Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical treatment of thoraco-lumbar kyphosis (TLK) associated with low pelvic incidence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Thoraco-lumbar kyphosis (TLK) is poorly described in the literature and its surgical treatment remains equivocal for patients with low pelvic incidence. The aim of the study was to identify which surgical correction would yield the best functional results as measured by the Oswestry score.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective study including patients described as a type 1 of Roussouly’s classification with a thoraco-lumbar kyphosis. Fifty-six patients with degenerative spinal disease were included, 42 (75%) with scoliosis and 14 (25%) without. Patients had a median age of 56 years (49–63), and there were 6 (11%) men. The primary outcome was the functional Oswestry disability index (ODI).

Results

At last follow-up, the median ODI was 15 (Q1–Q3: 6–23). In the degenerative spinal disease group, the median ODI was 7 (3.5–20) at last follow-up. Ten (84%) patients were classified as Roussouly’s type 1 after surgery. In the degenerative scoliosis group, the ODI was 17 (8–23) in patients classified as Roussouly’s type 1 and 20 (7.5–25) in patients classified as Roussouly’s type 2 with no significant difference between these groups (p = 1). There were two patients classified as Roussouly’s type 3a and their ODI at last follow-up were of 60 and 50.

Conclusion

It seems that keeping the physiological morphology is the treatment of choice. For patients with degenerative scoliosis, reducing the kyphosis could work. We do not recommend to increase the lordosis and obtain a type 3 morphology with an anteverted pelvis because of the risk of PJK and poor functional results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diebo BG, Varghese JJ, Lafage R et al (2015) Sagittal alignment of the spine: what do you need to know? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 139:295–301. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.10.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Diebo BG, Henry J, Lafage V, Berjano P (2014) Sagittal deformities of the spine: factors influencing the outcomes and complications. Eur Spine J 24:3–15. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3653-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Takemoto M, Boissière L, Novoa F et al (2016) Sagittal malalignment has a significant association with postoperative leg pain in adult spinal deformity patients. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4616-z

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koller H, Pfanz C, Meier O et al (2016) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J 25:532–548. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3898-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH (2006) The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine 31:S119–S125. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000232709.48446.be

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M et al (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 27:387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B et al (2012) Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine 37:1077–1082. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwab F, Lafage V, Farcy J-P et al (2007) Surgical rates and operative outcome analysis in thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult scoliosis: application of the new adult deformity classification. Spine 32:2723–2730. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a58f2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(suppl 5):609–618. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, Bodin A (2013) Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 22(suppl 2):S203–S215. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2953. doi:10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrero E, Vira S, Ames CP et al (2015) Analysis of an unexplored group of sagittal deformity patients: low pelvic tilt despite positive sagittal malalignment. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4048-1

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tyrakowski M, Mardjetko S, Siemionow K (2014) Radiographic spinopelvic parameters in skeletally mature patients With Scheuermann Disease. Spine 39:E1080–E1085. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasto LA, Perez-Romera AB, Shalabi ST et al (2016) Correlation between preoperative spinopelvic alignment and risk of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior-only surgical correction of Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine J 16:S26–S33. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI et al (2012) Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery. Spine 37:S144–S164. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d611b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takemoto M, Boissière L, Vital J-M et al (2016) Are sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters significantly associated with quality of life of adult spinal deformity patients? Multivariate linear regression analyses for pre-operative and short-term post-operative health-related quality of life. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4872-y

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glassman SD, Coseo MP, Carreon LY (2016) Sagittal balance is more than just alignment: why PJK remains an unresolved problem. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. doi:10.1186/s13013-016-0064-0

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre médico-chirurgical et de réadaptation des Massues, 92 rue Edmond Locard, 69005, Lyon, France

    C. Scemama, F. Laouissat, K. Abelin-Genevois & P. Roussouly

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, 83 boulevard de l’hôpital, 75013, Paris, France

    C. Scemama

Authors
  1. C. Scemama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Laouissat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Abelin-Genevois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Roussouly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Scemama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scemama, C., Laouissat, F., Abelin-Genevois, K. et al. Surgical treatment of thoraco-lumbar kyphosis (TLK) associated with low pelvic incidence. Eur Spine J 26, 2146–2152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4984-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4984-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation