Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating Implementation Costs of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

  • Scientific Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been well documented in the current literature to improve healthcare outcomes by decreasing length of stay, resource utilization, and morbidity without increasing readmission rates or complications. This subsequently leads to a net decrease in hospital costs. However, the initial costs of implementing such a program have not been well described, which is crucial information for hospitals with less resources. The aim of this study was to provide a cohesive review of the current literature for the costs of implementing a colorectal surgery ERAS protocol.

Methods

A comprehensive review was conducted on five databases (Google Scholar, Web of Science, PROSPERO, PubMed, and Cochrane) with the assistance of a professional librarian. All relevant English articles published between 1995 and June 2021 were screened for eligibility prior to inclusion in the review. Cost data were converted to US dollars based on the exchange rate at the end time of the study period for standardization.

Results

Seven studies were included for review. The studies evaluated a range of 50–1295 patients through their respective ERAS programs, which were followed for 5 to 22 months. ERAS implementation costs ranged from $57 to $1536 per patient. Components for each ERAS program varied for each study, but ultimately, the greatest costs were attributed to personnel.

Conclusions

Despite data heterogeneity and inconsistencies between cost breakdowns, a majority of the implementation cost was found to be secondary to personnel. This review demonstrates the need for a more standardized approach for reporting ERAS implementation costs through an open database as well as a potential streamlining of the ERAS protocol to facilitate implementation in institutions with less financial resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24(3):466–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenshields N, Mythen M (2020) Enhanced recovery after surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 10:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Shewy A, Abdalla W, Baghdadi M (2020) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in colorectal surgery. Egypt J Surg 1:94–101

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fierens J, Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: prospective study of outcome in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Belg 112(5):355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Geltzeiler CB, Rotramel A, Wilson C, Deng L, Whiteford MH, Frankhouse J (2014) Prospective study of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital. JAMA Surg 149(9):955–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jung AD, Dhar VK, Hoehn RS et al (2018) Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: can we afford not to use it? J Am Coll Surg 226(4):586–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Persico M, Miller D, Way C et al (2018) Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital: an evidence-based approach. J Perianesth Nurs 34(1):188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schilling PL, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD (2008) Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 207(5):698–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarez A, Goudra BG, Singh PM (2017) Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 30(1):133–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Małczak P, Pisarska M, Piotr M et al (2016) Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 27:226–235

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Auyong DB, Allen CJ, Pahang JA et al (2015) Reduced length of hospitalization in primary total knee arthroplasty patients using an updated enhanced recovery after orthopedic surgery (ERAS) pathway. J Arthroplasty 30(1):1705–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayrian E, Sugeir SH, Arakelyan A et al (2021) Impact of a perioperative protocol on length of ICU and hospital stay in complex spine surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 33(1):65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz N, Sharma M, Adams S et al (2019) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 130:415–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bisch SP, Jago CA, Kalogera E, Ganshorn H, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC, Nelson G (2021) Outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 161(1):46–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Glaser G, Dowdy SC, Peedicayil A (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 143(Suppl 2):143–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R et al (2018) The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery programs and their application in cardiothoracic surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 14(2):77–88

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Golder HJ, Papalois V (2021) Enhanced recovery after surgery: history, key advancements and developments in transplant surgery. J Clin Med 10(8):1634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao R, Yang H, Li Y, Meng L, Li Y, Sun B, Zhang G, Yue M, Guo F (2019) Enhanced recovery after surgery in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. J Int Med Res 47(1):4815–4826

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kocián P, Whitley A, Prikryl P et al (2019) Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: the clinical and economic benefit in elderly patients. Eur Surg 51:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pirrera B, Lucchi A, Gabbianelli C et al (2017) E.R.A.S. pathway in colorectal surgery in elderly: our experience: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 43:101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Geltzeiler CB, Rotramel A, Wilson C et al (2014) Prospective study of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital. JAMA Surg 149(9):955–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Norcross W, Miller TE, Huang S et al (2019) Implementation of a successful enhanced recovery after surgery program in a community hospital. Cureus 11(10):e6029

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Khanijow AN, Wood LN, Xie R et al (2020) The impact of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) on the costs of colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 222(1):186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh S, Liverpool A, Romeiser JL et al (2021) Types of surgical patients enrolled in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs in the USA. Perioper Med 10(12).

  27. Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Chuck A et al (2016) Cost impact analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients. Curr Oncol 23(3):e221-227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100(8):1108–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio Roda C et al (2016) Implementation costs of an enhanced recovery after surgery program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on experiences at a quaternary academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):219–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Portinari M, Ascanelli S, Targa S et al (2018) Impact of a colorectal enhanced recovery program implementation on clinical outcomes and institutional costs: a prospective cohort study with retrospective control. Int J Surg 53:206–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee L, Mata J, Ghitulescu GA et al (2015) Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 262(6):1026–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thanh NX, Chuck AW, Wasylak T et al (2016) An economic evaluation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta. Can J Surg 59(6):415–421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A et al (2010) A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123(1319):61–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Crumley ET et al (2016) Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS Alberta Colorectal Surgery Experience. World J Surg 40:1092–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 43(3):659–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stone AB, Grant MC, Wu CL et al (2019) Enhanced recovery after surgery for colorectal surgery: a review of the economic implications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 32(2):129–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Thanh NX, Nelson A, Wang X et al (2020) Return on investment of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multiguideline, multisite implementation in Alberta. Canada Can J Surg 63(6):E542–E550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seif MA, Kruse BC, Keramati CA, et al (2022) Development and implementation of an institutional enhanced recovery program data process. Health Inf. Manag. J. 0(0). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583221095139

  40. Cardell CF, Knapp L, Cohen ME et al (2021) Successful implementation of enhanced recovery in elective colorectal surgery is variable and dependent on the local environment. Ann Surg 274(4):605–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Campbell DA Jr, Englesbe MJ, Kubus JJ et al (2010) Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: the power of hospital collaboration. Arch Surg 145(10):985–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hedrick TL, Thiele RH, Hassinger TE et al (2019) Multicenter observational study examining the implementation of enhanced recovery within the virginia surgical quality collaborative in patients undergoing elective colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 229(4):374-382.e3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smucker L, Victory J, Scribani M et al (2020) Rural context, single institution prospective outcomes after enhanced recovery colorectal surgery protocol implementation. BMC Health Serv Res 20(1):1120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Urias DS, Di Como J, Marley M et al (2019) Resident implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery in a rural community. Am Surg 85(12):E593–E595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rona K, Choi J, Sigle G et al (2012) Enhanced recovery protocol: implementation at a county institution with limited resources. Am Surg 78(10):1041–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M et al (2010) Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97(5):754–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA

    Minki Hong, William Allen & Shravya Jasti

  2. Rutgers University, George F. Smith Library of the Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA

    Mina Ghajar

  3. Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Medical Science Building, G-514, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA

    Melissa M. Alvarez-Downing

Authors
  1. Minki Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mina Ghajar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shravya Jasti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Melissa M. Alvarez-Downing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa M. Alvarez-Downing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest or financial support for the review.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, M., Ghajar, M., Allen, W. et al. Evaluating Implementation Costs of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 47, 1589–1596 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07024-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07024-2

Search

Navigation