Skip to main content

Altersdiversität als Organisationskompetenz: Chancen und Herausforderungen

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz: Gegenstandsbereiche

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

  • 1628 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der demographische Wandel bedingt für Organisationen, dass sie sich mit zunehmend altersdiversen Belegschaftsstrukturen konfrontiert sehen. Der folgende Beitrag setzt sich damit auseinander, welche Chancen und Herausforderungen sich aus dieser Entwicklung ergeben. Auf Basis von aktuellen Ergebnissen aus der Organisations-, Management- und psychologischen Forschung werden zunächst potenzielle Auswirkungen von Altersdiversität auf die teambezogene und organisationale Leistungsfähigkeit beleuchtet. Darauf aufbauend werden konkrete Ansätze für Entscheidungsträger in Managementpositionen entwickelt, um den Herausforderungen steigender Altersdiversität in Organisationen erfolgreich zu begegnen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Aus Gründen der besseren Lesbarkeit wird im folgenden Text auf die weibliche Form jeglicher Personenbezeichnungen verzichtet.

Literatur

  • Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Third edition manual and sampler set. Redwood City: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backes-Gellner, U., & Veen, S. (2013). Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative companies-large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(3), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, B. (2009). Age identity: A cross-cultural global approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., Weber, T., & Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, E., & Kistler, W. J. (2003). Betriebliche Sicht- und Verhaltensweisen gegenüber älteren Arbeitnehmern. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 20, 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., & Spell, C. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, S. A., & Kunze, F. (2015). Age diversity and age climate in the workplace. In M. P. Bal, T. A. M. Kooij & D. M. Rousseau (Hrsg.), Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship (S. 33–55). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, S. A., Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2014). Spotlight on age-diversity climate: The impact of age-inclusive HR practices on firm-level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 667–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breu, C., Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K. H. (2010). Alters-, Geschlechts- und „Tenure“ -Diversität in Verwaltungsteams – Erklären Faultlines mehr Varianz bei Teamkonflikten und Burnout als traditionelle Diversitätsindikatoren. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 64, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium des Inneren. (2011). Demografiebericht. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur demographischen Lage und künftigen Entwicklung des Landes. http://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Broschueren/2012/demografiebericht.pdf;jsessionid = 5256D6DCBB4AAA6B472 B15440E341CF5.2_cid295?_blob = publicationFile. Zugegriffen am 26.01.2015.

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2010). Managing diversity in US federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel, C., & Zwick, T. (2009). Age and productivity-Evidence from linked employer employee data (ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper 09–020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grund, C., & Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2008). Age structure of the workforce and firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 29(5), 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünheid, E., & Fiedler C. (2013). Daten, Fakten, Trends zum demografischen Wandel. http://www.bib-demografie.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/DE/Broschueren/bevoelkerung_2013.pdf?_blob. Zugegriffen am 30.03.2015

  • Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmakunnas, P., & Ilmakunnas, S. (2011). Diversity at the workplace: Whom does it benefit? De Economist, 159(2), 223–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmakunnas, P., Maliranta, M., & Vainiomäki, J. (2004). The roles of employer and employee characteristics for plant productivity. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(3), 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kevin Kelloway, E., Barling, J., & Helleur, J. (2000). Enhancing transformational leadership: The roles of training and feedback. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21(3), 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Kotter-Grühn, D., & Smith, J. (2008). Self-perceptions of aging: Do subjective age and satisfaction with aging change during old age? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6), 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, F., & Böhm, S. A. (2013). Research on age diversity in the workforce – Current trends and future research directions. The SAGE Handbook of Aging, Work and Society, 41, 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2010). Age-based faultlines and perceived productive energy: The moderation of transformational leadership. Small Group Research, 41(5), 593–620. doi:10.1177/1046496410366307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, F., Böhm, S., & Bruch, H. (2011). Age diversity, age discrimination, and performance consequences – A cross organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 264–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, F., Böhm, S., & Bruch, H. (2013). Organizational performance consequences of age diversity: Inspecting the role of diversity-friendly HR policies and top managers’ negative age stereotypes. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 413–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, F., Raes, A. M. L., & Bruch, H. (2015). It matters how old you feel: Antecedents and performance consequences of average relative subjective age in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1511–1526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. S. (1988). New wrinkles in the theory of age: Demography, norms, and performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Team faultline measures a computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 393–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P. (2005). The external leadership of self-managing teams: intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Deutschland: Anteil der „inaktiven“ Bevölkerung ab 65 Jahre an der gesamten Erwerbsbevölkerung von 2000 bis 2050. In Statista – Das Statistik-Portal. http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/14177/umfrage/deutschland-anteil-rentner-an-erwerbsbevoelkerung/. Zugegriffen am 26.01.2015.

  • Pelled, L. H., Xin, K. R., & Weiss, A. M. (2001). No escomomí: Relational demography and conflict in a Mexican production facility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(1), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settersten, R. A., Jr. (1997). The salience of age in the life course. Human Development, 40(5), 257–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, R., Baier, J., & Fahlander, A. (2008). Managing demographic risk. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 119–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Hrsg.), Psychology of intergroup relations (S. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, T. A. (2000). Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research, 31(5), 592–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J., Roth, C., & Schmidt, K. H. (2008). Eine aktuelle Bilanz der Vor- und Nachteile altersgemischter Teamarbeit. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 10(3), 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L., & Lau, C. (2012). Effective teamwork at the top: The evidence from China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(9), 1853–1870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, H., & Gielnik, M. M. (2012). Organisational age cultures: The interplay of chief executive officers’ age and attitudes toward younger and older employees. International Small Business Journal. doi:0266242612463025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Kunze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kunze, F., Goecke, T. (2016). Altersdiversität als Organisationskompetenz: Chancen und Herausforderungen. In: Genkova, P., Ringeisen, T. (eds) Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz: Gegenstandsbereiche. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_12-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_12-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08932-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Altersdiversität als Organisationskompetenz: Chancen und Herausforderungen
    Published:
    02 June 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_12-2

  2. Original

    Altersdiversität als Organisationskompetenz: Chancen und Herausforderungen
    Published:
    01 March 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_12-1