Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Post mortem examinations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: challenges and chances

  • Clinical Study – Patient Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of organ donation for research purposes has evolved to overcome limited availability of tissue and foster research, in particular in diseases for which surgery is not routinely performed. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is an almost invariably fatal childhood tumour, not amenable to surgery because of its location and infiltrative nature. We report our institutional experience of post mortem brain or tumour donation and its impact on the families. Since July 2002, we have requested permission for post mortem brain examination for research purposes, from parents whose children succumbed to DIPG. Brain donation was discussed with 21 of 27 families of patients diagnosed with DIPG between July 2002 and June 2008 at the Hospital for Sick Children. Ten (47.6%) agreed, and autopsy was performed in 9 cases. Eight of these children died at home, one in the hospital. Autopsy was performed within 48 h from death in all cases except one. Pathological diagnosis was PNET in two and glioblastoma multiforme in seven patients. A disclosure of autopsy results was provided to all parents by the neuro-oncology team. None of the families expressed distress from the autopsy, or regretted the choice made. Autopsy limited to the brain did not interfere with the choices related to palliation. The families derived comfort from the hope that scientific breakthroughs could be made and felt that they were helping to make a difference in the future management of DIPG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hargrave D, Bartels U, Bouffet E (2006) Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 7:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pincus DW, Richter EO, Yachnis AT, Bennett J, Bhatti MT, Smith A (2006) Brainstem stereotactic biopsy sampling in children. J Neurosurg 104:108–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cartmill M, Punt J (1999) Diffuse brain stem glioma. A review of stereotactic biopsies. Childs Nerv Syst 15:235–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roujeau T, Machado G, Garnett MR, Miquel C, Puget S, Geoerger B, Grill J, Boddaert N, Di Rocco F, Zerah M, Sainte-Rose C (2007) Stereotactic biopsy of diffuse pontine lesions in children. J Neurosurg 107:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher PG, Breiter SN, Carson BS, Wharam MD, Williams JA, Weingart JD, Foer DR, Goldthwaite PT, Tihan T, Burger PC (2000) A clinicopathologic reappraisal of brain stem tumor classification. Identification of pilocystic astrocytoma and fibrillary astrocytoma as distinct entities. Cancer 89:1569–1576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hargrave D, Chuang N, Bouffet E (2008) Conventional MRI cannot predict survival in childhood diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neurooncol 86:313–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwon JW, Kim IO, Cheon JE, Kim WS, Moon SG, Kim TJ, Chi JG, Wang KC, Chung JK, Yeon KM (2006) Paediatric brain-stem gliomas: MRI, FDG-PET and histological grading correlation. Pediatr Radiol 36:959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leach PA, Estlin EJ, Coope DJ, Thorne JA, Kamaly-Asl ID (2008) Diffuse brainstem gliomas in children: should we or shouldn’t we biopsy? Br J Neurosurg 22:619–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zagzag D, Miller DC, Knopp E, Farmer JP, Lee M, Biria S, Pellicer A, Epstein FJ, Allen JC (2000) Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the brainstem: investigation of seven cases. Pediatrics 106:1045–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton JL, Underwood JC (2003) Necropsy practice after the “organ retention scandal”: requests, performance, and tissue retention. J Clin Pathol 56:537–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman WP III (1998) Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? JAMA 280:1245–1248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V, Porcher R, Thomas G, Zafrani ES, Lemaire F (2000) Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital: physician’s attitudes to the autopsy and use of autopsy material in research publications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:739–745

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hull MJ, Nazarian RM, Wheeler AE, Black-Schaffer WS, Mark EJ (2007) Resident physician opinions on autopsy importance and procurement. Hum Pathol 38:342–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradbury J, Weber W (1999) Consent requirements for necropsy may change in UK. Lancet 354:2055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramsay S (2001) 105,000 body parts retained in the UK, census says. Lancet 357:365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayor S (2003) Inquiry finds brains were removed without consent. Br Med J 326:1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klaiman MH (2005) Whose brain is it anyway? The comparative law of post-mortem organ retention. J Leg Med 26:475–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Millar T, Walker R, Arango JC, Ironside JW, Harrison DJ, MacIntyre DJ, Blackwood D, Smith C, Bell JE (2007) Tissue and organ donation for research in forensic pathology: the MRC Sudden Death Brain and Tissue Bank. J Pathol 213:369–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bell JE, Alafuzoff I, Al Sarraj S, Arzberger T, Bogdanovic N, Budka H, Dexter DT, Falkai P, Ferrer I, Gelpi E, Gentleman SM, Giaccone G, Huitinga I, Ironside JW, Klioueva N, Kovacs GG, Meyronet D, Palkovits M, Parchi P, Patsouris E, Reynolds R, Riederer P, Roggendorf W, Seilhean D, Schmitt A, Schmitz P, Streichenberger N, Schwalber A, Kretzschmar H (2008) Management of a twenty-first century brain bank: experience in the BrainNet Europe consortium. Acta Neuropathol 115:497–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurosu M, Mukai T, Ohno Y (2003). Regulations and guidelines on handling human materials obtained from medico-legal autopsy for use in research. Leg Med (Tokyo) 5 Suppl 1:S76–S78

  21. Azizi L, Garrick TM, Harper CG (2006) Brain donation for research: strong support in Australia. J Clin Neurosci 13:449–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghorpade A, Bruch L, Persidsky Y, Chin B, Brown WH, Borgmann K, Persidsky R, Wu L, Holter S, Cotter R, Faraci J, Heilman D, Meyer V, Potter JF, Swindells S, Gendelman HE (2005) Development of a rapid autopsy program for studies of brain immunity. J Neuroimmunol 163:135–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garrick T, Howell S, Terwee P, Redenbach J, Blake H, Harper C (2006) Brain donation for research: who donates and why? J Clin Neurosci 13:524–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Millar T, Lerpiniere C, Walker R, Smith C, Bell JE (2008) Postmortem tissue donation for research: a positive opportunity? Br J Nurs 17:644–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buckner T, Blatt J, Smith SV (2006) The autopsy in pediatrics and pediatric oncology: a single-institution experience. Pediatr Dev Pathol 9:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sirkia K, Saarinen-Pihkala UM, Hovi L, Sariola H (1998) Autopsy in children with cancer who die while in terminal care. Med Pediatr Oncol 30:284–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayward RM, Patronas N, Baker EH, Vezina G, Albert PS, Warren KE (2008) Inter-observer variability in the measurement of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. J Neurooncol 90:57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zarghooni M, Bartels U, Lee E, Buczkowicz P, Morrison A, Huang A, Bouffet E, Hawkins C (2010) Whole-genome profiling of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas highlights platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase as potential therapeutic targets. J Clin Oncol. 28(8):1337–1344

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thayyil S, Robertson NJ, Scales A, Weber MA, Jacques TS, Sebire NJ, Taylor AM (2009) Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: a successful model. Arch Dis Child 94:354–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stevens M (1998) Factors influencing decisions about donation of the brain for research purposes. Age Ageing 27:623–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kreicbergs U, Valdimarsdottir U, Onelov E, Henter JI, Steineck G (2004) Talking about death with children who have severe malignant disease. N Engl J Med 351:1175–1186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hilden JM, Watterson J, Chrastek J (2003) Tell the children. J Clin Oncol 21:37s–39s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Massimo LM, Wiley TJ, Casari EF (2004) From informed consent to shared consent: a developing process in paediatric oncology. Lancet Oncol 5:384–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Clements PT, Vigil GJ, Manno MS, Henry GC, Wilks J, Das S, Kellywood R, Foster W (2003) Cultural perspectives of death, grief, and bereavement. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 41:18–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gordijn SJ, Erwich JJ, Khong TY (2007) The perinatal autopsy: pertinent issues in multicultural Western Europe. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chichester M (2007) Requesting perinatal autopsy: multicultural considerations. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 32:81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hechler T, Blankenburg M, Friedrichsdorf SJ, Garske D, Hubner B, Menke A, Wamsler C, Wolfe J, Zernikow B (2008) Parents’ perspective on symptoms, quality of life, characteristics of death and end-of-life decisions for children dying from cancer. Klin Padiatr 220:166–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dussel V, Kreicbergs U, Hilden JM, Watterson J, Moore C, Turner BG, Weeks JC, Wolfe J (2009) Looking beyond where children die: determinants and effects of planning a child’s location of death. J Pain Symptom Manag 37:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Oppewal F, Meyboom-de Jong B (2001) Family members’ experiences of autopsy. Fam Pract 18:304–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nishio S, Fukui M, Tateishi J (1988) Brain stem gliomas: a clinicopathological analysis of 23 histologically proven cases. J Neurooncol 6:245–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to all the families and the patients in the Paediatric Brain Tumour Program at SickKids and all neuro-oncology team members. Without their support and efforts this work could not have been done.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada

    Paola Angelini

  2. Division of Pathology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada

    Cynthia Hawkins

  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada

    Normand Laperriere

  4. Paediatric Brain Tumour Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada

    Eric Bouffet & Ute Bartels

Authors
  1. Paola Angelini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia Hawkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Normand Laperriere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric Bouffet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ute Bartels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ute Bartels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angelini, P., Hawkins, C., Laperriere, N. et al. Post mortem examinations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: challenges and chances. J Neurooncol 101, 75–81 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0224-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0224-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation