Skip to main content
Log in

Consistencies and discrepancies in self- and observer-rated anxiety scales

A comparison between the self- and observer-rated Marks-Sheehan scales

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The Marks-Sheehan anxiety scales are the only scales where self-ratings and observer ratings are perfectly matched by the number, the content and the scaling of the items. Therefore these scales are an excellent tool to investigate the compatibility and to study different structures in self- and observer ratings. This was done by using the data material on the Marks-Sheehan scales of the Cross National Collaborative Panic Study. In this study 1168 outpatients who met the DSM-III criteria for panic disorder were randomly allocated either to alprazolam, imipramine or placebo treatment. Our results show that the Marks-Sheehan scales are highly comparable to other established rating scales. Both scales have a similar stable and consistent factor pattern for somatic symptoms but not for psychic symptoms of anxiety. Our results provide empirical evidence that the low consistencies between self-and observer ratings reported so far can be improved by using a rating scale which matches up item by item for self- and observer ratings. However, other sources of disagreement can only be solved by more elaborated item descriptions and training of patients as well as raters to obtain a better compatibility between self-and observer rating scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders; 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballenger JC, Burrows GD, DuPont RL, Lesser IM, Noyes R Jr, Pecknold JC, Rifkin A, Swinson RP (1988) Alprazolam in panic disorder and agoraphobia: results from a multicenter trial. I. Efficacy in short-term treatment. Arch Gen Psychiat 45:413–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Bech P (1987) Quality of life in psychosomatic research, Psychopathology 20:169–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L (1976) Self-report symptom inventory. In: Guy E (ed) ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rev Ed, Rockville, Maryland, pp 313–331

  • Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br. J. Soc. Clin Psychol 6:278–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (1969) Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. In: Lader MH (ed) Studies of anxiety. Br J Psychiatry Spec Publ 3:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerman GL (1990) Drug treatment of panic disorder: comparative efficacy of alprazolam, imipramine and placebo. Br J Psychiatry (accepted for publication)

  • Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 40:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman RS, Covi L, Rickels K, McNair DM, Downing R, Kahn RJ, Lasseter VK, Faden V (1986) Imipramine and chlordiazepoxide in depressive and anxiety disorders. I. Efficacy in depreseed outpatients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier W, Albus M, Shera D, Buller R, Bech P (1990) Self and observer assessment in anxiolytic drug trials: a comparison of their validity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 240:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks IM, Matthews AM (1979) Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behav Res Ther 17:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (1990) Outcome criteria in antidepressant drug trials: self rating versus observer rating scales. Eur J Psychopharmacol (in press)

  • Möller HJ, Zerssen D von (1985) Psychopathometrische Untersuchung zur prognostischen Bedeutung des psychopathologischen Befundes und der prämorbiden Persönlichkeit für den Entlassungszustand neuroleptisch behandelter Patienten mit schizophrenen Psychosen. Nervenarzt 56:498–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Parloff MB, Kelman HC, Frank JD (1954) Comfort, effectiveness and self-awareness as criteria of improvement in psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry 5:343–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind KA, Catell RB (1970) Zum Problem der Faktorenidentifikation. Psychol Beitr 12:214–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaith RP, Taylor CM (1985) Rating scales for depression and anxiety: a current perspective. Br J Clin Pharmacol 19:17S-20S

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (1988) Revised diagnostic criteria and a new structured interview for diagnosing anxiety disorders. J Psychiatr Res 22:55–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Überla K (1971) Faktorenanalyse. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JG, Barlow DH, Agras WS, Jackson J (1972) Behavioral measurement of severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 27: 330–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P (1986) The problem of diagnosis in psychiatric research. J Soc Med 79:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Zung WWK (1971) A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics 12:371–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Zung WWK (1976) SAS. Self rating anxiety scale. In: Guy E (ed) ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rev Ed, Rockville, Maryland, pp 337–340

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albus, M., Maier, W., Shera, D. et al. Consistencies and discrepancies in self- and observer-rated anxiety scales. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 240, 96–102 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189978

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189978

Key words

Navigation