Skip to main content
Log in

Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections in Hepatic and Pancreatic Resection

  • Scientific Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after HPB surgery are poorly defined. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the SSI rates and risk factors for SSI after pancreas and liver resection.

Methods

The PUBMED, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched using the PRISMA framework. The primary outcome measure was pooled SSI rates. The secondary outcome measure was risk factor profile determination for SSI.

Results

The overall rate of SSI after pancreatic and liver resection was 25.1 and 10.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). 32% of pancreaticoduodenectomies developed SSI vs 23% after distal pancreatectomy (p < 0.001). The rate of incisional SSI in the pancreatic group was 9% and organ/space SSI 16.5%. Biliary resection during liver surgery was a risk factor for SSI (25.0 vs 15.7%, p = 0.002). After liver resection, the incisional SSI rate was 7.6% and the organ space SSI rate was 10.2%. Pancreas-specific SSI risk factors were pre-operative biliary drainage (p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and radiotherapy (p = 0.007). Liver-specific SSI risk factors were smoking (p = 0.046), low albumin (p < 0.001) and significant blood loss (p < 0.001). The rate of organ/space SSI in patients with POPF was 47.7% and in patients without POPF 7.3% (p < 0.001). Organ/space SSI rate was 43% in patients with bile leak and 10% in those without (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The risk factors for SSI following pancreatic and liver resections are distinct from each other, with higher SSI rates after pancreatic resection. Pancreaticoduodenectomy has increased risk of SSI compared to distal pancreatectomy. Similarly, biliary resections during liver surgery increase the rates of SSI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY et al (2012) Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1727–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Surgical specialization and operative mortality in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1534–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0566-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Okano K, Hirao T, Unno M et al (2015) Postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic resection. Br J Surg 102:1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2019) Healthcare-associated infections-surgical site infections.pdf. In: ECDC. Annual epidemiological report for 2017. ECDC

  5. World Health Organization (2016) Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection

  6. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI et al (2014) Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35:605–627. https://doi.org/10.1086/676022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niitsuma T, Kusachi S, Takesue Y et al (2019) Current status of postoperative infections after digestive surgery in Japan: the Japan postoperative infectious complications survey in 2015. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadamori H, Yagi T, Shinoura S et al (2013) Risk factors for organ/space surgical site infection after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 359 recent cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0503-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Q-Y (2014) Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 20:17491. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morikane K (2017) Epidemiology and risk factors associated with surgical site infection after different types of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Surg Today 47:1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1503-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takahashi Y, Takesue Y, Fujiwara M et al (2018) Risk factors for surgical site infection after major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. J Infect Chemother 24:739–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2018.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R, Pramesh CS (2015) Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: odds versus risk. Perspect Clin Res 6:222–224. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.167092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD et al (2019) PROBAST: a tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 170:W1–W33. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heard NA, Rubin-Delanchy P (2018) Choosing between methods of combining p-values. Biometrika 105:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asx076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  17. Dewey M (2020) Metap: meta-analysis of significance values

  18. Elliott IA, Chan C, Russell TA et al (2017) Distinction of risk factors for superficial vs organ-space surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery. JAMA Surg 152:1023. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Joliat G-R, Sauvain M-O, Petermann D et al (2018) Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e11728. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Ohmagari N et al (2012) Risk factor of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 36:2888–2894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1742-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Poruk KE, Lin JA, Cooper MA et al (2016) A novel, validated risk score to predict surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 18:893–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y et al (2011) Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 15:250–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1390-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fadayomi AB, Kasumova GG, Tabatabaie O et al (2018) Unique predictors and economic burden of superficial and deep/organ space surgical site infections following pancreatectomy. HPB 20:658–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McCracken EKE, Mureebe L, Blazer DG (2019) Minimally invasive surgical site infection in procedure-targeted ACS NSQIP pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Surg Res 233:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, Yamashita K et al (2009) Risk factors and predictors for surgical site infection after hepatic resection. J Hosp Infect 73:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moreno Elola-Olaso A, Davenport DL, Hundley JC et al (2012) Predictors of surgical site infection after liver resection: a multicentre analysis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. HPB 14:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00417.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Togo S, Matsuo K, Tanaka K et al (2007) Perioperative infection control and its effectiveness in hepatectomy patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04761.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang T-Y, Zong Y, Shen Y-N et al (2019) Predicting surgical site infections using a novel nomogram in patients with hepatocelluar carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy. World J Clin Cases 7:2176–2188. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karavokyros I, Orfanos S, Angelou A et al (2017) Incidence and risk factors for organ/space infection after radiofrequency-assisted hepatectomy or ablation of liver tumors in a single center: more than meets the eye. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nanashima A, Arai J, Oyama S et al (2014) Associated factors with surgical site infections after hepatectomy: predictions and countermeasures by a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 12:310–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Isik O, Kaya E, Sarkut P, Dundar HZ (2015) Factors affecting surgical site infection rates in hepatobiliary surgery. Surg Infect 16:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2013.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Magill SS, O’Leary E, Janelle SJ et al (2018) Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. Hospitals. N Engl J Med 379:1732–1744. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhangu A, Ademuyiwa AO, Aguilera ML et al (2018) Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 18:516–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu CC, Yeh DC, Lin MC et al (1998) Prospective randomized trial of systemic antibiotics in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 85:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00606.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kondo K, Chijiiwa K, Ohuchida J et al (2013) Selection of prophylactic antibiotics according to the microorganisms isolated from surgical site infections (SSIs) in a previous series of surgeries reduces SSI incidence after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:286–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0515-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V et al (2009) Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 37:387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schweizer ML, Cullen JJ, Perencevich EN, Vaughan Sarrazin MS (2014) Costs associated with surgical site infections in veterans affairs hospitals. JAMA Surg 149:575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fukami Y, Maeda A, Takayama Y et al (2019) Adverse oncological outcome of surgical site infection after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Surg Today 49:170–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1715-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chikhladze S, Lederer A-K, Kousoulas L et al (2019) Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: retrospective real-life data. World J Surg Oncol 17:185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1732-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eckhauser F, Azoury S, Farrow N et al (2015) Postoperative abdominal wound infection-epidemiology, risk factors, identification, and management. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S62514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Watanabe A, Kohnoe S, Shimabukuro R et al (2008) Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 38:404–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3637-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Degrate L, Garancini M, Misani M et al (2011) Right colon, left colon, and rectal surgeries are not similar for surgical site infection development. Analysis of 277 elective and urgent colorectal resections. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1057-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dessie W, Mulugeta G, Fentaw S et al (2016) Pattern of bacterial pathogens and their susceptibility isolated from surgical site infections at selected referral hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2418902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schoellhammer HF, Fong Y, Gagandeep S (2014) Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 3:276–287. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.08.08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roberts KJ, Prasad P, Steele Y et al (2017) A reduced time to surgery within a ‘fast track’ pathway for periampullary malignancy is associated with an increased rate of pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 19:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, van Eijck CHJ et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0903230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sugimachi K, Iguchi T, Mano Y et al (2019) Significance of bile culture surveillance for postoperative management of pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg Oncol 17:232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1773-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hu QL, Liu JB, Ellis RJ et al (2020) Association of preoperative biliary drainage technique with postoperative outcomes among patients with resectable hepatobiliary malignancy. HPB 22:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wells CI, Ratnayake CBB, Perrin J, Pandanaboyana S (2019) Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in closed abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg 43:2779–2788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05116-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Javed AA, Teinor J, Wright M et al (2019) Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical-site infections: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 269:1034–1040. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pastena MD, Marchegiani G, Paiella S et al (2020) Use of an intraoperative wound protector to prevent surgical-site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy: randomized clinical trial. BJS Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L et al (2006) Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk? Arch Surg 141:690–694. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.7.690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Erdogan D, Busch ORC, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2007) Prevention of biliary leakage after partial liver resection using topical hemostatic agents. Dig Surg 24:294–299. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Pandanaboyana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No sources of funding or conflicts of interest to declare for any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 79 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mentor, K., Ratnayake, B., Akter, N. et al. Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections in Hepatic and Pancreatic Resection. World J Surg 44, 4221–4230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05741-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05741-6

Navigation