Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction/purpose

In adult scoliosis surgery (AS) delineation of risk factors contributing to failure is important to improve patient care. Treatment goals include deformity correction resulting in a balanced spine and horizontal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in fusions not ending at S1. Therefore, the study objectives were to determine predictors for deformity correction, complications, revision surgery, and outcomes as well as to determine predictors of postoperative evolution of the LIV-take-off angle (LIV-TO) and symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD).

Methods

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 448 patients who had AS surgery. Patients’ age averaged 51 years, BMI 26, and follow-up of 40 months. According to the SRS adult scoliosis classification, 51 % of patients had major lumbar curves, 24 % each with single thoracic or double major curves. 54 % of patients had stable vertebra at L5 and 34 % of patients had fusion to S1. The mean number of posterior fusion levels was eight and implant density 73 %. Among standard radiographic measures of deformity the LIV-TO was assessed on neutral and bending/traction-films (bLIV-TO). Clinical outcomes were assessed in 145 patients with degenerative-type AS using validated measures (ODI, COMI and SF-36). Prediction analysis was conducted with stepwise multiple regression analyses.

Results

Preoperative thoracic curve (TC) was 53° and 33° at follow-up. Preoperative lumbar curve (LC) was 43° and 24° at follow-up. Curve flexibility was low (TC 34 %/LC 38 %). TC-correction (38 %) was predicted by preoperative TC (r = 0.9) and TC-flexibility (r = 0.8). LC-correction (50 %) was predicted by preoperative LC (r = 0.8), LC-flexibility (r = 0.8) and screw density (r = 0.7). Preoperative LIV-TO was 18.2° and at follow-up 9.4° (p < 0.01). 20 % of patients had a non-union (18 % at L5-S1). The risk for non-union at L5-S1 increased with age (p = 0.04), low screw density (p = 0.03), and postoperative sagittal imbalance [(T9-tilt (p = 0.01), C7-SVA (p = 0.01), LL (p = 0.01) and PI-LL mismatch (p = 0.01)]. 32 % of patients had revision surgery. Risk for revision was increased in fusions to S1 (p < 0.01), increased BMI (p < 0.01), sagittal imbalance (C7-SVA, p < 0.01), age (p = 0.02), and disc wedging distal to the LIV (p < 0.01). To a varying extent, clinical outcomes negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with revision, ASD, perioperative complications, age, low postoperative TC- and LC-correction, and sagittal and coronal imbalance at follow-up (C7-SVA, PT, and C7-CSVL). 59 patients had ASD, which correlated with preoperative and postoperative sagittal and coronal parameters of deformity. In a multivariate model, preoperative bLIV-TO (p < 0.01) and preoperative LIV-TO (p < 0.01) demonstrated the highest predictive strength for follow-up LIV-TO.

Conclusion

In the current study, the magnitude of deformity correction in the sagittal and coronal planes was shown to have significant impact on radiographic and clinical outcomes as well as revision rates. Findings indicate that risks for complications might be reduced by restoration of sagittal balance, appropriate deformity correction and advanced lumbosacral fixation. The use of preoperative LIV-TO and LIV-TO on bending/traction-films were shown to be useful for surgical planning, selection of the LIV and prediction of follow-up-TO, respectively. Parameters of sagittal balance rather than coronal deformity predicted ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy J-P (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis. Spine 34:1828–1833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O (2010) Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 36:E60–E68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blamoutier A, Guigui P, Charosky S, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Group d’Étude de la scoliose (2012) Surgery of lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis in adults over 50. Morbidity and survival in a multicenter retrospective cohort of 180 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:528–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, Samuel S, Okada E, Hu SS, Deviren V, Burch S, William S, Ames CP, Mummaeni PV, Chou D, Berven SH (2013) Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine 38:E1469–E1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ, Won DS, Sweet FA, Blanke KM, Bridwell KH (2002) Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27:2013–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Shaughnessy BA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Baldus C, Chang MS, Auerbach JD, Crawford CH (2012) Does a long fusion T3-sacrum portend a worse outcome than a short fusion T10-sacrum in primary surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine 37:884–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho SKC, Briwdell KH, Lenke LG, Kang MM, Pahys J, Zebala LP, Yi J-S, Cho W, Baldus C (2010) Comparative analysis of clinical outcome and perioperative complications in primary vs. revision adult scoliosis surgery. In: 45th annual meeting of SRS, Kyoto/London

  8. Kasten MD, Rao LA, Priest B (2010) Long-term results of iliact wing fixation below extensive fusions in ambulatory adult patients with spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 23:E37–E42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schairer WW, Carrer A, Deviren V, Hu SS, Takemoto S, Mummaneni P, Chou D, Ames C, Burch S, Tay B, Sawyer A, Berven SH (2013) Hospital readmission after spine fusion for adult spinal deformity. Spine 38:1681–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Hart RA, Mundis GM, Burton DC, Hostin R, O’Biren MF, Bess S, Kebaish K, Deviren V, Lafage V, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, International Spine Study Group (2013) Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective multicenter, adult spinal deformity database. J Neurosurg Spine 19:464–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Stobbs G, Bridwell KH (2007) Adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine 32:2238–2244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Howe CR, Agel J, Lee MJ, Bransford RJ, Wagnerr TA, Bellabarba C, Chapman JR (2011) The morbidity and mortality of fusions from the thoracic spine to the pelvis in the adult population. Spine 36:1397–1401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly MP, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Agarwal R, Godzik J, Koester L (2013) Fate of the adult revision spinal deformity patient. Spine 38:E1196–E1200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwab FJ, Hawkinson N, Lafage V, Smith JS, Hart R, Mundis G, Burton DC, Line B, Akbarnia B, Boachie-Adjei O, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Arlet VA, Wood K, Gupta M, Bess S, Mummaneni PV, International Spine Study Group (2012) Risk factors for major peri-operative complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: a multi-center review of 953 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 21:2603–2610

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Glassmann SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Schwab FJ, Dimar JR, Lowe TG (2007) The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine 32:2764–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weistroffer JK, Perra JH, Lonstein JE, Schwender JD, Garvey TA, Transfeldt EE, Ogilvie JW, Denis F, Winter RB, Wroblewski JM (2008) Complications in long fusions to the sacrum for adult scoliosis: minimum five-year analysis of fifty patients. Spine 33:1478–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Study Group on scoliosis (2012) Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery. Spine 37:693–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwab F, e-Fegoun AB, Gamez L et al (2005) A lumbar classification of scoliosis in the adult patient: preliminary approach. Spine 30:1670–1673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) Pseudoarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31:2329–2336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho K-J, Suk S, Park S, Kim JH, Kang S-B, Kim H-S (2010) oh S-J. Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis Spine 35:1595–1601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumented and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis ? Spine 31:2343–2352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peelle MW, Boachie-Adjei O, Charles G, Kanazawa Y, Mesfin A (2008) The lumbar curve response to selective thoracic fusion in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 8:897–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sitte I, Kathrein A, Prof Pfaller K, Pedross F, Klosterhuber M, Lindtner R, Zenner J, Ferraris L, Meier O, Koller H (2013) Morphological differences in adult idiopathic scoliosis: a histological and ultrastructural investigation. Spine 38:1672–1680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kasliwal MK, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Dettori JR, Ely CG, Smith JS (2012) Frequency, risk factors, and treatment of distla adjacent segment pathology after long thoracolumbarr fusion. Spine 37:S165–S179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH (2006) The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity. Spine 31(Suppl):S119–S125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwab F, Farcy J-P, Bridwell K, Berven S, Glassmann S, Harrast J, Horton W (2006) A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine 31:2109–2114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Storheim K, Brox JI, Løchting I, Werner EL, Grotle M (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the core outcome measures index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 21:2539–2549

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Carrier CS, Bono CM, Lebl DR (2013) Evidence-based analysis of adjacent segment degeneration and disease after ACDF: a systematic review. Spine J 13:1370–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanchez-Mariscal F, Gomez-Rice A, Izquierdo E, Pizones J, Zuniga L, Alvarez-Gponzalez P (2012) Correlation of radiographic and functional measurements in patients who underwent primary scoliosis surgery in adult age. Spine 37:592–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Good CR, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, O’Leary PT, Pichelmann MA, Keeler KA, Baldus CR, Koester LA (2010) Can posterior-only surgery provide similar radiographic and clinical results as combined anterior (thoracotomy/thoracoabdominal)/posterior approaches for adult scoliosis? Spine 35:210–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Amor C, Lehman RA, Buchowski JM, Edwards C, Christine B (2007) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5—fate of the L5-S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 32:2771–2776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim YB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kim Y-W, Bridwell KH, Stobbs G (2008) Surgical treatment of adult scoliosis. Spine 33:1125–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim HJ, Buchowski JM, Zebala LP, Dickson DD, Koester L, Bridwell KH (2013) RhBMP-2 is superior to iliac crest bone graft for long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine 38:1209–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yagi M, Hosogane N, Okada E, Watanabe K, Machida M, Tezuka M, Matsumoto M, Asazuma T, Keio Spine Research Group (2014) Factors influencing the postoperative progression of thoracic kyphosis in surgically treated adult patients with lumbar degeenrative scoliosis. Spine 39:E521–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harding IJ, Charosky S, Vialle R, Chopin DH (2008) Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5). Eur spine J 17:250–254

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sansur CA, Smith JS, Coe JD, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Polly DW, Perra JH, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI (2011) Scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality of adult scoliosis surgery. Spine 36:E593–E597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pateder DB, Kebaish KM, Cascio BM, Neubaeur P, Matusz DM, Kostuik JP (2007) Posterior only versus combined anterior and posterior approaches to lumbar scoliosis in adults—a radiographic analysis. Spine 32:1551–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Finger T, Bayerl S, Onken J, Czabanka M, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P (2014) Sacropelvic fixation versus fusion to the sacrum for spondylodesis in multilevel degenerative spine disease. Eur Spine J 23:1013–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Koller H, Zenner J, Hempfing A, Ferraris L, Meier O (2013) Reinforcement of lumbosacral instrumentation using S1-pedicle screws combined with S2-alar screws. Oper Orthop Traumatol 25:294–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pateder DB, Park Y-S, Kebaish KM, Cascio BM, Buchowski JM, Song EW, Shapiro MB, Kostuik JP (2006) Spinal fusion after revision surgery for pseudoarthrosis in adult scoliosis. Spine 31:E314–E319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Kim Y-W (2007) is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1. Spine 32:2653–2661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tsuchiya K, Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Baldus C (2006) Minimum 5-years analysis of L5-S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral and iliac screws) for spinal deformity. Spine 31:303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Maeda T, Buchowski JM, Kim YJ, Mishiro T, Bridwell KH (2009) Long adult spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum using rhBMP-2 versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Spine 34:2205–2212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Edwards CC, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Kim YJ, Berra A, Rocca GJD, Lenke LG (2003) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis to L5 in adults: the fate of the L5-S1 disc. Spine 28:2122–2131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Brown KM, Ludwig SC, Gelb DE (2004) Radiographic predictors of outcome after long fusion to L5 in adult scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 17:358–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G (2008) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine 33:2179–2184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Park MS, Song KS, Piyaskulkaew Chuntarapas T (2014) Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and large sagittal balance corrections. Spine 39:E576–E580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P (2011) Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J 20:S564–S571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg 87A:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, Farcy JP (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 27:387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Blondel B, Schwab F, Bess S, Ames C, Mummaeni PV, Hart R, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Burton D, Boachie-Adjei O, Lafage V (2013) Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity—it happens and here is why. Spine 38:E394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mac-Thiong J-M, Tranfeldt EE, Mehbod AA, Perra JH, Denis F, Garvey TA, Lonstein JE, Wu C, Dorman CW, Winter RB (2009) Can C7 plumbline and gravity line predict health related qualty of life in adult scoliosis. Spine 34:E519–E527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy J-P (2009) Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination. Two key parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine 34:E599–E606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:2024–2029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell KH, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Moal B, Ames CP, Hostin R, Fu KMG, Burton D, Akbarnia B, Gupta M, Hart R, Bess S, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2013) Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures. Spine 38:1663–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim YJ, Hung M, Cheh G, Koester LA (2013) Does correction of preoperative coronal imbalance make a difference in outcomes of adult patients with deformity. Spine 38:476–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Acaroglu E, Guler UO, Yavu Y, Pellise F, Domingo-S M, Yakici S, Genc Y, Alanay A, Perez-Grueso FJS, European Spine Study Group (2013) Multiple regressio nanalysis of factors affecting HRQL in adult spinal deformity. In: 20th IMAST, Vancouver, Canada

  59. Ploumis A, Liu H, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE, Winter RB (2009) A correlation of radiographic and functional measurements in adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine 34:1581–1584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassmann SD, Carreon LY, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Arlet V, Fu K-MG, Bridwell KH, The Spinal Deformity Study Group (2012) Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults. Eur Spine J 22:402–410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a Stryker International research grant.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. German Scoliosis Center, Werner-Wicker-Clinic, Im Kreuzfeld 4, 34537, Bad Wildungen, Germany

      Heiko Koller, Oliver Meier & Michael Mayer

    2. Department for Spinal Surgery, St. Franziskus-Hospital, Cologne, Germany

      Viola Bullmann

    3. Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany

      Conny Pfanz & Tobias L. Schulte

    4. Research Office, Biostatistics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

      Wolfgang Hitzl

    Authors
    1. Heiko Koller
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Conny Pfanz
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Oliver Meier
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Wolfgang Hitzl
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Michael Mayer
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Viola Bullmann
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Tobias L. Schulte
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Heiko Koller.

    Additional information

    The first authors H.Koller and C.Pfanz contributed equally to the manuscript.

    Electronic supplementary material

    Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

    Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 92 kb)

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Koller, H., Pfanz, C., Meier, O. et al. Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J 25, 532–548 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3898-x

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Revised:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3898-x

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation