Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective Randomized Trial of Argon Plasma Coagulation Ablation Versus Endoscopic Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus in Patients Treated with Antisecretory Medication

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been used to ablate Barrett’s esophagus, however, its role in the management of non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) for ablation of Barrett’s esophagus in a prospective randomized controlled trial in two university teaching hospitals. Fifty-seven patients using proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication and with Barrett’s esophagus were randomized to undergo either ablation using endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) or ongoing surveillance. Fifty-one patients underwent endoscopy at 12 months. Endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) versus surveillance endoscopy was studied. Endoscopy and histopathological appearances of Barrett’s esophagus at 12 months follow-up was also studied. Initially, at least 95% ablation of the metaplastic mucosa was achieved in 25 of the 26 treated patients. At 12 months, 14 of 23 APC patients had at least 95% regression, and nine of 23 had complete regression of Barrett’s esophagus. No surveillance patient had more than 95% regression. The length of Barrett’s esophagus shortened significantly after APC (mean 3.0 vs. 0.5 cm). Significant regression of Barrett’s esophagus follows ablation with APC, although complete regression was achieved in less than half. The role of APC ablation of non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus remains uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolfsen HC. Endoluminal therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;17:59–82. doi:10.1016/j.giec.2006.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Overholt BF, Lightdale CJ, Wang KK, et al. Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomised phase 3 trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(4):488–498. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganz RA, Overholt BF, Sharma VK, et al. Circumferential ablation of Barrett’s esophagus that contains high-grade dysplasia: a U.S. multicenter registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters FP, Kara MA, Rosmolen WD, et al. Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(4):506–514. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(05)00063-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pech O, Behrens A, May A et al. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut [Online First]. Published May 6, 2008.

  6. Ackroyd R, Tam W, Schoeman M, et al. Prospective randomised controlled trial of argon plasma coagulation ablation vs endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett’s esophagus after antireflux surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:1–7. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02528-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bright T, Watson DI, Tam W, et al. Randomized trial of argon plasma coagulation versus endoscopic surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus after antireflux surgery: late results. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1016–1020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Basu KK, Pick B, Bale R, et al. Efficacy and one-year follow-up of argon plasma coagulation therapy for ablation of Barrett’s oesophagus: factors determining persistence and recurrence of Barrett’s epithelium. Gut. 2002;51:776–780. doi:10.1136/gut.51.6.776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Laethem JL, Cremer M, Peny MO, et al. Eradication of Barrett’s mucosa with argon plasma coagulation and acid suppression: immediate and mid term results. Gut. 1998;43:747–751.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma P, Wani S, Weston AP, et al. A randomised controlled trial of ablation of Barrett’s oesophagus with multipolar electrocoagulation versus argon plasma coagulation in combination with acid suppression: long-term results. Gut. 2006;55:1233–1239. doi:10.1136/gut.2005.086777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manner H, May A, Miehlke S, Dertinger S, et al. Ablation of non-neoplastic Barrett’s mucosa using argon plasma coagulation with concomitant esomeprazole therapy (APBANEX): a prospective multicenter evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1762–1769. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00709.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Madisch A, Miehlke S, Bayerdorfer E, et al. Long-term follow-up after complete ablation of Barrett’s esophagus with argon plasma coagulation. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:1182–1186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferraris R, Fracchia M, Foti M. Barrett’s oesophagus: long-term follow-up after complete ablation with argon plasma coagulation and the factors that determine its recurrence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(7):835–840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagani M, Granelli P, Chella B, et al. Barrett’s esophagus: combined treatment using argon plasma coagulation and laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(4):279–283. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2003.00347.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sampliner RE, Camargo L, Fass R. Impact of esophageal acid exposure on the endoscopic reversal of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:270–272. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05453.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weston AP. Automated circumferential Barrett’s ablation by using radiofrequency energy: a welcome step in the right direction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(2):196–199. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hage M, Siersma PD, van Dekken H, et al. 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy versus argon plasma coagulation for ablation of Barrett’s oesophagus: a randomised trial. Gut. 2004;53:785–790. doi:10.1136/gut.2003.028860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma VK, Wang KK, Overholt BF, et al. Balloon-based, circumferential, endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: 1-year follow-up of 100 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(2):185–195. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2006.09.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David I. Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bright, T., Watson, D.I., Tam, W. et al. Prospective Randomized Trial of Argon Plasma Coagulation Ablation Versus Endoscopic Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus in Patients Treated with Antisecretory Medication. Dig Dis Sci 54, 2606–2611 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0662-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0662-7

Keywords

Navigation