Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differences in perception, understanding, and responsiveness of product design between experts and students: an early event-related potentials study

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares the experts and the novices to investigate their information processing in dealing with the different degrees of recognition of shape-match stimulus by measuring the event-related potentials (ERPs). ERPs were recorded while 20 designers and 20 novices made shape-match judgments for table and chair sets. All of the tables were in the normal style, and the chairs had different components and structures, including NormalChair, AllbyChair, and NonebyChair. The results show that the experts had fewer agreements than the novices did in matching the Normal table to the NormalChair used in the experiment. Furthermore, the experts’ ERPs elicited by AllbyChair and NonebyChair conditions had higher N170 amplitudes than those of the novices. However, the novices, in response to these AllbyChair and NonebyChair conditions for N170 exhibited greater delay latency than the experts. Additionally, the design expertise effects in object recognition provided additional evidence and confirmed similar results from many previous N170 studies. The experts comprehended the content in their familiar field, and inferred the complex design structure to the abstract level to show the hierarchical association of the knowledge structure. However, novices could not clearly understand the different and varied structures, and could only speculate from the limited information presented in existing problems. This study infers that because they used visual thinking in their training, the designers showed stronger expert performances, and were more capable than ordinary people in recognizing novel objects from bizarre entity arrangements as familiar ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abra, J. C. (1993). Competition: creativity's vilified motive. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 119(3), 289–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1996). Hilgord’s introduction to psychology. Ca: Thomson Learning Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H., Fiedler, K., & Strack, F. (2004). Social cognition: How individuals construct reality. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, S. G., Dering, B., & Thierry, G. (2011). Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: A question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2082–2089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bötzel, K., & Grusser, O. J. (1989). Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for ‘face-specific’ EEG-potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 77, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bötzel, K., Schulze, S., & Stodieck, R. G. (1995). Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of faceevoked potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutsen, L., Humphreys, G. W., Praamstra, P., & Warbrick, T. (2006). Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion. Neuroimage, 32, 352–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldara, R., Thut, G., Servoir, P., Michel, C. M., Bovet, P., & Renault, B. (2003). Face versus non-face object perception and the ‘other-race’ effect: A spatio-temporal event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M., & Huang, S. H. (2014). Web-based reading annotation system with an attention-based self-regulated learning mechanism for promoting reading performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 959–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M., & Lin, Y. J. (2016). Effects of different text display types on reading comprehension, sustained attention and cognitive load in mobile reading contexts. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 553–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M., & Wang, J. Y. (2017). Effects of online synchronous instruction with an attention monitoring and alarm mechanism on sustained attention and learning performance. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1341938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M., Wang, J. Y., & Yu, C. M. (2017). Assessing the attention levels of students by using a novel attention aware system based on brainwave signals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 348–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. In M. D. Rugg & M. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crismond, D. (2013). Design Practices and Misconceptions: Helping Beginners in Engineering Design. Science Teacher, 80(1), 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., Sliney, A., Pitt, I., & Murphy, D. (2010). Evaluating a brain-computer interface to categorise human emotional response. In 2010 IEEE 10th international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), IEEE, Sousse, Tunisia, 276–278.

  • Curran, T., Tanaka, J. W., & Weiskopf, D. (2002). An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Model-based influences on humans' choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron, 69, 1204–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBono, E. (1967). New Think: The use of lateral thinking in the generation of new ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1998). Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? NeuroReport, 9, 2945–2948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (2000a). Attentional modulations of event-related brain potentials sensitive to faces. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1/2/3), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (2000b). Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M., & McCarthey, R. A. (1999). Prosopagnsosia and structural encoding of faces: evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 10, 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P., & Sternberg, R.J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R.J.Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

  • Ganis, G., Smith, D., & Schendan, H. E. (2012). The N170, not the P1, indexes the earliest time for categorical perception of faces, regardless of interstimulus variance. NeuroImage, 62, 1563–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. M., & Collins, D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghali, R., Ouellet, S., & Frasson, C. (2016). LewiSpace: An exploratory study with a machine learning model in an educational game. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(1), 192–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghergulescu, I., & Muntean, C. H. (2014). A novel sensor-based methodology for learner's motivation analysis in game-based learning. Interacting with Computers, 26(4), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghergulescu, I., & Muntean, C. H. (2016). ToTCompute: A novel EEG-based TimeOnTask Threshold computation mechanism for engagement modelling and monitoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(3), 821–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, M. J., Ehlis, A. C., Ellgring, H., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2005). Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs). Journal of Neural Transmission, 112, 1073–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. M., Liu, M. C., Lai, C. H., & Liu, C. J. (2017). Using humorous images to lighten the learning experience through questioning in class. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 878–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inventado, P. S., Legaspi, R., Suarez, M., & Numao, M. (2011). Predicting student emotions resulting from appraisal of ITS feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 107–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 132–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Je-Hun, Y., Seung-Min, P., Kwang-Eun, K., & Kwee-Bo, S. (2015). Classification of color imagination in electroencephalogram using Emotiv EPOC. In ISIS 2015 The 16th international symposium on advanced intelligent systems, 400–408.

  • Jeffreys, D. A., Tukmachi, E. S. A., & Rockley, G. (1992). Evoked-potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, C.O.S. Mesa, H.G.A. Rebolledo-Mendez, G., & de Freitas, S. (2011). Classification of cognitive states of attention and relaxation using supervised learning algorithms. In IEEE international games innovation conference (IGIC), IEEE, Orange, CA, 31–34.

  • Johnson, K. E., & Mervis, C. B. (1997). Effects of Varying Levels of Expertise on the Basic Level of Categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(3), 248–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2613–2631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (2008). From information to meaning: Confronting challenges of the 21st century. Libri, 58, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Y. C., Chu, H. C., & Tsai, M. C. (2017). Effects of an integrated physiological signal-based attention-promoting and English listening system on students' learning performance and behavioral patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 218–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. H., Liu, M. C., Liu, C. J., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). Using positive visual stimuli to lighten the online learning experience through in class questioning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Xiao, X., Ma, W., Jiang, J., Qiu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for emotional valence and competitive arousal effects on insight problem solving. Brain Research, 1538(13), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. H. (2006). Based design. Taipei: Hong Yang Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. S., Lai, Y. C., Lin, J. C., Wu, P. Y., & Chang, H. C. (2014). A novel method for concentration evaluation of reading behaviors with electrical activity recorded on the scalp. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 114(2), 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. C. K., Su, S. H., Chao, C. J., Hsieh, C. Y., & Tsai, S. C. (2016). Construction of multi-mode affective learning system: Taking affective design as an example. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. H., Lin, Y. S., & Wang, C. Y. (2019). Investigating the design logic of the ready-made design from semiotics viewpoint. Journal of Design, 24(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. H., Wang, C. Y., Cheng, S. K., & Cheng, S. H. (2011). An event-related potential study of semantic style-match judgments of artistic furniture. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82, 188–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Studying insight problem solving with neuroscientific methods. Methods, 42, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, M. Y., & Wei, C. C. (2016). A comparative study of children's concentration performance on picture books: Age, gender, and media forms. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1922–1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nacke, L. E., Stellmach, S., & Lindley, C. A. (2011). Electroencephalographic assessment of player experience: A pilot study in affective ludology. Simulation & Gaming, 42(5), 632–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, A. R., Gershman, S. J., Markman, A. B., & Daw, N. D. (2013). The curse of planning dissecting multiple reinforcement-learning systems by taxing the central executive. Psychological Science, 24(5), 751–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V.L., & Ramoni, M.F. (1997). Cognitive models of directional inference in expert medical reasoning. In P.J. Feltovich, K.M. Ford, & R.R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp. 67–99). London: MIT Press.

  • Proverbio, A. M., Zotto, M. D., & Zani, A. (2007). The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition. BMC neuroscience, 8(24), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. I. (2001). Problem solving. Luton: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez Buritica, J. M., Heekeren, H. R., Li, S. C., & Eppinger, B. (2018). Developmental differences in the neural dynamics of observational learning. Neuropsychologia, 119, 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rominger, C., Papousek, I., Perchtold, C. M., Weber, B., Weiss, E. M., & Fink, A. (2018). The creative brain in the figural domain: distinct patterns of EEG alpha power during idea generation and idea elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 18, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., Curran, T., & Gauthier, I. (2002a). A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition, 85, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M. (2002b). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science, 13, 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Despland, P., Linotte, S., Bruyer, R., et al. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is enhanced and delayed to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophyiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. NeuroReport, 11, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., Joyce, C. A., Cottrell, G. W., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage, 20(3), 1609–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., Kung, C. C., & Tarr, M. J. (2004). Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex. PNAS, 101, 14521–14526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaki, M., & Niki, K. (2011). Effects of the brief viewing of emotional stimuli on understanding of insight solutions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(4), 526–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinberger, S. R., Huddy, V., & Burton, A. M. (2004). N250r: Aface-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. NeuroReport, 15(9), 1501–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L. S., Tanaka, J. W., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2006). A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(9), 1453–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searleman, A., & Herrmann, D. J. (1994). Memory from a broader perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadiev, R., Huang, Y. M., & Hwang, J. P. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of speech-to-text recognition applications on learning performance, attention, and meditation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1239–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadiev, R., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Enhancing learning performance, attention, and meditation using a speech-to-text recognition application: Evidence from multiple data sources. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. E., Jr., & Zabelin, D. L. (2019). Creativity comes in waves: an EEG-focused exploration of the creative brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 154–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2009). A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. C. Y. (2014). Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Computers & Education, 72, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sviderskaya, N. E., Taratynova, G. V., & Kozhedub, R. G. (2006). The effects of the experience of forming visual images on the spatial organization of the EEG. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 36, 941–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. J., McCarthy, G., Saliba, E., & Degiovanni, E. (1999). ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 910–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovée, M. J. (1998). Face processing: Getting by with a little help from its friends. Current Biology, 8(9), 317–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. Y., & Chung, Y. J. (2017). Detecting the semantic differences of congruence, ambiguity, and incongruence in the picture-word matching task using the event-related potential. Journal of Design, 22(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., & Hsu, M. C. (2014). An exploratory study using inexpensive electroencephalography (EEG) to understand flow experience in computer-based instruction. Information & Management, 51(7), 912–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C. C., & Ma, M. Y. (2017). Influences of visual attention and reading time on children and adults. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(2), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, H. (2013). Do neural correlates of face expertise vary with task demands? Event-related potential correlates of own-and other-race face inversion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. W., Chan, R. H., & Mak, J. N. (2014). Spectral modulation of frontal EEG during motor skill acquisition: A mobile EEG study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Zhong, B. (2018). Review on portable EEG technology in educational research. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. H., & Sim, K.-B. (2016). Classification of color imagination using Emotiv EPOC and event-related potential in electroencephalogram. Optik, 127(20), 9711–9718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Shih-Kuen Cheng and I-Chung Han at National Central University for the helpful comments on ERP analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Creative Product Design, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Rd., Wufeng, Taichung City, 41354, Taiwan

    Ching-Yi Wang

Authors
  1. Ching-Yi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Yi Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, CY. Differences in perception, understanding, and responsiveness of product design between experts and students: an early event-related potentials study. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 1039–1061 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09592-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09592-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation