Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This prospective, clinical, randomized, controlled study was performed to define the incidence of chronic pain after total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair with a light-weighted mesh compared with heavyweight mesh in patients with bilateral inguinal hernias.

Methods

Consecutive patients with bilateral inguinal hernias were recruited for TEP inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia. Heavyweight mesh was randomly assigned to one side of the groin and lightweight mesh to the other. Patients were followed up regularly for up to 1 year by an independent surgeon who was unaware of the mesh assignment. The postoperative pain score by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS) and other data were recorded.

Results

Fifty bilateral TEP hernia repairs were performed between September 2007 and February 2009. Six patients (12%) complained of chronic pain 3 months after the operation. A higher average pain score was observed for the side of hernia repaired by heavyweight mesh compared with lightweight mesh, but the difference was not statistically significant. More patients complained about foreign body sensation on the side repaired with heavyweight mesh (24%) compared with the side with lightweight mesh (8%; P < 0.05). There was no recurrence or need for reintervention for either type of mesh.

Conclusions

Lightweight polypropylene mesh may be preferable to heavyweight mesh for TEP inguinal hernia repair because it provides less postoperative foreign body sensation; however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2001) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 235:322–332

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N, Hair A, O’Dwyer PJ (2001) Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerbery EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systemic review. Surg Endosc 21:161–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Cairns W, Smith S, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1478–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Roseman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systemic review. Am J Surg 194:394–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Muller C, Meurer K, Bauer KH, Papapostolou G, Uhl W (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes: a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12:63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ng WT, Chui LB (2008) Routine contralateral exploration is advisable during extraperitoneal hernioplasty for left inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 22(3):806–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng WT (2008) A cost-effective mesh design for extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using lightweight mesh. Hernia 12:447–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merskey H, Bogduk N (eds) (1994) Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definition of pain terms. Task Force on Taxonomy of the I+ASP, 2nd edn. IASP Press, Seattle, WA, pp 209–214

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91:44–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ (2006) Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 367:1625–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B, Geis P, Duncan T, Swell R, McKernan B (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 12:226–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Agrwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC (2009) Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy-and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early result. Surg Endosc 23:242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Chui, Ng, Sze, Yuen, Wong, and Kong have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. T. Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chui, L.B., Ng, W.T., Sze, Y.S. et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24, 2735–2738 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1036-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1036-8

Keywords

Navigation