surgeons’ recommendations may vary. The objective of this study was to give an overview of the current convalescence recommendations in the literature subdivided on the Lichtenstein and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.

Methods

In this systematic review, three databases were searched in August 2021 to identify studies on inguinal hernia repairs with a statement about postoperative convalescence recommendations. The outcome was convalescence recommendations subdivided on daily activities, light work, heavy lifting, and sport.

Results

In total, 91 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and 50 and 58 studies reported about convalescence recommendations after Lichtenstein and laparoscopic repairs, respectively. Patients were instructed with a wide range of convalescence recommendations. A total of 34 Lichtenstein studies and 35 laparoscopic studies recommended resumption of daily activities as soon as possible. Following Lichtenstein repairs, the patients were instructed to resume light work after median 0 days (interquartile range (IQR) 0–0), heavy lifting after 42 days (IQR 14–42), and sport after 7 days (IQR 0–29). Following laparoscopic procedures, the patients were instructed to resume light work after median 0 days (IQR 0–0), heavy lifting after 14 days (IQR 10–28), and sport after 12 days (IQR 7–23).

Conclusion

This study revealed a broad spectrum of convalescence recommendations depending on activity level following inguinal hernia repair, which likely reflects a lack of high-quality evidence within this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E et al (2015) Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc 29:289–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kingsnorth A (2004) Treating inguinal hernias: open mesh Lichtenstein operation is preferred over laparoscopy. BMJ 328:59. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.328.7431.59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Forbes J, Fry N, Hwang H, Karimuddin AA (2012) Timing of return to work after hernia repair: recommendations based on a literature review. B C Med J 54:341–345

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buhck H, Untied M, Bechstein WO (2012) Evidence-based assessment of the period of physical inactivity required after inguinal herniotomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:1209–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00423-012-1008-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulacoglu H, Celasin H, Karaca AS (2020) Return to outdoor walking, car driving, and sexual activity following elective inguinal hernia repair: surgeons’ perspective versus patients’ reality. Hernia 24:985–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02255-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10029-017-1668-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bay-Nielsen M, Thomsen H, Andersen FH et al (2004) Convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 91:362–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W et al (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169:467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harmankaya S (2021) Convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a scoping review. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NSF5K. Accessed 31 Dec 2021

  11. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331:1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mendeley Elsevier, UK. Mendeley Reference Manager. https://www.mendeley.com/reference-management/reference-manager. Accessed 20 Nov 2021

  13. Covidence—better systematic review management. https://www.covidence.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2021

  14. Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Sahu T, Mahajan KC (2010) Traditional polypropylene and lightweight meshes in totally extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy. Int J Surg 8:44–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.08.01415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aigner F, Augustin F, Kaufmann C et al (2014) Prospective, randomized-controlled trial comparing postoperative pain after plug and patch open repair with totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 18:237–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1123-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anadol AZ, Akin M, Kurukahvecioglu O et al (2011) A prospective comparative study of the efficacy of conventional Lichtenstein versus self-adhesive mesh repair for inguinal hernia. Surg Today 41:1498–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-4545-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersson B, Hallén M, Leveau P et al (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133:464–472. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andresen K, Burcharth J, Fonnes S et al (2015) Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial. Hernia 19:871–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edwards CCII, Bailey RW (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:149–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200006000-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bakker WJ, van Hessen CV, Clevers GJ et al (2020) Value and patient appreciation of follow-up after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 24:1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02220-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Batabyal P, Haddad RL, Samra JS et al (2016) Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities. Am J Surg 211:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bektaş H, Bilsel Y, Ersöz F et al (2011) Comparison of totally extraperitoneal technique and darn plication of primary inguinal hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:583–588. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK et al (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-002-0055-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Kraft B, Schwarz J (2011) One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). Hernia 15:503–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0810-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bowley DMG, Butler M, Shaw S, Kingsnorth AN (2003) Dispositional pessimism predicts delayed return to normal activities after inguinal hernia operation. Surgery 133:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bringman S, Heikkinen T-J, Wollert S et al (2004) Early results of a single-blinded, randomized, controlled, Internet-based multicenter trial comparing Prolene and Vypro II mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty. Hernia 8:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0192-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen T-J et al (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Heikkinen T (2005) Early results of a randomized multicenter trial comparing Prolene and VyproII mesh in bilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplast (TEP). Surg Endosc 19:536–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9100-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brügger L, Bloesch M, Ipaktchi R et al (2012) Objective hypoesthesia and pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing tissue adhesive versus spiral tacks. Surg Endosc 26:1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2003-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Burgmans JPJ, Voorbrood CEH, Schouten N et al (2015) Three-month results of the effect of Ultrapro or Prolene mesh on post-operative pain and well-being following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TULP trial). Surg Endosc 29:3171–3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4049-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cambal M, Zonca P, Hrbaty B (2012) Comparison of self-gripping mesh with mesh fixation with fibrin-glue in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). Bratisl Lek Listy 113:103–107. https://doi.org/10.4149/bll_2012_024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Campanelli G, Pascual MH, Hoeferlin A et al (2012) Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of Tisseel/Tissucol for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: results of the TIMELI trial. Ann Surg 255:650–657. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b32bf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chui LB, Ng WT, Sze YS et al (2010) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24:2735–2738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1036-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cristaudo A, Nayak A, Martin S et al (2015) A prospective randomised trial comparing mesh types and fixation in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs. Int J Surg 17:79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dahlstrand U, Sandblom G, Ljungdahl M et al (2013) TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:3632–3638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2936-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Karaliotas C et al (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0621-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dilip G, Lamture YR, Yeola M (2020) A prospective clinical study to evaluate recurrence and infection in laparoscopic hernia in a tribal area. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 14:6320–6325. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC et al (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 249:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819255d0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck C-E et al (2007) Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 21:634–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9163-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Elheny A, Mahran K, Saleh AF (2018) Factors guarantee competence of laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. World J Laparosc Surg 11:124–127. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Flaherty JM, Auyong DB, Yuan SC et al (2020) Continuous transversus abdominis plane block for primary open inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pain Med 21:e201–e207. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fleming WR, Elliott TB, Jones RM, Hardy KJ (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with the Shouldice technique. Br J Surg 88:1183–1188. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01865.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fujita F, Lahmann B, Otsuka K et al (2004) Quantification of pain and satisfaction following laparoscopic and open hernia repair. Arch Surg 139:596–600. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.6.596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gutlic N, Gutlic A, Petersson U et al (2019) Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial). Br J Surg 106:845–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gys T, Gys B, Lafullarde T (2016) The use of a self-gripping mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. A prospective observational single surgeon study. Acta Chir Belg 113:192–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2013.11680910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Heikkinen T, Wollert S, Osterberg J et al (2006) Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias. Hernia 10:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0026-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim-Fuchs C, Helbling C, Schlumpf R et al (2011) Prospective randomized trial comparing sutured with sutureless mesh fixation for Lichtenstein hernia repair: long-term results. Hernia 16:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0856-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ielpo B, Nuñez-Alfonsel J, Duran H et al (2018) Cost-effectiveness of randomized study of laparoscopic versus open bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 268:725–730. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jutte EH, Cense HA, Dur AHM et al (2010) A pilot study for one-stop endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 24:2730–2734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1035-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kapiris S, Mavromatis T, Andrikopoulos S et al (2009) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP): stapling the mesh is not mandatory. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:419–422. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A (2010) Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure—a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:317–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0597-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kapur N, Kumar N (2017) Incidence of chronic pain after single stitch mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair: an observational prospective study, a case series. Int J Surg Open 8:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2017.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kaynak B, Celik F, Guner A et al (2007) Moloney darn repair versus Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty for open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today 37:958–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3543-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kulasegaran S, Rohan M, Pearless L, Hulme-Moir M (2017) Pre-peritoneal local anaesthetic does not reduce post-operative pain in laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Hernia 21:879–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1672-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kuzu MA, Hazinedaroğlu S, Dolalan S et al (2005) Prevention of surgical site infection after open prosthetic inguinal hernia repair: efficacy of parenteral versus oral prophylaxis with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 29:794–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7689-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J et al (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lal P, Philips P, Chander J, Ramteke VK (2010) Is unilateral laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair a job half done? The case for bilateral repair. Surg Endosc 24:1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0841-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Langeveld HR, Vant Riet M, Weidema WF et al (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d96c32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lau H, Loong F, Yuen WK, Patil NG (2007) Management of herniated retroperitoneal adipose tissue during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 21:1612–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9205-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lau H, Patil NG (2004) Acute pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty: multivariate analysis of predictive factors. Surg Endosc 18:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9068-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK (2006) Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0203-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Leff DR, Bhutiani RP (2006) Give the patients the choice—the “walk in walk out” hernia clinic. Ambul Surg 12:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Li S, Xiao H, Yang L et al (2019) Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanoscale fibrinogen patch vs porcine small intestine submucosa graft repair of inguinal hernia in adults: a randomized, single-blind, controlled, multicenter, noninferiority trial. J Am Coll Surg 229:541-551e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.08.1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E et al (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 245:222–231. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000245832.59478.c6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Manyilirah W, Kijjambu S, Upoki A, Kiryabwire J (2012) Comparison of non-mesh (Desarda) and mesh (Lichtenstein) methods for inguinal hernia repair among black African patients: a short-term double-blind RCT. Hernia 16:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0883-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mattila K, Vironen J, Eklund A et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial comparing ambulatory and inpatient care after inguinal hernia repair in patients aged 65 years or older. Am J Surg 201:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mayagoitia JC, Prieto-Díaz Chávez E, Suárez D et al (2006) Predictive factors comparison of complications and recurrences in three tension-free herniorrhaphy techniques. Hernia 10:147–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0057-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. McCloud JM, Evans DS (2003) Day-case laparoscopic hernia repair in a single unit. Surg Endosc 17:491–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9093-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Messaris E, Nicastri G, Dudrick SJ (2010) Total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation: prospective study with 1-year follow-up results. Arch Surg 145:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Molegraaf MJ, Grotenhuis B, Torensma B et al (2017) The HIPPO Trial, a randomized double-blind trial comparing self-gripping parietex progrip mesh and sutured parietex mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a long-term follow-up study. Ann Surg 266:939–945. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Moreno-Egea A (2014) Is it possible to eliminate sutures in open (Lichtenstein technique) and laparoscopic (totally extraperitoneal endoscopic) inguinal hernia repair? A randomized controlled trial with tissue adhesive (n-hexyl-alpha-cyanoacrylate). Surg Innov 21:590–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350613517944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Morrison JEJ, Jacobs VR, Morrison JE Jr (2008) Laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using preformed polyester mesh without fixation: prospective study with 1-year follow-up results in a rural setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0b013e318157b155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Muldoon RL, Marchant K, Johnson DD et al (2004) Lichtenstein vs anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized trial. Hernia 8:98–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0174-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Munghate A, Mittal S, Singh H et al (2014) Skin staples: a safe technique for securing mesh in Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty as compared to suture. Surg Res Pract 2014:958634. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/958634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa040093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Keemers-Gels M et al (2007) Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World J Surg 31:1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9090-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME et al (2005) Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C et al (2002) Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 89:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01960.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Paajanen H, Varjo R (2010) Ten-year audit of Lichtenstein hernioplasty under local anaesthesia performed by surgical residents. BMC Surg 10:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Pielaciński K, Puła B, Wróblewski T et al (2020) Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with or without fixation leads to similar results. Outcome of randomized prospective trial. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 15:1–10. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.83611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Pielaciński K, Szczepanik AB, Wróblewski T (2013) Effect of mesh type, surgeon and selected patients’ characteristics on the treatment of inguinal hernia with the Lichtenstein technique. Randomized trial. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 8:99–106. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.32824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Pokorny H, Klingler A, Scheyer M et al (2006) Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial. Hernia 10:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0105-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Pullyblank AM, Carney L, Braddon F, Dixon AR (2002) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a NICE operation. J R Coll Surg Edinb 47:630–633

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Ruze R, Yan Z, Wu Q et al (2019) Correlation between laparoscopic transection of an indirect inguinal hernial sac and postoperative seroma formation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 33:1147–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6374-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sadowski B, Rodriguez J, Symmonds R et al (2011) Comparison of polypropylene versus polyester mesh in the Lichtenstein hernia repair with respect to chronic pain and discomfort. Hernia 15:643–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0841-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Salma U, Ahmed I, Ishtiaq S (2015) A comparison of post-operative pain and hospital stay between Lichtenstein’s repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia: a randomized controlled trial. Pak J Med Sci 31:1062–1066. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.315.4811

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Savarise MT, Simpson JP, Moore JM, Leis VM (2001) Improved functional outcome and more rapid return to normal activity following laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 15:574–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Schopf S, von Ahnen T, von Ahnen M, Schardey H (2011) Chronic pain after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized comparison of light and extralight titanized polypropylene mesh. World J Surg 35:302–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0850-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Singhal T, Balakrishnan S, Grandy-Smith S, El-Hasani S (2007) Consolidated five-year experience with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgeon 5:137–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(07)80040-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Szopinski J, Dabrowiecki S, Pierscinski S et al (2012) Desarda versus Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia treatment: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 36:984–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1508-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Tolver MA, Strandfelt P, Bryld EB et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of dexamethasone versus placebo in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 99:1374–1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Tolver MA, Strandfelt P, Forsberg G et al (2012) Determinants of a short convalescence after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surgery 151:556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Tomaoglu K, Sarı YS, Bektas H et al (2015) Prospective randomized clinical trial of Jean Rives technique versus laparoscopic TEP repair for primary inguinal hernia: 10-year follow-up. Hernia 19:383–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1350-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Tschudi JF, Wagner M, Klaiber C et al (2001) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice repair. Surg Endosc 15:1263–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9047-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Uzzaman MM, Sinha S, Shaygi B et al (2012) Evaluation of patient’s understanding and recall of the consent process after open inguinal hernia repairs. Int J Surg 10:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Vironen J, Nieminen J, Eklund A, Paavolainen P (2006) Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein patch or Prolene Hernia System for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 93:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Voorbrood CEH, Burgmans JPJ, Clevers GJ et al (2015) One-stop endoscopic hernia surgery: efficient and satisfactory. Hernia 19:395–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1151-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Wani MM, Durrani AM (2019) Cost effective use of mosquito net mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Int J Biomed Res 33:351–356. https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.33.20170138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Wongyingsinn M, Kohmongkoludom P, Trakarnsanga A, Horthongkham N (2020) Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 15:e0242925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Yang B, Zhou S, Li Y et al (2018) A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty for recurrent inguinal hernia. Am Surg 84:1774–1780. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481808401134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Yang S, Shen Y-M, Wang M-G et al (2019) Titanium-coated mesh versus standard polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Hernia 23:255–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1823-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Yan Z, Liu Y, Ruze R et al (2019) Continuation of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid during perioperative period of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is safe: results of a prospective clinical trial. Hernia 23:1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02040-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Shah P, Aaudichya A, Juneja I et al (2018) A comparative study between prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy versus nerve preservation in Lichenstein tension-free meshplasty for inguinal hernia repair. Indian J Surg 81:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1738-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Quilici PJ, Greaney EMJ, Quilici J, Anderson S (2000) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: optimal technical variations and results in 1700 cases. Am Surg 66:848–852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Nienhuijs S, Kortmann B, Boerma M et al (2004) Preferred mesh-based inguinal hernia repair in a teaching setting: results of a randomized study. Arch Surg 139:1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.10.1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Burgmans JPJ, Schouten N, Clevers GJ et al (2015) Pain after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair might fade out within a year. Hernia 19:579–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1384-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Pielaciński K, Szczepanik AB, Misiak A et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 6:190–206. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.26253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S et al (2006) Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 93:1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Bakker WJ, van Hessen CV, Verleisdonk EJMM et al (2019) Is young age a risk factor for chronic postoperative inguinal pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair? Hernia 23:1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01882-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Staal E, Nienhuijs SW, Keemers-Gels ME et al (2008) The impact of pain on daily activities following open mesh inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 12:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0297-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Pierides G, Vironen J (2011) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System and the Lichtenstein patch technique for inguinal hernia repair in long term: 2- and 5-Year results. Am J Surg 202:188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Lau H, Patil NG, Lee F, Yuen WK (2002) A prospective trial of analgesia following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty: local wound infiltration vs extraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine. Surg Endosc 16:159–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-8106-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Lau H, Patil NG (2003) Selective non-stapling of mesh during unilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a case-control study. Arch Surg 138:1352–1355. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK (2003) A comparative outcome analysis of bilateral versus unilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplastics. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/109264203766207663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Burcharth J, Pedersen M, Bisgaard T et al (2013) Nationwide prevalence of groin hernia repair. PLoS ONE 8:e54367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Tolver MA, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2016) Convalescence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a qualitative systematic review. Surg Endosc 30:5165–5172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4863-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Lichtenstein IL, Shore JM (1976) Exploding the myths of hernia repair. Am J Surg 132:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(76)90381-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Schaaf S, Willms A, Schwab R, Güsgen C (2022) Recommendations on postoperative strain and physical labor after abdominal and hernia surgery: an expert survey of attendants of the 41st EHS Annual International Congress of the European Hernia Society. Hernia, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02377-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no financial support from extramural sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    S. Harmankaya, S. Öberg & J. Rosenberg

Authors
  1. S. Harmankaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Öberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Harmankaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sehriban Harmankaya, Stina Öberg, and Jacob Rosenberg declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not required.

Human and animal rights

Not required.

Informed consent

Not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harmankaya, S., Öberg, S. & Rosenberg, J. Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review. Hernia 26, 1009–1021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation