Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Four Quinoa Cultivars Under Varying Salinity and Sodicity Levels

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salinization and sodication present significant threats to crop productivity in many parts of the world including Pakistan. Cultivating halophytes like quinoa presents a viable solution for the profitable use of salt-affected lands. This study specifically examines the performance and salt tolerance mechanism of four quinoa accessions under varying salinity and sodicity levels. In addition to a control group, different combinations of electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio (ECe dS m−1 SAR levels) were established: 10:20, 10:40, 20:20, and 20:40, achieved by using a mixture of salts. Most of the quinoa cultivars exhibited robust growth, with the exception of GLN-22, which proved unable to withstand high levels of salinity and sodicity, resulting in a 78% reduction in yield. GLN-29, on the other hand, demonstrated superior performance across all levels of salinity and sodicity. UAF-Q7 excelled under conditions of high salinity and low sodicity compared to equivalent salinity levels but elevated sodicity. Meanwhile, GLN-33 exhibited enhanced growth under elevated sodicity levels but struggled in the face of high salinity stress. In terms of nutrient uptake, GLN-29 displayed a higher accumulation of Na+ (32%) in older leaves compared to younger ones, alongside elevated levels of antioxidant activity at all salinity and sodicity levels. Notably, GLN-29 exhibited excellent adaptation to both high salinity and sodicity levels, resulting in the highest grain yield (14.75 g/pot) and the salt tolerance mechanism was associated with highly efficient K+ retention and transport of Na+ to older leaves. This underscores the necessity for further comprehensive field studies to ascertain its suitability for the sustainable utilization of salt-affected soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly thankful to Professor Mark Tester, KAUST, Saudi Arabia for the provision of quinoa accessions and Department of Agronomy, UAF for the provision of quinoa cultivar UAF-Q7.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IA and GM: Conception and Design of the work, provision of resources, supervision. AZ and AR: Conduct experiment, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, draft the work. WS and ZURF: Data analysis and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irfan Afzal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Author: Vijay Pratap Singh.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zafar, A., Murtaza, G., Afzal, I. et al. Comparative Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Four Quinoa Cultivars Under Varying Salinity and Sodicity Levels. J Plant Growth Regul (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11315-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11315-w

Keywords

Navigation