Skip to main content
Log in

Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males

A randomized trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) is an accepted technique for the repair of recurrent and bilateral inguinal hernia, but its role in the management of unilateral primary inguinal hernia remains controversial. The current randomized trial was undertaken to compare the postoperative and 1-year outcomes of day-case TEP and open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males.

Methods

From January 2002 to January 2004, a total of 200 male patients were randomized to undergo either day-case unilateral TEP or open Lichtenstein hernioplasty under general anesthesia. The primary outcome measures included postoperative pain score, time until return to work, incidence of chronic groin pain, and recurrence rate 1 year after the operation.

Results

All TEP procedures were successfully performed without conversion. The mean operation time for TEP (50±13.2 min) was significantly shorter than for open Lichtenstein hernioplasty (58 ± 17.6 min) (p < 0.001). The pain score at rest was significantly lower in the TEP group than in the open group on postoperative days 0, 1, 4, 5, and 6. On the average, the patients returned to work 8.6 days after TEP and 14 days after Lichtenstein hernioplasty (p = 0.006). Postoperative recovery and morbidity rates were otherwise comparable between the two groups. The incidence of chronic groin pain 1 year after TEP (9.9%) was significantly lower than after open surgery (21.7%) (p = 0.032). None of the patients in either group showed recurrence at the last follow-up assessment.

Conclusions

Day-case TEP was superior to open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for the repair of unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males. The benefits of day-case TEP included less postoperative pain, a faster return to work, and a lower incidence of chronic groin pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson B, Hallen M, Leveau P, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133: 464–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozuk M, Schuster R, Stewart D, Hicks K, Greaney G, Waxman K (2003) Disability and chronic pain after open mesh and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 69: 839–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, Englund T, Westman B, Anderberg B (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237: 142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colak T, Akca T, Kanik A, Aydin S (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach with open mesh repair in inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13: 191–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gokalp A, Inal M, Maralcan G, Baskonus I (2003) A prospective randomized study of Lichtenstein open tension-free versus laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Acta Chir Belg 103: 502–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91: 1570–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heikkinen T, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 12: 1199–1203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89: 1476–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17: 850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lau H, Lee F (2003) Seroma following endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 17: 1773–1777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F (2002) Learning curve for unilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16: 1724–1728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F (2003) Prevalence and severity of chronic groin pain following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 17: 1620–1623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157: 188–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, Zwart RC, Geurts I, Vroonhoven TJ (1997) A randomized comparison of physical performance following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 84: 64–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ, Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237: 136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17: 1386–1390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354: 185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nathan JD, Pappas TN (2003) Inguinal hernia: an old condition with new solutions. Ann Surg 238: s148–s157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program, 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350: 1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114: 1–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the kind assistance of Tze-Ching Tan, M.D., in editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Lau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, H., Patil, N.G. & Yuen, W.K. Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males. Surg Endosc 20, 76–81 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0203-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0203-9

Key words

Navigation