Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Partial Splenic Embolization Versus Splenectomy for the Management of Hypersplenism in Cirrhotic Patients

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hypersplenism occurs in patients with chronic liver disease, and splenectomy is the definitive treatment. However, the operation may be hazardous in patients with poor liver function. In recent years, partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been widely used in patients with hypersplenism and cirrhosis. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of PSE compared to splenectomy in the management of hypersplenism in cirrhotic patients.

Methods

This study comprised 40 patients with hypersplenism secondary to cirrhosis. They were divided into two groups, each including 20 patients. The first group of patients were treated by PSE using polyvinyl alcohol particles to achieve embolization of at least 50% of the distal branches of the splenic artery. Postembolization arteriography and computed tomography were performed to document the extent of devascularization. Patients in the second group were treated by splenectomy with or without devascularization and left gastric ligation according to the presence or absence of esophageal varices.

Results

There was marked improvement in platelet and leukocytic counts in both groups, and the counts remained at appropriate levels during the follow-up period. All patients in the first group had problems related to postembolization syndrome that abated by the first week. One patient in the first group died from myocardial infarction. No deaths occurred in the second group. Asymptomatic portal vein thrombosis developed in one patient in the first group that was treated with anticoagulation, and another patient developed splenic abscess treated by splenectomy with a good outcome. In the second group, three patients developed portal vein thrombosis, one of them being readmitted 4 months postoperatively with mesenteric vascular occlusion; that patient underwent a resection anastomosis with good outcome.

Conclusions

Partial splenic embolization is an effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of hypersplenism secondary to chronic liver disease. It is a simple, rapid procedure that is easily performed under local anesthesia; and it allows preservation of adequate splenic tissue to safeguard against overwhelming infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCormick PA, Murphy KM (2000) Splenomegaly, hypersplenism and coagulation abnormalities in liver disease. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 14:1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dwivedi MK, Pal RK, Dewanga L et al (2002) Efficacy of partial splenic embolization in the management of hypersplenism. Indian J Radiol Imaging 12:371

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noguchi H, Hirai K, Aoki Y et al (1995) Changes in platelet kinetics after a partial splenic arterial embolization in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. Hepatology 22:1682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakai T, Shiraki K, Inoue H et al (2002) Complications of partial splenic embolization in cirrhotic patients. Dig Dis Sci 47:388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pugh RNH, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL (1973) Transection of the esophagus for bleeding esophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumpe DA, Rumack CM, Pretorious DH et al (1985) Partial splenic embolization in children with hypersplenism. Radiology 155:357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sindel M, Sarikcioglu L, Ceken K et al (2001) The importance of the anatomy of the splenic artery and its branches in splenic artery embolization. Folia Morphol 60:333–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida H, Mamada Y, Taniai N et al (2005) Long-term results of partial splenic artery embolization as supplemental treatment for portal-systemic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol 100:43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Romano M, Giojelli A, Capuano G et al (2004) Partial splenic embolization in patients with idiopathic portal hypertension. Eur J Radiol 49:268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. N’Kontchou G, Seror O, Bourcier V et al (2005) Partial splenic embolization in patients with cirrhosis: efficacy, tolerance and long term outcome in 32 patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tajiri T, Onda M, Yoshida H et al (2002) Long term hematological and biochemical effects of partial splenic embolization in hepatic cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murata KK, Shirati K, Takase K et al (1996) Long term follow up for patients with liver cirrhosis after partial splenic embolization. Hepatogastroenterology 43:1212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sangro B, Bilbao I, Herrero I et al (1993) Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of hypersplenism in cirrhosis. Hepatology 18:309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Firat A, Boyvat F, Moray G et al (2005) Comparison of two different percutaneous splenic artery interventions in the treatment of hypersplenism: preliminary report. Transplant Proc 37:1094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kimura F, Itoh H, Ambiru S et al (2002) Long-term results of initial and repeated partial splenic embolization for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1323–1326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sunderson JB, Dutta TK, Badrinath S et al (2005) Study of hypersplenism and effect of splenectomy on patients with hypersplenism. J Indian Assoc Clin Med 6:291

    Google Scholar 

  17. Letoquart JP, La Gamma A, Leblay R et al (1979) Splenectomy for splenomegaly exceeding 1000 grams: analysis of 47 patients. Br J Surg 80:334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spigo DG, Mozes M, Capek V (1979) Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of hypersplenism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 132:777

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shah R, Mahour GH, Ford E et al (1990) Partial splenic embolization: an effective alternative to splenectomy for hypersplenism. Am Surg 56:774

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ezzat FA, Abu Elmagd KM, Aly MA et al (1990) Selective shunt versus non shunt surgery for management of both schistosomal and nonschistosomal variceal bleeding. Ann Surg 212:97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Abou El Hoda MF, Dawoud IE, Settein MF et al (1996) Postsplenectomy portal vein thrombosis: frequency and significance. Egypt J Surg 15:5

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eguchi A, Hashizume M, Kitano S et al (1991) High rate of portal thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with esophageal varices and idiopathic portal hypertension. Arch Surg 126:752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Belli L, Rommani F, Riolo F (1989) Thrombosis of the portal vein in the absence of hepatic disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169:46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Faught WE, Gillbertson JJ, Nelson EW (1989) Splenic abscess: presentation, treatment options, and results. Am J Surg 158:612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gerlock AJ, MacDonnell RC, Muhletaler CA et al (1982) Partial splenic embolization for hypersplenism in renal transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 138:451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu RY, Liu B, Lin N (2004) Therapeutic effects of endoscopic variceal ligation combined with partial splenic embolization for portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 10:1072

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Mahmoud A. Amin, Mohamed M. El Gendy, Ibrahim E. Dawoud, Ashraf Shoma & Ahmed M. Negm

  2. Radiology Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Talal A. Amer

Authors
  1. Mahmoud A. Amin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed M. El Gendy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ibrahim E. Dawoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashraf Shoma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahmed M. Negm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Talal A. Amer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud A. Amin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amin, M.A., El Gendy, M.M., Dawoud, I.E. et al. Partial Splenic Embolization Versus Splenectomy for the Management of Hypersplenism in Cirrhotic Patients. World J Surg 33, 1702–1710 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0095-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0095-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation