Skip to main content
  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

Structured interviews are basically orally administered questionnaires. The Diagnostic Interview Schedule (Robins et al. 1981) is an orally administered questionnaire to be used by lay interviewers for making diagnoses according to DSM-III. The rating scales discussed in Chapters 2 and 3 of this compendium rely on clinical, goal-directed interviews which depend for their accuracy very strongly upon the skill and experience of the rater (psychiatrist, psychologist or other skilled observer). However, in Chapter 2 is shown an example of a structured interview for the Hamilton Melancholia Scale. DSM-III-R emphasizes that the user should be trained in psychopathology before making diagnostic assessments. In some cases, however, the psychiatrist or psychologist is less skilled than nurses in the observation and assessment of clinical syndromes. Thus, in assessing the psychiatric inpatient’s competence in social or interpersonal relations and ability to perform basic activities of daily life, the nurse is the most appropriate rater, observing his behaviour in a natural way as it occurs. Rating scales such as the Hamilton Depression Scale have a high cross-national reliability because the clinical interview can be adapted with culturally specific idioms and questions, with the goal of improving the information obtained for the items of the scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albus M, Maier W, Shera D, Bech P. Consistences and discrepances in self-and observerrelated anxiety scales: a comparison between the self and the observer rated Markes-Sheehan scale. Eur Arch Psychiat Clin Neurosci 1990; 240: 96–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angst J. Meta-analysis of oxaprotyline. Paper presented at Strassbourg Forum, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrindell WA. Dimensional structure and psychopathology correlates of the Fear Survey Schedule (FSS-HE) in phobic population: a factorial definition of agoraphobia. Beh Res Ther 1980; 18:229–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bech P. Quality of life in psychosomatic research. Psychopath 1987; 20:169–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bech P. Rating scales for mood disorders: applicability, consistency and construct validity. Acta Psychiat Scand 1988; 78(suppl 345): 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bech P, Gram LF, Dein E, Jacobsen O, Vitger J, Bolwig, TG. Quantitative rating of depressive states. Acta Psychiat Scand 1975; 51:161–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bech P, Vendsborg PB, Rafaelsen OJ. Lithium maintenance treatment of manic-melancholic patients: Its role in the daily routine. Acta Psychiat Scand 1976; 53: 70–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bech P, Hey H. Depression or asthenia related to metabolic disturbances in obese patients after intestinal bypass surgery. Acta Psychiat Scand 1979; 59:462–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bech P, Kastrup M, Loldrup D. Use of headache rating scales: a multiaxial approach. Cephalalgia 1986; 6: 69–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bech P, Allerup P, Maier W, Albus M, Lavori P, Ayuso JL. The Hamilton Scales and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90): a cross-national validity study in patients with panic disorders. Br J Psychiat 1992; 160: 206–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck AT. Depression: Clinical, Experimental, and Theoretical Aspects. Univ Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 1961; 4: 561–571.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck AT, Beamesderfer A. Assessment of depression: the depression inventory. In: Pichot P (ed). Psychological Measurements in Psychopharmacology. Basel, Karger, 1974, pp. 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck AT, Brown G, Epstein N, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56: 893–897.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouman TK, Kok AR. Homogeneity of Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI): applying Rasch analysis in conceptual exploration. Acta Psychiat Scand 1987; 76: 568–573.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodman K, Erdmann AJ, Lorge I, Wolff HG. The Cornell Medical Index. An adjunct to medical interview. J Am Med Ass 1949a; 140: 530–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodman K, Erdman AJ, Lorge I, Wolff HG. The Cornell Medical Index — Health Questionnaire as a diagnostic instrument J Am Med Ass 1951; 145: 152–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll BJ, Fielding JM, Blashki TG. Depression rating scales: a critical review. Arch Gen Psychiat 1973; 28: 361–366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WW, Medley DM. Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales from the MMPI. J Appl Psychol 1954; 38:414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyr JJ, McKenna-Foley JM, Peacock E. Factor structure of the SCL-90: Is there one? J Pers Ass 1985; 49:571–578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom WG, Brooks JD, Petersen CD. The Beck Depression Inventory: item order and impact of response sets. J Pers Ass 1990; 55: 224–233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L, Rickeis K. Neurotic symptom dimensions as perceived by psychiatrists and patients of various social classes. Arch Gen Psychiat 1971; 24: 454–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick P, Ferrero E. A double-blind comparative study of the clinical efficacy of fluvoxamine and clomipramine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1983; 15: 419–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Psychoticism as a Dimension of Personality. London, Hodder & Stroughton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadden G, Bebbington P, Kuipers L. Caring and its burdens. A study of the spouses of depressed patients. Brit J Psychiat 1987; 151: 660–667.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fava GA, Kellner R, Lisansky J, Park S, Perini GI, Zielezny M. Rating depression in normals and depressive: observer versus self-rating scales. J Aff Dis 1986; 11:29–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg M, Carroll BJ. The Carroll Rating Scale for Depression. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds). Assessment of depression. Berlin, Springer, 1986, pp. 188–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank JF, Gliedman LH, Imber SD, Nash EH, Stone AR. Why patients leave psychotherapy. Arch Neurol Psychiat 1957; 77:283–299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frimodt-Møller J, Loidrup D, Kornerup HJ, Bech P. Quality of life, side effects and efficacy of lisinopril compared with metoprolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. J Human Hypertension 1991; 5: 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford, Oxford Univ Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, NFER, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandi S, Fava GA, Cunsolo A, Saviotti FM, Ranieri M, Trombini G, Gozzetti G. Rating depression and anxiety after mastectomy: observer versus self-rating scales. Int J Psychat Med 1990; 20:163–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guelfi JD, Pull CB, Guelfi C, Rushels, Dreyfus JF. La CHESS. Utilization dans la pathologie anxiense et depressive. Structure factorielle. Am Med Psychol 1983; 141: 257–278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guelfi JD, von Frenckell R, Caille Ph. The Norris VAS and the ADA inventory. A factorial analysis in outpatients. Paper presented at World Psychiatric Association Congress, Athens, October, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy W. Early Clinical Drug Evaluation Program (ECDEU) Assessment Manual. Rockville, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M. Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. Br J Psychiat, 1969 (special publication): 76-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M, Shapiro CM. Depression. In: Peck DF, Shapiro CM (eds). Measuring Human Problems. A Practical Guide. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 1990, pp. 25–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachuck SJ, Brierly H, Jachuck S, Willcox PM. The effect of hypotensive drugs on quality of life. J Roy Col Gen Pract 1982; 32: 103–105.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner R. The Symptom Rating Test In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds). Assessment of Depression. Berlin, Springer, 1986, pp. 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner R. A Symptom Questionnaire. J Clin Psychiatry 1987; 48: 268–274.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen CB, Rasmussen S, Dahl A, Lauritsen G, Lund B, Stubgaard M, Bech P. The Withdrawal Syndrome Scale for alcohol and related psychoactive drugs. Total scores as guidelines for treatment with phenobarbital. Nord Psykiat Tidsskr 1986; 40: 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lader M, Marks M. The rating of clinical anxiety. Acta Psychiat Scand 1974; 50: 112–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langevin R, Stancer H. Evidence that depression rating scales primarily measure a social undesirability response set Acta Psychiat Scand 1979; 59: 70–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lau M. Livskvalitet? Hos lungekraæftpatienter. Copenhagen, FADL, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932; 140: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman RS. Depression scales derived from the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds). Assessment of Depression. Berlin, Springer, 1986, pp. 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loldrup D, Langemark M, Hansen HJ, Kastrup M, Jeppesen K, Elsborg L, Bonnevie O, Olesen J, Bech P. The validity of the Melancholia Scale (MES) in predicting outcome of antidepressants in chronic idiopathic pain disorders. Eur Psychiat 1991; 6:119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, Heuser I. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Aff Dis 1988; 14: 61–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maier W, Albus M, Buller R, Nutzinger D, Shera D, Bech P. Self-and observer assessment in anxiolytic drug trials: a comparison of their validity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1990; 240:103–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNair DM. Self-evaluations of antidepressions. Psychopharma (Berl.) 1974; 37:281–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Profile of Mood States. San Diego, Educ Indus Test Serv, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollica RF, Caspi-Yavin Y, Balini P, Troung T, For S, Lavelle J. The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire: Validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1992; 180: 111–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parioff MB, Kelman HC, Frank JD. Comfort, effectiveness, and self-awareness as criteria of improvement in psychotherapy. Am J Psychiat 1954; 111: 343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paykel ES, Norton KRW. Self-report and clinical interview in the assessment of depression. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds). Assessment of Depression. Berlin, Springer, 1986, pp. 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peveler RC, Fairburn CG. Measurement of neurotic symptoms by self-report questionnaire: validity of the SCL-90R. Psychol Med 1990; 20: 873–879.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pichot P, Brun JP. Questionnaire bref d’auto-evaluation des dimensions depressive, asthenique, et anxiose. Am Med Psychol 1984; 142: 862–865.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff LS. The CES-D scale. a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measurement, 1977; 1:385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin A. Sensitivity to treatment effects of evaluation instruments completed by psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, and patients. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds). Assessment of Depression. Berlin, Springer, 1986, pp. 367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins LN, Heizer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff K. The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiat 1981; 38: 381–389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan DV. The Anxiety Disease. New York, Charles Schribner’s Sons, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel SM. The relationship of hostility to authoritarianism. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1956; 52:368–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Brit J Cancer 1988; 57:109–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snaith RP, Tayler CM. Irritability: Definition, assessment and associated factors. Br J Psychiat 1985; 147:127–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger CD, Borsuch RL, Lushene RE. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger CD, Jacobs G, Russel S, Crane RS. Assessment of anger: The state-trait scale. In: Butcher JN (ed). Personality Assessments. New York, Erolbaun Hillsdale, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger CD, Johnson EH, Jacobs GA, Krasner SS, Oesterle SE, Worden TJ. The State Trait Anger Inventory. Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman EA. The utility of scalogram analysis. In: Stouffer SA, Guttman L, Suchman EA, Lazarsfeld PF, Star SA, Clausen JA (eds). Measurement and Prediction. Princeton, Princeton Univ Press, 1950, pp. 122–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S, Bradbum NM. Asking Questions. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson C. The instruments of psychiatric research. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem J. Semantics of time. In: Michon JA, Jackson JL (eds). Time, Mind and behavior. Berlin: Springer Verlag 1985, pp. 266–278.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • von Zeersen D. Clinical self-rating scales of the Munich psychiatric information system (PSYCHIS München). In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds). Assessment of Depression. Berlin, Springer, 1986, pp. 270–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson M. Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC Scale. Psychol Med 1988; 18:203–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiat Scand 1983; 67:361–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zung WWK. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiat 1965; 12: 63–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zung WWK. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosom 1971; 12: 371–379.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zung WWK. The Depression Status Inventory: an adjunct to the Self-rating Depression Scale. J Clin Psychol 1972; 28: 539–543.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bech, P. (1993). Psychopathological Self-Rating Scales. In: Rating Scales for Psychopathology, Health Status and Quality of Life. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77759-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77759-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77761-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77759-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics