Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ACL double-bundle reconstruction with one tibial tunnel provides equal stability compared to two tibial tunnels

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) double-bundle reconstruction with one tibial tunnel displays the same in vitro stability as a conventional double-bundle reconstruction with two tibial tunnels when using the same tensioning protocol.

Methods

In 11 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, ACL double-bundle reconstruction with one and two tibial tunnels was performed. The two grafts were tightened using 80 N in different flexion angles (anteromedial-bundle at 60° and posterolateral-bundle at 15°). Anterior tibial translation (134 N) and translation with combined rotatory and valgus loads (10 Nm valgus stress and 4 Nm internal tibial torque) were determined at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° flexion. Measurements were taken in intact ACL, resected ACL, three-tunnel reconstruction and four-tunnel reconstruction. Additionally, the tension on the grafts was determined. Student’s t test was performed for statistical analysis of the related samples. Significance was set at p < 0.017 according to Bonferroni correction.

Results

The two reconstructive techniques displayed no significant differences in comparison with the intact ACL in anterior tibial translation at 0°, 60° and 90° of flexion. The same results were obtained for the anterior tibial translation with a combined rotatory load at 60° and 90°. When directly comparing both reconstructive techniques, there were no significant differences for the anterior tibial translation and combined rotatory load at all flexion angles. The measured tension on grafts displayed similar load sharing between both bundles. Except at full extension, both grafts displayed a significantly different tension increase under anterior tibial translation for both techniques (p = 0.0086).

Conclusions

Tightening both bundles in ACL double-bundle reconstruction with one or two tibial tunnels in different flexion angles achieved comparable restoration of stability, although there was different load sharing on the bundles. With regard to individualized ACL reconstruction, the double-bundle technique with one tibial tunnel offers a possibility to address small tibial insertion sites without compromising the advantages of a double-bundle procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Choi S-H, Wang JH, Yoo JC, Yim HS, Chang MJ (2011) Outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluation after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a single tibial tunnel. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1865–1872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amis AA, Dawkins GP (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:260–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boylan D, Greis PE, West JR, Bachus KN, Burks RT (2003) Effects of initial graft tension on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a cadaver study. Arthroscopy 19:700–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chae IJ, Bae JH, Wang JH, Jeon J, Park J-H (2013) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with split Achilles allograft and single tibia tunnel for small ACL tibial footprint: technical note with clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:819–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dargel J, Koebke J, Brüggemann G-P, Pennig D, Schmidt-Wiethoff R (2009) Tension degradation of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with dynamic flexion-extension loading: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Arthroscopy 25:1115–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Debandi A, Maeyama A, Lu S, Hume C, Asai S, Goto B, Hoshino Y, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2011) Biomechanical comparison of three anatomic ACL reconstructions in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:728–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhillon MS, Bali K, Vasistha RK (2010) Immunohistological evaluation of proprioceptive potential of the residual stump of injured anterior cruciate ligaments (ACL). Int Orthop 34:737–741

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dürselen L, Claes L, Kiefer H (1995) The influence of muscle forces and external loads on cruciate ligament strain. Am J Sports Med 23:129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dürselen L, Hebisch A, Claes LE, Bauer G (2003) Gapping phenomenon of longitudinal meniscal tears. Clin Biomech 18:505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dürselen L, Hebisch A, Wagner D, Claes LE, Bauer G (2007) Meniscal screw fixation provides sufficient stability to prevent tears from gapping. Clin Biomech 22:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dürselen L, Vögele S, Seitz AM, Ignatius A, Friederich NF, Bauer G, Majewski M (2011) Anterior knee laxity increases gapping of posterior horn medial meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med 39:1749–1755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL-Y, Yagi M, Debski RE (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 22:85–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grover DM, Howell SM, Hull ML (2005) Early tension loss in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. A cadaver study of four tibial fixation devices. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:381–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang H-Y, Ou Y-L, Li P-Y, Zhang T, Chen S, Shen H-Y, Wang Q, Zheng X-F (2014) Biomechanics of single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fixation with a unique expandable interference screw. Knee 21:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Järvelä T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:500–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Järvelä T, Moisala A-S, Sihvonen R, Järvelä S, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med 36:290–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung KA, Lee SC, Song MB, Lee CK (2008) Arthroscopic double bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone patellar tendon bone-gracilis tendon composite autograft: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:382–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim S-J, Jo S-B, Kim T-W, Chang J-H, Choi H-S, Oh K-S (2009) A modified arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction technique with autogenous quadriceps tendon graft: remnant-preserving technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:403–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koga H, Muneta T, Yagishita K, Ju Y-J, Sekiya I (2012) The effect of graft fixation angles on anteroposterior and rotational knee laxity in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation using computerized navigation. Am J Sports Med 40:615–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH (2009) A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kopf S, Pombo MW, Szczodry M, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2011) Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Am J Sports Med 39:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lao M-L, Chen J-H, Wang C-J, Siu K-K (2013) Functional outcomes of Y-graft double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Arthroscopy 29:1525–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maestro A, Sicilia A, Rodriguez L, Garcia P, Fdez-Lombardia J, Guerado E (2012) ACL reconstruction with single tibial tunnel: single versus double bundle. J Knee Surg 25:237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju Y-J, Hara K, Nimura A, Yagishita K, Sekiya I (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23:618–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray PJ, Alexander JW, Gold JE, Icenogle KD, Noble PC, Lowe WR (2010) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: kinematics and knee flexion angle-graft tension relation. Arthroscopy 26:202–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Noh HK, Wang JH, Bada LP, Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Nha KW, Lee YS (2008) Trantibial anterior cruciate ligament double bundle reconstruction technique: two tibial bundle in one tibial tunnel. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1245–1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nurmi JT, Kannus P, Sievänen H, Järvelä T, Järvinen M, Järvinen TLN (2004) Interference screw fixation of soft tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: part 2: effect of preconditioning on graft tension during and after screw insertion. Am J Sports Med 32:418–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weimann A, Strobel MJ, Raschke MJ, Zantop T (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Petersen W, Tretow H, Weimann A, Herbort M, Fu FH, Raschke M, Zantop T (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of two techniques for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one tibial tunnel versus two tibial tunnels. Am J Sports Med 35:228–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Li G, Fu FH (1997) In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 15:285–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Siebold R (2007) Observations on bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:291–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:137–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J (2008) Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 24:154–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stijak L, Radonjić V, Nikolić V, Blagojević Z, Aksić M, Filipović B (2009) Correlation between the morphometric parameters of the anterior cruciate ligament and the intercondylar width: gender and age differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:812–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Udagawa K, Niki Y, Enomoto H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2014) Factors influencing graft impingement on the wall of the intercondylar notch after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:2219–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL-Y (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yasen SK, Logan JS, Smith JO, Nancoo T, Risebury MJ, Wilson AJ (2014) TriLink: anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech 3:e13–e20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yasuda K, Ichiyama H, Kondo E, Miyatake S, Inoue M, Tanabe Y (2008) An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy 24:276–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the funding from the Alwin Jäger Foundation. The instruments for the surgical preparation were sponsored by Arthrex (Karlsfeld, Germany). All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Orthopedic Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Surgery, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    Björn Holger Drews

  2. Center of Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstraße 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    Andreas Martin Seitz, Anita Ignatius & Lutz Dürselen

  3. Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70734, Stuttgart, Germany

    Jochen Huth & Gerhard Bauer

Authors
  1. Björn Holger Drews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Martin Seitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jochen Huth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerhard Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anita Ignatius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lutz Dürselen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Holger Drews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drews, B.H., Seitz, A.M., Huth, J. et al. ACL double-bundle reconstruction with one tibial tunnel provides equal stability compared to two tibial tunnels. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 1646–1652 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4199-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4199-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation