Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ergebnisse der Knieendoprothetik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endoprothetik des Kniegelenkes

Part of the book series: AE-Manual der Endoprothetik ((AEME))

  • 730 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Verbesserung von Lebensqualität, Gelenkfunktion und Schmerzreduktion bei einer möglichst langen Standzeit der Endoprothese ist das Ziel jeder Implantation eines künstlichen Kniegelenkes. Die multifaktoriellen Einflüsse sowohl intrinsischer Faktoren, wie z. B. BMI, Alter und Komorbiditäten der Patienten, als auch extrinsischer Faktoren, wie z. B. Prothesendesign, Fixationsart und Implantatalignment, beeinflussen das klinische Outcome und die Überlebenszeit der implantierten Knieendoprothese. Weiterhin spielen ebenso die Herstellung einer günstigen Kinematik, gutes Weichteilmanagement und die verbesserten Material- und Implantationstechniken der Neuzeit eine entscheidende Rolle für ein effizientes Behandlungsergebnis. Die in der Vergangenheit eher mechanistisch geprägte Betrachtungsweise wird in Zukunft beispielsweise durch neue Einflüsse der Psychologie, des präoperativen Patientenmanagementes, wie auch der klinischen Qualitäts- und Prozessoptimierung verändert. Neue Technologien werden die künftige Knieendoprothetik wahrscheinlich weiter vorantreiben und neue Impulse in ihrer Entwicklung versetzen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • 16th Annual Report of the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, S 124. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2016th%20Annual%20Report%202019.pdf. Zugegriffen am 12.05.2020

  • Albrektsson BE, Carlsson LV, Freeman MA, Herberts P, Ryd L (1992) Proximally cemented versus uncemented Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:233–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assor M, Aubaniac JM (2006) Influence of rotatory malposition of femoral implant in failure of unicompartimental medial knee prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:473–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M (2005) A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2290–2296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blauth W, Hassenpflug J (1990) Are unconstrained components essential in total knee arthroplasty? Long-term results of the Blauth knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 258:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm P (2003) The hinged knee prosthesis: outdated design or valuable implant for difficult cases? Zentralbl Chir 128:64–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm P, Holy T (1998) Is there a future for hinged prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty? A 20-year survivorship analysis of the Blauth prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:302–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnin M, Deschamps G, Neyret P, Chambat P (2000) Revision in non-infected total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 69 consecutive cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 86:694–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Mont MA (2008) Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2730–2735

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne RB, Finlay JB (1986) The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briard JL, Hungerford DS (1989) Patellofemoral instability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 4(Suppl):87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briard JL, Witoolkollachit P, Lin G (2007) Soft tissue management in total knee replacement. Analysis of ligament balancing. Orthopäde 36:635–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buechel FF, Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Alessio J (2001) Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett RS, Boone JL, McCarthy KP, Rosenzweig S, Barrack RL (2007) A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:65–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein AH, Wright TM (1997) Biomechanik in Orthopädie und Traumatologie. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan JJ, Wells CW, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Johnston RC (2010) Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(7):1635–1639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron HU, Hunter GA (1982) Failure in total knee arthroplasty: Mechanisms, revisions, and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Châtain F, Richard A, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Neyret P (2004) Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90:49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng T, Zhu C, Wang J, Cheng M, Peng X, Wang Q, Zhang X (2014) No clinical benefit of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 85(4):415–421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Claus A, Scharf HP (2007) „Ligament balancing“ and varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopäde 36:643–644, 646–649. Review

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coory JA, Tan KG, Whitehouse SL, Hatton A, Graves SE, Crawford RW (2020) The outcome of total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing up to 17 years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplast 35(1):132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.007

  • Costales TG, Chapman DM, Dalury DF (2020) The natural history of radiolucencies following uncemented total knee arthroplasty at 9 years. J Arthroplast 35(1):127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson PA, Rivenburgh D (2008) Focal anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: theoretic basis, surgical technique, and case reports. Orthop Clin North Am 39:337–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D (1997) Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:575–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducheyne P, Kagan A 2nd, Lacey JA (1978) Failure of total knee arthroplasty due to loosening and deformation of the tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:384–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP (1987) Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DA, Dierckman B, Watts MR, Davis K (2007) Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(Suppl 2):39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe ME, Dunbar MJ, Hennigar AW, Sullivan MJL, Gross M (2008) Prospective relation between catastrophizing and residual pain following knee arthroplasty: two-year follow-up. Pain Res Manag 13(4):335–341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschetti E, Torre G, Palumbo A, Papalia R, Karlsson J, Ayeni OR, Franceschi F (2017) No difference between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a review of the evidence. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(6):1749–1756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (2004) Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 17:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill GS, Joshi AB, Mills DM (1999) Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (2010) A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92–B(12):1628–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore DR, Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardner GM (1986) Correlations between objective measures of function and a clinical knee rating scale following total knee replacement. Orthopedics 9:1363–1367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grassmayr MJ, Parker DA, Coolican MR, Vanwanseele B (2007) Posterior cruciate ligament deficiency: biomechanical and biological consequences and the outcomes of conservative treatment. A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport 11(5):433–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimberg A, Jansson V, Melsheimer O, Steinbrück A (2019). Endoprothesenregister Deutschland [EPRD] – Jahresbericht 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Halder AM, Gehrke T, Günster C, Heller KD, Leicht H, Malzahn J, Jeschke E (2020) Low hospital volume increases re-revision rate following aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 23,644 cases. J Arthroplast 35(4):1054–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamoui N, Kantor S, Vince K, Crookes PF (2006) Long-term outcome of total knee replacement: does obesity matter? Obes Surg 16:35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess S, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT (2019) Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1368–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann AA, Tkach TK, Evanich CJ, Camargo MP (2000) Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert. J Arthroplast 15:576–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:173–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke E, Gehrke T, Günster C, Heller KD, Leicht H, Malzahn J, Halder AM (2019) Low hospital volume increases revision rate and mortality following revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 17,773 cases. J Arthroplast 34(9):2045–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan T, Evans Robert W, Walker Jonathan P, Evans Ashley W, Blom Adrian, Sayers Michael R, Whitehouse (2019) How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. The Lancet 393(10172):655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32531-5

  • Jorgensen NB, McAuliffe M, Orschulok T, Lorimer MF, de Steiger R (2019) Major aseptic revision following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 101(4):302–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura H, Bourne RB (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:248–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KT, Lee S, Park HS, Cho KH, Kim KS (2007) A prospective analysis of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30(Suppl):15–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS (2017) The clinical outcome of computer-navigated compared with conventional knee arthroplasty in the same patients. J Bone Joint Surg 99(12):989–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klutzny M, Singh G, Hameister R, Goldau G, Awiszus F, Feuerstein B, Lohmann CH (2019) Screw track osteolysis in the cementless total knee replacement design. J Arthroplast 34(5):965–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Ylinen P, Tallroth K, Remes V (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Miller-Galante II prosthesis: mid-term clinical and radiographic results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:617–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosse NM, Heesterbeek PJC, Schimmel JJP, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB, Defoort KC (2018) Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26(6):1792–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4792-3

  • Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 71(1):145–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lädermann A, Saudan M, Riand N, Fritschy D (2008) Fixed bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical and radiological study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94:247–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laura Frattura G di, Filardo G, Giunchi D, Fusco A, Zaffagnini S, Candrian C (2018) Risk of falls in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. J Orthopaedics 15(3):903–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter WB (2008) Patellofemoral arthroplasty in the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis: rationale and outcomes in younger patients. Orthop Clin North Am 39:363–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liebau C, Friedrich F, Becker R, Neumann HW (1998) Ist die Implantation einer unikondylären Schlittenprothese noch zeitgemäß? In: Rabenseifner J (Hrsg) Knieendoprothetik. Steinkopff, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim JB, Pang HN, Tay KJD, Chia S, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2019) Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 26(4):847–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lisowski LA, Verheijen PM, Lisowski AE (2004) Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA): clinical and radiological results of minimum follow-up of 2 years. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 31:773–776

    Google Scholar 

  • List JP van der, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2016) Why do medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties fail today? J Arthroplast 31(5):1016–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • List JP van der, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2017) Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(8):2622–2631

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo CWT, Tsang WN, Yan CH, Lord SR, Hill KD, Wong AYL (2019) Risk factors for falls in patients with total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil 27(7):979–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi AV Jr, Berasi CC, Berend KR (2007) Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(Suppl 1):25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Mannering N, D’Andrea V, Cimmino M, Denaro V (2018) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplast 33(2):620–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg-Jensen A, Kourakis AH, Rossen B, Kofoed H (2002) Radiolucency adjacent to the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25:49–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lustig S, Barba N, Magnussen RA, Servien E, Demey G, Neyret P (2012) The effect of gender on outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 19(3):176–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahfouz M, Abdel Fatah EE, Bowers LS, Scuderi G (2012) Three-dimensional morphology of the knee reveals ethnic differences. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):172–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahfouz MR, Merkl BC, Fatah EE, Booth R Jr, Argenson JN (2007) Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 10:447–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCalden RW, Hart GP, MacDonald SJ, Naudie DD, Howard JH, Bourne RB (2017) Clinical results and survivorship of the GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 15 years. J Arthroplast 32(7):2161–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloni MC, Hoedemaeker RW, Violante B, Mazzola C (2017) Soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Joints 2(1):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton JT, Mayahi R, Baxter SE, Facek M, Glezos C (2012) Long-term outcome in an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94–B(8):1067–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Lira Neto OA, Queiroz AA, Navarro RD (2012) Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10):Cd006193

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam D, Lawrie CM, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM (2019) Cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same modern design. J Bone Joint Surg 101(13):1185–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V (2014) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(5):1496–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes FR, Matthews DS, Mooar PA, Grood ES (1983) The symptomatic anterior cruciate deficient knee. II. The results of rehabilitation, activity modification and councelling on functional disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:163–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Outcome beim Wechsel einer Hüft- oder Knieprothese hängt von Fallzahl ab (2020) Retrieved May 28, 2020, Ärzteblatt online. https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/113284/Outcome-beim-Wechsel-einer-Hueft-oder-Knieprothese-haengt-von-Fallzahl-ab. Zugegriffen am 12.05.2020

  • Partridge TC, Baker PN, Jameson SS, Mason J, Reed MR, Deehan DJ (2020) Conventional versus highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 102(2):119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patil S, McCauley JC, Pulido P, Colwell CW (2015) How do knee implants perform past the second decade? nineteen- to 25-year follow up of the press-fit condylar design TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1):135–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP (2001) Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J (2004) Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75:464–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz JN, Hooper G, Gray A, Beard D (2018) Knee replacement. Lancet 392(10158):1672–1682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:60–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertsson O, Lidgren L, Sundberg M, W-Dahl A (2020) The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register – Annual report 2019, Part II, S 39. https://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2019_1.0_Eng.pdf. Zugegriffen am 12.05.2020

  • Rousseau MA, Lazennec JY, Catonné Y (2008) Early mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:53–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Garratt AM, Coutts A, Russell IT (1994) SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient-based studies. Qual Health Care 3:180–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu J, Saito S, Yamamoto K, Sano S (1993) Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 53:35–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saevarsson SK, Sharma GB, Ramm H, Lieck R, Hutchison CR, Werle J, Anglin C (2013) Kinematic differences between gender specific and traditional knee implants. J Arthroplast 28(9):1543–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R, Barrack R (2015) Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:151–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sathappan SS, Wasserman B, Jaffe WL, Bong M, Walsh M, Di Cesare PE (2006) Midterm results of primary total knee arthroplasty using a dished polyethylene insert with a recessed or resected posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplast 21:1012–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavone Panni A, Falez F, D’Apolito R, Corona K, Perisano C, Vasso M (2017) Long-term follow-up of a non-randomised prospective cohort of one hundred and ninety-two total knee arthroplasties using the NexGen implant. Int Orthop 41(6):1155–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Li G, Kozanek M, Song EK (2009) Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int Orthop 33:987–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J (2014) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today–has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplast 29:1774–1778

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi MG, Lü HS, Guan ZP (2006) Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 44:1101–1105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silva RR da, Santos AAM, de Sampaio Carvalho Júnior J, Matos MA (2014) Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: systematic review. Rev Bras Ortop (English Edition) 49(5):520–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisto DJ, Sarin VK (2008) Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a customized trochlear prosthesis. Orthop Clin North Am 39:355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skowroński J, Jatskewych J, Długosz J, Skowroński R, Bielecki M (2005) The Oxford II medial unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 10-year follow-up study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 7:620–625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Naima VS, Freeman MA (1999) The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 14:3–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steckel H, Klinger HM, Baums MH, Schultz W (2005) Long Term results of the Blauth knee prosthesis–current status of hinged knee prostheses. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:30–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE (2004) Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:328–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingart M, Lüring C, Bäthis H, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Perlick L (2008) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel M, Riediger C, Krippl M, Frommer J, Lohmann CH, Illiger S (2019) Negative affect, type D personality, quality of life, and dysfunctional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Pain Res Manag 2019:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel M, Frenzel L, Riediger C, Haase M, Frommer J, Lohmann CH, Illiger S (2020) The pain paradox of borderline personality and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): recruiting borderline personality organization to predict the one-year postoperative outcome. J Pain Res 13:49–55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm SK, Henrichsen JL, Siljander M, Moore D, Karadsheh M (2018) Polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty: where are we now? J Orthop Surg 26(3):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Moran MC, Insall JN (1989) Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248(15–19):discussion 19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Wang Z, Shang Y (2007) Balance of soft tissues in total knee arthroplasty for patients with knee of varus deformity and flexion contracture. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 21:1062–1066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiderbaan HA, van der List JP, Chawla H, Khamaisy S, Thein R, Pearle AD (2016) Predictors of subjective outcome after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31(7):1453–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland

    Christian Stärke, Marcus Klutzny & Christoph Hubertus Lohmann

Authors
  1. Christian Stärke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcus Klutzny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christoph Hubertus Lohmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Hubertus Lohmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland

    Dieter Christian Wirtz

  2. Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik am RKU, Ulm, Deutschland

    Heiko Reichel

  3. Professur für Orthopädie am Universitätsklinikum Jena, Campus Eisenberg, Eisenberg, Deutschland

    Georg Matziolis

  4. Vivantes – Netzwerk für Gesundheit Berlin, Klinik für Endoprothetik, Knie- und Hüftchirurgie Klinikum Spandau und Humboldt Klinikum, Berlin, Deutschland

    Tilman Pfitzner

Section Editor information

  1. Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Eisenberg, Deutschland

    Georg Matziolis

  2. Klinik für Endoprothetik, Knie- und Hüftchirurgie; Department für Bewegungschirurgie, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Berlin, Deutschland

    Tilman Pfitzner

  3. Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Ulm am RKU, Ulm, Deutschland

    Heiko Reichel

  4. Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Direktor der Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Bonn, Deutschland

    Dieter Christian Wirtz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stärke, C., Klutzny, M., Lohmann, C.H. (2023). Ergebnisse der Knieendoprothetik. In: Wirtz, D.C., Reichel, H., Matziolis, G., Pfitzner, T. (eds) Endoprothetik des Kniegelenkes. AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65175-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65175-9_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65174-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65175-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation