Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling the Cost-effectiveness of Strategies for Treating Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and High-grade Dysplasia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to synthesize cost and health outcomes for current treatment pathways for esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and to model comparative net clinical and economic benefits of alternative management scenarios.

Methods

A decision-analytic model of real-world practices for esophageal adenocarcinoma treatment by tumor stage was constructed and validated. The model synthesized treatment probabilities, survival, quality of life, and resource use extracted from epidemiological datasets, published literature, and expert opinion. Comparative analyses between current practice and five hypothetical scenarios for modified treatment were undertaken.

Results

Over 5 years, outcomes across T stage ranged from 4.06 quality-adjusted life-years and costs of $3,179 for HGD to 1.62 quality-adjusted life-years and costs of $50,226 for stage T4. Greater use of endoscopic mucosal resection for stage T1 and measures to reduce esophagectomy mortality to 0–3 % produced modest gains, whereas a 20 % reduction in the proportion of patients presenting at stage T3 produced large incremental net benefits of $4,971 (95 % interval, $1,560–8,368).

Conclusion

These findings support measures that promote earlier diagnosis, such as developing risk assessment processes or endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Incremental net monetary benefits for other strategies are relatively small in comparison to predicted gains from early detection strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moen, J., Antonov, K., Larsson, C.A., Lindblad, U., Nilsson, J.L.G., Råstam, L., Ring, L.: Factors Associated with Multiple Medication Use in Different Age Groups. Pharmacoepidemiology 43(12), 1978–1985 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moss, A., Bourke, M.J., Hourigan, L.F., Gupta, S., Williams, S.J., Tran, K., Swan, M.P., Hopper, A.D., Kwan, V., Bailey, A.A.: Endoscopic Resection for Barrett’s High-Grade Dysplasia and Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Essential Staging Procedure With Long-Term Therapeutic Benefit. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2010, 23.

  3. Shaheen, N., Sharma, P., Overholt, B.F., Wolfsen, H.C., Sampliner, R., Wang, G., Galanko, J.A., Bronner, M.P., Goldblum, J., Bennett, A.E.: Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett’s Esophagus with Dysplasia. New England Journal of Medicine 360(22), 2277–2288 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfsen, H.C.: New technologies for imaging of Barrett’s esophagus. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America 18(3), 487–502 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirst, N.G., Gordon, L.G., Whiteman, D.C., Watson, D.I., Barendregt, J.J.: Is endoscopic surveillance for non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus cost-effective? Review of economic evaluations. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(2), 247–254 (2011). doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06506.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon, L.G., Eckermann, S., Hirst, N.G., Watson, D.I., Mayne, G.C., Fahey, P., Whiteman, D.C.: Healthcare resource use and medical costs for the management of oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 98(11), 1589–1598 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Briggs, A., Claxton, K., Sculpher, M.: Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smithers, B.M., Fahey, P.P., Corish, T., Gotley, D.C., Falk, G.L., Smith, G.S., Kiroff, G.K., Clouston, A.D., Watson, D.I., Whiteman, D.C.: Symptoms, investigations and management of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in Australia. Med J Aust 193(10), 572–577 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eckermann, S., Coory, M., Willan, A.R.: Consistently estimating absolute risk difference when translating evidence to jurisdictions of interest. Pharmacoeconomics 29(2), 87–96 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Briggs, A., Gray, A.: The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy 3(4), 233–245 (1998).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. AIHW: Cancer incidence data cubes. http://www.aihw.gov.au/cancer/data/datacubes/index.cfm (2009). Accessed 23 May 2009

  12. de Boer, A.G., Stalmeier, P.F., Sprangers, M.A., de Haes, J.C., van Sandick, J.W., Hulscher, J.B., van Lanschot, J.J.: Transhiatal vs extended transthoracic resection in oesophageal carcinoma: patients’ utilities and treatment preferences. British Journal of Cancer 86(6), 851–857 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garside, R., Pitt, M., Somerville, M., Stein, K., Price, A., Gilbert, N.: Surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 10(8), 1–158 (2006).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerson, L.B., Ullah, N., Hastie, T., Goldstein, M.K.: Does cancer risk affect health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett’s esophagus? Gastrointest Endosc 65(1), 16–25 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hur, C., Nishioka, N.S., Gazelle, G.S.: Cost-effectiveness of aspirin chemoprevention for Barrett’s esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(4), 316–325 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. OECD Statistics: Statistics: Purchasing Power Parities and exchange rates. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=SNA_TABLE4 (2011). Accessed 14 November 2011

  17. Stinnett, A.A., Mullahy, J.: Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med. Decis. Making 18(2 Suppl), S68-80 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eckermann, S., Karnon, J., Willan, A.R.: The value of value of information: best informing research design and prioritization using current methods. Pharmacoeconomics 28(9), 699–709 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoomans, T., Fenwick, E.A., Palmer, S., Claxton, K.: Value of information and value of implementation: application of an analytic framework to inform resource allocation decisions in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Value Health 12(2), 315–324 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Willan, A.R., Eckermann, S.: Optimal clinical trial design using value of information methods with imperfect implementation. Health Econ. 19(5), 549–561 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eckermann, S., Briggs, A., Willan, A.R.: Health technology assessment in the cost-disutility plane. Med. Decis. Making 28(2), 172–181 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shih, Y.C., Halpern, M.T.: Economic evaluations of medical care interventions for cancer patients: how, why, and what does it mean? CA Cancer J Clin 58(4), 231–244 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boger, P.C., Turner, D., Roderick, P., Patel, P.: A UK-based cost-utility analysis of radiofrequency ablation or oesophagectomy for the management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 32(11–12), 1332–1342 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pohl, H., Sonnenberg, A., Strobel, S., Eckardt, A., Rosch, T.: Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus: a decision analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 70(4), 623–631 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jamieson, G.G., Mathew, G., Ludemann, R., Wayman, J., Myers, J.C., Devitt, P.G.: Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 91(8), 943–947 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Metzger, R., Bollschweiler, E., Vallbohmer, D., Maish, M., DeMeester, T.R., Holscher, A.H.: High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? Dis Esophagus 17(4), 310–314 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Funk, L.M., Gawande, A.A., Semel, M.E., Lipsitz, S.R., Berry, W.R., Zinner, M.J., Jha, A.K.: Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality. Ann Surg 253(5), 912–917 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zingg, U., Smithers, B.M., Gotley, D.C., Smith, G., Aly, A., Clough, A., Esterman, A.J., Jamieson, G.G., Watson, D.I.: Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(5), 1460–1468 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Menon, D., Stafinski, T., Wu, H., Lau, D., Wong, C.: Endoscopic treatments for Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness compared to esophagectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 10(111), 111 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bright, T., Watson, D.I., Tam, W., Game, P.A., Ackroyd, R., Devitt, P.G., Schoeman, M.N.: Prospective randomized trial of argon plasma coagulation ablation versus endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus in patients treated with antisecretory medication. Dig Dis Sci 54(12), 2606–2611 (2009). doi:10.1007/s10620-008-0662-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dijckmeester, W.A., Wijnhoven, B.P., Watson, D.I., Leong, M.P., Michael, M.Z., Mayne, G.C., Bright, T., Astill, D., Hussey, D.J.: MicroRNA-143 and −205 expression in neosquamous esophageal epithelium following Argon plasma ablation of Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 13(5), 846–853 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0799-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Inadomi, J.M., Sampliner, R., Lagergren, J., Lieberman, D., Fendrick, A.M., Vakil, N.: Screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(3), 176–186 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Inadomi, J.M., Somsouk, M., Madanick, R.D., Thomas, J.P., Shaheen, N.J.: A Cost-Utility Analysis of Ablative Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus. Gastroenterology 136(7), 2101–2114 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peters, F.P., Brakenhoff, K.P., Curvers, W.L., Rosmolen, W.D., Fockens, P., ten Kate, F.J., Krishnadath, K.K., Bergman, J.J.: Histologic evaluation of resection specimens obtained at 293 endoscopic resections in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 67(4), 604–609 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.039

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peters, F.P., Kara, M.A., Rosmolen, W.D., Aalders, M.C., Ten Kate, F.J., Bultje, B.C., Krishnadath, K.K., Fockens, P., van Lanschot, J.J., van Deventer, S.J., Bergman, J.J.: Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 61(4), 506–514 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gerson, L.B., Groeneveld, P.W., Triadafilopoulos, G.: Cost-effectiveness model of endoscopic screening and surveillance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(10), 868–879 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stavrou, E.P., McElroy, H.J., Baker, D.F., Smith, G., Bishop, J.F.: Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: incidence and survival rates in New South Wales, 1972–2005. Medical Journal of Australia 191(6), 310–314 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van Heijl, M., Omloo, J.M., van Berge Henegouwen, M.I., Hoekstra, O.S., Boellaard, R., Bossuyt, P.M., Busch, O.R., Tilanus, H.W., Hulshof, M.C., van der Gaast, A., Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A., Bonenkamp, H.J., Plukker, J.T., Cuesta, M.A., Ten Kate, F.J., Pruim, J., van Dekken, H., Bergman, J.J., Sloof, G.W., van Lanschot, J.J.: Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for evaluating early response during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 253(1), 56–63 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

L. Gordon is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship #496714.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louisa G. Gordon.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Database: PubMED, MEDLINE

Literature search terms for model probabilities

For EMR (split between T1m T1sm) data:

(esophagus OR oesophagus) AND dysplasia AND (T1a OR T1s OR T1b or T1sm)

8 results. References from selected papers to be searched.

For ablation findings:

(esophagus OR oesophagus) AND (radiofrequency OR RFA) AND ablation AND (dysplasia OR HGD)

24 results. References from selected papers to be searched.

For surgical and endoscopic therapy survival or other data:

(esophagus OR oesophagus) AND (T1a OR T1s OR T1b or T1sm) AND (survival OR mortality)

12 results. References from selected papers to be searched.

Appendix 2

Method to elicit expert opinion for some data estimates

Independent interviews were undertaken between authors LG and NG and five esophageal surgeons. The interviews were designed to ask the same set of questions where gaps existed in the literature. Responses were recorded and the range of all responses collated. Consensus was reached via e-mail correspondence after the surgeons were given the opportunity to agree/disagree with the group range. An average was taken of each estimate for the baseline model and range included in the sensitivity analyses. The surgeons were chosen from high-volume centers and with an active interest in esophageal cancer research. The locations spanned two Australian states and surgeons worked in private and public hospital settings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, L.G., Hirst, N.G., Mayne, G.C. et al. Modeling the Cost-effectiveness of Strategies for Treating Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and High-grade Dysplasia. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1451–1461 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1911-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1911-9

Keywords

Navigation