Skip to main content
Log in

Initial tool path selection of the iso-scallop method based on offset similarity analysis for global preferred feed directions matching

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The iso-scallop method has been long adopted to achieve a shorter overall machining length. The efficiency and machining performance of this method are largely dominated by the initial tool path. The preferred direction field supplies the local best feed directions. Usually, the offset paths generated by the iso-scallop method largely deviate from the preferred directions, even though the initial path is strictly along the preferred directions. The matching degree of the offset paths and preferred direction field should be taken into consideration when selecting an initial tool path. This paper presents a novel initial path selection method for the iso-scallop method to make whole iso-scallop tool paths and the preferred direction field consistent as much as possible. A surface is re-parameterized to keep the conformality between the surface and parametric domain, which leads to the more regular offset paths on the new parametric domain. By fitting the vector field, streamlines are generated for representing the preferred feed direction on the parametric domain. The offset similarity metric defined by the initial path and streamlines is constructed to measure the matching degree between offset paths and preferred feed directions. Then the feasible path with the best offset similarity for the streamlines will be selected as the initial tool path. In our case study, feed directions with the maximum strip width are chosen. The test results have shown that the tool paths generated by the proposed method achieved a better matching for the selected feed directions and a shorter overall length compared with some existing tool path generation methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lasemi A, Xue D, Gu P (2010) Recent development in CNC machining of freeform surfaces: a state-of-the-art review. Comput Aided Des 42:641–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun Y, Guo D, Jia Z, Wang H (2006) Iso-parametric tool path generation from triangular meshes for free-form surface machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:721–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loney GC, Ozsoy TM (1987) NC machining of free form surfaces. Comput Aided Des 19:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang Y, Oliver DJH (1994) Non-constant parameter NC tool path generation on sculptured surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 9:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng HY, Li H (2002) Constant scallop-height tool path generation for three-axis sculptured surface machining. Comput Aided Des 34:647–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suresh K, Yang DCH (1994) Constant scallop-height machining of free-form surfaces. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 116:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin RS, Koren Y (1996) Efficient tool-path planning for machining free-form surfaces. ASME J Eng Ind 118:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giri V, Bezbaruah D, Bubna P, Choudhury AR (2005) Selection of master cutter paths in sculptured surface machining by employing curvature principle. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1202–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiou CJ, Lee YS (2002) A machining potential field approach to tool path generation for multi-axis sculptured surface machining. Comput Aided Des 34:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Li Y, Ma S, Lee CH (2015) A tool path generation method for freeform surface machining by introducing the tensor property of machining strip width. Comput Aided Des 66:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumazawa GH, Feng HY, Fard MJB (2015) Preferred feed direction field: a new tool path generation method for efficient sculptured surface machining. Comput Aided Des 67:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu AM, Bohez ELJ, Makhanov SS, Munlin M, Phien HN, Tabucanon MT (2008) On 5-axis freeform surface machining optimization: vector field clustering approach. Int J CAD/CAM 5

  13. Moodleah S, Makhanov SS (2015) 5-axis machining using a curvilinear tool path aligned with the direction of the maximum removal rate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:65–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinsat Y, Sabourin L (2006) Optimal selection of machining direction for three-axis milling of sculptured parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:1132–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang K, Tang K (2014) An efficient greedy strategy for five-axis tool path generation on dense triangular mesh. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1539–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim T, Sarma SE (2002) Toolpath generation along directions of maximum kinematic performance; a first cut at machine-optimal paths. Comput Aided Des 34:453–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li LL, Zhang YF, Li HY, Geng L (2011) Generating tool-path with smooth posture change for five-axis sculptured surface machining based on cutter’s accessibility map. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamikiz A, Lacalle D, López LN, Sánchez JA, Salgado MA (2005) Cutting force integration at the CAM stage in the high-speed milling of complex surfaces. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 18(7):586–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pavanaskar S, Pande S, Kwon Y, Hu Z, Sheffer A, Mcmains S (2015) Energy-efficient vector field based toolpaths for CNC pocketmachining. J Manuf Process 20:314–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun Y, Sun S, Xu J, Guo D (2017) A unified method of generating tool path based on multiple vector fields for CNC machining of compound NURBS surfaces. Comput Aided Des 91:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu K, Tang K (2014) Five-axis tool path and feed rate optimization based on the cutting force–area quotient potential field. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:1661–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu P, Tang K (2016) Five-axis tool path generation based on machine-dependent potential field. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29:636–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu P, Chen L, Tang K (2016) Efficiency-optimal iso-planar tool path generation for five-axis finishing machining of freeform surfaces. Comput Aided Des:83

  24. Floater M, Hormann K (2005) Surface parameterization: a tutorial and survey. Advances in Multiresolution for Geometric Modelling 1:157–186

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheffer A, Praun E, Rose K (2006) Mesh parameterization methods and their applications. Foundations & Trends® in Computer Graphics & Vision 2(2):105–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang YJ, Zeng W, Meng XX (2016) Conformal freeform surfaces. Comput Aided Des 81:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang YJ, Zeng W, Zhang H, Yong JH, Paul JC (2010) Projection of curves on B-spline surfaces using quadratic reparameterization. Graph Model 72:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1107402), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Z180005), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11290141).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that could have direct or potential influence or impart bias on the research reported in this paper. The research does not involve human participants and/or animals. Consent to submit the paper for publication has been received explicitly from all co-authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, C., Jiang, X., Huo, G. et al. Initial tool path selection of the iso-scallop method based on offset similarity analysis for global preferred feed directions matching. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 2675–2687 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04789-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04789-6

Keywords

Navigation