Summary
Self-rating scales are considered to be less useful for comparing different treatments in anxiety patients than observer-rating scales. However, the empirical evidence for this assumption is not adequate. A selfrating inventory of 35 items related to anxiety was perfectly parallel with an observer-rating inventory. Both instruments were used in the Cross National Collaborative Panic Study to compare the efficacy of imipramine, alprazolam and placebo in an 8-week drug trial in a sample of 1168 outpatients. The variance of the self-rating assessments was about two times higher. Both scales were equally sensitive to change; however, the measurement of change by means of the self-rating scale was slightly less consistent. The discriminative power of the observer-rating scale between placebo and active treatment was two to three times higher than that of the selfrating scale; consequently the observer-rating procedure provides a more valid instrument when the efficacies of different anxiolytic treatments are compared between different groups of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albus M, Maier W, Shera D, Bech P (1990) Consistencies and discrepancies in self- and observer-rated anxiety scales: a comparison between the self and the observer rated Marks-Sheehan scale. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 240:96–102
Angst J, Bech P, Boyer P, Bruinvels J, Engle P, Helmchen H, Hippius H, Lingjaerde O, Racagni G, Saletu B, Sedvall G, Silverstone JT, Stefanis CN, Stoll K, Woggon B (1989) Consensus Conference on the Methodology of Clinical Trials of Antidepressants, Zurich, March 1988: Report of the Consensus Committee. Pharmacopsychiatry 22:3–7
Ballenger JC, Burrows GD, DuPont RL, Jr, Lesser IM, Noyes R Jr, Pecknold JC, Rifkin A, Swinson RP (1988) Alprazolam in panic disorder and agoraphobia: results from a multicenter trial I. Efficacy in short-term treatment. Arch. Gen Psychiatry 45:413–422
Cronbach LJ, Furby L (1970) How should we measure “Change”- or should we? Psychol Bull 74:68–80
Cross National Collaborative Panic Study, Second Phase Investigators (1990) Drug treatment of panic disorder: compartive efficacy of alprazolam, imipramine and placebo. Br J Psychiatry (in press)
Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L (1973) SCL-90/an outpatient psychiatric rating scale — preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 9:13–28
Dunn OI, Clark V (1971) Comparisons of tests of the equality of dependent correlation coefficents. J. Am Stat Assoc 66:904–911
Glass RM, Uhlenhuth EH, Kellner R (1987) The value of self-report assessment in studies of anxiety disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol 7:215–221
Hamilton M (1969) Diagnoses and rating of anxiety. Br J Psychiatry Spec Publ 3:76–79
Kerlinger FN (1964) Foundations of behavioural research. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York
Klerman GL (1988) Overview of the Cross-National Collaborative Panic Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45:407–412
Lord FM (1963) Elementary models for measuring change. In: Harris (ed) Problems in measuring change. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 21–38
Lydiard RB, Ballenger JC (1987) Antidepressants in panic disorder and agoraphobia. J Affect Dis 13:153–168
Marks IM, Mathews AM (1979) Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behav Res Ther 17:263–267
Pocock SJ (1984) Clinical trials. A practical approach. Wiley, Chichester
Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (1983) Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III — Upjohn Version (SCID-UP, 12/15/83). New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, Biometrics Research Division
Wilson GT, Raclunan SJ (1983) Metaanalysis of psychotherapy outcome: limitations and liabilities. J Consult Clin Psychol 51: 54–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maier, W., Albus, M., Buller, R. et al. Self- and observer assessment in anxiolytic drug trials: A comparison of their validity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 240, 103–108 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189979
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189979