Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative treatment and literature review for laparoscopic splenectomy alone versus preoperative splenic artery embolization splenectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic splenectomy has been gradually regarded as an acceptable therapeutic approach for patients with massive splenomegaly, intraoperative blood loss remains an important complication. In an effort to evaluate the most effective and safe treatment of splenomegaly, we compared three methods of surgery for treating splenomegaly, including open splenectomy, laparoscopic splenectomy, and a combination of preoperative splenic artery embolization plus laparoscopic splenectomy.

Methods

From January 2006 to August 2011, 79 patients underwent splenectomy in our hospital. Of them, 20 patients underwent a combined treatment of preoperative splenic artery embolization and laparoscopic splenectomy (group 1), 30 patients had laparoscopic splenectomy alone (group 2), and 29 patients underwent open splenectomy (group 3). Patients’ demographics, perioperative data, clinical outcome, and hematological changes were analyzed.

Results

Preoperative splenic artery embolization plus laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully performed in all patients in group 1. One patient in group 2 required an intraoperative conversion to traditional open splenectomy because of severe blood loss. Compared with group 2, significantly shorter operating time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter postoperative hospital stay were noted in group 1. No marked significant differences in postoperative complications of either group were observed. Compared with group 3, group 1 had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative stay, and fewer complications. No significant differences were found in operating time. There was a marked increase in platelet count and white blood count in both groups during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Preoperative splenic artery embolization with laparoscopic splenectomy reduced the operating time and decreased intraoperative blood loss when compared with laparoscopic splenectomy alone or open splenectomy. Splenic artery embolization is a useful intraoperative adjunctive procedure for patients with splenomegaly because of the benefit of perioperative outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S et al (1992) Technical aspects of laparoscopic splenectomy: hilar segmental devascularization and instrumentation. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:414–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iwase K, Higaki J, Mikata S et al (1999) Laparoscopically assisted splenectomy following preoperative splenic artery embolization using contour emboli for myelofibrosis with massive splenomegaly. Surg Laparosc Endosc PercutanTech 9(3):197–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reso A, Brar MS, Church N et al (2010) Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy with preoperative splenic artery embolization for massive splenomegaly 24:2008–2012

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hama T, Takifuji K, Uchiyama K et al (2008) Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective procedure for patients with splenomegaly due to portal hypertension. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:304–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takahashi T, Arima Y, Yokomuro S et al (2005) Splenic artery embolization before laparoscopic splenectomy in children. Surg Endosc 19:1345–1348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poulin E, Thibault C, Mamazza J et al (1993) Laparoscopic splenectomy: clinical experience and the role of preoperative splenic artery embolization. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:445–450

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Poulin EC, Thibault C, Mamazza J (1995) Laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 9:172–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujitani RM, Johs SM, Cobb SR et al (1998) Preoperative splenic artery occlusion as an adjunct for high risk splenectomy. Ann Surg 54:602–608

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hiatt JR, Gomes AS, Machleder HI (1990) Massive splenomegaly: superior results with a combined endovascular and operative approach. Arch Surg 125:1363–1367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM (1998) Splenic artery embolization before laparoscopic splenectomy: an update. Surg Endosc 12:870–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Totte E, Van Hee R, Kloech I et al (1998) Laparoscopic splenectomy after arterial embolisation. Hepatogastroenterology 45:773–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swanson TW, Meneghetti AT, Sampath S et al (2011) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: 20-year experience at a Canadian center. Can J Surg 54(3):189–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iwase K, Higaki J, Yoon HE et al (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura during pregnancy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:53–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hori S, Osuga K, Yamaguchi Y et al (2001) Embolotherapy of large hepatocellular carcinoma using a new permanent, spherical embolic material without anti-neoplastic agents. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:203

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iwase K, Higaki J, Yoon HE et al (2002) Splenic artery embolization using contour emboli before laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(5):331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peters MB, Camacho D, Ojeda H et al (2004) Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Am J Surg 188:522–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park AE, Birgisson G, Mastrangelo MJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcomes and lessons learned from over 200 cases. Surgery 128:660–667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai YQ, Zhou J, Chen XD et al (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy is an effective and safe intervention for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis. Surg Endosc 25:3791–3797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Urata K, Kawasaki S, Matsunami H (1995) Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation. Hepatology 21:1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A (2003) When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J Pediatr Surg 38:720–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitzgerald PG, Langer JC, Cameron BH et al (1996) Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy using the lateral approach. Surg Endosc 10:859–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Flowers JL, Lefor AT, Steers J et al (1996) Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hematologic diseases. Ann Surg 2124:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomikawa M, Akahoshi T, Sugimachi K et al (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy may be a superior supportive intervention for cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Silverstein MN, Remine WH (1979) Splenectomy in myeloid metaplasia. Blood 53:515–518

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahon D, Rhodes M (2003) Laparoscopic splenectomy: size matters. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:248–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hellman P, Arvidsson D, Rastad J (2000) HandPort-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in massive splenomegaly. Surg Endosc 14:1177–1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Naoum JJ, Silberfein EJ, Zhou W et al (2007) Concomitant intraoperative splenic artery embolization and laparoscopic splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy: comparison of treatment outcome. Am J Surg 193:713–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maddison FE (1973) Embolic therapy for hypersplenism. Invest Radiol 8:280–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koconis KG, Singh H, Soares G (2007) Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of patients with portal hypertension: a review of the English language literature. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:463–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hilleren DJ (1999) Embolization of the treatment of hypersplenism and in portal hypertension. In: Kasir S (ed) Current practice of interventional radiology, spleen. B.C. Decker, Philadelphia, pp 494–497

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yamashita H, Ohuchida J, Shimura H et al (1996) Laparoscopic splenectomy aided by balloon occlusion of the splenic artery: report of a case. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:326–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Killeen KL, Shanmuganathan K, Boyd-Kranis R et al (2001) CT findings after embolization for blunt splenic trauma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:209–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reso A, Brar MS, Church N et al (2010) Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy with preoperative splenic artery embolization for massive splenomegaly. Surg Endosc 24:2008–2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Amin MA, Gendy MMEI, Dawoud IE et al (2009) Partial splenic embolization versus splenectomy for the management of hypersplenism in cirrhotic patients. World J Surg 33:1702–1710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Letoquart JP, La Gamma A, Leblay R et al (1979) Splenectomy for splenomegaly exceeding 1000 grams: analysis of 47 patients. Br J Surg 80:334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou J, Wu Z, Cai YQ et al (2012) The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study. J Surg Res 171(1):e55–e60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Hammerschmidt DE, Sanchez R et al (1977) Nonsurgical splenectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 129:805–811

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sunderson JB, Dutta TK, Badrinath S et al (2005) Study of hypersplenism and effect of splenectomy on patients with hypersplenism. J Indian Assoc Clin Med 6:291

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ezzat FA, Abu Elmagd KM, Aly MA et al (1990) Selective shunt versus nonshunt surgery for management of both schistosomal and nonschistosoma variceal bleeding. Ann Surg 212:97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Abou El Hoda MF, Dawoud IE, Settein MF et al (1996) Postsplenectomy portal vein thrombosis: frequency and significance. Egypt J Surg 15:5

    Google Scholar 

  41. Maalouf M, Papasavas P, Goitein D et al (2008) Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy for systemic mastocytosis: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(2):219–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tran T, Demyttenaere SV, Polyhronopoulos G et al (2010) Recommended timing for surveillance ultrasonography to diagnose portal splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 24(7):1670–1678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a grant from the West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

Disclosures

Zhing Wu, Jin Zhou, and Bing Peng have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Peng.

Additional information

Z. Wu and J. Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Zhou, J., Pankaj, P. et al. Comparative treatment and literature review for laparoscopic splenectomy alone versus preoperative splenic artery embolization splenectomy. Surg Endosc 26, 2758–2766 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2270-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2270-z

Keywords

Navigation