Skip to main content
Log in

A modified arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction technique with autogenous quadriceps tendon graft: remnant-preserving technique

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several techniques of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) double-bundle reconstruction have been introduced to improve the functional outcome and restore normal kinematics of the knee. Meanwhile, a remnant-preserving technique was developed to preserve the proprioception and to enhance the revascularization of the reconstructed ACL. We developed double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique using autogenous quadriceps tendon graft while preserving the remnant. With this technique, two femoral sockets and one tibial tunnel are made. To preserve the remnant of the ACL, the rotational direction of the reamer was set to counterclockwise just before perforation of the tibial tunnel. To pass the graft more easily without disturbance of the remnant, the graft passage was achieved through the tibial tunnel. We suggest that the remnant-preserving technique could be an effective alternative considering its mechanical stability as well as the proprioception and vascularization recovery in arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Kuriwaka M, Ito Y (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett DS (1991) Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:833–837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Georgoulis AD, Pappa L, Moebius U, Malamou-Mitsi V, Pappa S, Papageorgiou CO, Agnantis NJ, Soucacos PN (2001) The presence of proprioceptive mechanoreceptors in the remnants of the ruptured ACL as a possible source of re-innervation of the ACL autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:364–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomez-Barrena E, Nunez A, Ballesteros R, Martinez-Moreno E, Munuera L (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction affects proprioception in the cat’s knee. Acta Orthop Scand 70:185–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Miyama T, Shiozaki Y, Mae T (2001) Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 17:801–807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim SJ, Jung KA, Song DH (2006) Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous quadriceps tendon. Arthroscopy 22(797):e791–e795

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim SJ, Kim HJ (2001) High portal: practical philosophy for positioning portals in knee arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 17:333–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T, Shinjo H, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H, Fujie H (2001) Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17:708–716

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Paulos LE, Grood ES (1983) Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 71–77

  10. Radford WJ, Amis AA (1990) Biomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:1038–1043

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sbihi A, Franceschi JP, Christel P, Colombet P, Djian P, Bellier G (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison on cadaver specimens using a single or double hamstring technique. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90:643–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vercillo F, Woo SL, Noorani SY, Dede O (2007) Determination of a safe range of knee flexion angles for fixation of the grafts in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a human cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 35:1513–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiler A, Richter M, Schmidmaier G, Kandziora F, Sudkamp NP (2001) The EndoPearl device increases fixation strength and eliminates construct slippage of hamstring tendon grafts with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 17:353–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to Dong-Su Jang, B.A. (Research Assistant, Department of Anatomy) for his help with figures of surgical procedure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Soo Oh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SJ., Jo, SB., Kim, TW. et al. A modified arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction technique with autogenous quadriceps tendon graft: remnant-preserving technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 403–407 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0764-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0764-x

Keywords

Navigation