Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Factor of Surgical Site Infection After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although surgical site infection (SSI) following pancreaticoduodenectomy is a common complication, the risk factors remain unclear.

Patients and methods

A retrospective study of 408 consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy was conducted and the risk factors for SSI were assessed. The bacterial composition was also analyzed.

Results

Sixty-one patients developed incisional SSI, and 195 developed organ/space SSI. A multivariate analysis identified that length of operation >480 min (odds ratio [OR] 3.22), main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≤3 mm (OR 2.18), and abdominal wall thickness >10 mm (OR 2.16) were significant risk factors for incisional SSI. The development of pancreatic fistula (OR 7.56), use of semi-closed drainage system (OR 3.68), body mass index >23.5 kg/m2 (OR 3.04), MPD ≤3 mm (OR 2.21), and length of operation >480 min (OR 1.78) were significantly associated with organ/space SSI. Bacterial isolation at the SSI foci revealed that gut-derived micro-organisms were the predominant bacterial species.

Conclusions

The presence of pancreatic fistula was the strongest risk factor for organ/space SSI. Efforts to reduce the development of pancreatic fistulas, to decrease length of operation, and to use a closed drainage system would decrease the incidence of SSI following pancreaticoduodenectomy. If SSI that requires antibacterial treatment occurs, then the treatment should target enterobacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D et al (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234:487–493; discussion 493–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:47–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2002) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 236:355–366; discussion 366–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H et al (2004) Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am J Surg 187:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt CM, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT et al (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients. Arch Surg 139:718–725; discussion 725–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazanjian KK, Hines OJ, Eibl G et al (2005) Management of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 437 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 140:849–854; discussion 854–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H et al (2006) Increased plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-8 are associated with surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 32:178–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:250–278; quiz 279–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Olson MM, Lee JT Jr (1990) Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg 125:794–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cruse PJ, Ford R (1980) The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 60:27–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ et al (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL et al (2001) Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:181–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST et al (2004) Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 239:599–605; discussion 605–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walz JM, Paterson CA, Seligowski JM et al (2006) Surgical site infection following bowel surgery: a retrospective analysis of 1446 patients. Arch Surg 141:1014–1018; discussion 1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haridas M, Malangoni MA (2008) Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. Surgery 144:496–501; discussion 501–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe A, Kohnoe S, Shimabukuro R et al (2008) Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 38:404–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D et al (2003) Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg 138:314–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J et al (2006) Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance. Ann Surg 244:758–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ et al (2008) Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg 12:270–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Kanemoto H et al (2012) Serum CA19-9 is a significant predictor among preoperative parameters for early recurrence after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16:977–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagai H, Henrich H, Wunsch PH et al (1989) Role of pancreatic enzymes and their substrates in autodigestion of the pancreas. In vitro studies with isolated rat pancreatic acini. Gastroenterology 96:838–847

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Naruse S, Wang Y, Kitagawa M et al (2000) Long-term effects of nafamostat and imipenem on experimental acute pancreatitis in rats. Pancreas 21:290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Patel SA, Kandil E et al (2003) Pancreatic elastase is proven to be a mannose-binding protein—implications for the systemic response to pancreatitis. Surgery 133:678–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, Yamashita K et al (2009) Risk factors and predictors for surgical site infection after hepatic resection. J Hosp Infect 73:47–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bamgbade OA, Rutter TW, Nafiu OO et al (2007) Postoperative complications in obese and nonobese patients. World J Surg 31:556–560; discussion 561. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0305-0

    Google Scholar 

  27. Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD et al (2009) Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 208:53–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kajiwara T, Sakamoto Y, Morofuji N et al (2009) An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical impact of bile juice infection on day 1. Langenbecks Arch Surg 38:896–902

    Google Scholar 

  29. Babior BM (1978) Oxygen-dependent microbial killing by phagocytes (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 298:659–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hopf HW, Hunt TK, West JM et al (1997) Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patients. Arch Surg 132:997–1004; discussion 1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kabon B, Nagele A, Reddy D et al (2004) Obesity decreases perioperative tissue oxygenation. Anesthesiology 100:274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G et al (2010) Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 252:207–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaiser AB, Herrington JL Jr, Jacobs JK et al (1983) Cefoxitin versus erythromycin, neomycin, and cefazolin in colorectal operations. Importance of the duration of the surgical procedure. Ann Surg 198:525–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Coppa GF, Eng K (1988) Factors involved in antibiotic selection in elective colon and rectal surgery. Surgery 104:853–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hooton TM, Haley RW, Culver DH et al (1981) The joint associations of multiple risk factors with the occurrence of nosocomial infection. Am J Med 70:960–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Limongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D et al (2007) Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery. Surgery 142:313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Karsten TM, Allema JH, Reinders M et al (1996) Preoperative biliary drainage, colonisation of bile and postoperative complications in patients with tumours of the pancreatic head: a retrospective analysis of 241 consecutive patients. Eur J Surg 162:881–888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC et al (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230:131–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shigeta H, Nagino M, Kamiya J et al (2002) Bacteremia after hepatectomy: an analysis of a single-center, 10-year experience with 407 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:117–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F et al (2006) Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg 202:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K et al (2007) Specific antibiotic prophylaxis based on bile cultures is required to prevent postoperative infectious complications in pancreatoduodenectomy patients who have undergone preoperative biliary drainage. World J Surg 31:2230–2235. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9210-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no financial or any other type of support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teiichi Sugiura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sugiura, T., Uesaka, K., Ohmagari, N. et al. Risk Factor of Surgical Site Infection After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 36, 2888–2894 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1742-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1742-6

Keywords

Navigation