Abstract
Hearing in insects serves to gain information in the context of mate finding, predator avoidance or host localization. For these goals, the auditory pathways of insects represent the computational substrate for object recognition and localization. Before these higher level computations can be executed in more central parts of the nervous system, the signals need to be preprocessed in the auditory periphery. Here, we review peripheral preprocessing along four computational themes rather than discussing specific physiological mechanisms: (1) control of sensitivity by adaptation, (2) recoding of amplitude modulations of an acoustic signal into a labeled-line code (3) frequency processing and (4) conditioning for binaural processing. Along these lines, we review evidence for canonical computations carried out in the peripheral auditory pathway and show that despite the vast diversity of insect hearing, signal processing is governed by common computational motifs and principles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Autrum HJ (1942) Schallempfang bei mensch und tier. Naturwissenschaften 5:69–85
Baden T, Hedwig B (2006) Neurite-specific Ca2+ dynamics underlying sound processing in an auditory interneurone. Dev Neurobiol 67(1):68–80
Barlow HB (2001) Redundancy reduction revisited. Network 12(3):241–253
Benda J, Hennig RM (2008) Spike-frequency adaptation generates intensity invariance in a primary auditory interneuron. J Comput Neurosci 24:113–136
Benda J, Herz AVM (2003) A universal model for spike-frequency adaptation. Neural Comput 15:2523–2564
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Clemens J, Hennig RM (2013) Computational principles underlying the recognition of acoustic signals in insects. J Comput Neurosci 35:75–85
Clemens J, Ronacher B (2013) Feature extraction and integration underlying perceptual decision making during courtship behavior. J Neurosci 33(29):12136–12145
Clemens J, Weschke G, Vogel A, Ronacher B (2010) Intensity properties of auditory neurons compared to the statistics of relevant natural signals in grasshoppers. J Comp Physiol A 196:285–297
Clemens J, Kutzki O, Ronacher B, Schreiber S, Wohlgemuth S (2011) Efficient transformation of an auditory population code in a small sensory system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13812–13817
Clemens J, Wohlgemuth S, Ronacher B (2012) Nonlinear computations underlying temporal and population sparseness in the auditory system of the grasshopper. J Neurosci 32:10053–10062
Creutzig F, Wohlgemuth S, Stumpner A, Bena J, Ronacher B, Herz AVM (2009) Time-scale invariant representation of acoustic communication signals by a bursting interneuron. J Neurosci 29:2575–2580
Creutzig F, Benda J, Wohlgemuth S, Stumpner A, Ronacher B, Herz AVM (2010) Timescale-invariant pattern recognition by feedforward inhibition and parallel signal processing. Neural Comput 22:1493–1510
deWeese MR, Wehr M, Zador AM (2003) Binary spiking in auditory cortex. J Neurosci 23(7940):7949
Dobler S, Stumpner A, Heller K-G (1994) Sex-specific spectral tuning for the partner’s song in the duetting bushcricket Ancistrura nigrovittata (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae). J Comp Physiol A 175:303–310
Eyherabide HG, Rokem A, Herz AVM, Samengo I (2008) Burst firing is a neural code in an insect auditory system. Front Comput Neurosci 2:1–17
Fisch K, Schwalger T, Lindner B, Herz AV, Benda J (2012) Channel noise from both slow adaptation currents and fast currents is required to explain spike-response variability in a sensory neuron. J Neurosci 32(48):17332–17344
Fonseca PJ, Münch D, Hennig RM (2000) How cicadas interpret acoustic signals. Nature 405:297–298
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gogala M (1995) Songs of four cicada species from Thailand. Bioacoustics 6:101–116
Gollisch T, Herz AVM (2004) Input-driven components of spike-frequency adaptation can be unmasked in vivo. J Neurosci 24:7435–7444
Hennig RM, Weber T (1997) Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by cricket females of two closely related species: a behavioral analysis. J Comp Physiol A 180:621–630
Hennig RM, Franz A, Stumpner A (2004) Processing of auditory information in insects. Microsc Res Tech 63:351–374
Hildebrandt KJ (2014) Neural maps in insect versus vertebrate auditory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 24:82–87
Hildebrandt KJ, Benda J, Hennig RM (2009) The origin of adaptation in the auditory pathway of locusts is specific to cell type and function. J Neurosci 29:2626–2636
Hildebrandt KJ, Benda J, Hennig RM (2011) Multiple arithmetic operations in a single neuron: the recruitment of adaptation processes in the cricket auditory pathway depends on sensory context. J Neurosci 31:14142–14150
Hill KG (1974) Carrier frequency as a factor in phonotactic behavior of female crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). J Comp Physiol 93:7–18
Hoy RR (1989) Startle, categorical response, and attention in acoustic behavior of insects. Ann Rev Neurosci 12:355–375
Imaizumi K, Pollack GS (1999) Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors. J Neurosci 19:1508–1516
Jacobs K, Otte B, Lakes-Harlan R (1999) Tympanal receptor cells of Schistocerca gregaria: correlation of soma positions and dendrite attachment sites, central projections and physiologies. J Exp Zool 283:270–285
Klump GM, Shelter MD (1984) Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context; I. Factors affecting the structure of alarm signals. II. The functional significance and evolution of alarm signals. Z Tierpsychol 66:189–226
Kostarakos K, Hedwig B (2012) Calling song recognition in female crickets: temporal tuning of identified brain neurons matches behavior. J Neurosci 32(28):9601–9612
Krahe R, Gabbiani F (2004) Burst firing in sensory systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:13–24
Lampe U, Schmoll T, Franzke A, Reinhold K (2012) Staying tuned: grasshoppers from noisy roadside habitats produce courtship signals with elevated frequency components. Function Ecol 26:1348–1354
Laughlin SB (1981) A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron’s information capacity. Z Naturforsch C: Biosci 36:910–912
Laurent G (2002) Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:884–895
Machens CK, Stemmler MB, Prinz P, Krahe R, Ronacher B, Herz AVM (2001) Representation of acoustic communication signals by insect auditory receptor neurons. J Neurosci 21:3215–3227
Machens CK, Schütze H, Franz A, Stemmler MB, Ronacher B, Herz AVM (2003) Auditory receptor neurons preserve characteristic differences between conspecific communication signals. Nature Neurosci 6:341–342
Machens CK, Gollisch T, Kolesnikova O, Herz AVM (2005) Testing the efficiency of sensory coding with optimal stimulus ensembles. Neuron 47:447–456
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2005) Effect of the temporal pattern of contralateral inhibition on sound localization cues. J Neurosci 25:6137–6144
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2006) A behavioral role for feature detection by sensory bursts. J Neurosci 26(41):10542–10547
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2010) The structure and size of sensory bursts encode stimulus information but only size affects behavior. J Comp Physiol A 196:315–320
Marshall DC, Hill KBR (2009) Versatile aggressive mimicry of cicadas by an Australian predatory katydid. PLoS One 4(1):e4185. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004185
Michelsen A (1998) Biophysics of sound localization in insects. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Springer, Berlin, NewYork, pp 18–62
Miles RN, Robert D, Hoy RR (1995) Mechanically coupled ears for directional hearing in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea. J Acoust Soc Am 98:3059–3070
Neuhofer D, Ronacher B (2012) Influence of different envelope maskers on signal recognition and neuronal representation in the auditory system of a grasshopper. PLoS One 7(3):e34384
Neuhofer D, Wohlgemuth S, Stumpner A, Ronacher B (2008) Evolutionarily conserved coding properties of auditory across grasshopper species. Proc R Soc B 275:1965–1974
Neuhofer D, Stemmler M, Ronacher B (2011) Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network. J Comp Physiol A 197:251–265
Oldfield BP, Kleindienst H, Huber F (1986) Physiology and tonotopic organization of auditory receptors in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus deGeer. J Comp Physiol A 159:457–464
Pollack GS (1988) Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci 8:2635–2639
Poulet JFA, Hedwig B (2005) Auditory orientation in crickets: pattern recognition controls reactive steering. PNAS 102:15665–15669
Rokem A, Watzl S, Gollisch T, Stemmler M, Herz AVM, Samengo I (2006) Spike-timing precision underlies the coding efficiency of auditory receptor neurons. J Neurophysiol 95:2541–2552
Römer H (1987) Representation of auditory distance with a central neuropil of the bushcricket Megalopsis marki. J Comp Physiol 161:33–42
Römer H, Krusch M (2000) A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 186:181–191
Römer H, Lewald J (1992) High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:437–444
Römer H, Bailey WJ, Dadour I (1989) Insect hearing in the field: III masking by noise. J Comp Physiol A 164:609–620
Römer H, Spickermann M, Bailey W (1998) Sensory basis for sound intensity discrimination in the bushcricket Requena verticalis (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol A 182:595–607
Römer H, Hedwig B, Ott SR (2002) Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongate. Eur J Neurosci 15:1655–1662
Ronacher B, Hennig RM (2004) Neuronal adaptation improves the recognition of temporal patterns in a grasshopper. J Comp Physiol A 190:311–319. doi:10.1007/s00359-004-0498-3
Ronacher B, Stumpner A (1988) Filtering of behaviourally relevant temporal parameters of a grasshopper’s song by an auditory interneuron. J Comp Physiol A 163:517–523
Ronacher B, Stumpner A (1993) Parallel processing of song pattern and sound direction by ascending auditory interneurons in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. In: Wiese K, Gribakin FG, Popov AV, Renninger G (eds). Sensory systems of Arthropods. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 376
Ronacher B, von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1986) Routes and stations in the processing of auditory directional information in the CNS of a grasshopper, as revealed by surgical experiments. J Comp Physiol A 158:363–374
Ronacher B, Krahe R, Hennig RM (2000) Effects of signal duration on the recognition of masked communication signals by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. J Comp Physiol A 186:1065–1072
Ronacher B, Hennig RM, Clemens J (2014) Computational principles underlying recognition of acoustic signals in grasshoppers and crickets. J Comp Physiol A. doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0946-7
Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket’s brain. J Comp Physiol A 155:171–185
Schmidt AKD, Riede K, Römer H (2011) High background noise shapes selective auditory filters in a tropical cricket. J Exp Biol 214:1754–1762
Schneider E, Hennig RM (2012) Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 198:181–191
Schul J, Sheridan RA (2006) Auditory stream segregation in an insect. Neuroscience 138:1–4
Schul J, von Helversen D, Weber T (1998) Selective phonotaxis in Tettigonia cantans and T. viridissima in song recognition and discrimination. J Comp Physiol A182:687–694
Sobel E, Tank DW (1994) In vivo Ca2+dynamics in a cricket auditory neuron: an example of chemical computation. Science 263:823–826
Stabel J, Wendler G, Scharstein H (1989) Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern. J Comp Physiol A 165:165–177
Stumpner A (1997) An auditory interneurone tuned to the male song frequency in the duetting bushcricket Ancistrura nigrovittata (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae). J Exp Biol 200:1089–1101
Stumpner A (2002) A species-specific frequency filter through specific inhibition, not specific excitation. J Comp Physiol A 188:239–248
Stumpner A, Nowotny M (2014) Neural processing in the bushcricket auditory pathway. In: Hedwig B (ed) Topics of acoustic communication in insects, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–166
Stumpner A, Ronacher B (1991) Auditory interneurons in the metathoracic ganglion of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus 1. Morphological and physiological characterization. J Exp Biol 158:391–410
Stumpner A, Ronacher B (1994) Neurophysiological aspects of song pattern recognition and sound localization in grasshoppers. Am Zool 34:696–705
Stumpner A, von Helversen D (2001) Evolution and function of auditory systems in insects. Naturwissenschaften 88:159–170
Vinje WE, Gallant JL (2000) Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 287:1273–1276
Vogel A, Ronacher B (2007) Neural correlations increase between consecutive processing levels in the auditory system of locusts. J Neurophysiol 97:3376–3385
Vogel A, Hennig RM, Ronacher B (2005) Increase of neuronal response variability at higher processing levels as revealed by simultaneous recordings. J Neurophysiol 93:3548–3559
von Helversen O, von Helversen D (1994) Forces driving coevolution of song and song recognition in grasshoppers. In: Schildberger K, Elsner N (eds) Neural basis of behavioural adaptations. G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 253–284
von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1995) Acoustic pattern recognition and orientation in orthopteran insects: parallel or serial processing. J Comp Physiol A 177:767–774
von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1997) Recognition of sex in the acoustic communication of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A 180:373–386
von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1998) Acoustic pattern recognition in a grasshopper: processing in the time or frequency domain? Biol Cybern 79(6):467–476
Vonderschen K, Chacron MJ (2011) Sparse and dense coding of natural stimuli by distinct midbrain neuron subpopulations in weakly electric fish. J Neurophysiol 106:3102–3118
Wimmer K, Hildebrandt KJ, Hennig RM, Obermayer K (2008) Adaptation and selective information transmission in the cricket auditory neuron AN2. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000182. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000182
Wohlers D, Huber F (1982) Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus campestris L. J Comp Physiol 146:161–173
Wohlgemuth S, Ronacher B (2007) Auditory discrimination of amplitude modulations based on metric distances of spike trains. J Neurophysiol 97:3082–3092
Wohlgemuth S, Vogel A, Ronacher B (2011) Encoding of amplitude modulations by auditory neurons of the locust: influence of modulation frequency, rise time, and modulation depth. J Comp Physiol A 197:61–74
Wyttenbach RA, May ML, Hoy RR (1996) Categorical perception of sound frequency by crickets. Science 273:1542–1544
Zorovic M, Hedwig B (2011) Processing of species-specific auditory patterns in the cricket brain by ascending, local, and descending neurons during standing and walking. J Neurophysiol 105(5):2181–2194
Acknowledgments
We thank Bernhard Ronacher for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was funded by a grant to MH and JB by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB618).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hildebrandt, K.J., Benda, J. & Hennig, R.M. Computational themes of peripheral processing in the auditory pathway of insects. J Comp Physiol A 201, 39–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0956-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0956-5