Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective study of a prospective clinical and radiological database of subjects with adolescent (AIS) and adult (AS) idiopathic scoliosis undergoing surgical correction by posterior approach.

Objectives

To evaluate the differences in sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in AIS and AS before surgery and changes after surgery in both populations.

Summary of background data

The relationship between the spine and pelvis highly influences the sagittal balance in adults and adolescents. However, the sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis before and after surgery in idiopathic scoliosis, whatever the age, is poorly defined in the literature.

Methods

Clinical and radiological data were extracted from a prospective database of 132 AIS patients and 52 AS before and at last follow-up after surgical correction. Sagittal parameters were evaluated on AP and lateral radiographs using a custom software: pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), C7 Barrey’s ratio, spino-sacral angle (SSA). A new algorithm of combination of balance parameters was proposed to characterize and compare the various pathological spino-pelvic settings. Based on PI subdivision in high (<55°) and low values (>55°), then on a range of PT indexed on PI giving the pelvis positioning (anteverted, normal or retroverted), the population was finally characterized by the C7 plumbline position with regard to the posterior edge of the sacrum and the center of the femoral heads, in balanced, slightly unbalanced and unbalanced. More specifically, the AIS study included the cervical shape alignment with cervical lordosis (CL) and sagittal thoracic profile assessment (hypo vs. normokyphotic). In AS, the study focused on thoraco-lumbar kyphosis (TLK) occurrence (LL length). Paired Student t tests were used for comparison (α = 0.02).

Results

Pre-operatively, in AIS there was a prevalence of lower PI (57 %). Whatever the PI, PT remained anteverted or normal. Positioning of C7 was much more unbalanced, forward of the femoral heads (50 %), than in asymptomatic population (17 %). There was a notable loss and reversal of cervical lordosis in the majority of subjects, with an average cervical kyphosis measurement of 10 ± 18°. Thoracic kyphosis values were lower than average, while lumbar lordosis values were within normal limits. After surgery, in the entire group, a slight but significant increase of PT coupled to a decrease of SS and LL was noted, while no changes could be documented in thoracic kyphosis and cervical lordosis. However, when sub-classified according to thoracic hypo versus normokyphosis pre-op, there was a significant decrease of TK coupled to a decrease of LL and CL in the normokyphotic group, while TK and CL were improved in the hypokyphotic group. A significant number of patients improved their global balance. Changes in sagittal profile between Lenke curve types were minimal. In AS there were significant differences between low and high PI populations. Severity of unbalance increased in high PI population with association of retroverted pelvis and forward unbalance. In lower PI, increasing PT was generally sufficient to balance the patients. The occurrence of TLK was strongly increased in the entire population and became the rule in those with lower PI (76 %). Post-operatively, in those with high PI, PT did not change while global balance improved slightly. The strategy of correction in higher PI was to maintain TLK. In those with low PI, PT improved while C7 did not change. Correction of TLK was obtained in eight cases.

Conclusions

A decrease of cervical lordosis and thoracic kyphosis is commonly associated with AIS. The anterior unbalance frequently found in AIS does not seem to have the same significance of severity as in AS. In AIS PI does not change the balance criterions, while in AS the severity of unbalance is increased with higher PI. TLK seems to be a way of worsening the balance in elderly, mainly in lumbar and thoraco-lumbar scoliosis with low PI. Surgical correction of the thoracic and lumbar spine in AIS induces significant changes in the sagittal spino-pelvic profile. Changes in the cervical sagittal profile vary according to the pre-op sagittal profile of the thoracic kyphosis. Cervical lordosis and thoracic kyphosis are improved by surgical correction in subjects with pre-operative hypokyphosis, but a reverse effect is noted in those with normal pre-operative kyphosis. The clinical significance of these changes in sagittal shape remains to be determined. In AS, it appears easier to restore a good balance in the lower PI population than in those with less pre-operative unbalance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:682–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duval-Beaupère G, Schimdt C, Cosson P (1992) A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20:451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J et al (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31(11):E320–E325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimar JR 2nd, Carreon LY, Labelle H, Djurasovic M, Weidenbaum M, Brown C, Roussouly P (2008) Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods. Eur Spine J 10:1373–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Berthonnaud E, Dimar J, Betz R (2004) Sagittal Alignment of the Spine and Pelvis during Growth. Spine 29(15):1642–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E et al (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Berthonnaud E, Betz RR, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 16(2):227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Charlebois M, Huot MP, de Guise JA (2003) Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 28:1404–1409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takeda N, Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T, Shirado O, Minami A (2009) Changes in the sagittal spinal alignment of the elderly without vertebral fractures: a minimum 10-year longitudinal study. J Orthop Sci 14(6):748–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cronen GA, Mulconrey DS, Buchowski JM, Kim YJ (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine 34(8):785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwab F, Lafage V, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, Glassman S, Ondra S, Lowe T, Shainline M (2007) Surgical rates and operative outcome analysis in thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult scoliosis: application of the new adult deformity classification. Spine 32(24):2723–2730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30(3):346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 33(14):1572–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):626–633

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Jonge T, Dubousset JF, Illés T (2002) Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27:754–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis? Spine 31(20):2343–2352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP (2011) Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(13):1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(1):40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine 35(22):E1193–E1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hilibrand AS, Tannenbaum DA, Graziano GP, Loder RT, Hensinger RN (1995) The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 15:627–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Jonge T, Dubousset JF, Illés T (2002) Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27:754–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hagglund G, Karlberg J, Willner S (1992) Growth in girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 17:108–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Archer IA, Dickson RA (1985) Stature and idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:185–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dickson RA, Lawton JO, Archer IA et al (1984) The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis: biplanar spinal asymmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:8–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hwang SW et al (2011) Cervical sagittal plane decompensation after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an effect imparted by postoperative thoracic hypokyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine 15:491–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Edgar MA, Mehta MH (1988) Long-term follow-up of fused and unfused idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:712–716

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ofiram E, Garvey TA, Schwender JD, Wroblewski JM, Winter RB (2009) Cervical degenerative changes in idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent long fusion to the sacrum as adults: incidence, severity, and evolution. J Orthop Traumatol 10:27–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Grob D, Frauenfelder H, Mannion AF (2007) The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain. Eur Spine J 16:669–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Cunningham M, Shaffrey C, Shelokov A, Hostin R, Schwab F, Wood K, Akbarnia B; International Spine Study Group (2009) Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine 34(20):2186–2190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis? Spine 31(20):2343–2352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Croix Rouge française CMCR des Massues, 92 rue Edmond Locard, 69005, Lyon, France

    Pierre Roussouly & Arnaud Bodin

  2. Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada

    Hubert Labelle & Jihane Rouissi

  3. Research Center, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, 3175, Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada

    Hubert Labelle

Authors
  1. Pierre Roussouly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hubert Labelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jihane Rouissi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arnaud Bodin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Roussouly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roussouly, P., Labelle, H., Rouissi, J. et al. Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 22 (Suppl 2), 203–215 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation