Abstract
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and direct gene transfer using the gene gun (microparticle bombardment) are the two most widely used methods for plant genetic modification. The Agrobacterium method has been successfully practiced in dicots for many years, but only recently have efficient protocols been developed for grasses. Microparticle bombardment has evolved as a method delivering exogenous nucleic acids into plant genome and is a commonly employed technique in plant science. Here these two systems are compared for transformation efficiency, transgene integration, and transgene expression when used to transform tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). The tall fescue transformation protocols lead to the production of large numbers of fertile, independent transgenic lines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Danford JC (1988) The biolistic process. Trends Biotechnol 6:299–302
Ishaida Y et al (1996) High frequency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nat Biotechnol 14:745–750
Hiei Y, Komari T, Kubo T (1997) Transformation of rice mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol 35:205–218
Gonzalez A et al (1998) Regeneration of transgenic plants of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.) through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic suspension cultures. Plant Cell Rep 17:827–831
Altpeter F et al (2005) Particle bombardment and the genetic enhancement of crops: myths and realities. Mol Breed 15:305–327
Francois I, Broekaert W, Cammue B (2002) Different approaches for multi-transgene-stacking in plants. Plant Sci 163:281–295
Fu XD et al (2000) Linear transgene constructs lacking vector backbone sequences generate low-copy-number transgenic plants with simple integration patterns. Transgenic Res 9:11–19
Breitler JC et al (2002) Efficient microprojectile bombardment mediated transformation of rice using gene cassettes. Theor Appl Genet 104:709–719
Loc NT et al (2002) Linear transgene constructs lacking vector backbone sequences generate transgenic rice plants which accumulate higher levels of proteins conferring insect resistance. Mol Breed 9:231–244
Romano A et al (2003) Transgene organization in potato after particle bombardment-mediated (co)transformation using plasmids and gene cassettes. Transgenic Res 12:461–473
Romano A et al (2005) Expression of poly-3-(R)-hydroxyalkanoate (PHA) polymerase and acyl-CoA-transacylase in plastids of transgenic potato leads to the synthesis of a hydrophobic polymer, presumably medium-chain-length PHAs. Planta 220:455–464
Spangenberg G et al (1995) Transgenic tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and red fescue (F. rubra) plants from microprojectile bombardment of embryogenic suspension cells. J Plant Physiol 145:693–701
Cho MJ, Ha CD, Lemaux PG (2000) Production of transgenic tall fescue and red fescue plants by particle bombardment of mature seed-derived highly regenerative tissues. Plant Cell Rep 19:1084–1089
Bai Y, Qu RD (2001) Genetic transformation of elite turf-type cultivars of tall fescue. Int Turf Soc Res J 9:129–136
Chen L, Auh C, Dowling P (2003) Improved forage digestibility of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) by transgenic down regulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Plant Biotechnol J 1:437–449
Wang ZY et al (2003) Inheritance of transgenes in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 39:277–282
Chen L et al (2004) Transgenic down regulation of caffeic acid o-methyltransferase (COMT) led to improved digestibility in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Funct Plant Biol 31:235–245
Wang ZY, Ge YX (2005) Agrobacterium-mediated high efficiency transformation of tall fescue (Festuca Arundinacea). J Plant Physiol 162:103–113
Dong SJ, Qu RD (2005) High efficiency transformation of tall fescue with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Sci 168:1453–1458
Gao CX et al (2008) Comparative analysis of transgenic tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) plants obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rep 27:1601–1609
Tingay S et al (1997) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated barley transformation. Plant J 11:1369–1376
Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp 9.31–9.62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Gao, C., Nielsen, K.K. (2013). Comparison Between Agrobacterium-Mediated and Direct Gene Transfer Using the Gene Gun. In: Sudowe, S., Reske-Kunz, A. (eds) Biolistic DNA Delivery. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 940. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-110-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-110-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-109-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-110-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols