Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Biocontrol Agents for Viral Protection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes for Sustainable Biotic and Abiotic Stress Management

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture, especially environmental sustainability, can be achieved without the use of chemical fertilizers that spoil fertility of the soil and biological diversity. There is a need for alternative measures to cope up with these problems using natural agents. The role of rhizosphere microbiology has great importance in sustainable agriculture as well as the world economy. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is an alternative method to compete with stresses affecting the growth and development of a plant. PGPR-plant interaction is commercially used in sustainable agriculture, and their applications are studied in many horticultural and agronomic crops. There are different management strategies to control plant virus disease that include an amalgamation of selected cultural practices, using genetically resistant varieties, reducing insects’ vectors by applying the insecticidal spray, and a combination of all these. The most environmentally sound and economical option to minimize viral diseases is by far the use of genetically resistant varieties though not always available. The effective and economic measure to manage viral diseases is systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a kind of plant natural defense mechanism. Biological and chemical agents are used against viral infections. The use of PGPR and biocontrol agents (BCAs) is well-thought-out to be the most effective method to safeguard plants against plant pathogens. Many PGPRs and BCA are extensively studied against different plant pathogens and showed promising results to promote plant growth particularly against different viral diseases in various crops. There is an increasing demand of microorganism’s mixture against plant viruses in recent times where PGPR strains (individually or in combination) against numerous phytopathogens for biological control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdalla OA, Bibi S, Zhang S (2017) Application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to control Papaya ringspot virus and Tomato chlorotic spot virus. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 50:584–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aboul-Ata A-AE et al (2011) Diagnosis and control of cereal viruses in the Middle East. Adv Virus Res 81:33–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams MJ, Heinze C, Jackson AO, Kreuze JF, Macfarlane SA, Torrance L (2012) Tobamovirus. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ (eds) Virus taxonomy: ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Elsevier/Academic Press, London, pp 1153–1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn IP, Park K, Kim CH (2002) Rhizobacteria-induced resistance perturbs viral disease progress and triggers defense related gene expression. Mol Cells 13:302–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Alazem M, Lin N-S (2015) Roles of plant hormones in the regulation of host-virus interactions. Mol Plant Pathol 16:529–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarger N, Macheret V, Laguerre G (1997) Rhizobium gallicum sp. nov. and Rhizobium giardinii sp. nov., from Phaseolus vulgaris nodules. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47(4):996–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand K, Kumari B, Mallick MA (2016) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: an effective and alternative approach as bio-fertilizers. Int J Pharm Sci 8:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Babalola OO (2010) Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotechnol Lett 32:1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur PS, Liaqat F, Eltem R (2018) Plant growth pFromoting properties of phosphate solubilizing Bacillus species isolated from the Aegean Region of Turkey. Turk J Bot 42:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi C, Stevanato P, Motto M, Biancardi E (2012) Breeding for biotic stress resistance/ tolerance in plants. In: Ashraf M, Ă–ztĂĽrk M, Ahmad M, Aksoy A (eds) Crop production for agricultural improvement. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4116-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barahona E, Navazo A, MartĂ­nez-Granero F, Zea-Bonilla T, PĂ©rezJimĂ©nez RM, MartĂ­n M, Rivilla R (2011) Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 mutant with enhanced competitive colonization ability and improved biocontrol activity against fungal root pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5412–5419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr JG, Emmerson AM, Hogg GM, Smyth E (1989) API-20NE and sensititre autoidentification systems for identifying Pseudomonas spp. J Clin Pathol 42:1113–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basit A, Shah K, Rahman MU, Xing L, Zuo X, Han M, Alam N, Khan F, Ahmed I, Khalid MA (2018) Salicylic acid an emerging growth and flower inducing hormone in marigold (Tagetes sp. L.). Pure Appl Biol 7(4):1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2018.700151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera TK, Behera S, Bharathi LK, John KJ, Simon PW, Staub JE (2010) Bitter gourd: botany, horticulture, breeding. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural reviews, vol 37. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470543672.ch2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bektas Y, Eulgem T (2014) Synthetic plant defense elicitors. Front Plant Sci 5:804

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35:1044–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou N, Gagne S, Quere DL, Dehbi L (2000) Bacterial-mediated induced resistance in cucumber: Beneficial effect of the endophytic bacterium Serratia plymuthica on the protection against infection by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 90:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benizri E, Baudoin E, Guckert A (2001) Root colonization by inoculated plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Biocontr Sci Technol 11:557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beris D, Theologidis I, Skandalis N, Vassilakos N (2018) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain MBI600 induces salicylic acid dependent resistance in tomato plants against Tomato spotted wilt virus and Potato virus Y. Sci Rep 8:10320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28677-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee RB, Singh A, Mukhopadhyay SN (2008) Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertiliser for non-legumes: prospects and challenges. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1327–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigirimana J, Hofte M (2002) Induction of systemic resistance to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in bean by a benzothiadiazole derivative and rhizobacteria. Phytoparasitica 30:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1999) The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth. Adv Agron 66:1–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BĂĽcker-Neto L, Paiva AL, Machado RD, Arenhart RA, Margis-Pinheiro M (2017) Interactions between plant hormones and heavy metals responses. Genet Mol Biol 40:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CT, Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1991) Relationship between root colonization and suppression of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici by Pseudomonas fuorescens strain 2-79. Phytopathology 81:954–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll H, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Dawling DN, Gara FO (1995) Mutational disruption of the biosynthesis genes coding for the antifungal metabolite2,4 diacetylphloroglucinol does not influence the ecological fitness of Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 in the rhizosphere of sugar beets. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3002–3007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro RO, Cornejo HAC, Rodriguez LM, Bucio JL (2009) The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav 4(8):701–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerritos R, Vinuesa P, Eguiarte LE, Herrera-Estrella L, Alcaraz-Peraza LD, Arvizu-Gomez JL, Olmedo G, Ramirez E, Siefert JL, Souza V (2008) Bacillus coahuilensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic species from a desiccation lagoon in the Cuatro Cienegas Valley in Coahuila, Mexico. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:919–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K-G, Atkinson S, Mathee K, Sam C-K, Chhabra SR, Camara M, Koh C-L, Williams P (2011) Characterization of N acylhomoserine lactone-degrading bacteria associated with the Zingiber officinale (ginger) rhizosphere: co-existence of quorum quenching and quorum sensing in Acinetobacter and Burkholderia. BMC Microbiol 11:51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanway CP, Nelson LM, Holl FB (1988) Cultivar-specific growth promotion of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by co-existent Bacillus species. Can J Microbiol 34:925–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WX, Yan GH, Li JL (1988) Numerical taxonomic study of fast growing soybean rhizobia and a proposal that Rhizobium fredii be assigned to Sinorhizobium gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 38(4):392–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Belanger RR, Benhamou N, Paulitz TC (2000) Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 56:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernin L, Ismailov Z, Haran S, Chet I (1995) Chitinolytic Enterobacter agglomerans antagonistic to fungal plant pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1720–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RR (1970) Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Vibrio: numerical taxonomy of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related Vibrio species. J Bacteriol 104:410–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compant S, ClĂ©ment C, Sessitsch A (2010) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42:669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth DM, Popat R, McNally L, Gurney J, Scott-Phillips TC, Ivens A, Diggle SP, Brown SP (2014) Combinatorial quorum sensing allows bacteria to resolve their social and physical environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(11):4280–4284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damam M, Kaloori K, Gaddam B, Kausar R (2016) Plant growth promoting substances (phytohormones) produced by rhizobacterial strains isolated from the rhizosphere of medicinal plants. Int J Pharm Sci Rev 37:130–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Damayanti TA, Pardede H, Mubarik NR (2007) Utilization of root colonizing bacteria to protect hot-pepper against Tobacco Mosaic Tobamovirus. Hayati J Biosci 14(3):105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti NH, Ali NY, Cherian VM, Montasser MS (2012) Application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in combination with a mild strain of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) associated with viral satellite RNAs to enhance growth and protection against a virulent strain of CMV in tomato. Can J Plant Pathol 34:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2012.685495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer M, van der Sluis I, van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM (1997) In vitro compatibility between fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. strains can increase effectivity of Fusarium wilt control by combinations of these strains. In: Ogoshi A, Kobayashi K, Homma Y, Kodama F, Kondo N, Akino S (eds) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—present status and future prospects. Proceedings of the International workshop on plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria, 4th edn. Nakanishi Printing, Sappora, pp 380–382

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer M, Van der Sluis I, van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM (1999) Combining fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. strains to enhance suppression of Fusarium wilt of radish. Eur J Plant Pathol 105:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lajudie P, Laurent-Fulele E, Willems A (1998a) Allorhizobium undicola gen. nov., sp. nov., nitrogen-fixing bacteria that efficiently nodulate Neptunia natans in Senegal. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:1277–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lajudie P, Willems A, Nick G, Moreira F (1998b) Characterization of tropical tree rhizobia and description of Mesorhizobium plurifarium sp. Nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer K-H, Whitman WB (2009) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. The Firmicutes, vol 3, 2nd edn XXVI, 1450 p. 393 illus., Hardcover. Originally published by Williams & Wilkins, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Denholm I, Cahil M, Byrne FJ, Devonshire AL (1996) Progress with documenting and combating insecticide resistance in Bemisia. In: Gerling D, Mayer RT (eds) Bemisia 1995: taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management. Intercept Ltd, Andover, Hants, pp 577–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Depret G, Laguerre G (2008) Plant phenology and genetic variability in root and nodule development strongly influence genetic structuring of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae populations nodulating pea. New Phytol 179:224–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong YH, Xu JL, Li XZ, Zhang LH (2000) AiiA, an enzyme that inactivates the acylhomoserine lactone quorum-sensing signal and attenuates the virulence of Erwinia carotovora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:3526–3531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus B, Garcia JL, Gillis M (1988) Characterization of Azorhizobium caulinodans gen. nov., sp. nov., a stem-nodulating nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from Sesbania rostrata. Int J Syst Bacteriol 38:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y, Chet I (1987) Possible role of competition for nutrients in biocontrol of Pythium damping-off by bacteria. Phytopathology 77:190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-beshehy EKF, Youssef SA, Elazzazy AM (2015) Resistance induction in pumpkin Cucurbita maxima L. against Watermelon mosaic potyvirus by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biocontrol Sci Technol 25:525–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Dougdoug KA, Dawoud RA, Rezk AA, Sofy AR (2012) Incidence of fruit trees viroid diseases by tissue pint hbridization in Egypt. Int J Virol 8:114–120. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijv.2012.114.120

  • El-Dougdoug KA, Sofy AR, Mousa AA, Refaey EE (2014) Monitoring variability responses of cultivated potato varieties infected with Potato virus Y pepper isolate. Egypt J Virol 11:82–101

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas HM, Ibrahim IA, Anwar HM, Hegazi NA (2000) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria producing indole-3-acetic acid from plants growing in Egypt. J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ 25:6493–6502

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlani G, Mantelli M, Branzoni M, Nielsen E, Favilli F (1995) Root colonization efficiency, plant growth promoting activity and potentially related properties associated bacteria. J Gene Breed 49:343–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich L, Lawton K, Dietrich R, Willits M, Cade R, Ryals J (2001) NIM1 over expression in Arabidopsis potentiates plant disease resistance and results in enhanced effectiveness of fungicides. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14:1114–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia de Salamone IE, Hynes RK, Nelson LM (2001) Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants. Can J Microbol 47:404–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghonim MI (1999) Induction of systemtic resistance against Fusarium wilt in tomato by seed treatment with the biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis. Bull Fac Agric Cairo Univ 50:313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR (2015a) Biocontrol mechanisms beneficial plant-bacterial interactions. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:329–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G, Penrose DM (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth-promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan S, Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R, Varshney RK, Gowda CL, Krishnamurthy L (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobia: challenges and opportunities. 3. Australas Biotechnol 5(355):377

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC, Tejada Moral M (2016) Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. Cogent Food Agric 2:1127500

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: Commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerinot ML, Chelm BK (1984) Isolation and expression of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum adenylate cyclase gene (cya) in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 159:1068–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guetsky R, Shtienberg D, Elad Y, Dinoor A (2001) Combining biocontrol agents to reduce the variability of biological control. Phytopathology 91:621–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Snehi SK, Singh V (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microb Biochem Technol 7(2):096–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy M, Balkan A, Ulukan H (2012) Ecophysiological responses to stresses in plants: a general approach. Pak J Biol Sci 15:506–516. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2012.506.516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han D, Wang L, Luo Y (2018) Isolation, identification, and the growth promoting effects of two antagonistic actinomycete strains from the rhizosphere of Mikania micrantha Kunth. Microbiol Res 208:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman J, Stabb EV (1996) Biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens. Plant Cell 8:1855–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harish S, Kavino M, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Soorianathasundaram K, Samiyappan R (2008) Biohardening with plant growth promoting rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria induces systemic resistance against Banana bunchy top virus. Appl Soil Ecol 39:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harish S, Kavino M, Kumar N, Balasubramanian P, Samiyappan R (2009) Induction of defense-related proteins by mixtures of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria against Banana bunchy top virus. Biol Control 51:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel H, Wilfarth H (1888) Untersuchungen uber die Stickstoffnahrung der Gramineen und Leguminosen. In: Beilageheft zu der Zeitschrift des Vereins fur Rubenzucker-Industrie Deutschen Reichs, p 234

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofte M, Altier N (2010) Fluorescent pseudomonads as biocontrol agents for sustainable agricultural systems. Res Microbiol 161:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Shi Y, Zeng G, Gu Y, Chen G, Shi L, Hu Y, Tang B, Zhou J (2016) Acyl-homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing and quorum quenching hold promise to determine the performance of biological wastewater treatments: an overview. Chemosphere 157:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull R (1994) The movement of plant viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27:213–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein ME (1992) The effect of an Egyptian isolate of Streptomyces afghanensis on some plant viruses. Acta Virol 36:479–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Husson E, Hadad C, Huet G, Laclef S, Lesur D, Lambertyn V, Jamali A, Gottis S, Sarazina C, Nguyen Van Nhien A.(2017) The effect of room temperature ionic liquids on the selective biocatalytic hydrolysis of chitin via sequential or simultaneous strategies. Green Chem 19: 4122–4131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imriz G, Ă–zdemir F, Topal BE, TaĹź MN, Yakışır E, Okur O (2014) Bitkisel ĂĽretimde bitki geliĹźimini teĹźvik eden rizobakteri (pgpr)’ler ve etki mekanizmaları. Elektronik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 12:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Innerebner G, Knief C, Vorholt JA (2011) Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3202–3210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaprakashvel M, Mathivanan N (2011) Management of plant diseases by microbial metabolites. D.K. Maheshwari (Ed.), Bacteria in agrobiology: plant nutrient management, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 237–265, 10.1007/978-3-642-21061-7_10

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi P, Bhatt AB (2011) Diversity and function of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria associated with wheat rhizosphere in North Himalayan region. Int J Environ Sci 1(6):1135–1143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandan A, Commare RR, Nandakumar R, Ramiah M, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R (2002) Induction of phenylpropanoid metabolism by Pseudomonas fluorescens against tomato spotted wilt virus in tomato. Folia Microbiol 47:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02817669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandan A, Ramaiah M, Vasanthi VJ, Radjacommare R, Nandakumar R, Ramanathan A, Samiyappan R (2005) Use of Pseudomonas fluorescens based formulations for management of tomato spotted wilt virus and enhanced yield in tomato. Biocontrol Sci Technol 15:553–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavino M, Harish S, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Damodaran T, Samiyappan R (2007a) Potential implications of biopriming in banana (Musa spp) plantlets against Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV). J Plant Interact 2:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429140701586365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavino M, Harish S, Kumar N, Samiyappan R (2009) Rhizobacteria-mediated growth promotion of banana Leads to protection against Banana bunchy top virus under field conditions. Acta Hortic:69–76. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2009.828.5

  • Kessman H, Staub T, Hofmann C, Ward E, Uknes S, Ryals J (1994) Induction of systemic acquired resistance in plants by chemicals. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:439–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-S, Lee J, Lee C-h, Woo SY, Kang H, Seo S-G, Kim S-H (2015) Activation of pathogenesis-related genes by the hizobacterium, Bacillus sp. JS, which induces systemic resistance in tobacco plants. Plant Pathol J 31:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim N-G et al (2017) Pseudomonas oleovorans strain KBPF-004 culture supernatants reduced seed transmission of Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus and Pepper mild mottle virus, and remodeled aggregation of 126 kDa and subcellular localization of movement protein of Pepper mild mottle virus. Plant Pathol J 33:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King EB, Parke JL (1996) Population density of the biocontrol agent Burkholderia cepacia AMMDRl on four pea cultivars. Soil Biol Biochem 28:307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ (2011) Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. In: Ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Elsevier/Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW (1996) Biological control agents vary in specificity for host, pathogen control, ecological habitat and environmental conditions. Biol Sci 46:406–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on plant pathogenic bacteria. Gilbert Clarey Tours, pp 879–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Rodriguez-Ubana R, Zehnder GW, Murphy JF, Sikora E, Fernadez C (1999) Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soil borne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Aust Plant Pathol 28:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Reddy MS, RodrĂ­guez-Kabana R, Kenney DS, Kokalis-Burelle N, Martinez-Ochoa N (2004a) Application for rhizobacteria in transplant production and yield enhancement. Acta Hortic 631:219–229. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2004.631.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004b) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Gutierrez-Estrada A, Mclnroy JA (2007) Photoperiod regulates elicitation of growth promotion but not induced resistance by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Can J Microbiol 53(2):159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koby S, Schickler H, Ilan C, Oppenheim AB (1994) The chitinase encoding Tn7-based chiA gene endows Pseudomonas fluorescens with the capacity to control plant pathogens in soil. Gene 147:81–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowsari M, Zamani M, Motallebi M (2016) Overexpression of chimeric chitinase 42 enhanced antifungal activity of Trichoderma harzianum against Fusarium graminearum. Mycol Iran 3:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus J, Loper JE (1995) Characterization of a genomic region required for production of the antibiotic pyoluteorin by the biological control agent Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:849–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Prakash A, Johri BN (2011) Bacillus as PGPR in crop ecosystem. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: crop ecosystems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S et al (2016) Paenibacillus lentimorbus inoculation enhances tobacco growth and extenuates the virulence of Cucumber mosaic virus. PLoS One 11:e0149980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupferschmied P, Maurhofer M, Keel C (2013) Promise for plant pest control: root-associated pseudomonads with insecticidal activities. Front Plant Sci 4:287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee GH, Ryu C-M (2016) Spraying of leaf-colonizing Bacillus amyloliquefaciens protects pepper from Cucumber mosaic virus. Plant Dis 100:2099–2105. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-03-16-0314-re

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeman M, Den Ouden FM, Van Pelt JA, Dirkx FPM, Steijl H, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B (1996) Iron availability affects induction of systemic resistance to Fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology 86:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H et al (2016a) Control of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease by Enterobacter asburiae BQ9 as a result of priming plant resistance in tomatoes. Turk J Biol 40:150–159. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1502-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Huang W, Xu L, Zhou X, Liu H, Cheng Z (2016b) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia HW2 enhanced cucumber resistance against Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus. J Plant Biol 59:488–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-016-0246-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian L, Xie L, Zheng L, Lin Q (2011) Induction of systemic resistance in tobacco against Tobacco mosaic virus by Bacillus spp. Biocontrol Sci Technol 21:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2010.543667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddell CM, Parke JL (1989) Enhanced colonization of pea taproots by a fluorescent pseudomonad biocontrol agent by water infiltration into soil. Phytopathology 79:1327–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lifshitz R, Kloepper JW, Mozlowski M, Simonson C, Carlson J, Tipping EM, Zaleska I (1987) Growth promotion of canola (rapeseed) seedlings by a strain of Pseudomonas putida under gnotobiotic conditions. Can J Microbiol 33:390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom K (1989) Rhizobiumgalegae, a new species of legume root nodule bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:365–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan NA, Berkeley RCW (1984) Identification of Bacillus strains using the API system. J Gen Microbiol 130:1871–1882

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan NA, Berge O, Bishop AH, Busse HJ, De Vos P, Fritze D, Heyndrickx M, Kampfer P, Rabinovitch L, Salkinoja-Salonen MS, Seldin L, Ventosa A (2009) Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of aerobic, endospore-forming bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59(8):2114–2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loper JE, Haack C, Schroth MN (1985) Population dynamics of soil pseudomonads in the rhizosphere of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Appl Environ Microbiol 49:416–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugtenberg BJJ, van der Bij A, Bloemberg G, Chin-A-Woeng T, Dekkers L, Kravchenko L, Mulders I, Phoelich C, Simons M, Spaink H, Tikhonovich I, de Weger L, Wijffelman C (1996) Molecular basis of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas bacteria. In: Stacey G, Mullin B, Gresshoff PM (eds) Biology of plant-microbe interactions. ISPMB, St. Paul, MN, pp 433–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugtenberg BJJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV (2001) Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:461–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari DK, Annapurna K (2017) Endophytes: crop productivity and protection, vol 2. Springer International, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari DK, Saraf M, Dheeman S (2019) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as protagonists of ever-sustained agriculture: an introduction. In: Maheshwari DK, Dheeman S (eds) Field crops: sustainable management by PGPR, vol 3. Springer Nature, Cham, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann EW (1965) Inhibition of tobacco mosaic virus by a bacterial extract. Phytopathology 59:658–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • MartĂ­nez RT, de Almeida MMS, Rodriguez R, de Oliveira AS, Melo FL, Resende RO (2018) Identification and genome analysis of Tomato chlorotic spot virus and dsRNA viruses from coinfected vegetables in the Dominican Republic by high-throughput sequencing. Virol J 15:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-0931-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Viveros O, Jorquera MA, Crowley DE, Gajardo G, Mora ML (2010) Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10:293–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauch F, Hadwiger LA, Boller T (1994) Ethylene: Symptom, not signal for the induction of chitinase and-1,3-glucanase in pea pods by pathogens and elicitors. Plant Physiol 76(607):611

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurhofer M, Hase C, Meuwly P, MĂ©traux JP, Defago G (1994) Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0: influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology 84:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurhofer M, Keel C, Haas D, Defago G (1995) Influence of plant species on disease suppression by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO with enhanced antibiotic production. Plant Pathol 44:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurhofer M, Reimann C, Sacherer SP, Heebs S, Haas D, Defago G (1998) Salicylic acid biosynthetic genes expressed in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain P3 improve the induction of systemic resistance in tobacco against necrosis virus. Phytopathology 88:678–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42(6):565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megahed AA, El-Dougdoug KA, Othman BA, Lashin SM, Ibrahim MA, Sofy AR (2013) Induction of resistance in tomato plants against Tomato mosaic tobamovirus using beneficial microbial isolates. Pak J Biol Sci 16:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meziane H, Van Der Sluis I, Van Loon LC, Höfte M, Bakker PAHM (2005) Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants. Mol Plant Pathol 6:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JM, Rhoden DL (1991) Preliminary evaluation of Biolog, a carbon source utilization method for bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol 29:1143–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hare EW, Wu J (1990) Quantitative characterization of the vegetation red edge reflectance. I. An inverted-Gaussian reflectance model. Int J Rem Sens 11:1755–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishina TE, Zeier J (2007) Pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition rather than development of tissue necrosis contributes to bacterial induction of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 50:500–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra J, Arora NK (2018) Secondary metabolites of fluorescent pseudomonads in biocontrol of phytopathogens for sustainable agriculture. Appl Soil Ecol 125:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro JM, Vollu RE, Coelho MRR, Alviano CS, Blank AF, Seldin L (2009) Culture-dependent and -independent approaches to analyze the bacterial community of different genotypes of Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty (vetiver) rhizospheres. J Microbiol 47:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi Z (2011) Diagnosis and molecular variability of Watermelon mosaic virus isolates from North, East, North-east and North-west regions of Iran. Asian J Plant Pathol 5:115–125. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajppaj.2011.115.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mota FF, Gomes EA, Paiva E, Seldin L (2005) Assessment of the diversity of Paenibacillus species in environmental samples by a novel rpoB-based PCR-DGGE method. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JF, Zehnder GW, Schuster DJ, Sikora EJ, Polston JE, Kloepper JW (2000) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against Tomato mottle virus. Plant Dis 84:779–784. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.2000.84.7.779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JF, Reddy MS, Ryu CM, Kloepper JW, Li R (2003) Rhizobacteria mediated growth promotion of tomato leads to protection against cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopathology 93:1301–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JF, Zehnder GW (2000) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against tomato mottle virus. Plant Dis 84:779–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu RA, Sherwood JL, Deom CM (2008) Characterization of a vector-non-transmissible isolate of Tomato spotted wilt virus. Plant Pathol 57:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01707.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr SA (2002) Stimulation of auxin biosynthesis by some bacterial, and yeast strains. Arab Univ J Agric Sci Ain Shams Univ Cairo 10:89–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson LM (2004) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): prospects for new inoculants. Online. Crop Management https://doi.org/10.1094/CM-2004-0301-05-RV

  • Nick G, de Lajudie P, Eardly BD (1999) Sinorhizobium arboris sp. nov. and Sinorhizobium kostiense sp. nov., isolated from leguminous trees in Sudan and Kenya. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:1359–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nour SM, Fernandez MP, Normand P, Cleyet-Marel JC (1994) Rhizobium ciceri sp. nov., consisting of strains that nodulate chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numan M, Bashir S, Khan Y, Mumtaz R, Shinwari ZK, Khan AL, Ahmed AH (2018) Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salt tolerance in plants: a review. Microbiol Res 209:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan KJ, Dixon RA, Cocking EC (2000) Arabidopsis thaliana: a model for studies of colonization by non-pathogenic and plant growth promoting bacteria. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:975–982

    Google Scholar 

  • Olanrewaju OS, Glick BR, Babalola OO (2017) Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33(11):197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongena M, Daayf F, Jacques P, Thonart P, Benhamou N, Paulitz TC, Cornelis P, Koedam N, Belanger RR (1999) Protection of cucumber against Pythium root rot by fluorescent pseudomonads: predominant role of induced resistance over siderophores and antibiosis. Plant Pathol 48:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park KS, Paul D, Ryu KR, Kim EY, Kim YK (2006) Bacillus vallismortis strain EXTN-1 mediated systemic resistance against Potato virus Y and X in the field. Plant Pathol J 22:360–363. https://doi.org/10.5423/ppj.2006.22.4.360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke JL (1991) Root colonization by indigenous and introduced microorganisms. In: Keister DL, Cregan PB (eds) The rhizosphere and plant growth. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, pp 33–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indole acetic acid in development of host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:3795–3801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei R, Lamas-Samanamud GR (2014) Inhibition of biofilm formation by T7 bacteriophages producing quorum-quenching enzymes. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5340–5348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson EA, Weller DM (1994) Use of mixtures of fluorescent pseudomonads to suppress take-all and improve the growth of wheat. Phytopathology 84:940–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse CMJ, Van Wees SCM, Hoffland E, Van Pelt JA, Van Loon LC (1996) Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell 8:1225–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse CMJ, Van Wees SCM, Van Pelt JA, Knoester M, Laan R, Gerrits H, Weisbeek PJ, Van Loon LC (1998) A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1571–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse CMJ, Ton J, Van Loon LC (2001) Cross-talk between plant defence signalling pathways: boost or burden? AgBiotechNet 3:ABN068

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse CMJ, Van Wees SCM, Ton J, Van Pelt JA, van Loon LC (2002) Signalling in rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Boil 4:535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietro-Souza W, Mello IS, Vendruscullo SJ, da Silva GF, da Cunha CN, White JF, Soares MA (2017) Endophytic fungal communities of Polygonum acuminatum and Aeschynomene fluminensis are influenced by soil mercury contamination. PLoS One 12:e0182017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires MN, Seldin L (1997) Evaluation of Biolog system for identification of strains of Paenibacillus azotofixans. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 71:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polston JE, Wood E, Palmateer AJ, Zhang S (2013) Tomato chlorotic spot virus. University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pp306

  • Pozo MJ, Azcon-Aguilar C (2007) Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probanza A, Garcia JAI, Palomino MR, Ramos B, Manero FJG (2002) Pinus pinea L. seedling growth and bacterial rhizosphere structure after inoculation with PGPR Bacillus (B. Licheniformis CECT 5106 and B. pumilus CECT 5105). Appl Soil Ecol 20:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers JM, Mazzola M (2012) Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by benefcial and plant pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajinimala N, Rabindran R, Ramaiah M (2009) Management of Bittergourd yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV) by using virus inhibiting chemical, biocontrol agents, antiviral principles (AVP) and insecticide. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 42:738–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400701390729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan EM, AbdelHafez AA, Hassan EA, Saber FM (2016) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their potential for biocontrol of phytopathogens. Afr J Microbiol Res 10(15):486–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramjegathesh R, Samiyappan R, Raguchander T, Prabakar K, Saravanakumar D (2013) Plant–PGPR interactions for pest and disease resistance in sustainable agriculture. In: Maheshwari D (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: disease management. Springer, Berlin, pp 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33639-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach GS, Kloepper JW (1998) Mixture of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology 88:1158–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach GS, Liu L, Murphy JF, Tuzun S, Kloepper JW (1996) Induced systemic resistance of cucumber and tomato against cucumber mosaic cucumovirus using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Plant Dis 80:891–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo C, Krumpholz E, Cassan F, Bottini R, Cantore M, Cura A (2006) Azospirillum sp. promotes root hair development in tomato plants through a mechanism that involves ethylene. J Plant Growth Regul 24:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Diaz M, Rodelas B, Pozo C, Martinez-Toledo MV, Gonzalez-Lopez J (2008) A review on the taxonomy and possible screening traits of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Ahmad I, Pichtel J, Hayat S (eds) Plant-bacteria interactions: strategies and techniques to promote plant growth. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rome S, Fernandez MP, Brunel B, Normand P, Cleyet-Marel JC (1996) Sinorhizobium medicae sp. nov., isolated from annual Medicago spp. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:972–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross AF (1961) Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology 14:340–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryals J, Uknes S, Ward E (1994) Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 104:1109–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PR, Dessaux Y, Thomashow LS, Weller DM (2009) Rhizosphere engineering and management for sustainable agriculture. Plant and Soil 321:363–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu C-M, Murphy JF, Mysore KS, Kloepper JW (2004) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria systemically protect Arabidopsis thaliana against Cucumber mosaic virus by a salicylic acid and NPR1-independent and jasmonic acid-dependent signaling pathway. Plant J 39:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu C-M, Murphy JF, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW (2007b) A two-strain mixture of rhizobacteria elicits induction of systemic resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and Cucumber mosaic virus coupled to promotion of plant growth on Arabidopsis thaliana. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:280–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B et al (1988) Biological control of pathogens with rhizobacteria. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 318:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1988.0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholla MH, Elkan GH (1984) Rhizobium fredii sp. nov., a fastgrowing species that effectively nodulates soybeans. Int J Syst Bacteriol 34(484):486

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth MN, Hancock JG (1982) Disease suppressive soil and root colonizing bacteria. Science 216:1376–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segovia L, Young JPW, Matinez-Romero E (1993) Reclassification of American Rhizobium leguminosarum Biovar Phaseoli type I strains as Rhizobium etli sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:374–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldin L, Penido EGC (1986) Identification of Bacillus azotofixans using API tests. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 52:403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafie RM, Hamed AH, El-Sharkawy HHA (2016) Inducing systemic resistance against Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus using Streptomyces spp. Egypt J Phytopathol 44:127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Johri BN, Sharma AK, Glick BR (2013) Plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas sp. strain GRP3 influences iron acquisition in mung bean (Vignaradiata L. Wilzeck). Soil Biol Biochem 35:887–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoman SA, Abd-Allah NA, El-Baz AF (2003) Induction of resistance to Tobacco necrosis virus in bean plants by certain microbial isolates. Egypt J Biol 5:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Shridhar BS (2012) Review: nitrogen fixing microorganisms. Int J Microb Res 3:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui ZA (2004) Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria and composted organic fertilizers on the reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita and tomato growth. Bioresour Technol 95:223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikora RA (1992) Management of the antagonistic potential in agricultural ecosystems for the biological control of plant parasitic nematodes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:245–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spadden MC, Gardener BB, Fravel DR (2002) Biological control of plant pathogens: research, commercialization, and application in the USA. Online Plant Health Prog

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan K, Mathivanan N (2009) Biological control of Sunflower necrosis virus disease with powder and liquid formulations of plant growth promoting microbial consortia under field conditions. Biol Control 51:395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM (1994) Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA re-association and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:846–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stackebrandt E, Liesack W (1993) Nucleic acids and classification. In: Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG (eds) Handbook of new bacterial systematics. Academic, London, pp 151–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Steijl H, Niemann GJ, Boon JJ (1999) Changes in chemical composition related to fungal infection and induced resistance in carnation and radish investigated by pyrolysis mass spectrometry. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 55:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutz EW, Defago G, Kern H (1986) Naturally occurring fluorescent pseudomonads involved in suppression of black root rot of tobacco. Phytopathology 76:181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian S, Souleimanov A, Smith DL (2016) Proteomic studies on the effects of lipo-chitooligosaccharide and thuricin 17 under unstressed and salt stressed conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 7:1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun GZ, Yao T, Feng CJ, Chen L, Li JH, Wang LD (2017) Identification and biocontrol potential of antagonistic bacteria strains against Sclerotiniasclerotiorum and their growth-promoting effects on Brassica napus. Biol Control 104:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki K, Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG (1993) Cell envelopes and classification. In: Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG (eds) Handbook of new bacterial systematics. Academic, London, pp 195–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda J, ÄŚervená G, Rodová J, Jokeš M (2006) First report of Pepper mild mottle virus in pepper seeds produced in the Czech Republic. Plant Prot Sci 42:34–37. https://doi.org/10.17221/2694-pps

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmusk S, Wagner EGH (1999) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa induces changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression: a possible connection between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 12:951–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale SL, Nelson WL (1975) Soil fertility and fertilizers, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York, p 694

    Google Scholar 

  • Ton J, Van Pelt JA, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2002) The Arabidopsis ISR1 locus is required for rhizobacteria mediated induced systemic resistance against different pathogens. Plant Biol 4:224–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricoli DM, Careny KJ, Russell PF, McMaster JR, Groff DW, Hadden KC, Himmel PT, Hubbard JP, Boeshore ML, Quemada HD (1995) Field evaluation of transgenic squash containing single or multiple virus coat protein gene constructs for resistance to cucumber mosaic virus, watermelon mosaic virus 2, and zucchini yellow mosaic virus. BioTechnology 13:1458–1464

    Google Scholar 

  • Udvardi M, Poole PS (2013) Transport and metabolism in legume-rhizobia symbioses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:781–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaddepalli P, Fulton L, Wieland J, Wassmer K, Schaeffer M, Ranf S, Schneitz K (2017) The cell wall-localized atypical β-1, 3 glucanase ZERZAUST controls tissue morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 144:2259–2269

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon LC (2007) Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM (2005) Induced systemic resistance as a mechanism of disease suppression by rhizobacteria. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: Biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4152-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer R, Niemann GJ, Schippers B (1991) Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r. Phytopathology 81:728–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wees SCM, De Swart EAM, Van Pelt JA, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2000) Enhancement of induced disease resistance by simultaneous activation of salicylate and jasmonate dependent defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:8711–8716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wees SCM, Van der Ent S, Pieterse CMJ (2008) Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velazquez E, Igual JM, Willems A (2001) Mesorhizobium chacoense sp. nov.: a novel species that nodulates Prosopis albain the Chaco Arido region (Argentina). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1011–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma JP, Yadav J, Tiwari KN, Lavakush, Singh V (2010) Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on crop production. Int J Agric Res 5(11):954–983

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen BWM, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2006) Induced disease resistance signaling in plants. In: Silva JAT (ed) Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology, vol 3. Global Science Books, Gainesville, pp 334–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil 255:571–586. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026037216893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vleesschauwer D, Hofte M (2009) Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance. Adv Bot Res 51:223–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LT, Lee FL, Tai CJ, Kasai H (2007) Comparison of gyrB gene sequences, 16S rRNA gene sequences and DNA-DNA hybridization in the Bacillus subtilis group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1846–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1991) Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 81: 1508–1512

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1996) Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and increased plant growth by Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Phytopathology 86:221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM, Gardener BB, Thomashow LS (2002) Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:309–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner GDA, Cornwell WK, Sprent JI, Kattge J, Kiers ET (2014) A single evolutionary innovation drives the deep evolution of symbiotic N2-fixation in angiosperms. Nat Commun 5:4087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel L, Newton AC, Elliott I, Booty D, Gilroy EM, Birch PRJ, Hein I (2014) Molecular effects of resistance elicitors from biological origin and their potential for crop protection. Front Plant Sci 5:655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Backman PA (1999) Biological control of plant pathogens. In: Ruberson JR (ed) Handbook of pest management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 309–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen GY, Schroth MN (1986) lnteractions of Pseudomonas flourescens strain E6 with ornamental plants and its effect on the composition of root-colonizing microflora. Phytopathology 76:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebelo S, Song Y, Kloepper JW, Fadamiro H (2016) Rhizobacteria activates (+)-delta-cadinene synthase genes and induces systemic resistance in cotton against beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). Plant Cell Environ 39:935–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder GW, Yao C, Murphy JF, Sikora ER, Kloepper JW (2000) Induction of resistance to tomato against cucumber mosaic cucumo virus by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Biocontrol 45:127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder GW, Murphy JF, Sikora EJ, Kloepper JW (2001) Application of rhizobacteria for induced resistance. Eur J Plant Pathol 107:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhou YY, Li Y, Fu XC, Wang Q (2017) Screening and characterization of endophytic Bacillus for biocontrol of grapevine downy mildew. Crop Prot 96:173–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Cao R, Jin L, Zhu W, Ji Y, Xu X, Zhu L (2019) The regulation of N-acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs)-based quorum sensing on EPS secretion via ATP synthetic for the stability of aerobic granular sludge. Sci Total Environ 673:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Abdul Basit & Syed Tanveer Shah

  2. Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding, Institute of Vegetable Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Sidra Tul Muntha

  3. Department of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Heba I. Mohamed

Authors
  1. Abdul Basit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Syed Tanveer Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sidra Tul Muntha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heba I. Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Heba I. Mohamed

  2. King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

    Hossam El-Din Saad El-Beltagi

  3. Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

    Kamel A. Abd-Elsalam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Basit, A., Shah, S.T., Muntha, S.T., Mohamed, H.I. (2021). Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Biocontrol Agents for Viral Protection. In: Mohamed, H.I., El-Beltagi, H.ED.S., Abd-Elsalam, K.A. (eds) Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes for Sustainable Biotic and Abiotic Stress Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66587-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation