Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prevention of postoperative small bowel obstruction in gastric cancer

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postoperative adhesion is a frequent problem in patients undergoing surgery. In particular, gastrectomy is associated with a high risk of bowel obstruction. However, there are few reports of small bowel obstruction (SBO) after gastrectomy in the English-language literature. We reviewed the literature to assess the effectiveness of various techniques for preventing adhesion in patients treated with gastrectomy. We assumed that strategies used to prevent postoperative adhesion associated with colorectal surgery, cholecystectomy, appendectomy and gynecologic procedures are similar to those used in gastrectomy. We therefore reviewed reports on the prevention of postoperative SBO in any abdominal surgical procedure, focusing especially on gastrectomy. General intraoperative preventive techniques, such as the use of starch-free gloves, saline irrigation at a temperature below 37 °C and laparoscopic techniques whenever possible, may reduce the incidence of SBO in patients with gastric cancer who undergo gastrectomy. If preserving the omentum is unrelated to the survival rate of patients with gastric cancer, this technique should be recommended for preventing postoperative SBO. The use of hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose bioabsorbable membranes should also be considered in patients undergoing gastrectomy. However, demonstrating the advantages of bioabsorbable membranes would require larger randomized studies with a longer follow-up period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions—how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:60–3.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Inaba T, Okinaga K, Fukushima R, Iinuma H, Ogihara T, Ogawa F, et al. Prospective randomized study of two laparotomy incisions for gastrectomy: midline incision versus transverse incision. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Korenaga D, Yasuda M, Takesue F, Honda M, Inutsuka S, Nagahama S, et al. Factors influencing the development of small intestinal obstruction following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: the impact of reconstructive route in the Roux-Y procedure. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1389–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D, Pararas N, Tzertzemelis D, Giannopoulos P, et al. Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:432–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moran BJ. Adhesion-related small bowel obstruction. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zielinski MD, Eiken PW, Bannnon MP, Heller SF, Lohse CM, Huebner M, et al. Small bowel obstruction—who needs an operation? A multivariate prediction model. World J Surg. 2010;34:910–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Goor HV, Bauer JJ, Wolff BG, et al. Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnuriger B, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Systemic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2010;97:470–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Assalia A, Schein M, Kopelman D, Hirshberg A, Hashmonai M. Therapeutic effect of oral Gastrografin in adhesive, partial small-bowel obstruction: a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 1994;115:433–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee FJ, Meng WC, Leung K, Yu SC, Poon C, Lau W. Water soluble contrast follow-through in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a prospective randomized trail. Ann Coll Surg Hong Kong. 2004;8:120–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbas SM, Bissett IP, Parry BR. Meta-analysis of oral water-soluble contrast agent in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2007;94:404–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cade D, Ellis H. The peritoneal reaction to starch and its modification by prednisone. Eur Surg Res. 1976;8:471–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamffer WJ, Jooste EV, Nel JT, de Wet JI. Surgical glove powder and intraperitoneal adhesion formation. An appeal for the use of powder-free surgical gloves. S Afr Med J. 1992;81:158–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Tol MP, Haverlag R, van Rossen ME, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Jeekel J. Glove powder promotes adhesion formation and facilitates tumour cell adhesion and growth. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1258–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooke SA, Hamilton DG. The significance of starch powder contamination in the aetiology of peritoneal adhesions. Br J Surg. 1977;64:410–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kappas AM, Fatouros M, Papadimitriou K, Katsouyannopoulos V, Cassioumis D. Effect of intraperitoneal saline irrigation at different temperatures on adhesion formation. Br J Surg. 1988;75:854–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mochiki E, Nakabayashi T, Kamimura H, Haga N, Asao T, Kuwano H. Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2002;26:1145–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosono S, Arimoto Y, Ohtani H, Kanamiya Y. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:7676–83.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JH, Yom CK, Han HS. Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1759–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Hashimoto H, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;257:640–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Inaba T, Okinaga K, Fukushima R, Iinuma H, Ogihara T, Ogawa F, et al. Prospective randomized study of two laparotomy incisions for gastrectomy: midline incision versus transverse incision. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimizu K, Yoshida K, Hirai T, Toge T. Relation between surgical approach and postoperative ileus in gastric cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Clin Surg. 2003;64:801–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fujita J, Tsukahara Y, Ikeda K, Akagi K, Kan K, Hata S, et al. Evaluation of omentum preserving gastrectomy foe advanced gastric cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Gastroenterol. 2003;36:1151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sugimachi K, Korenaga D, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Tsukamoto S, Kawasaki K, et al. Factors influencing the development of small intestinal obstruction following gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:496–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasegawa S, Yamamoto Y, Taguri M, Morita S, Sato T, Yamada R, et al. A randomized phase II trial of omentum-preserving gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43:214–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman HS, van Goor H, Wolff BG, Adhesion Study Group Steering Committee. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1310–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Inoue M, Uchida K, Otake K, Nagano Y, Ide S, Hashimoto K, et al. Efficacy of Seprafilm for preventing adhesive bowel obstruction and cost-benefit analysis in pediatric patients undergoing laparotomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:1528–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayashi S, Takayama T, Masuda H, Kochi M, Ishii Y, Matsuda M, et al. Bioresorbable membrane to reduce postoperative small bowel obstruction in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:766–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohri Y, Uchida K, Araki T, Inoue Y, Tonouchi H, Miki C, et al. Hyaluronic acid-carboxycellurose membrane (Seprafilm) reduces early postoperative small bowel obstruction in gastrointestinal surgery. Am Surg. 2005;71:861–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohri Y, Tanaka K, Uchida K, Ohi M, Inoue M, Araki T, et al. Oncologic outcome with use of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose barrier in gastric cancer. Int Surg. 2013;98:271–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kawamura H, Yokota R, Yokota K, Watarai H, Tsunoda Y, Yamagami H, et al. A sodium hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane prevents postoperative small-bowel adhesive obstruction after distal gastrectomy. Surg Today. 2010;40:223–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Pinna AD, World Society of Emergency Surgery. P.O.P.A. study: prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomy for adhesive small bowel obstruction. A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:382–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brown CB, Luciano AA, Martin D, Peers E, Scrimgeour A, diZerega GS, Adept Adhesion Reduction Study Group. Adept (icodextrin 4% solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1413–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee WS, Baek JH, Lee WK. Direct comparison of Seprafilm® versus Adept® versus no additive for reducing the risk of small-bowel obstruction in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2013;43:995–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mais V, Ajossa S, Marongiu D, Peiretti RF, Guerriero S, Melis GB. Reduction of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic endometriosis surgery: a randomized trial with an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:512–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saravelos H, Li TC. Post-operative adhesions after laparoscopic electrosurgical treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome with the application of Interceed to one ovary: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:992–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Digestive Surgery, School of Medicine, Nihon University, 30-1 Ooyaguchikamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan

    Shigeoki Hayashi, Masashi Fujii & Tadatoshi Takayama

Authors
  1. Shigeoki Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masashi Fujii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tadatoshi Takayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeoki Hayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayashi, S., Fujii, M. & Takayama, T. Prevention of postoperative small bowel obstruction in gastric cancer. Surg Today 45, 1352–1359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1106-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1106-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation