Skip to main content

Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Proximal Femur Fractures

Abstract

Subtrochanteric femur fractures are significant injuries that despite surgery can lead to relatively high rates of nonunion, malunion, and subsequent poor clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boyd HB, Griffin LL. Classification and treatment of trochanteric fractures. Arch Surg. 1949;58(6):853–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman GD, Winquist RA, Mayo KA, Hansen ST. Subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Fixation using the Zickel nail. J Bone Joint Surgery Am. 1987;69(7):1032–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robey LR. Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur in the Negro. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38-A(6):1301–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Velasco RU, Comfort TH. Analysis of treatment problems in subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Trauma. 1978;18(7):513–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waddell JP. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: a review of 130 patients. J Trauma. 1979;19(8):582–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goh SK, Yang KY, Koh JS, et al. Subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures in patients on alendronate therapy: a caution. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):349–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwek EB, Goh SK, Koh JS, Png MA, Howe TS. An emerging pattern of subtrochanteric stress fractures: a long-term complication of alendronate therapy? Injury. 2008;39(2):224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lenart BA, Neviaser AS, Lyman S, et al. Association of low-energy femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use: a case control study. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(8):1353–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grechenig W, Pichler W, Clement H, Tesch NP, Grechenig S. Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing. Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(6):899–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grisell M, Moed BR, Bledsoe JG. A biomechanical comparison of trochanteric nail proximal screw configurations in a subtrochanteric fracture model. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(6):359–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kraemer WJ, Hearn TC, Powell JN, Mahomed N. Fixation of segmental subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;332:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koch JC. The laws of bone architecture. Am J Anat. 1917;21:177–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiss DA, Brien WW. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment by interlocking nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(283):231–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Starr AJ, Hay MT, Reinert CM, Borer DS, Christensen KC. Cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of high-energy proximal femur fractures in young patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry portal. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(4):240–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brien WW, Wiss DA, Becker V, Lehman T. Subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comparison of the Zickel nail, 95 degrees blade plate, and interlocking nail. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(4):458–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Forward DP, Doro CJ, OʼToole RV, et al. A biomechanical comparison of a locking plate, a nail, and a 95° angled blade plate for fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(6):334–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. French BG, Tornetta P. Use of an interlocked cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fracture stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kummer FJ, Olsson O, Pearlman CA, Ceder L, Larsson S, Koval KJ. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(6):580–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pugh KJ, Morgan RA, Gorczyca JT, Pienkowski D. A mechanical comparison of subtrochanteric femur fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(5):324–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rydell NW. Forces acting on the femoral head-prosthesis. A study on strain gauge supplied prostheses in living persons. Acta Orthop Scand. 1966;37(Suppl 88):81–132.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frankel VH, Burstein AH. Orthopaedic biomechanics. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fielding JW, Cochran GV, Zickel RE. Biomechanical characteristics and surgical management of subtrochanteric fractures. Orthop Clinics N Am. 1974;5(3):629–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rybicki EF, Simonen FA, Weis EB. On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human femur. J Biomech. 1972;5(2):203–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Froimson AI. Treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970;131(3):465–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ. Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury. 2010;41(7):739–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Russell T, Taylor J. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, editors. Skeletal trauma. Fractures, dislocations, ligamentous injuries. 1st ed. Philadephia: Saunders; 1992. p. 1485–524.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P. J. S. The AO classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Hussmann B, Lendemans S. Pre-hospital and early in-hospital management of severe injuries: changes and trends. Injury. 2014;45(Suppl 3):S39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Radvinsky DS, Yoon RS, Schmitt PJ, Prestigiacomo CJ, Swan KG, Liporace FA. Evolution and development of the advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol: a historical perspective. Orthopedics. 2012;35(4):305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoon RS, Hwang JS, Beebe KS. Long-term bisphosphonate usage and subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures: a cause for concern? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(10):1289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoon RS, Beebe KS, Benevenia J. Prophylactic bilateral intramedullary femoral nails for bisphosphonate-associated signs of impending subtrochanteric hip fracture. Orthopedics. 2010;33(4). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100225-21. Epub 2010 Apr 16. Epub 2010 Apr 16.

  32. Kao CM, Huang PJ, Chen CH, Chen SJ, Cheng YM. Atypical femoral fracture after long-term alendronate treatment: report of a case evidenced with magnetic resonance imaging. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012;28(10):555–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bush LA, Chew FS. Subtrochanteric femoral insufficiency fracture following bisphosphonate therapy for osseous metastases. Radiol Case Rep. 2008;3(4):232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Probst S, Rakheja R, Stern J. Atypical bisphosphonate-associated subtrochanteric and femoral shaft stress fractures: diagnostic features on bone scan. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38(5):397–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saleh A, Hegde VV, Potty AG, Schneider R, Cornell CN, Lane JM. Management strategy for symptomatic bisphosphonate-associated incomplete atypical femoral fractures. HSS J. 2012;8(2):103–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Banffy MB, Vrahas MS, Ready JE, Abraham JA. Nonoperative versus prophylactic treatment of bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(7):2028–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Resch S, Thorngren KG. Preoperative traction for hip fracture: a randomized comparison between skin and skeletal traction in 78 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(3):277–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zickel RE. Subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Orthop Clinics N Am. 1980;11(3):555–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Brumback RJ, Toal TR, Murphy-Zane MS, Novak VP, Belkoff SM. Immediate weight-bearing after treatment of a comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft with a statically locked intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surgery Am. 1999;81(11):1538–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson KD, Tencer AF, Sherman MC. Biomechanical factors affecting fracture stability and femoral bursting in closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures, with illustrative case presentations. J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang J, Ma XL, Ma JX, et al. Biomechanical analysis of four types of internal fixation in subtrochanteric fracture models. Orthop Surg. 2014;6(2):128–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ricci WM, Schwappach J, Tucker M, et al. Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(10):663–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ostrum RF, Marcantonio A, Marburger R. A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(10):681–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ostrum RF, Levy MS. Penetration of the distal femoral anterior cortex during intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric fractures: a report of three cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(9):656–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yoon RS, Donegan DJ, Liporace FA. Reducing subtrochanteric femur fractures: tips and tricks, do’s and don’ts. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(Suppl 4):S28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Afsari A, Liporace F, Lindvall E, Infante A Jr, Sagi HC, Haidukewych GJ. Clamp-assisted reduction of high subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1913–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Beingessner DM, Scolaro JA, Orec RJ, Nork SE, Barei DP. Open reduction and intramedullary stabilisation of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study of 56 cases. Injury. 2013;44(12):1910–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hoskins W, Bingham R, Joseph S, et al. Subtrochanteric fracture: the effect of cerclage wire on fracture reduction and outcome. Injury. 2015;46(10):1992–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Joglekar SB, Lindvall EM, Martirosian A. Contemporary management of subtrochanteric fractures. Orthop Clinics N Am. 2015;46(1):21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Riehl JT, Koval KJ, Langford JR, Munro MW, Kupiszewski SJ, Haidukewych GJ. Intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures--does malreduction matter? Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 2014;72(2):159–63.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Robinson CM, Houshian S, Khan LA. Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(10):2217–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Barquet A, Mayora G, Fregeiro J, López L, Rienzi D, Francescoli L. The treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions with the long gamma nail: twenty-six patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(6):346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:185–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Whatley JR, Garland DE, Whitecloud T, Whickstrom J. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: treatment with ASIF blade plate fixation. South Med J. 1978;71(11):1372–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kinast C, Bolhofner BR, Mast JW, Ganz R. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment with the 95 degrees condylar blade-plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(238):122–30.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Crist BD, Khalafi A, Hazelwood SJ, Lee MA. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(9):622–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mirbolook A, Siavashi B, Jafarinezhad AE, et al. Subtrochanteric fractures: comparison of proximal femur locking plate and intramedullary locking nail fixation outcome. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(Suppl 3):795–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. El-Desouky II, Mohamed MM, Kandil AE. Clinical outcome of conventional versus biological fixation of subtrochanteric fractures by proximal femoral locked plate. Injury. 2016;47(6):1309–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Glassner PJ, Tejwani NC. Failure of proximal femoral locking compression plate: a case series. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(2):76–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wieser K, Babst R. Fixation failure of the LCP proximal femoral plate 4.5/5.0 in patients with missing posteromedial support in unstable per-, inter-, and subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(10):1281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Prasarn ML, Ahn J, Helfet DL, Lane JM, Lorich DG. Bisphosphonate-associated femur fractures have high complication rates with operative fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(8):2295–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Balasubramanian N, Babu G, Prakasam S. Treatment of non unions of subtrochanteric fractures using an anatomical proximal femur locked compression plate – a prospective study of 13 patients. J Orthop Case Rep. 2016;6(1):65–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Shroeder JE, Mosheiff R, Khoury A, Liebergall M, Weil YA. The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(9):653–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Isaacs JD, Shidiak L, Harris IA, Szomor ZL. Femoral insufficiency fractures associated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(12):3384–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Broos PL, Reynders P, Vanderspeeten K. Mechanical complications associated with the use of the unreamed AO femoral intramedullary nail with spiral blade: first experiences with thirty-five consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(3):186–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gugenheim JJ, Probe RA, Brinker MR. The effects of femoral shaft malrotation on lower extremity anatomy. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(10):658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Giannoudis PV, Ahmad MA, Mineo GV, Tosounidis TI, Calori GM, Kanakaris NK. Subtrochanteric fracture non-unions with implant failure managed with the “Diamond” concept. Injury. 2013;44(Suppl 1):S76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Qvick LM, Ritter CA, Mutty CE, Rohrbacher BJ, Buyea CM, Anders MJ. Donor site morbidity with reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) use for autogenous bone graft harvesting in a single centre 204 case series. Injury. 2013;44(10):1263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kenneth J. Koval or Richard S. Yoon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koval, K.J., Rezaie, N., Yoon, R.S. (2018). Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures. In: Egol, K., Leucht, P. (eds) Proximal Femur Fractures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64904-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64904-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64902-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64904-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics